Hearth Record

Amedicus Hospice Inc.

A hospice in Dallas, Texas 75238

10935 Estate Ln. Ste. 320, Dallas, Texas 75238. (469) 389-1028.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 27 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

27 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 63 hospices serving ZIP code 75238 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 3, 2025: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

27 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

27 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 3, 2025: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care2 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 6 (Patient #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy Patient #4: Hydrocortisone cream was listed on the medication profile as, “apply to effected area” without indicating the specific affected area.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 6 (Patient #1) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs Patient #1: Though the aide plan of care frequency was documented as 3 x week, the hospice plan of care dated 07-01-2025 indicated a lack of detail to the frequency of aide services which was written as 1 -3 x week.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

May 15, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care25 deficiencies
  • Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)

    “Condition of participation: Initial and Comprehensive assessment of the patient The hospice must conduct and document in writing a patient-specific comprehensive assessment that identifies the patient’s need for hospice care and services, and the patient’s need for physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual care. This assessment includes all areas of hospice care related to the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions.”

    Rule L0520. Condition-level.

  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of participation: Interdisciplinary group, care planning, and coordination of services. The hospice must designate an interdisciplinary group or groups as specified in paragraph (a) of this section which, in consultation with the patient’s attending physician, must prepare a written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must specify the hospice care and services necessary to meet the patient and familyspecific needs identified in the comprehensive assessment as such needs relate to the terminal illness and related conditions.”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 14 (Patient #1,3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 1: The patient was admitted 6/12/24 the MSW did not complete their assessment until 6/18/24. There is no evidence the SN completed the psychosocial assessment in the initial comprehensive assessment. Patient 3: The patient was admitted 12/19/24 the MSW did not complete their assessment until 12/28/24. There is no evidence the SN completed the psychosocial assessment in the initial comprehensive assessment.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 10 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death. Patient 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10: did not take in consideration the imminence of death in the comprehensive assessment.”

    Rule L0528. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 496 words

    “Upon patient record review, 10 of 14 (Patient # 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,11,12) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. Patient 1: The medication profile contains an order for Nystatin as needed with no frequency. Corrected on site. The hospice medication profile has Nystatin cream 100,000 u/grams PRN, Amino Acid 500 mg oral liquid dose 30 ml 2 x daily and Benadryl 25mg oral q HS and during home visit in Facility there is no evidence of these medications on the facility medication profile. The facility medication profile contains orders for Influenza Vaccination annually, Zinc Oral tablet 1 tab daily and Ascorbic Acid 500 mg tab BID and these medications are not found on hospice medication profile. Patient 2: The medication profile contains orders for Bisacodyl Rectal suppository 1 q 24 hours, Ensure Oral Liquid 1 TID PRN for supplement and Omega 3-6-9 oral liquid 2 caps 2x daily for supplement that are not found on facility MAR during home visit on 5/14/25. Morphine Sulfate (conc) 100mg/5ml Give 0.75ml po q 2 hours PRN SOB and Morphine Sulfate conc 100mg/5ml Give 1.0 ml po q 2 hr PRN SOB, with no directive of when to take each dose of medication and are not found on the hospice medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medication profile contained Sucralfate oral tablets, the caregiver states patient has not taken this medication in a very long time. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The medication profile does not contain the oxygen that is ordered on the POC. Albuterol on medication profile listed with two frequencies 4 times daily and 5 times daily, no clear instruction for dosing. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medication profile contains hemorrhoidal rectal ointment 1 application prn. No frequency or dose. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medication profile contains Lantiseptic skin protectant ointment apply dose 1, 4x/day with no dose amount or instructions for where to apply. Oxygen order for 2 L via NC with no frequency for use. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medication profile contains ondansetron PRN with no frequency and Miconazole 1 application does not contain a dose. The lidocaine menthol cream dose is 3 applications 3-4 times daily with no application site. Corrected on site Patient 8: The medication profile contains Bisacodyl PRN with no frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The medication profile on 2/19/25 contains Tylenol ES 500mg 1 tab q. 6 hours and Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen 10/325mg at HS and 2 tabs every 6 hour PRN and 1 tab q 6 hour PRN with none of these orders containing do not exceed 3-4grams in 24 hours. Patient 12: The medication profile 10/23/23 contains an order for Preparation H dose 1 QID apply to area as needed. Does not include where and how much to apply. Voltaren gel documented 1 application daily without documentation of where and how much to apply.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 107 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 2: The Bereavement assessment was not completed until 1/7/25 this is greater than 5 days and there was no evidence it was completed in the RN initial assessment.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 5: The POC contains evidence that the patient has a Permacath for dialysis. There is evidence that the SN assessed the Permacath site during visits on 4/18/24, 4/24/24, and 5/6/24. There was no evidence of the site being assessed at any other of the visits. Pt was being seen by SN 1-3 times per week.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that the hospice follows the individualized plan of care developed in in collaboration with the attending physician (if any), the patient or representative, and the primary caregiver in accordance with the patient’s needs if any of them so desire. Patient 11: The POC did not have evidence that the hospice provided planning and arranging for any required post discharge services. The POC did not contain evidence of Discharge planning activities, coordination with other care providers, the patient’s response and understanding of these activities.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 166 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #5,6,9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 5: The comprehensive assessment 3/26/25 and CTI contain evidence patient is on dialysis 3 times per week and has a Permacath. There was no nursing care plan with goals and interventions related to renal. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The POC 2/20/25 contains an order for Clopidogrel Bisulfate. There was no risk for bleeding care plan initiated with goals and interventions. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The POC 2/24/25 contains an order for Eliquis. There was no risk for bleeding care plan initiated with goals and interventions. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: Patient 1: The POC 5/6/25 contains an order for SN 1-5 days per week. This is not a detailed statement of the scope and frequency to meet the individual needs of the patient. Correction on site.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 164 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #4, 6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including measurable outcomes are anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care for each patient by using data elements identified by the hospice and is used as part of the Hospice’s QAPI program. Patient 4: The nursing care plan contains goals of: Patient/caregiver will verbalize understanding of oxygen use by death or discharge and patient/caregiver will verbalize understanding of O2 use and safety by death or discharge. These goals are not measurable. Corrected on site. Corrected on site Patient 6: The nursing care plan contains goals of : Patient/caregiver will demonstrate how to maintain skin integrity by death or discharge and Pt will achieve and maintain pain level at an acceptable level as defined by patient/family by death or discharge. These goals are not measurable. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 505 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 14 (Patient #1,2,4,5,6,7,8,11,12) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The POC 5/6/25 contains an order for Nystatin as needed with no frequency. The HSP POC contains orders for Nystatin cream 100,000 u/gms PRN, Amino Acid 500 mg oral liquid dose 30 ml 2 x daily and Benadryl 25mg oral q HS and during home visit in Facility there is no evidence of these medications on the facility med profile. The Facility Med Profile contains orders for Influenza Vaccination annually, Zinc Oral tablet 1 tab daily and Ascorbic Acid 500 mg tab BID and these medications are not found on HSP POC. Corrected on site Patient 2: The POC contains orders for Bisacodyl Rectal suppository 1 q 24 hrs, Ensure Oral Liquid 1 TID PRN for supplement and Omega 3-6-9 oral liquid 2 caps 2x daily for supplement that are not found on facility MAR during home visit on 5/14/25. Morphine Sulfate (conc) 100mg/5ml Give 0.75ml po q 2 hrs PRN SOB and Morphine Sulfate conc 100mg/5ml Give 1.0 ml po q 2 hr PRN SOB with no directive of when to take each dose of medication and are not found on the HSP POC. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The POC contains an order for Albuterol with two frequencies 4 times daily and 5 times daily, no clear instruction for dosing. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The POC 3/26/25 contains “Perma cath dressing right chest”. There are no details for the dressing. In addition, the POC contains hemorrhoidal rectal ointment 1 application prn. No frequency or dose. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The POC on 2/20/25 contains Lantiseptic skin protectant ointment apply dose 1 4x/day with no dose amount or instructions for where to apply. Oxygen order for 2 L via NC with no frequency for use. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The POC 1/16/25 and 3/17/25 contains Ondansetron PRN with no frequency. The POC on 3/17/25 contains Miconazole 1 application does not contain a dose. The lidocaine menthol cream dose is 3 applications 3-4 times daily with no application site. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The POC 4/1/25 contains Bisacodyl PRN with no frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The POC on 2/18/25 contains Tylenol ES 500mg 1 tab q6 hours and Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen 10/325mg at HS and 2 tabs every 6 hours PRN and 1 tab q 6 hours PRN with none of these orders containing Do Not Exceed max allowable dose in 24 hours. The POC 2/18/25 contains an order for Foley cath #18 Fr with no balloon size, frequency to change or directives of what to irrigate with. Patient 12: The POC 10/23/23 contains an order for Preparation H dose 1 QID apply to area as needed. Does not include where and how much to apply. Voltaren gel documented 1 application daily without documentation of where and how much to apply.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #1,4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The SN documented on the comprehensive assessment 6/12/24 patient has w/c, cushion, specialty mattress and over bed table. These were not on the POC. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The SN documented on 4/30/25 patient uses a walker. The walker was not included on the POC. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #7, 8) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 7: SN documented 5/6/25 “HN administered Tylenol PRN to patient. HN instructed patient to take another Tylenol in one hour if pain is not relieved.” There is no order to repeat the Tylenol in one hour. Patient 8: SN documented 4/23/25 “HN instructed CG to apply compression stockings”. There is no order for compression stockings.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient 12: The patient refused an aide. Though MSW identified a need for more help in the home. Assisted patient and family in getting hired caregivers through DADS 18-22 hours per week. There was no evidence volunteers were offered to assist the family to offer more support from the hospice.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #7, 9) did not have evidence that the IDG documents the sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement. Patient 7: SN documents on 4/2/25 patient had a fall, the SN notified the Medical Director, there was no evidence the chosen attending physician was notified. Patient 9: SN documented on 4/29/25 patient having constipation. SN notified Medical Director and did not attempt to call chosen attending physician.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient 3: The SN cleansed equipment with gloved hands and placed equipment directly in to nursing bag with gloved hands without hand hygiene performed after patient care. Per Agency Bag Technique IC.60 When visit is completed, reusable equipment is cleaned using alcohol, disinfectant wipe and /or antimicrobial soap and water as appropriate, hands are washed, and equipment and supplies are returned to the bag.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are Patient 8: The aide POC contains orders to change linens Q week. The aide changed linens on 4/8/25 and 4/10/25, 4/15/25 and 4/17/25. There was no evidence the aide called the SN for directives to change the linens the second time during those weeks.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 2 of 13 (Personnel #7,9) did not have evidence the hospice employees and contract employees have received orientation on the hospice philosophy. Personnel 7, 9: There was no evidence in the personnel file that the contracted staff have received orientation on the hospice philosophy. The agency states they have used PT and ST.”

    Rule L0661. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #1,6) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: Patient 1: The EOB did not contain an election date. Patient 6: The EOB did not contain an election date.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #2,7) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Physician certification and recertification of terminal illness. Patient 2: The EOB indicates the patient chose an attending physician that is not the medical director. There was no CTI by the attending. Patient 7: The EOB indicates the patient chose an attending physician that is not the medical director. There was no CTI by the attending.”

    Rule L0676. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 164 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,10,11) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: The SN documented 6/12/24 “Cleanse with NS, pat dry, calcium alginate, cover with dry dressing daily”. It is not clear if the wound care was performed as the documentation is not in past tense. Patient 10: The SN documented on 4/4/25 “HN” this is not an approved abbreviation. The IDG on 3/25/25, the SN documented that the “wound is healed”. It is unclear which wounds are healed as patient had wounds on the right and left foot. Patient 11: The SN documented on 2/18/25 Performed “wound care per orders and area almost closed.” It is not clear that the SN followed the POC.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #11,12) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: Patient 11 and 12: There was no evidence in the medical records that a discharge summary was sent to the attending physicians.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #11,12) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information Patient 11: The discharge summary did not include the following: foley care, wound care treatments. the patient’s current plan of care, the patient’s latest physician orders, any other documentation that will assist in post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the attending physician or receiving facility. Patient 12: The discharge summary did not include the following: The patient’s current plan of care, the patient’s latest physician orders, any other documentation that will assist in post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the attending physician or receiving facility.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 173 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient # 5,11) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 5: SN documented 4/24/25 Diabeti-Source AC 1.2 kcal/min infusion at 40 cc/hr to be infused via G-tube from 8pm-5am via PEG tube with 150 ml of water every 4 hours via GTube with no evidence of an order. On 5/6/25 the SN documented checking patency of G tube there is no order to check patency and the SN documented checking placement of the G tube and documented the dressing was clean and dry. There was no order to check placement or for a dressing. Corrected on site. Patient #11: SN documented in plan of care that Spiritual Care visits should be made 1-3 times/week and Spiritual care visits were made 1 time/month. Foley catheter changed by the SN on 08/6/24 with no orders to change the foley.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 3, 2025Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care2 deficiencies cited
May 15, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care25 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 17, 2019.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 7.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 78.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 89% at home, 1% in assisted living, 9% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day7.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.9%
Visits near death78.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Lakeitha Hester (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Catherine Mccoy (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Syed M A Jamal (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 6 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 86.11% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 25% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold6 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 63 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75238, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 27.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.