Hearth Record

Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of Texas -San Antonio

A hospice in San Antonio, Texas 78230

9901 W Interstate 10 Ste 450, San Antonio, Texas 78230. (210) 471-2300.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 100 hospices serving ZIP code 78230 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 6, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 6, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission6 deficiencies
  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    “Observed in Record Review. On 1 of 10 active patient records reviewed, the organization did not provide education and training to the patient based off of services identified on the Plan of care. On RRHV #1, patient was started on amoxicillin therapy and there was no documentation in the record to reflect that patient or caregivers had been educated on the new medication therapy. This finding was reviewed with agency leadership.”

    Rule L0544. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 10 active patient records reviewed, the Hospice surveyor noted the goals in patient records were not measurable and specific to the care needs of the patient. On records reviewed goals were not measurable and specific to the patient with timeframes and measures. Examples include: nursing plan of care will be established that meets needs of patient, oxygen levels will be monitored as appropriate, spiritual support as appropriate, pain will be controlled”, caregiver will verbalize mouth care with no timeframe to achieve goal. This finding was reviewed with agency leaders.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 10 active patient records reviewed, the organization did not individualize the plan of care to reflect the goals and outcomes anticipated. On RRHV #1, patient had started an antibiotic, and the plan of care had not been updated with goals or outcomes for the change in the care plan. On RRHV #3, patient had lost Social Security coverage and the MSW was working with the patient to resolve the matter including helping arrange appointments and calls to social security, but these needs were not reflected on the plan of care. On RRNHV #5, teaching goals from start of care 6 months ago had not been updated to reflect the current needs of patient. This finding was reviewed with agency leadership.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 356 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 10 active patient records reviewed, the medication record was not accurate and reflect duplication of therapy. Agency Medication Profile Policy states the organization will address duplicate therapy. On RRHV #1 it was noted that patient had multiple duplicate PRN therapy for constipation and pain management with no clear indication of when to use each duplicate therapy. For example, PRN constipation orders for Polyethylene Glycol, Bisacodyl and Lactulose with indication of constipation and no indication how to handle the duplication. In addition, PRN pain orders of Hydrocodone/Tylenol, Tylenol supp, and Morphine with indication of pain and no clear instruction how to handle the duplication in therapy. On RRHV #2 it was noted that patient had duplicate PRN medication orders for Morphine and acetaminophen and no indication on how to handle the duplicate therapy. On RRHV # 3, it was noted that patient had duplicate therapy of Benadryl and hydroxyzine PRN for Itching and duplicate pain therapy of Tylenol and Morphine both with no indication how to handle the duplicate therapy. On RRNHV #1 it was note patient had duplicate therapy for cough/congestion of Guaifenesin and Ipratropium neb with no indication how to handle the duplicate therapy. On RRNHV #4 and RRNHV #6 it was noted patient had duplicate pain therapy of Tylenol and Morphine with no indication how to handle the duplicate therapy. This finding was reviewed with agency leaders. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 active patient records reviewed, the organization did not provide care, treatment or services according to the patient’s individual plan of care. In RRHV #1, the surveyor noted that during the home visit, the nurse told the caregiver and patient to administer Lactulose 3 times per day when the plan of care stated Lactulose 2 times per day PRN constipation. On discussion with the nurse after the visit, the nurse stated that she will call the md in the car and get an order for the medication change versus her normal process of doing it in the home. This was reviewed and confirmed with Quality Consultant who was present for the visit. 
”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During the review of the Volunteer Program, the Hospice nurse surveyor identified the that organization did not provide at least 5% of the total patient care hours for the last year. The agency lost all but one of their volunteers and their volunteer coordinator and a new coordinator was hired 6 months ago and working to recruit and train new volunteers. The organization has an active performance improvement plan and tracking the percent monthly and is currently at 2% of total hours. This was reviewed and validated with the agency leaders.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 active patient records reviewed, the medication profile was inaccurate. Agency Medication Profile policy states that the profile will be updated reflecting new changes, modifications and/or discontinued medications and this will be used to teach patient/caregivers during visits. During RRHV#1, it was noted the medication list in the facility was not accurate to reflect changes in medications. The list in the facility was updated 2 months ago and the patient has since had two medication changes (Amoxicillin and change in Lactulose dosing) that were not reflected in the medication list at the board and care facility. This was discussed with the agency leadership.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 6, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 16, 2012.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 57% at home, 28% in assisted living, 14% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.5%
Visits near death96.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Seasons Hospice & Palliative Care of Texas Holding Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 16, 2020.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: John Guess (corporate officer); Heather Siscel (corporate officer); Andrew Johnston (corporate officer); Steven Walker (managing employee (under contract)); Louise Reyes (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dena Schwartz-Doty (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Horizon Acquisition Co Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Horizon Group Holdings Intermediate 2, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Horizon Group Holdings Intermediate 1, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Seasons Hospice & Palliative Care of Texas Holding Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 16, 2020
Horizon Group Holdings, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Accentcare, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Pluto Acquisition I Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Seasons Rollover Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies15.4%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-B, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies15.1%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-A LPOwns 5% or more through other companies11.2%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe Viii-B-3, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies6.3%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-H, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.5%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe Viii-B-1, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.4%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-I, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.1%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-J LPOwns 5% or more through other companies5%Dec 21, 2020

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 71.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 100 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78230, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.