Hearth Record

Archway Hospice

A hospice in Frisco, Texas 75033

4645 Avon Lane #225, Frisco, Texas 75033. (469) 290-6100.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 70 hospices serving ZIP code 75033 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 4, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 4, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 475 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added, or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that the patient’s Plan of Care included all of the patients’ medications. Agency policy “Medication List and Monitoring (PC17), dated 01/01/2021, read in part that “...The hospice will maintain a current, accurate medication profile for all prescription and over-the-counter medications taken by the patient... Changes in the medication regimen will be documented in the medical record either on the Medication Profile, on a verbal order, and in the Plan of Care... Changes in medications will be updated as frequently as necessary to keep the profile accurate. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/17/2024. The licensed vocational nurse (LVN) visit note dated 01/23/2024 included “oxygen saturation of 91% on room air and noted, New order for Robitussin and Mucinex... Lungs clear upper lobes, diminished bases...” The RN documented in the Interdisciplinary Group Meeting dated 02/21/2024 in part “...Notes rales to upper lobes and new order for zpack...” There was no documented evidence for a physician order for Z-pack (Azithromycin) and Z-pack is not included in the patient’s current or discontinued medication lists, or the patient Plan of Care. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/22/2023 and transferred to another hospice effective 09/29/2023. The LVN visit note dated 09/25/2023 stated in part, “oxygen sat 80% on 3lpm O2 NC. Tumor to neck appears larger and spreading across the trachea ... O2 sat at 80% RA. Put O2 on resident at 2L and only came up to 82%. Increased O2 to 3.5L and O2 sats came up to 85-87%. Noted rubs on expiratory to right lobe ... received order for Keflex 500mg TID x 10 days for tumor redness and warmth ...continues on nebulizer treatments...” The LVN note dated 9/28/23 stated in part “...The tumor to the neck is growing and could possibly be blocking the trachea and making it more difficult to swallow. Ordered a suction machine to be delivered ...” There was no documented evidence on the plan of care dated 08/22/2023-11/19/2023 for problems or interventions related to the tumor to the neck, suction machine and need for oxygen. During a joint record review and interview with the Patient Care Director on 04/04/2024, it was confirmed that no orders were documented for these medications described in the nursing notes, nor were the medication listed in the medication profile or the plan of care.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 760 words

    “It is required that the hospice designates a registered nurse member of the IDG to ensure continuous assessment of each patient’s and family’s needs and ensure the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that the RN ensured implementation of the plan of care and continuous assessment. Agency policy “Implementing Care and Treatment (PC.7) dated 10/01/2020 included in part that “... The agency designates a qualified registered nurse ... who will oversee ... the continuous assessment of each patient’s/family’s needs, the implementation of the IDG POC (Interdisciplinary Group Plan of Care) ...” Agency policy “Plan of Care Process” (PC.6), dated 05/01/2020, read in part that “... All hospice care and services furnished to patients ... will follow an individualized written POC (Plan of Care) established by the hospice Interdisciplinary Group ... A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the patient and family needs ...” Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/20/2023 with the primary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The Plans of Care effective 10/18/2023 to 1/15/2024 and 1/16/2024 to 3/15/2024 included the RN visit frequency of one RN visit every other week per the family’s request. The RN documented visits on 12/20/2023, NP/RN on 01/03/2024, 01/24/2024, 02/07/2024, 02/21/2024, and 03/06/2024. There was a twenty-one-day gap in RN visits from 01/03/2024 to 01/24/2024. There were no Licensed Vocational Nurse visits during the 01/03/2024 to 01/24/2024 time period. The Clinical Director/RN documented a call to the patient/family on 01/17/2024 to update them on the change in RN Case Manager and to determine if the patient/family had any needs. The RN documented on visit note dated 12/20/2023 that the “Pt sitting in the kitchen of home with husband ... continues a steady decline. VS WNL. LCTAB with diminished lung sounds in bilateral bases. BS x4, abdomen soft, non-distended. 1+ edema noted in BLLE ... no refills needed ...” Then on 01/03/2024, the NP/RN documented, in part, that the patient “...exhibits symptoms of fatigability and anxiety...requiring 24 hrs. supervision...mild dysphagia ...Lorazepam was recently increased due to exacerbations in anxiety symptoms. She does not participate in evaluation. Her husband assists with identifying her needs ...appears weak and tired. Walks with minimal assist ... Patient requires minimal to extensive assistance with ADL activities ... has had weight loss .. continent with bowel and bladder but requires assistance with toileting ... On 01/24/2024, the RN noted in part that the patient has “...poor coordination/balance; max assist by family ... Does ambulate but is not steady on feet ... frequent behaviors with cares. She is currently on medications for behaviors that are effective ... “ During the Interdisciplinary Team Meeting (IDT) on 01/10/24, the RN noted in part that ..”. Pt requires full assist for all ADLs. Pt with increased weakness and fatigue, sleeping more during the day than previously reported by husband.” Then the RN documented during the IDT 01/24/2024 in part that “Patient continues on hospice services ... She continues to reside in private home with her husband, who is also her primary caregiver. Patient does ambulate, but without intent. She is a fall risk. ...” On 01/17/2024, the PCD phoned the patient/family to update them regarding the change in their RNCM and inquire as to any medication or supply needs. The PCD also notified the hospice’s Medical Director on 01/24/2024 about the missed visit secondary to the previous nurse’s lack of documentation the week of 01/14/2024. The nurse visit resumed the next week as per order. It was confirmed during an interview with the Patient Care Director (PCD) Personnel Record 2) on 04/04/2024 that there was a gap of documented Registered Nurse (RN) visits of twenty-one days from 01/03/2024 to 01/24/2024. Per the PCD, the patient’s RN Case Manager (RNCM) abruptly left employment at the hospice on 01/16/2024. She reportedly had made a visit to the patient but left her employment before completing the documentation of the visit, but the PCD did not know that the nurse would not complete the documentation for the visit. On 01/17/2024, the PCD phoned the patient/family to update them regarding the change in their RNCM and inquire as to any medication or supply needs. The PCD also notified the hospice’s Medical Director on 01/24/2024 about the missed visit secondary to the previous nurse’s lack of documentation the week of 01/14/2024. The nurse visit resumed the next week as per order.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 641 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. In 3 of 14 (21%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that the patient’s Plans of Care were updated with identified problems and interventions based on the information obtained in the updated assessments. Agency policy “Review and Revision of Patient Care (PC.9) dated 08/01/20024 read in part that “... Upon identifying that patient care needs have changed, adjustments to the care planning documents will be made ... to the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) Plan of Care by the RN ... each change will be accompanied by specific interventions. All written changes to th Plan of Care will be incorporated into the patient’s medical record as changes occur. Clinical Record 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/06/2024. The Registered Nurse (RN) Admission visit dated 02/06/2024, stated in part, “new onset of dysphagia and the need for a mechanical soft diet.” A physician’s order dated 02/06/2024 included Lamotrigine 25mg: 2 tablets by mouth twice a day. The RN visit note dated 02/20/2024 stated in part, “the patient was on oxygen two liters per minute per nasal cannula.” The patient’s history and physical referral notes from a neurology visit dated 09/13/2023,” included in part that ...” Since last visit, she has had several seizures ... stares off, becomes unresponsive, whole-body shakes ... She has had about 6 in the past year. They seem to be happening more frequently now ... Seizures: Start Lamotrigine 25mg daily and slowly titrate up to 50mg twice daily. Seizure precautions discussed ...” There were no identified problems or interventions in the patient’s Plan of Care dated 02/6/2024-05/05/2024 to address the patient’s dysphagia, seizures, or use of oxygen. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/17/2024. The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) visit on 01/23/2024 included documentation that the patient’s oxygen saturation of 91% on room air and noted, “New order for Robitussin and Mucinex... Lungs clear upper lobes, diminished bases...” The RN documented in the Interdisciplinary Group Meeting dated 02/21/2024 in part “...Notes rales to upper lobes and new order for zpack...” The only identified nursing-related problems noted in the patient’s Plan of Care date 01/17/2024-04/15/2024 included deficits related to quality of life and cardiac/circulatory function and fluid volume alteration. There was no documented evidence of problems or interventions on the plan of care for the active respiratory infection nor interventions related to the infection, its treatment, or symptom management. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/22/2023 and transferred to another hospice effective 09/29/2023. The LVN visit note dated 09/25/2023 stated in part, “oxygen sat 80% on 3lpm O2 NC ...Tumor to neck appears larger and spreading across the trachea ... O2 sat at 80% RA. Put O2 on resident at 2L and only came up to 82%. Increased O2 to 3.5L and O2 sats came up to 85-87%. Noted rubs on expiratory to right lobe ... received order for Keflex 500mg TID x 10 days for tumor redness and warmth ...continues on nebulizer treatments...” The LVN note dated 9/28/23 stated in part “...The tumor to the neck is growing and could possibly be blocking the trachea and making it more difficult to swallow. Ordered a suction machine to be delivered ...”. There was no documented evidence on the plan of care dated 08/22/2023-11/19/2023 for problems or interventions related to the tumor to the neck, suction machine and need for oxygen. During a joint record review and interview with the Patient Care Director on 04/03/2024 and 04/04/2024, it was confirmed that the patients’ Plans of Care had not been updated with the identified problems documented in the assessment notes.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 309 words

    “It is required that the hospice develops, implements, and maintains an effective, ongoing, hospice-wide, data-driven quality assurance and performance improvement program (QAPI). The hospice governing body is responsible for ensuring that the program includes defined data details and frequency of collection. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. A review of the agency’s QAPI documentation revealed that the agency did not ensure that the hospice documented two meetings in 2023 as required by the agency’s policy “Quality Assessment Performance Improvement Program (QAPI.4) dated 12/01/2019. The policy reads in part that “...The QAPI Committee will meet at least twice a year or more often if needed and will maintain a written record of the meetings with appropriate signatures...” The agency had documented Hospice Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Quarterly Review meetings on 05/02/2022, 07/27/2022, and 07/12/2023. During an interview on 04/04/2024 with the Patient Care Director responsible for the QAPI program, she confirmed that there was only one QAPI meeting during 2023. Due to staffing changes and the agency’s staffing shortages, other operations and needs took priority. A review of the agency’s QAPI documentation revealed that the agency did not ensure that the hospice documented two meetings in 2023 as required by the agency’s policy “Quality Assessment Performance Improvement Program (QAPI.4) dated 12/01/2019. The policy reads in part that “...The QAPI Committee will meet at least twice a year or more often if needed and will maintain a written record of the meetings with appropriate signatures...” The agency had documented Hospice Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Quarterly Review meetings on 05/02/2022, 07/27/2022, and 07/12/2023. During an interview on 04/04/2024 with the Patient Care Director responsible for the QAPI program, she confirmed that there was only one QAPI meeting during 2023. Due to staffing changes and the agency’s staffing shortages, other operations and needs took priority.”

    Rule L0565. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 252 words

    “It is required that a hospice aide provides services that are ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group and included in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. In 1 of 11 (9%) clinical records reviewed in which Hospice Aide services were accepted revealed the agency did not ensure that the Hospice Aide visit frequency met the ordered frequency documented in the patient’s Plan of Care. Agency’s policy “Implementing Care and Treatment” (PC.7), dated 10/01/2020, read in part that “... The hospice RN ... will oversee the assignment of a Hospice Aide initiating Hospice Aide services within the time frame to meet the patient’s needs as identified in the Plan of Care and per physician’s orders...” Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/20/2023. A physician order dated 07/21/2023 ordered the hospice aide to visit the patient twice a week, effective 07/21/2023. There were no additional physician orders updating the hospice aide visit frequency. Hospice Aide visits were documented on 01/02/2024 and 01/08/2024, and a missed visit was documented on 01/15/2024. Then visits resumed on 01/23/2024, 01/30/2024, 02/06/2024, 02/13/2024, 02/20/2024, 02/27/2024, 03/05/2024 and 03/12/2024. The patient was being seen by the aide once a week instead of twice a week as ordered. During a joint record review and an interview with the Patient Care Director on 04/03/2024, it was confirmed that no updated Hospice Aide frequency orders were documented in a physician’s order or the patient’s Plans of Care.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 286 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician a copy of the hospice discharge summary. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 2 (50%) clinical records reviewed in which there was a live discharge from hospice services revealed that the agency did not ensure that the agency forwarded the Discharge Summary to the patient’s attending physician. Clinical Record 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/04/2023 and was discharged on 08/25/2023 for admission to a non-contracted facility. The discharge summary did not indicate that the Discharge Summary or any documentation was sent to the attending physician. No documentation was scanned into the clinical record, and no communication notes or Interdisciplinary Group notes mentioned sharing the patient’s clinical information with the attending physician. During a joint record review and interview with the Patient Care Director (PCD) on 04/04/2024, it was confirmed that there was no documentation that the patient’s discharge summary or any clinical information had been forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. Further, the PCD stated that the patient’s son from out of town arrived to see the patient and wanted to take the patient to the hospital. He requested that the patient be discharged and advised the hospice that he did not want anyone from the hospice to come to the house or meet them at the hospital. The hospice then discharged the patient. The family did not take the patient to the hospital, nor was the discharge summary or any clinical information provided to the attending physician.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 214 words

    “It is required that the hospice discharge summary provided to a facility receiving a hospice patient for care—or to the patient’s community attending physician upon hospice discharge—includes at least a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, and the patient’s latest physician orders. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 2 (50%) clinical records reviewed in which the patient was a live discharge from the hospice agency revealed the agency did not ensure that the Discharge Summary contained the required elements. Clinical Record 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/04/2023 and was discharged on 08/25/2023 for admission to a non-contracted facility. The discharge summary did not include a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, the patient’s written Plan of Care, or any physician orders. There was no documentation in the clinical record that any of this information was sent separately to the patient’s attending physician. During a joint record review and interview with the Patient Care Director on 04/04/2024, it was confirmed that the patient’s documented discharge summary did not contain any of the patient’s medications, the patient’s plan of care, a summary of the patient’s care, or any other physician orders.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 4, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 27, 2018.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 3.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 89.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 57% at home, 5% in assisted living, 1% in a nursing facility, 36% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends3.6%
Visits near death89.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Jk Hospice, LLC owns 33.33% directly since Aug 17, 2017; Rinaz, PLLC owns 33.33% directly since Aug 17, 2017; Vinayaka Holdings LLC owns 25% directly since Oct 1, 2025; Mr and Jr Consulting LLC owns 8.34% directly since Oct 1, 2025.
  • Southwest Palliative Plus LLC runs it.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Jalil Khan (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Jalil Khan (owns 5% or more through other companies, 33.33%); Vaqar Dar (owns 5% or more through other companies, 33.33%); Suresh G Kumar (owns 5% or more through other companies, 22%); Robert D Barker (managing employee (on the payroll)); Haridasan Pillai (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Southwest Palliative Plus LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Aug 1, 2025
Jk Hospice, LLCOwns 5% or more directly33.33%Aug 17, 2017
Rinaz, PLLCOwns 5% or more directly33.33%Aug 17, 2017
Vinayaka Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more directly25%Oct 1, 2025
Mr and Jr Consulting LLCOwns 5% or more directly8.34%Oct 1, 2025

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 81.63% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 35.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 70 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75033, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.