Home Hospice
A hospice in Sherman, Texas 75090
505 West Center Street, Sherman, Texas 75090. (903) 868-9315.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 5of 5 family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
5 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 25 hospices serving ZIP code 75090 had 3.
The last inspection on record was on Jul 23, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jul 23, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
The inspectors’ words, 258 words
“It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 19 (16%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure an initial comprehensive assessment was completed no later than five calendar days after the election of hospice care. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient’s election of benefit was dated 04/01/2024. The initial nursing comprehensive assessment was dated 04/01/2024, the initial psychosocial assessment completed on 04/02/2026, and the initial spiritual assessment completed on 04/10/2026 (a total of 9 days from the election of benefit). CLINICAL RECORD 10: The patient’s election of benefit was dated 02/03/2026. The initial nursing comprehensive assessment was dated 02/03/2026, the initial psychosocial assessment completed on 02/03/2026, and the initial spiritual assessment completed on 02/14/2026 (a total of 11 days from the election of benefit). CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient’s election of benefit was dated 10/22/2025. The initial nursing assessment completed on 10/23/2025, the initial psychosocial assessment completed on 10/23/2025, and the initial spiritual assessment completed on 10/28/2025 (a total of 6 days from the election of benefit). During an interview with the Executive Director (Personnel Record 6) on 07/23/2026, she stated they will be providing education to clinical staff about completing the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 days after admission.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 297 words
“It is required that the hospice assesses the skills and competencies of all individuals providing care, including volunteers providing services and, as necessary, provides in-service training and education programs where required. This standard was not met as evidenced by personnel record review, document review, and interview. In 3 of 9 (33%) personnel records reviewed of clinical staff, the agency did not ensure the skills and competencies of all individuals providing care were assessed. Document 1: The agency policy titled Competency of Clinical Staff, effective date 02/20/2002, revision date 03/22/2013, stated in part, “Clinical competency evaluations are performed at time of hire and annually to assess the basic skills levels for all Home Hospice staff who provide patient/family care.” PERSONNEL RECORD 4: The personnel record review of the spiritual counselor, with a date of hire 10/05/2011, did not include documented evidence that the hospice assessed the skills and competencies annually for the year 2025, as required by agency policy. PERSONNEL RECORD 5: The personnel record review of the Volunteer Coordinator, with a date of hire 07/21/2025, did not include documented evidence that the hospice assessed the skills and competencies of all individuals providing care at hire as required by agency policy. PERSONNEL RECORD 7: The personnel record review of the alternate Bereavement Coordinator, with a date of hire 02/10/2015, did not include documented evidence that the hospice assessed the skills and competencies at hire and annually as required by agency policy, During an interview with the Executive Director (Personnel Record 6) on 07/22/2026, she stated that she was not aware that the competency needed to be completed for the volunteer coordinator or the bereavement coordinator and doesn’t know why the spiritual counselor was missed in 2025. However, they would review and update the process as soon as possible.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 772 words
“It is required that the hospice medical director, physician-designee, or physician member of the IDG provides written and signed recertification of the terminal illness to meet the hospice care benefit requirement. Recertification is completed no later than two (2) calendar days after the first day of each benefit period, and no more than fifteen (15) days before the next benefit period begins. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 12 of 13 (92%) clinical records reviewed of patients who have been recertified for hospice benefit revealed that the agency did not ensure that a recertification of terminal illness was present in the patient’s clinical record as required. CLINICAL RECORD 1: A review of the clinical record for the recertification benefit periods 02/28/2026 to 04/28/2026, 04/29/2026 to 06/27/2026 and 06/28/2026 to 08/26/2026 revealed no documented evidence of a recertification of terminal illness for these benefit periods. The Face-to-face documentation was completed on 02/17/2026, 04/21/2026 and 06/19/2026, however, no recertification of terminal illness was completed as required. CLINICAL RECORD 3: A review of the clinical record for the recertification benefit periods 03/11/2026 to 05/09/2026, 05/10/2026 to 07/08/2026 and 07/09/2026 to 09/06/2026 revealed no documented evidence of a recertification of terminal illness for these benefit periods. Face-to-face was completed on 03/05/2026, 05/01/2026 and 06/30/2026, however, no recertification of terminal illness was completed as required. CLINICAL RECORD 4: A review of the clinical record for the recertification benefit periods 04/13/2026 to 07/11/2026 and from 07/12/2026 to 09/09/2026 revealed no documented evidence of a recertification of terminal illness for these benefit periods. A Face-to-face was dated 07/09/2026, however, no recertification of terminal illness was completed as required. CLINICAL RECORD 5: A clinical record review for the recertification benefit periods 02/21/2026 to 04/21/2026, 04/22/2026 to 06/20/2026, and 06/21/2026 to 08/19/2026 revealed no documented evidence of a recertification of terminal illness for these benefit periods. A Face-to-face was completed on 02/17/2026, 04/07/2026, and 06/21/2026, however, no recertification of terminal illness was completed as required. CLINICAL RECORD 6: A clinical record review for the recertification benefit periods 03/29/2026 to 05/27/2026 and 05/28/2026 to 07/26/2026 revealed no documented evidence of a recertification of terminal illness for these benefit periods. A Face-to-face was completed 03/29/2026 and 05/20/2026, however, no recertification of terminal illness was completed as required. CLINICAL RECORD 7: A clinical record review for the benefit period 07/09/2026 to 10/06/2026 revealed no documented evidence of a recertification of terminal illness for this benefit period as required. CLINICAL RECORD 8: A clinical record review for the recertification benefit periods for 03/18/2026 to 05/16/2026, 05/17/2026 to 07/15/2026, and 07/16/2026 to 09/13/2026 revealed no documented evidence of a recertification of terminal illness for these benefit periods. A Face-to-face was completed on 03/09/2026, 05/04/2026 and 07/13/2026, however, no recertification of terminal illness was completed as required. CLINICAL RECORD 9: A clinical record review for the recertification benefit periods for 04/05/2026 to 06/03/2026 and 06/04/2026 to 08/02/2026 revealed no documented evidence of a recertification of terminal illness for these benefit periods. A Face-to-face was completed on 03/26/2026 and 05/29/2026, however, no recertification of terminal illness was completed as required. CLINICAL RECORD 10: A clinical record review for the recertification benefit periods for 04/04/2026 to 06/02/2026 and 06/03/2026 to 08/01/2026 revealed no documented evidence of a recertification of terminal illness for these benefit periods. A Face-to-face was completed on 03/30/2026 and 06/03/2026, however, no recertification of terminal illness was completed as required CLINICAL RECORD 11: A clinical record review for the recertification benefit periods for 04/20/2026 to 06/18/2026 and 06/19/2026 to 08/17/2026 revealed no documented evidence of a recertification of terminal illness for these benefit periods. A Face-to-face was completed on 04/14/2026 and 06/23/2026, however, no recertification of terminal illness was completed as required. CLINICAL RECORD 12: A review of the benefit period 07/10/2026 to 09/07/2026 revealed a written recertification without the hospice medical director’s signature as of 07/23/2026, 13 days after the start of the benefit period. There was no documented evidence that the clinical record included a signed recertification of terminal illness by the medical director as of the record review date 07/23/2026. CLINICAL RECORD 14: A clinical record review for the recertification benefit periods for 03/18/2026 to 06/15/2026 and 06/16/2026 to 08/14/202 revealed no documented evidence of a recertification of terminal illness for these benefit periods. A Face-to-face was completed on 06/10/2026, however, no recertification of terminal illness was completed as required. During an interview with the Executive Director (Personnel Record 6) on 07/22/2026, she stated she was aware and that they are actively working on a process to have the recertifications completed in a timely manner.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 225 words
“It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician: a copy of the hospice discharge summary and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed of patients who were live discharge from hospice services, the agency did not ensure a copy of the patient’s hospice discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 18: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/23/2025 and revoked on 01/24/2026. The hospice discharge summary was dated 01/24/2026, however, there was no documented evidence that the discharge summary was forwarded the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 19: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/10/2025 and was discharged on 10/21/2025 for being out of the service area. The discharge summary was dated 10/21/2025, however, there was no documented evidence that the discharge summary was forwarded the patient’s attending physician. During an interview with the Executive Director (Personnel Record 6) on 07/22/2026, she stated that they will be reviewing the policy and updating the staff on this requirement.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(iii))
The inspectors’ words, 392 words
“It is required that the designated IDG member provides the SNF/NF or ICF/IID with the following information for each patient/resident: the most recent hospice plan of care; hospice election form; physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness; and hospice physician and attending physician (if any) orders. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview and observation. In 3 of 3 (100%) observation visits of patients living in a skilled nursing facility (SNF) revealed that the agency did not ensure the designated IDG member provided the SNF/NF with the physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness. CLINICAL RECORD 1/HOME VISIT 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/01/2025 with diagnosis of chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). During the home visit observation with the hospice aide (Personnel Record 2) on 07/21/2026 at the SNF, a review of the documents provided to the facility revealed there was no documented evidence that the physician certification and recertification of terminal illness was included in the documents provided to the facility. CLINICAL RECORD 2/HOME VISIT 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/10/2026 with diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). During the home visit observation with the registered nurse (RN) (Personnel Record 1) on 07/21/2026 at the facility, a review of the documents provided to the facility revealed there was no documented evidence that the physician certification and recertification of terminal illness was included in the documents provided to the facility. CLINICAL RECORD 4/HOME VISIT 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/13/2026 with diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease with late onset. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). During the home visit with the Medical Social Worker (Personnel Record 3) on 07/21/2026 at the SNF, a review of the documents provided to the facility revealed there was no documented evidence that the physician certification and recertification of terminal illness was included in the documents provided to the facility During an interview with the Executive Director (Personnel Record 6) on 07/21/2026, she stated that all the documents are sent to the facility after the interdisciplinary team meeting; however, it is true that the recertification of terminal illness was missing, but they would review and strengthen the process.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner | 5 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 3, 1987.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98.1% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 61% at home, 17% in assisted living, 21% in a nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 14.7 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7.8% |
| Visits near death | 98.1% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Home Hospice of Grayson County runs it.
- 13 owners or officers are people: Tina L Garner (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Tina L Garner (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Nancy Jackson (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Virginia Ohanlan (corporate director, 0%); Keith Orsburn (corporate director, 0%); Denise Peckman (corporate director, 0%); George Aune (corporate director, 0%); Kitty Richardson (corporate director, 0%); Charles Dannel (corporate director, 0%); Don Wood (corporate director, 0%); John Wusterhausen (corporate director, 0%); Patrick Flynn (corporate director, 0%); Amber Grubb (corporate director, 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home Hospice of Grayson County | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Nov 17, 2008 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 94% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 96.52% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 91.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 25 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75090, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 5.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Home Hospice This hospice | 5 |
| Centric Hospice | 0 |
| Guardian Hospice | 1 |
| Heart to Heart Hospice of North Texas LLC | 2 |
| Concord Hospice LLC | 1 |
| Birdie Hospice | 5 |
| Vitas Healthcare of Texas LP | 15 |
| VNA | 1 |
| Hospice Plus | 18 |
| Angel Hands Hospice | 0 |
| Paloma Hospice and Palliative Care | 0 |
| Elara Caring | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.