Hearth Record

Birdie Hospice

A hospice in Sherman, Texas 75092

404 N. Bryant Ave, Sherman, Texas 75092. (903) 771-4648.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 25 hospices serving ZIP code 75092 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 29, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 25, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 14 records reviewed (Patient #7, #8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #7: The record indicated the psychosocial comprehensive assessment was completed on 10/18/23. The start of care was 10/12/23. There was no evidence of this assessment being completed within 5 days from the start of care date. Patient #8: The record indicated the psychosocial comprehensive assessment was completed on 10/19/23. The start of care was 10/10/23. There was no evidence of this assessment being completed within 5 days from the start of care date.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 571 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 14 records reviewed (Patient #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #2: Upon home visit patient Patient #2 had Tramadol and Lorazepam on the medication profile but did not have it in the home. When the daughter (caregiver) was asked what she would give her mom if she had pain during the night and or anxiety and she replied, “Zyquil”. The nurse reported she threw these two mediations away. She also had Atorvastatin 20mg oral table QHS on the medication profile, this was also not in the home. The nurse stated she had not taken it in a while. Mupirocin 2% topical cream prn BID,no specific site as to where this medication needed to be applied. Travoprost 0.004% opthalmic solution one drop in (eye) @ QHS, no indication of which eye. Miralax oral powder 17gram by mouth prn BID, no liquid to reconstitute with or the amount of liquid. Calmoseptine 0.44%-20.6% Topical ointment prn, no site to where this medication needed to be applied. Patient #3: Calmoseptine 0.44%-20.6% Topical ointment prn, no evidence of the specific site to where this medication needed to be applied. Miralax 17gm by mouth prn BID for reconstitution, no evidence of the what type of liquid to reconstitute the medication in or the amount of the liquid. Silvadene 1% topical cream one dime size QID prn, no evidence in the record of where to apply this cream. Patient #4: Metamucil (2) by mouth daily, no evidence of what (2) was i.e. tablets, scoops, etc. Multi Vitamin mineral (1) daily by mouth, no evidence of what (1) was i.e. tablet or liquid Patient #5: Triamcinolone Acetonide 1% one dime size amount topically BID, no evidence of where the cream needed to be applied. Patient #6: Calmoseptine 0.44% - 20.6% topical ointment one application topical BID prn, no amount or where the ointment should be applied. Patient #7: Calmoseptine 0.44% -20.6% topical ointment one nickel size drop prn QID, no evidence of where the ointment should be applied. Miralax oral powder for reconstitution 1 capful by mouth BID prn, no liquid or the amount of liquid was listed. Mupirocin 2% Topical small amount topically tid, no evidence in the record as to how much and where the medication should be applied. Patient #8: Calmoseptine 0.44% - 20.6% topical oint. Nickel size prn QID, no evidence in the record where this medication should be applied. Solonpas Large Pain Relief Patch – 1 patch transdermal tid prn, no evidence of where the patch should be placed. Patient #9: Cholecalciferol tablet 1000U 2 tabs by mouth daily. The patient verbalized on home visit she had not taken this medication in a long while, no discontinuation of the medication. Nystatin 100,000 units/g topical powder as directed topical prn BID yeast, no evidence in the record where this powder should be applied. Patient #10: Miralax oral powder for reconstitution 1 cap 17gm by mouth prn daily for constipation, no liquid was listed that should be reconstituted in or the amount of liquid.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 510 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 14 records reviewed (Patient #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #2: Travoprost 0.004% opthalmic solution one drop in (eye) @ QHS, no indication of which eye. Miralax oral powder 17gram by mouth prn BID, no liquid to reconstitute with or the amount of liquid. Calmoseptine 0.44%-20.6% Topical ointment prn, no site to where this medication needed to be applied. The record indicated the patient had a foley catheter, the MD order from 6/23/23 read SN may place a foley catheter prn. SN may collect a UA & C&S prn s/s UTI. SN may change foley catheter monthly and prn. Complications per sterile technique and may irrigate. There was no evidence in the record for an MD order to include the foley catheter size or the amount of saline to go into the balloon. This was corrected on site. Patient #3: Calmoseptine 0.44%-20.6% Topical ointment prn, no evidence of the specific site to where this medication needed to be applied. Miralax 17gm by mouth prn BID for reconstitution, no evidence of the what type of liquid to reconstitute the medication in or the amount of the liquid. Silvadene 1% topical cream one dime size QID prn, no evidence in the record of where to apply this cream. Patient #4: Metamucil (2) by mouth daily, no evidence of what (2) was i.e. tablets, scoops, etc. Multi Vitamin mineral (1) daily by mouth, no evidence of what (1) was i.e. tablet or liquid Patient #5: Triamcinolone Acetonide 1% one dime size amount topically BID, no evidence of where the cream needed to be applied. Patient #6: Calmoseptine 0.44% - 20.6% topical ointment one application topical BID prn, no amount or where the ointment should be applied. Patient #7: Calmoseptine 0.44% -20.6% topical ointment one nickel size drop prn QID, no evidence of where the ointment should be applied. Miralax oral powder for reconstitution 1 capful by mouth BID prn, no liquid or the amount of liquid was listed. Mupirocin 2% Topical small amount topically tid, no evidence in the record as to how much and where the medication should be applied. Patient #8: Calmoseptine 0.44% - 20.6% topical oint. Nickel size prn QID, no evidence in the record where this medication should be applied. Solonpas Large Pain Relief Patch – 1 patch transdermal tid prn, no evidence of where the patch should be placed. Patient #9: Cholecalciferol tablet 1000U 2 tabs by mouth daily. The patient verbalized she had not taken this medication in a long while, no discontinuation of the medication. Nystatin 100,000 units/g topical powder as directed topical prn BID yeast, no evidence in the record where this powder should be applied. Patient #10: Miralax oral powder for reconstitution 1 cap 17gm by mouth prn daily for constipation, no liquid was listed that should be reconstituted in or the amount of liquid.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient #3: The record indicated the patient had 3 falls on 3/8/24, 3/15/24, and on 3/25/24. In the nurses note for a future plan it was noted the patient would have an exercise plan. There was no evidence in the record for this exercise plan and by who would be providing it. Upon nurse interview she stated this is what the daughter wanted.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 records reviewed (Patient #11) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient #11: Upon hospice discharge due to no longer meeting medical criteria there was no evidence of the Medical Director giving a discharge order prior to the discharge date. This was corrected on site with a late entry for the MD order.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 29, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Apr 25, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 6, 2018.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 5.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 76% at home, 24% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day5.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.6%
Visits near death93.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Amy E Stephens (owns 5% or more directly, 95%); Jamee Wix (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%); Alexis Stephens (owns 5% or more directly, 5%); Alexis Stephens (managing employee (on the payroll), 5%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 70.59% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 74.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 25 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75092, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.