Hearth Record

Olive Branch Hospice

A hospice in Jasper, Texas 75951

2014 S Wheeler St Ste 250, Jasper, Texas 75951. (409) 384-5700.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 16 hospices serving ZIP code 75951 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 24, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 24, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner3 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 867 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care include measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. In 4 of 19 (21%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that the patient’s plans of care included goals that were individualized and measurable. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/03/2024 with the diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. The plans of care for the benefit periods 04/01/2025 to 05/30/2025 and 01/01/2025 to 03/31/2025 were reviewed. During the Registered Nurse’s (RN) visit on 03/10/2025, it was noted on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) that the patient’s shortness of breath was rated a three. Also included was that the patient’s lung sounds were diminished in all lobes, and the patient was short of breath at rest with a productive cough. The patient’s medication list included DuoNeb four times a day and oxygen at two to five liters per minute by nasal cannula as needed. During the nurse’s visit on 04/14/2025, the documentation included a respiratory rate of twenty with an ESAS shortness of breath score of four. It was noted that the patient was short of breath after getting out of the shower. The patient’s plan of care identified dyspnea as a problem and included interventions to administer supplemental oxygen as ordered, assess oxygen saturation levels, and educate the patient and caregivers on oxygen safety and equipment maintenance. The identified goal was that the patient would voice or show signs of decreased episodes of shortness of breath. The goal of decrease is not measurable. CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/27/2024 with the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, with the comorbid condition of severe dementia with psychotic disturbance. The plans of care for the benefit periods 02/22/2025 to 04/22/2025 and 12/24/2024 to 02/21/2025 were reviewed. During the nurse’s visit on 01/28/2025, the nurse documented that the “...Patient’s spouse reported he started giving the Seroquel 50mg twice daily over the weekend to help control the patient’s agitation and behaviors. Changes were discussed with (hospice NP), and an order was given to increase Seroquel to BID...” The original order dated 07/16/2024 was for Seroquel, fifty milligrams by mouth at bedtime for sundowning behaviors. On 01/28/2025, the Seroquel dose was increased to fifty milligrams by mouth twice daily. On 03/05/2025, the nurse noted that the “patient was uncooperative and did not allow vital signs for this visit...Medication changes... to help control the patient’s dementia behaviors...” A physician’s order documented the same date increased the patient’s Seroquel to 150 milligrams, an extended twenty-four-hour tablet by mouth at bedtime, and the addition of Depakote, 250 milligrams, a delayed-release tablet by mouth twice a day for behaviors. The plan of care included the identified problem of sundowning behaviors with interventions to assess for causes of altered mental status (infection, pain, urinary retention, constipation), educate on anticipated decline in neurological status as the disease progresses, and assess the effectiveness of neurological medications. The goal identified was that the patient’s self-care needs would be met by the caregiver and hospice staff while maintaining dignity and maximum autonomy and personal independence. The goal of dignity and maximum autonomy is not measurable. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/08/2025 with the diagnosis of cerebral palsy and the comorbid condition of anxiety disorder. The plan of care for the benefit period 03/08/2025 to 06/05/2025 was reviewed. During the Registered Nurse’s admission visit on 03/08/2025, the patient’s anxiety was rated a seven on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. In the psychological assessment section of the note, the nurse noted that the patient was alert but agitated and combative. A physician’s order for the same date included Lorazepam, one milligram per gastric tube every six hours as needed for anxiety and/or agitation. The patient’s plan of care identified the problem of anxiety and agitation with interventions to administer medications for anxiety/agitation as ordered, evaluate the effectiveness of the antianxiety medication, and assess for signs and/or symptoms of anxiety/agitation. The goal was for effective symptom management. Effective symptom management is not a measurable goal. CLINICAL RECORD 14: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/09/2024. The patient’s plans of care for the benefit periods 04/04/2025 to 06/02/2025 and 02/03/2025 to 04/03/2025 were reviewed. During the Registered Nurses (RN) visit on 03/31/2025, she documented that the patient had left-sided weakness, a shuffling gait, stooped posture, generalized weakness, poor endurance, and fatigued easily. The patient utilized the assistive devices of a cane and a rollator. On 04/22/2025, the nurse documented increased weakness and poor balance. The plan of care included identifying an increased risk for falls. The intervention was to educate the patient and/or caregiver on ways to reduce fall risk, identify safety issues, educate on safety precautions, and assess for weakness and/or fatigue. The goal was for the patient to have decreased falls, and decreased is not measurable. During a joint clinical record review and interview with the Executive Director/RN (Personnel Record 2) on 04/23/2025, she confirmed that the goals presented in evidence were not individualized or measurable.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 572 words

    “It is required that all hospice aide services must be provided by an individual who has successfully completed a training and competency evaluation program described below. The competency evaluation addresses each of the following subject areas, and they are evaluated by observation of an aide’s performance with a patient or pseudo-patient, including reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration. The appropriate and safe techniques in performing personal hygiene and grooming tasks, including bed bath, hair shampoo (sink, tub, and bed), toileting and elimination, and safe transfer techniques and ambulation. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview and personnel record review. In 1 of 1 (100%) personnel record reviewed of hospice aides revealed the agency did not ensure that all required personal hygiene and safety transfer techniques were documented as observed by the Registered Nurse on the Initial Competency form in accordance with agency policy. AGENCY POLICY: The hospice’s policy dated 09/01/2024 entitled “Hospice Aide/Homemaker Competency Evaluation (HR.45)” read in part that “...The hospice will ensure that each hospice aide successfully completes a hospice aide skills competency evaluation in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations prior to the aide performing care independently...Documentation of successful completion is required, whether the training was provided by the hospice or by another training facility...The competency evaluation and skills checklist will be administered by an RN...and will be scheduled during the orientation period. The RN will document observation of skills as required and will sign and date the completed checklist...The following subject areas must be evaluated by observing an aide’s performance with a patient or pseudo-patient ...bed bath ... hair shampooing in skin, tub, and bed ... toileting and elimination... safe transfer techniques...” PERSONNEL RECORD 10: The Hospice Aide was hired on 01/25/2023, and the “Initial Competency Assessment Skills Checklist—Hospice Aide” form was documented and signed by the Registered Nurse and the Hospice Aide on 02/07/2023. The following tasks were not documented as observed on the Competency Skills Checklist form. These task were just verbalized and not observed: reading and recording pulse and respirations, bed bath, hair shampoo (sink, tub, and bed), toileting and elimination (urinal and bedpan), and safe transfer techniques (Hoyer lift). There was no documented evidence that the aide was observed reading and recording pulse and respirations, sink and tub bath, toileting (urinal) and safe transfer techniques (Hoyer Lift) in accordance with agency policy. During a joint personnel record review and interview with the Executive Director/RN (Personnel Record 2) on 04/24/2025, she confirmed that the skills in evidence were not observed. She explained that a new graduate nurse completed the Skills Checkoff, and the Business Office Manager, who was in charge of personnel records, was also new to her position. The form used then made it optional for the RN to document a task as either observed or verbalized. Additionally, the Executive Director/RN could locate the in-person supervisory visit performed by the RN on 02/07/2023 in a visit note in the patient’s medical record, noted in the evidence. The Hospice Aide’s plan of care that the aide performed included a bed bath, hair shampoo, and elimination with a bedpan. The Executive Director/RN (Personnel Record 2) inquired about the Public Health Emergency Waivers and if they were applicable in this circumstance. Upon review, the only applicable waiver for initial competency assessment was introducing a trained person to role-play as a patient or a computer-based mannequin device, which does not impact the evidence.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 405 words

    “It is required that hospice volunteers provide day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. A review of the Volunteer Department and QAPI documents on 04/21/2025 revealed that the average percentage of volunteer hours for 2024 was 0.26%. For the first quarter of 2025, the average was 1.68%. There was no documented evidence that the hospice volunteers provided day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff for 2024. The volunteer hours for 2024 were 0.26%. In addition, there was no documented evidence that Volunteer QAPI Performance Improvement Project (PIP) was identified. Monthly initiatives to recruit new volunteers through flyers, colleges, churches, etc., were documented. The Volunteer Coordinator was recently hired on 02/04/2025. Additionally, retention activities were recorded monthly by the new Volunteer Coordinator to show how the volunteer coordinator is working to keep the current volunteers engaged. Since she started with the hospice, the Volunteer Coordinator had onboarded two new volunteers, had two more about to begin training, and two more submitted for background checks. During an interview with the Executive Director (Personnel Record 2) and the Volunteer Coordinator (Personnel Record 5) on 04/24/2025 the volunteer hour percentage from 2024 was confirmed. A review of the Volunteer Department and QAPI documents on 04/21/2025 revealed that the average percentage of volunteer hours for 2024 was 0.26%. For the first quarter of 2025, the average was 1.68%, which is an improvement but still under the 5% requirement. No Volunteer QAPI Performance Improvement Project (PIP) was identified. The volunteer hour percentage from 2024 was confirmed during an interview with the Executive Director (Personnel Record 2) and the Volunteer Coordinator (Personnel Record 5) on 04/24/2025. Monthly initiatives to recruit new volunteers through flyers, colleges, churches, etc., were documented. The Volunteer Coordinator was recently hired on 02/04/2025. Additionally, retention activities were recorded monthly by the new Volunteer Coordinator to show how the volunteer coordinator is working to keep the current volunteers engaged. Since she started with the hospice, the Volunteer Coordinator had onboarded two new volunteers, had two more about to begin training, and two more submitted for background checks.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 24, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 10, 2019.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 8.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 66% at home, 9% in assisted living, 24% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day8.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.2%
Visits near death94.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Flower Moon Holdings, LLC owns 75% directly since Nov 30, 2021.
  • 13 owners or officers are people: Gregory L Gray (owns 5% or more directly, 10.25%); Teresa Brown (owns 5% or more directly, 10.25%); Bridget N Hearn (owns 5% or more directly, 1.75%); Bridget N Hearn (other role (CMS gives no detail), 1.75%); Molly Siau (owns 5% or more directly, 1.75%); Molly Siau (other role (CMS gives no detail), 1.75%); Crystal Heigley (owns 5% or more directly, 1%); Crystal Heigley (other role (CMS gives no detail), 1%); Tiffany Coggins (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Richard R Riggins (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Erica A Errigo (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kelly Mitchell (corporate officer, 0%); Kelly Mitchell (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Flower Moon Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more directly75%Nov 30, 2021

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 94% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.67% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 62.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 16 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75951, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 3.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.