Companion Hospice and Palliative Care of South Texas LLC
A hospice in San Antonio, Texas 78230
3201 Cherry Ridge Dr Ste C-300, San Antonio, Texas 78230. (855) 320-5552.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 24 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
24 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 100 hospices serving ZIP code 78230 had 4.
The last inspection on record was on Oct 17, 2025: a complaint inspection by The Joint Commission.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
24 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Oct 17, 2025: complaint inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies
-
EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(3)(iii))
“Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review of the Emergency Management plan it was noted the organization had not completed an emergency exercise with documentation of an evaluation of the emergency exercise. For example; review of the Emergency Management Plan revealed an event that had occurred prior to the last survey in July with documentation of a discuss on why the organization failed. However, there was no documentation of an actual Emergency Exercise. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Clinical Services/Alternate Administrator.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 137 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 3 patient records reviewed, During RR# 1, RR# 2, and RR# 3’s patient records it was noted the organization had not ensured the written plan of care was based on the patient’s goals and services required to meet those goals. For example: review of RR# 1 and RR# 2’s patient records revealed documentation of a high risk for falls. However, review of RR# 1 and RR# 3’s plan of care revealed no goals related to falls. Review of RR# 2’s patient record revealed RR# 3 had a risk for aspiration and on a mechanical soft diet with thickened liquids for dysphagia. However, review of RR# 2’s plan of care revealed no goals related to the aspiration risk. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Clinical Services/Alternate Administrator.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 114 words
“Observed in Record Review. During RR# 1, RR# 2, and RR# 3’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured the patients’ plans of care included all interventions to manage pain and symptoms. For example: review of RR# 1 and RR# 3’s patient records revealed RR# 1 and RR# 3 were both high risk for falls. However, review of RR# 1 and RR# 3’s plans of care revealed no fall safety precautions. Review of RR# 2’s patient record revealed RR# 2 had risk for aspiration. However, review of RR# 2’s plan of care revealed no aspiration safety precautions. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Clinical Services/Alternate Administrator.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 97 words
“Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 3 HR files reviewed with date of hire after August 2025, During review of HR# 2 and HR# 3’s HR files it was noted the organization had not ensured staff completed an initial competence assessment. For example: review of HR# 2’s (Volunteer Coordinator) HR file revealed a blank initial competence assessment form. Review of HR# 3’s (Chaplain/Bereavement Coordinator) HR file revealed a blank Chaplain initial competence assessment form and a blank Bereavement Coordinator initial competence assessment form. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Clinical Services.”
-
Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(a))
The inspectors’ words, 192 words
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 4 HR files reviewed, During review of HR# 2’s HR file it was noted the organization had not ensured it verified staff qualification required by Texas state law and regulation that required licensure examination for a Master of Social Work to work as a Master of Social Work. For example: review of HR# 2’s date of hire was approximately 45 days prior to the surveyor review of the record. Further review of HR# 2’s HR file revealed HR# 2 had a LBSW (licensed Baccalaureate Social Worker). This was reviewed and discussed with the Director of Clinical Services/Alternate Administrator that revealed HR# 2 was not licensed in the state of Texas as a Master of Social Work and supervision by a LMSW was required for a LBSW to work as a Medical Social Worker. Further discussion with the Director of Clinical Services/Alternate Administrator revealed HR# 2 had graduated with a Master of Social Work approximately 70 days prior to the surveyor review of the record and was scheduled to take the licensure exam but had not done yet and did not have a temporary license.”
Jul 18, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission19 deficiencies
-
EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(3)(iii))
“Observed in Emergency Management Session. the organization failed to ensure review and evaluate all exercises and actual emergency or disaster incidents. On review of the Emergency Management Program it was noted there was documentation of an actual event in 2025 for inclement weather - icy conditions however there was no documentation of an after action report or analysis of the event to revise the hospice’s emergency plan as needed. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator and Executive Director.”
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment was documented no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. On review of RRNHV#6 there was no documentation that the comprehensive assessment was repeated within 5 days of the patient’s April 2025 payor change from Non-Medicare payor to Medicare. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator and Executive Director.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to conduct a patient specific comprehensive assessment that identified the patient’s need for hospice care and services. On review of RRHV#2 there was no documentation noted on the record of an initial bereavement risk assessment. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 158 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 9 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care reflect patient and family goals that were specific, measurable, and time-bound. On review of records there were examples of goals that were not specific, measurable and/or time-bound. For example: in RRHV#1 a non measurable goal was Prevent discomfort due to increasing edema. In RRHV#3 an example was Promote rest status for Pt/Family/PCG. In RRNHV#4 a non specific not measurable goal was Facilitate bowel elimination and comfort each visit within 4 weeks -Pt/Family/PCG will verbalize having elimination needs met at an acceptable level. In RRNHV#5 an example was Achieve and maintain peripheral circulation for Pt comfort. Another example in RRNHV#7 was Prevent discomfort due to increasing edema by elevating lower extremities when sitting and using compression stockings appropriately. Further examples could be seen in RRNHV#8, RRNHV#9, RRNHV#6, and RRNHV#10. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator and Executive Director.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 168 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of RRHV#3 there was documentation the patient was a high fall risk yet there was no care plan for fall safety. In RRNHV#4 there was documentation of increased weakness with staggered gait and walker use but no fall safety care plan. Also, there was documentation of dyspnea with ordering of oxygen but no respiratory care plan to guide the care. In RRNHV#5 the documentation noted the patient was using a Pure Wick device for urinary incontinence but the device use was not reflected in the orders of in the care plans. In RRNHV#7 the documentation noted nausea and vomiting with the ordering of Zofran and Cough and congestion with Mucinex ordered but no care plan to reflect the issues and guide the care. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 217 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care revisions are based on information from updates to the patient’s comprehensive assessment and address the patient’s progress toward goals and outcomes. On Review of RRHV#1 there were goals that were not addressed over time as they remained without progress to goals IDG to IDG. An example was Pt/pcg will verbalize/express understanding of treatment orders and side effects, of no cardiac medications. The goal was established on admit in February and remained unchanged to date of survey. In RRHV#2 an example was Pt/Family/Caregiver will verbalize understanding of expected symptoms associated with terminal disease process established in December and remained without progress to goal. In RRHV#3 an example was Pt will verbalize improvement of symptoms associated with GERD yet no progress to the goals was noted in the record. In RRNHV#7 a goal established in March read Pt/pcg will verbalize/express understanding of medication /treatment orders and side effects of Spirolactulone and Furosemide within 1 month but remained unchanged to date of survey. In RRNHV#7 an example was Pt/Family/PCG will verbalize having urinary elimination needs met at an acceptable level. within 6 weeks the goals was established in March without progress to survey. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the care and services were provided in accordance with the plan of care. On review of RRHV#2 the volunteer was ordered a 1 visit a week frequency per the plan of care yet the last visit documented was in June a month prior to survey. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 132 words
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, for the hospice aide, the organization failed to ensure a supervisor evaluate skill by observing the aide’s performance of required tasks with a patient or pseudo-patient as part of a simulation. On review of HR#2 for the Hospice Aide there was no documentation of an initial competency evaluation noted in the HR file. Observation was reviewed with the Executive Director. Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, for the hospice aide, there was no documentation of a competency evaluation that addressed each of the required subjects. On review of HR#2 for the Hospice Aide there was no documentation of an initial competency evaluation documented as part of orientation. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
In-service training (42 CFR 418.76(d))
The inspectors’ words, 116 words
“Observed in Tracer Activities. the organization failed to ensure the hospice aide receive ongoing education and training. On review of the hospice aide in-service training records it was noted that there was no documentation of 12 hours of in-service training during the last 12 months for the hospice aides currently employed. There was documentation of 6 hours of education in 2025. Prior to 2025, there were sign in sheets for 4 months (July 2024 - Oct 2024) yet the sheets did not contain content of what was taught or time elapsed during the training. There was no further documentation of aide in-servicing in November or December. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator and Executive Director.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 154 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 9 patient records reviewed, with aide services assigned, the organization failed to ensure the Registered Nurse provide written patient care instructions for the hospice aide. On review of RRNHV#4 the patient was on Eliquis yet the aide assignment for plan of care did not include bleeding precautions. Further the RN assigned the aide to take vital signs yet there were not parameters for when to report vital sign findings. In RRNHV#5 the patient was also on Eliquis but no bleeding precautions noted on the aide’s assigned plan of care. Further, there was documentation the patient was using a Pure Wick device but no specific instruction on how the Aide was to handle the device when providing care. In RRNHV#8 the patient had multiple wounds with dressing but no instruction for how the aide was to handle the dressings during care. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 9 patient records reviewed, with aide services assigned, the organization failed to ensure the hospice aide provide services that were ordered by the physician in the plan of care. On review of RRNHV#4 the aide plan of care specified for the aide to obtain and record vital signs each visit however the aide’s documentation for each visit did not include vital signs. This observation was review with the Administrator.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, the organization failed to ensure a registered nurse make an annual on-site visit to the location where a patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each aide while he or she is performing care. On review of HR#2 for the hospice aide there was no documentation of annual on-site aide evaluation from hire in 2023 to date of survey as required. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 8 HR files reviewed, the organization failed to ensure documentation of initial orientation for each employee that addressed the employee’s specific job duties including those related to infection prevention and control and assessment and managing pain. On review of HR#1 for the RN and HR#5 for the RN Administrator the orientation checklist was noted in the HR file but was blank without documentation that the orientation was completed. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 162 words
“Observed in HR File Review. In 3 of 8 HR files reviewed, the organization failed to ensure staff competence was initially assessed and documented as part of orientation. On review of HR#4 for the MSW, HR#6 for the Volunteer Coordinator, and HR#6 for the Spiritual Counselor there was no documentation of an initial competency noted in the employee HR file. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator. Observed in HR File Review. In 3 of 8 HR files reviewed, the organization ailed to ensure staff competence was assessed and documented annually as required by organization policy 1-008. On review of HR#3 for the MD, HR#5 for the Administrator, and HR#6 for the volunteer coordinator, there was no documentation on review of the file of annual competency evaluation as required. For HR#3 the last competency was 2023, for HR#5 the last documented was initial in 2022, and for HR#6 the last was the initial in 2021. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 98 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the Medical Director review the clinical information for each hospice patient and provide written certification that the patient’s life expectancy is six months or less if the illness runs it’s normal course to include all required elements. On review of RRNHV#6 the Certificate of Terminal Illness (CTI) documented at the time of the April 2025 patient payor change from a non-Medicare payor to Medicare did not include current subjective and objective findings. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator and Executive Director.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 99 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure hospice obtains the signature of the patient or representative to confirm that the patient or representative has received a copy of the notice of rights and responsibilities in accordance with 42 CFR 418.52 and obtains a signed election statement in accordance with 42 CFR 418.24. On review of RRNHV#6 there was no Election of Benefits signed at the time of a payor change from non-Medicare to a Medicare payor in April of 2025. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator and Executive Director.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization failed to ensure the patient record contains the information to reflect the patient’s care, treatment, services. On home observation for RRHV#2 during medication reconciliation there was discrepancy in the Morphine dosage as the bottle in the home was Morphine 100mg/5ml yet the medication profile per the plan of care stated Morphine 20mg/5ml. This observation was reviewed with the RN and the Administrator.”
-
Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))
The inspectors’ words, 128 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 6 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to maintain complete and accurate patient records. On review of RRNHV#6 the record was not maintained complete, readily available, or systematically organized to facilitate retrieval for a patient with a April, 2025 payor change from non-Medicare to Medicare. The organization maintained 2 separate records for the same period of time, a discharge record and an April admission record. Staff continued to document their hospice care in the discharged record after the change in payor source to Medicare. Therefore both the discharge record and the April 2025 admission record had to be reviewed by the surveyor in order to determine what care had been provided. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator and Executive Director.”
-
Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 177 words
“Observed in Competency Session. In 1 of 5 contracts reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the written agreement with and outside agency providing contracted services for the hospice include all the required elements. On review of the contract for pharmacy it was noted the contract did not include all required stipulations such as a stipulation that services may be provided only with the authorization of the hospice - A stipulation that services will be delivered in accordance with the patient’s plan of care - The manner in which contracted services will be coordinated, supervised, and evaluated by the hospice - The delineation of the role of the hospice and contractor in the admission process, patient/family assessment, and the interdisciplinary group conferences - Requirements for documenting that services are furnished in accordance with the agreement - The qualifications of the individuals providing the services - A stipulation that the outside agency will complete criminal background checks on contracted employees who provide direct patient care or have access to patient records. This observation was reviewed with the Executive Director.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2025 | Complaint inspection by The Joint Commission | 5 deficiencies cited |
| Jul 18, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 19 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 1, 2016.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 99% at home, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 10.7 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 8.1% |
| Visits near death | 95.0% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Upsa Aco LLC owns 10.57% directly since Apr 21, 2023.
- Companion Management Group LLC runs it.
- 12 owners or officers are people: Michael Adam Uranga (owns 5% or more directly, 72.46%); Shundra R Moss (owns 5% or more directly, 6.52%); Lloyd P Van Winkle (owns 5% or more directly, 5.02%); Charles Mccann (limited partner, 2.64%); Mary S Nguyen (limited partner, 1.32%); Carlos Porter (limited partner, 0.7%); Tamre Mcclelland (limited partner, 0.08%); Lloyd P Van Winkle (managing employee (under contract)); Charles Mccann (corporate officer); Michael Adam Uranga (corporate officer); Michael Adam Uranga (corporate director); Tabitha Flutur (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upsa Aco LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 10.57% | Apr 21, 2023 |
| Estate of Gordon Hill | Limited partner | 0.7% | Apr 21, 2023 |
| Companion Management Group LLC | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | May 1, 2015 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 87.41% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 82.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 100 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78230, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 24.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Alamo Hospice | 25 |
| Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of Texas -San Antonio | 6 |
| Superior Hospice LLC | 1 |
| Holy Savior Hospice | 5 |
| Opuscare of Texas | 4 |
| Companion Hospice and Palliative Care of South Texas LLC This hospice | 24 |
| Three Oaks Hospice | 1 |
| Anchorage Hospice, Inc. | 3 |
| Cardinal Hospice of South Texas | 12 |
| Advanced Hospice of Texas | 6 |
| Yellow Rose Hospice Care, Inc. | 13 |
| Advanced Hospice of Texas | 7 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.