Hearth Record

Provista Hospice

A hospice in Dallas, Texas 75206

4849 Greenville Ave, Ste 1124 - B, Dallas, Texas 75206. (214) 965-0431.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 24 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

24 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 50 hospices serving ZIP code 75206 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 3, 2025: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

24 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

24 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 15, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care24 deficiencies
  • Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the organization develops, implements, and maintains an effective, on-going, organization wide Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. There were no evidence QAPI minutes, no annual review and no performance improvement activities.”

    Rule L0559. Condition-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 16 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #5: The spiritual care assessment was completed on 1-31-25 indicating greater than 5 days from admission on 01-23-25.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 201 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 16 (Patient #1,#2,#4,#5,#11,#12) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions Patient #1: The RN assessment dated 11-22-24 and 11-25-24 documented “Abx for UTI”. There was no evidence of antibiotics on the medication profile. Patient #2: Augmentin was ordered on 10-23-24 for 5 days. Augmentin remained on the medication profile until the patient’s death 11-30-24. Patient #4: On the plan of care dated 12-31-25, the RN documented the patient was on 2 LPM of Oxygen via NC. Oxygen was not on the medication profile. Patient #5: On 02-25-25, an order was written for Oxycodone and Prednisone. Neither of these meds were listed on the medication profile. Patient #11: The care plan dated 04-08-25, indicated the patient was using 2LPM of O2 via NC. Oxygen was not listed on the medication profile. Patient #12: O2 2-4 LPM was ordered per the plan of care dated 04-01-25 however, oxygen was not on the medication profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 16 (Patient #5, #13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #5: The bereavement assessment was completed on 01-31-25 indicating greater than 5 days from the admission date of 01-23-25. Patient #13: There is no evidence of a bereavement assessment completed within 5 days of the admission.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 125 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 16 (Patient #9) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #9: On the plan of care dated 3-1-25, and through 4-1-25, the aide frequency was written as “1-3 x week”. The aide was visiting the patient 3 x week.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 16 (Patient #14) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #14: Physical therapy “eval and treat” was ordered on 04-04-25, but there was no evidence that goals and interventions were updated in the plans of care on 04-15-25 and 04-29-25.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 16 (Patient #2, #4,#12) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #2: The plan of care dated 10-30-25 indicated the RN frequency was 2 x week. For the week of 10-27-24 through 11-2-24, there was only 1 routine visit on 10-28-25. Patient #4: The plan of care dated 1-8-25, 1-22-25, 2-5-25, 2-18-25, 3-4-25, 3-18-25, and 4-1-25 indicate the Chaplain frequency is 1 x month. The Chaplain visited once on 01-05-25. Patient #12: Per the plan of cares dated 04-01-25, 04-15-25 and 04-29-25, the chaplain frequency was 1 x mo. but, there was no evidence of a chaplain visit in April.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 214 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 16 (Patient #2, #16) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient #2: On 10-28-24, the RN documented, “urine sample for C&S”. On 10-30-24, the RN instructed the family that C&S “results were not in”.There was no evidence of follow-up with caregiver about results and the nurse continued to document, “New orders due to dysuria”, for bi weekly visits until 11-18-24. On 11-18-24, the RN documented the foley was changed and an additional urine sample was taken for “C&S”. The caregiver requested results on 11-20-24 and through 11-30-24, there was no evidence of follow-up with caregiver about results. Additionally, the RN continued to document on 11-18, 11-20, 11-27-24, “New orders for dysuria...white milky (urine)...and signs and symptoms of UTI...”, but there is no evidence of new orders since 10-23-24. Patient #16: On 04-22-25, the MSW called caregiver to schedule a monthly visit according to the plan of care. The caregiver said she was, “available on Wednesdays and Fridays”. There was no follow-up to reschedule visit on the Wednesday or Friday prior to the end of the month and MSW documented a missed visit for the month of April on 04-22-25.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the board of directors/governing body approves the frequency and detail of the data collection. There was no evidence of a QAPI plan approved by the governing body.”

    Rule L0565. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice investigates all adverse events, incidents, accidents, variances or unusual occurrences that involve patient care and develops a plan of correction to prevent the same or similar event from occurring again. There is no evidence that plans of correction were developed to prevent patient falls.”

    Rule L0569. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence a written plan of correction is developed in response to any QAPI activity that does not meet an acceptable threshold. There is no evidence of measurement or analyses of collected data or that a plan of correction was developed.”

    Rule L0570. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the number and scope of distinct QAPI projects conducted annually is based on the needs of the hospice’s population and internal organizational needs and must reflect the scope, complexity, and past performance of the hospice’s services and operations. There is no evidence that QAPI projects were chosen or conducted for 2024 or 2025.”

    Rule L0572. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice documents what QAPI projects are being conducted, the reasons for conducting these projects, and the measurable progress achieved on these projects. There is no evidence of projects being conducted in 2024 or 2025.”

    Rule L0573. Standard-level.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence of involvement of the governing body and organizational leaders in the Quality Assessment/Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. There is no evidence of the involvement of the governing body in the QAPI program, no QAPI minutes or annual review.”

    Rule L0574. Standard-level.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice’s governing body is responsible for ensuring that the hospice-wide Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement efforts address priorities for improved quality of care and patient safety, and that all improvement actions are evaluated for effectiveness. There is no evidence of a hospice wide QAPI plan approved by the board of directors which addressed priorities, patient safety and improvement actions.”

    Rule L0575. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence in the QAPI reports that the hospice maintains a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases. There is no evidence that the hospice maintains a coordinated infection program which identifies infections to be reported and which uses data to assess the effectiveness of the infection control program and apply corrective action plans as needed.”

    Rule L0581. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(i))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #5 ) did not have evidence that all bereavement services are provided by a qualified counselor in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, professional practice standards, the hospice’s policies and procedures and/or job descriptions which includes experience or education in grief or loss counseling. Personnel #5: The Bereavement Coordinator job description required “Experience in bereavement and grief counseling.” There was no evidence of experience grief and bereavement in the personnel file and the personnel’s application indicated she applied for the “receptionist” role.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 16 (Patient #16) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable. Patient #16: The aide care plan, dated 03-10-24, indicated, “change linen” was ordered “q week and PRN”. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task,whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice documented the cost savings achieved through the use of volunteers. Documentation must include the following: • The identification of each position that is occupied by a volunteer • The work time spent by volunteers occupying those positions • Estimates of the dollar costs that the hospice would have incurred if paid employees occupied the positions identified in paragraph (d)(1) of CFR 418.78 for the amount of time specified in paragraph (d)(2) of CFR 418.78 There was no evidence of a volunteer cost savings report.”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. There was no evidence that volunteer labor equaled 5% of all paid employee and contract labor.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is directed by a Board of Directors/governing body which assumes full legal authority and responsibility for the operation of the hospice. While there is a compliant Board of Directors Agenda, there is no evidence of meeting minutes that are dated or document attendees.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 16 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that each patient record contains responses to medications, symptom management, treatments, and services. Patient #5: On 02-25-25, the patient developed pain and new orders for Oxycodone and Prednisone were given. There was no follow-up visit or phone call to the patient or caregiver to assess the effectiveness of the medication until 03-06-25.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 16 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #6: The RN completed a supervisory visit on 04-23-24, but there were no visits by the aide to the patient, and there was a missed visit documented on 04-18-25.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 16 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #4: There was no evidence of a discharge summary.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 3, 2025Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareNo deficiencies cited
May 15, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care24 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 31, 2016.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 8.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 3.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 99% at home, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day8.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends3.8%
Visits near death90.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Beajohn Medical LLC owns 100% directly since Dec 1, 2017.
  • 3 owners or officers are people: Melissa Rodriguez (corporate officer, 0%); Melissa Rodriguez (managing employee (on the payroll)); Rubin M Simon (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Beajohn Medical LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Dec 1, 2017

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 93.02% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 42.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 50 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75206, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 24.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.