Hearth Record

Serenity Hospice

A hospice in Fort Worth, Texas 76104

700 Pennsylvania Ave, Fort Worth, Texas 76104. (817) 348-9863.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 32 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

32 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 57 hospices serving ZIP code 76104 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 4, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

4 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

32 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

32 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 10, 2025: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission8 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During discussion with Asst Administrator and review of records it was noted that there was no plan in place or education having been done for goals for volunteers providing patient services. There are currently no patients receiving volunteer services so unable to assess records.”

    Rule L0547. Condition-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Tracer Visit. There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by condition level deficiencies at 418.56, and 418.58.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the POC goals did not have time frames for achieving goals. For example, in records 1 and 2 the documented goals did not contain any time frames. The goals are not individualized, such as Optimal sleep/rest for patient. Optimal spiritual/emotional support to patient and all involved in care. Patient/caregiver adequately informed on pain control measures. This was confirmed with the Alternate Administrator present.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(1))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During review of PI systems it was found that there was no data collected for volunteers, bereavement, or DME. This was confirmed by the asst Administrator.”

    Rule L0561. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(2)(ii))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During PI review the asst Administrator reported a process and surveyor viewed a spreadsheet showing data over time including hand hygiene and patient satisfaction. They have not yet started collecting the data. This was confirmed with the asst. Administrator.”

    Rule L0564. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(2))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During the Data session it was noted that the hospice had identified one performance improvement project, Communicable disease that was being conducted, but did not document the reasons for conducting the project or the measurable progress achieved on it. This was confirmed with the alternate administrator present.”

    Rule L0573. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. Volunteer systems tracer was conducted with the Asst. Administrator. There was no documentation of efforts to recruit and retain volunteers. This was confirmed by the Asst. Admin.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. There is now a form for documenting volunteers orientation but no orientation has been done for the volunteers. This was confirmed by the asst Administrator.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

Jan 29, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission24 deficiencies
  • Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)

    “Observed in Data Session. During the Data session it was noted that the hospice’s QAPI program failed to address DME, pharmacy, bereavement and volunteer services. This was confirmed with the Alternate Administrator present.”

    Rule L0559. Condition-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Data Session. There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by 418.56, 418.78, and 418.58.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Establishment of the Emergency Program (EP) (42 CFR 418.113)

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During the Emergency Management session it was noted that the written comprehensive emergency management program did not include exercises and testing - Disaster recovery - Program evaluation. This was confirmed with the Alternate Administrator present.”

    Rule E0001. Standard-level.

  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(iii))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 6 of 7 HR files reviewed, it was noted that ongoing emergency management training was not done every 2 years. For example the HR files for the LVN, HHA/Volunteer, MSW, spiritual counselor, Medical Director and Alternate Administrator did not have documentation of ongoing emergency management training every 2 years. This was confirmed with the Alternate Administrator present.”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During the Emergency Management session it was noted that the organization did not test its plan in any of the last 2 years. The Alternate Administrator present had printed copies of actual events from the news that had taken place in the area in a binder and there were blank Corridor group event evaluation forms in the binder, but nothing had been documented.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the initial bereavement assessment was not documented. For example, in records RRNHV#6 and #7 there was no documentation of the initial bereavement assessment. This was discussed with the Alternate Administrator and Alternate DON.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(8))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, for bereavement care it was noted that an assessment at death was not done to assess bereavement risk in order to inform the decisions made by the IDG. For example in records RRBR#1 and #2 it was noted that there was a list of items to complete over a 12 month time frame, but no documentation of a post death assessment. This was confirmed with the Bereavement Coordinator present.”

    Rule L0532. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b ))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the POC goals did not have time frames for achieving goals. For example, in records RRHV#1 to #3 and RRNHV#1 to #7 the documented goals did not contain any time frames. The goals are not individualized, such as Optimal sleep/rest for patient. Optimal spiritual/emotional support to patient and all involved in care. Patient/caregiver adequately informed on pain control measures. This was confirmed with the Alternate Administrator present.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, that included volunteer services it was noted that the plan of care did not include all services needed for palliation. For example, In record RRHV#2 the POC did not include any goals or interventions for the volunteer visits. This was confirmed with the Alternate Administrator present.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that care was not provided according to hospice plan of care. For example in record RRHV#1 and RRNHV#1, #2 and #3 the plan of care skilled nurse frequency was one visit per week. However, in RRHV#1 6 weeks in the past 3 months there was no documentation of a visit and in RRNHV#1 and #3 3 weeks in the past 2 months there was no documentation of a visit. This was confirmed with the Alternate Administrator present.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(1))

    “Observed in Data Session. During Data session it was noted that the hospice did not collect data for volunteer services, bereavement, or DME and as a result was unable to demonstrate improvement in the related indicators. This was confirmed with the Alternate Administrator present.”

    Rule L0561. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(2)(ii))

    “Observed in Data Session. During the Data session it was noted that the organization collected patient satisfaction and hand hygiene data, however the data was not compiled in a manner it could be analyzed or used to identify performance trends or variances. This was confirmed with the Alternate Administrator present.”

    Rule L0564. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(2))

    “Observed in Data Session. During the Data session it was noted that the hospice had identified one performance improvement project, Communicable disease that was being conducted, but did not document the reasons for conducting the project or the measurable progress achieved on it. This was confirmed with the alternate administrator present.”

    Rule L0573. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(2)(ii))

    “Observed in Data Session. During the Data session it was noted that there was no data collection to evaluate hand hygiene compliance. The Alternate Administrator present stated that hand hygiene compliance was evaluated twice a year, once during a joint visit and once in the office. There was no data available for hand hygiene compliance for 2024 and 2023.”

    Rule L0581. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, for bereavement care it was noted that there was no documented bereavement plan of care. For example, in records RRBR#1 and #2 the paper sheet titled Bereavement POC for each patient did not include any goals or interventions, it was a to do list with dates for mailings. They did not include specific, individualized interventions, and the timing and frequency were the same exactly for all patients. This was confirmed with the Bereavement Coordinator present.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 3 patient records reviewed, that included aide services it was noted that the hospice aide supervision was not done every 14 days. For example in record RRHV#1 documentation of aide supervision was missing 3 times in the past 2 months. This was confirmed with the Alternate Administrator present.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During the Volunteer program session it was noted that the organization stated that they could not recruit volunteers since COVID there was no documentation to support any recruitment or retention activities. This was discussed with the Volunteer Coordinator.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During the Volunteer program discussion it was noted that the cost savings achieved did not include the positions occupied by volunteers. The cost savings was based on hours collected 100% for paid employees working as volunteers in the same position that they were paid to work. For example, the aide is seeing a patient daily to empty a foley catheter bag and volunteers on Saturday to do the same and the office manager volunteers time to make charts in the office. This was discussed with the Alternate Administrator.”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 121 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, that included volunteer services it was noted that the documented volunteer hours were done by paid staff and when factored out the organization did not meet the required 5%. During discussion with the Alternate Administrator about the roles the staff had while working as ‘volunteers’ revealed the roles were the same as when they were paid to work. For example record RRHV#2 the HHA is seeing the patient daily to empty a foley catheter bag and volunteers on Saturday to do the same. The Alternate Administrator sees patient on the weekend to assist in the home the same as during the paid week. This was discussed with the Alternate Administrator.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Services (42 CFR 418.100(c)(1)(v))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During the Volunteer program discussion, it was noted that the hospice recorded 5 volunteers. However, they were all paid employees of the hospice whose volunteer activities were the same as their paid activities. For example, the aide was seeing a patient daily to empty a foley catheter bag and volunteered on Saturdays to do the same and the office manager volunteers time to make charts in the office. This was discussed with the Alternate Administrator.”

    Rule L0652. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 2 HR files reviewed, for employees who also acted as volunteers it was noted that the organization had not documented the orientation of the volunteers. For example, the aide and alternate administrator also worked as volunteers for the organization and there was no documentation of orientation for the volunteer position. This was confirmed with the Alternate Administrator present.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that a physician’s certification of terminal illness statement was not filed in the patient record. For example record RRHV#2 there was no initial CTI documentation. Verbal attestation was included in record 8 days after SOC. This was confirmed with the Alternate Administrator present.”

    Rule L0676. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, for a hospice live discharge patient, it was noted that the discharge summary was not sent to the next health care professional responsible for providing care and services. For example, in record RRDC#2 it stated Patient’s daughter called stating that patient will be moving to a new facility and has a in-house hospice and was wanting to use there services. A revocation was signed and a discharge summary completed, However it was not sent to the new hospice. This was confirmed with the Alternate Administrator present.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 133 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 3 of 3 home visits conducted, that included oxygen in the home, it was noted that the organization did not provide education related to the oxygen equipment. For example, during visit RRHV#1 there were 3 E tanks in the home and 2 were free standing unsecured. Upon questioning the daughter related to oxygen safety she did not recall receiving education. During visit RRHV#2 there were 3 E tanks in the home and 2 were free standing unsecured. The RN conducting the visit worked with the unsecured tank’s valve, however did not address the safety of unsecured E tank. During visit RRHV#3 the Etank was on a cart, but placed in the corner of an enclosed closet. The LVN present did not educate related to proper oxygen tank storage.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 4, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 10, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission8 deficiencies cited
Jan 29, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission24 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 9, 2010.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 5.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 89% at home, 11% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day5.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.6%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Cristela Flores (managing employee (on the payroll), 55%); Cristela Flores (owns 5% or more directly, 51%); Jesus Flores (owns 5% or more directly, 49%); Anthony M Zepeda (managing employee (under contract), 45%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 57 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 76104, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 32.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.