Hearth Record

Care Plus Palliative and Hospice Care LLC

A hospice in Fort Worth, Texas 76116

6940 River Park Circle, Fort Worth, Texas 76116. (817) 782-9557.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 76 hospices serving ZIP code 76116 had 3.5.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 9, 2023: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 9, 2023: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner8 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. Agency policy # PE.1 “Patient Assessments” (revised: 01/01/2020), stated in part, “The Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) in consultation with the patient’s attending physician (if any), will complete the comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of the hospice benefit.” In 1 of 15 (7%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the hospice Interdisciplinary group completed an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected hospice care on 04/29/2022. The initial plan of care dated 4/29/2022 ordered the Chaplain to evaluate and develop a plan of care. The chaplain evaluation was dated 5/18/2022, with 19 days outstanding. During an interview on 11/8/2023, the Executive Director, Area Vice President of Clinical Operations, and Patient Care Manager confirmed the findings.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 662 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care Identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 7 of 15 (47%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the patient’s plan of care Identified interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected hospice care on 05/02/2023. The initial nursing assessment dated 05/02/2023 documented the patient’s identified problems with urinary retention, hypertension, seizures, pain, and a self-care deficit. The IDG (interdisciplinary group meeting) initial plan of care and updated plan of care did not document goals and interventions for the identified problems. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected hospice care on 12/23/2022. The initial nursing assessment dated 12/23/2022 documented the patient’s identified problems with insomnia, anxiety, hypertension, constipation, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The IDG initial plan of care and updated plan of care did not document goals and interventions for the identified problems. The updated comprehensive assessment dated 01/10/2023 documented the patient’s problems with severe cough and abdominal cramps. On 01/20/2023, physician orders were received for symptom management. The updated IDG plan of care did not document goals and interventions for the identified problems with severe cough and abdominal cramps. Clinical Record 4: The patient elected hospice care on 11/13/2022. The initial nursing assessment dated 11/13/2022 and the Physician Certification of terminal illness dated 11/14/2022 documented the patient’s identified problems with an enlarged prostate, overactive bladder, incontinence, constipation, and multiple falls. The IDG initial plan of care did not document goals and interventions for the identified problems. The updated assessment dated 11/15/2022 documented that a Foley catheter was inserted. The updated IDG plan of care did not document goals and interventions for the care and maintenance of the Foley catheter. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected hospice care on 04/29/2023. The initial nursing assessment dated 04/29/2023 and the Physician Certification of terminal illness dated 04/29/2023 documented the patient’s identified problems with persistent nausea and vomiting. The IDG initial plan of care did not document goals and interventions for the identified problems. Clinical Record 6: The patient elected hospice care on 02/09/2023. The initial nursing assessment dated 02/09/2023 documented the patient’s identified problems with an enlarged prostate, overactive bladder, gastroesophageal reflux disease, insomnia, constipation, and glucose monitoring. The IDG initial plan of care did not document goals and interventions for the identified problems. Clinical Record 7: The patient elected hospice care on 4/12/2023. The initial nursing assessment was completed on 04/12/2023. The plan of care dated 04/12/2023 through 07/10/2023 and the updated IDG plans of care every two weeks did not document interventions for this patient with complaints of itching beginning on 04/18/2023. A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient was started on steroids on 04/20/2023, with the dose of steroids increased on 04/27/2023, 05/03/2023, and 05/24/2023 due to the status of the rash. The POC intervention documented, “Educate to report changes of skin.” This was not individualized to the patient’s problem of itching and rash. On 4/15/2023 through the patient’s death on 06/16/2023, the patient had a Foley catheter. The updated IDG plan of care did not document goals and interventions for the care and maintenance of the Foley catheter. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected hospice care on 06/20/2023. The plans of care dated 08/09/2023 through 11/06/2023 did not document individualized interventions for falls. A review of the clinical record revealed the patient fell on 08/11/2023 and 08/23/2023. The updated plans of care did not document goals and interventions for the patient’s identified problems with falls. During an interview and a joint review of the records on 11/08/2023, the Executive Director, Patient Care Manager, and Regional Vice President of Clinical Operation agreed that the plans of care did not include planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 158 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the following: drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 15 (7%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the plan of care included all drugs necessary to meet the patient’s needs. Clinical Record 7: The patient elected hospice care on 4/12/2023. The skilled nursing visit note dated 04/15/2023 documented that “Omnicef 30 mg daily times 5 days” was started. A review of the clinical record revealed the plan of care did not include documentation of an order for the Omnicef as of the patient’s death on 06/16/2023. During an interview, the Executive Director stated that the on-call nurse who made the visit called for the order but had not documented the order.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 250 words

    “It is required that the hospice follows accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable disease, including the use of standard precautions, such as: hand hygiene, safe handling of equipment in the patient’s care environment if it is likely to have been contaminated with body fluids, and safe handling of soiled items in the patient’s care environment. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview, and observation. Agency policy #IC.12 “Bag Technique” (revised 1/1/2020) stated in part, “After cleaning hands, the supplies and/or equipment needed for the visit are removed from bag. Hands are washed again if additional supplies are needed during the visit. Close bag before performing patient care... When visit is completed, reusable equipment is cleaned using alcohol disinfectant wipe and/or antimicrobial soap and water as appropriate, hands are washed, and equipment and supplies are returned to the bag.” In 1 of 2 (50%) home visits observed, the agency did not ensure hand hygiene was performed when indicated per policy. Home Visit 1: During the home visit on 11/8/2023 with the Registered Nurse (RN) [Personnel Record 1], the RN reentered their open bag four (4) times to remove equipment. The RN did not wash or sanitize their hands before reentering the bag for additional equipment per the policy. During an interview, the Regional Vice President of Clinical Operations and Executive Director agreed that the staff member did not follow the required bag technique and hand hygiene to prevent transmission of infection.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 230 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 12 (17%) clinical records reviewed of patients receiving hospice aide services, the agency did not ensure the hospice aide received specific written patient care instructions. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected hospice care on 05/02/2023. The hospice aide care plan dated 05/02/2023 and updated on 10/26/2023 and 10/30/2023 assigned the hospice aide the task “Change linens two times a week and PRN (as needed).” The care plan did not provide clear instructions to the hospice aide for the frequency of changing the linens. Clinical Record 6: The patient elected hospice care on 02/09/2023. The hospice aide care plan dated 02/09/2023 assigned the hospice aide the task of “changing linens two times a week and PRN.” The care plan did not provide clear instructions to the hospice aide for the frequency of changing the linens. During an interview and joint review of the records, the Executive Director, Patient Care Manager, and Area Vice President of Clinical Operations agreed the hospice aide plan needed clear instructions for the aide.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 198 words

    “It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum: the initial plan of care, updated plans of care, initial assessment, comprehensive assessment, updated comprehensive assessments, and clinical notes including the care and services provided This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 2 (50%) clinical records reviewed in which volunteer services were accepted, the agency did not ensure the clinical record included documentation of care and services provided. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected hospice care on 06/20/2023. The skilled nurse documented in the coordination notes on 08/09/2023 that the patient accepted a volunteer. A clinical record review revealed no documentation of an evaluation of the need for volunteer services until the interdisciplinary meeting on 08/22/2023 when it documented that no volunteer was needed. The clinical record did not document how it was determined that the patient no longer wanted a volunteer. During an interview on 11/09/2023, the Volunteer Coordinator confirmed the finding and stated that the family was called, and decided they did not want the volunteer. No further documentation was provided.”

    Rule L0672. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “It is required that if the care of a hospice patient is transferred to a Medicare/Medicaid-certified facility, the hospice forwards to the receiving facility a copy of: the hospice discharge summary described in HCDT 40. I; and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 3 (33%) clinical records reviewed of patients transferred to a Medicare/Medicaid certified facility, the agency did not ensure that the discharge summary was sent to the receiving facility. Clinical Record 10: The patient elected hospice care on 1/05/2023, and the nurse documented that the patient was transferred to the hospital to seek aggressive treatment. There was no documented evidence that the discharge summary was sent to the receiving facility, the hospital. During an interview on 11/09/2023, the Executive Director stated that the nursing note documented communication with the facility, but the record did not document sending the discharge summary.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 197 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician: a copy of the hospice discharge summary. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed of patients that revoked the election of hospice care, the agency did not ensure the discharge summary was sent to the patient’s attending physician. Clinical Record 10: The patient elected hospice care on 1/05/2023, and the nurse documented that the patient revoked the hospice care benefit on 01/11/2023 for aggressive treatment. There was no documented evidence that the discharge summary was sent to the patient’s attending physician. Clinical Record 13: The nurse documented that the patient and wife revoked the hospice care benefit on 07/22/2023 to seek aggressive treatment. There was no documented evidence that the discharge summary was sent to the patient’s attending physician. During an interview on 11/09/2023, the Executive Director stated that the summary was sent to the attending physicians, but there was no documentation to confirm the summaries were sent.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 9, 2023Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 8, 2019.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 8.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 83.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 88% at home, 4% in a nursing facility, 7% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day8.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.6%
Visits near death83.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • West Texas Medical Couriers and Express Delivery Services, LLC owns 100% directly since Feb 10, 2020.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Kelly Mitchell (owns 5% or more through other companies, 65.87%); John D Clark (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Brent Colvin (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Lauren Morrisson (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Jacy Barrow (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Jed Cottle (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Kelly Mitchell (corporate officer, 0%); Kelly Mitchell (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Heart to Heart Hospice Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 10, 2020
West Texas Medical Couriers and Express Delivery Services, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Feb 10, 2020
H to H Founders, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies59.83%Feb 10, 2020
Htohh Preferred LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies39.92%Feb 10, 2020
Hthh Atlas, LLCOther role (CMS gives no detail)0.25%Feb 10, 2020

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 76 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 76116, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3.5; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.