Hearth Record

St Gabriels Hospice and Palliative Care LLC

A hospice in Weatherford, Texas 76088

103 Cartwright Park Road, Weatherford, Texas 76088. (817) 458-6484.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 22 hospices serving ZIP code 76088 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 9, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 9, 2026: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,747 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the interdisciplinary group- (core group of a physician, registered nurse, chaplain, and social worker that provided/supervised all care and services, ensuring a holistic approach to terminal illness and bereavement), in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any, failed to review, revise, and document the patient’s individualized plan of care as frequently as the patient’s condition required but no less frequently than every 15 days, in that the interdisciplinary group failed to revise the plan of care regarding the frequency of staff visits for 3 (Patient #2, Patient #7, and Patient #8) of 10 active patient records reviewed. The failure placed the patients at risk of receiving care that was not appropriate to meet their specific needs. Patient #2: Record review of Patient #2’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 3/12/2026. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #2 started on the hospice’s services on 3/16/2026. The Plan of Care listed Alzheimer’s Disease (progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory, thinking skills, and the ability to carry out simple daily tasks) as the terminal diagnosis. The Plan of Care contained orders for the Hospice Aide to provide visits 3 times each week and the Social Worker to visit monthly. Review of the interdisciplinary group’s plan of care documentation, dated 7/9/2026, contained orders for Patient #2 to receive visits from the Social Worker once a month and the hospice aide three times each week. Review of the interdisciplinary group’s plan of care documentation, dated 7/23/2026, contained orders for Patient #2 to receive visits from the Social Worker once a month and visits from the Hospice Aide three times each week. Review of the interdisciplinary group’s plan of care documentation, dated 8/6/2026, contained orders for Patient #2 to receive visits from the Social Worker once a month and visits from the hospice aide three times each week. Review of the interdisciplinary group’s plan of care documentation, dated 8/20/2026, contained orders for Patient #2 to receive visits from the Social Worker once a month and visits from the hospice aide three times each week. Review of the clinical notes for Patient #2, between 7/1/2026 to 8/31/2026, indicated that the Social Worker did not make a monthly visit and the Hospice Aide did not conduct visits three times each week. The interdisciplinary team met on 7/9/2026, 7/23/2026, 8/6/2026, and 8/20/2026. The Interdisciplinary team failed to revise the Plan of Care for the Social Worker frequency and the Hospice Aide frequency. Patient #7:Review of Patient #7’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 5/31/2026. The Plan of Care indicated Patient #7 started on the hospice’s services on 5/31/2026. The Plan of Care listed Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure (long-term, unmanaged high blood pressure damages the heart and the kidneys, causing the heart to weaken and fail to pump blood effectively) as the terminal diagnosis. The Plan of Care contained orders for the Social Worker to visit once a month. Review of the interdisciplinary group’s plan of care documentation, dated 6/2/2026, contained an order for Patient #7 to receive a visit from the Social Worker once a month. Review of the interdisciplinary group’s plan of care documentation, dated 6/16/2026, contained an order for Patient #7 to receive a visit from the Social Worker once a month. Review of the interdisciplinary group’s plan of care documentation, dated 6/25/2026, contained an order for Patient #7 to receive a visit from the Social Worker once a month. Review of the interdisciplinary group’s plan of care documentation, dated 7/9/2026, contained orders for Patient #7 to receive visits from the Social Worker once a month. Review of the interdisciplinary group’s plan of care documentation, dated 7/23/2026, contained orders for Patient #7 to receive visits from the Social Worker once a month. Review of the clinical notes between 5/31/2026 and 8/1/2026 indicated the Social Worker C conducted a social work visit on 6/9/2026. A Social Worker did not provide a visit to Patient #7 in July 2026. The interdisciplinary group met on 6/16/2026, 6/25/2026, 7/9/2026, and 7/23/2026. The Interdisciplinary group failed to revise the Plan of Care for the Social Work frequency. Patient #8: Record review of Patient #8’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 9/5/2025. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #8 started on the hospice’s services on 9/5/2026. The Plan of Care listed Alzheimer’s Disease with Late Onset (progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory, thinking skills, and the ability to carry out simple daily tasks) as the terminal diagnosis. The Plan of Care contained orders for no visits from the Chaplain or Social worker. Review of the Interdisciplinary group’s plan of care documentation for 7/9/2026 contained an order for the social worker to visit once a month. Review of the Interdisciplinary group’s plan of care documentation for 7/23/2026 contained an order for the social worker to visit once a month. Review of the Interdisciplinary group’s plan of care documentation for 8/6/2026 contained an order for the social worker to visit once a month. Review of the Interdisciplinary group’s plan of care documentation for 8/20/2026 contained an order for the social worker to visit once a month. Review of the clinical notes for Patient #8 between 7/31/2026 and 8/31/2026 indicated that the social worker did not make a monthly visit in July 2026 or August 2026. The interdisciplinary team met on 7/9/2026, 7/23/2026, 8/6/2026, and 8/20/2026. The Interdisciplinary team failed to revise the Plan of Care for the Social Worker frequency. During an interview on 9/2/2026 at 11:17 AM with the Director of Nursing and Alternate Administrator, the Surveyor asked what constituted the hospice patient’s plan of care. The Surveyor asked if the Initial Plan of Care, interim orders, and the interdisciplinary group’s documentation would be the Plan of Care. The Director of Nursing stated, “Yes.” During an interview on 9/2/2026 at 3:10 PM with the Director of Nursing, the Surveyor discussed the interdisciplinary group plan of care documentation contained orders for a Social Worker to visit Patient #2 once a month and the hospice aide to visit 3 times each week; review of the clinical documentation indicated that the Social Worker did not provide visits once a month and the Hospice Aide did not provide visits 3 times each week. The Surveyor asked why the visits had not been made. The Director of Nursing stated, “The Aide was discontinued. The order to discontinue that Aide was not put in the record. Social Worker frequency looked like it was added to the assignments without an order on 4/20/2026 on accident. It was added by mistake.” The Surveyor asked who would be responsible for documenting the revision of the Plan of Care. The Director of Nursing informed the Surveyor that the Case Manager would be responsible to do so. The Surveyor asked if the Case Manager’s knew they were responsible to revise and document the Plan of Care. The Director of Nursing stated, “They know.” During an interview on 9/4/2026 at 1:40 PM with the Administrator, Alternate Administrator, and the Director of Nursing, the Surveyor discussed the Plans of Careand interdisciplinary group plan of care documentation for Patient #2, Patient #7, and Patient #8, contained orders for Social Work visits but the Social Worker was not providing visits, and the Aide for Patient #2 was not providing visits. The Director of Nursing informed the Surveyor that the Social Work visits were accidentally added to the Plans of Care. The Hospice Aide was discontinued for Patient #2. During an interview on 9/9/2026 with Registered Nurse E (Registered Nurse Case Manger that went as needed employee status), the Surveyor asked what Registered Nurse E’s responsibility for the interdisciplinary group was. Registered Nurse E informed the Surveyor that Registered Nurse E would do the assessment. The Surveyor asked what Registered Nurse E would be responsible regarding documentation for the interdisciplinary group. Registered Nurse E informed the Surveyor that Registered Nurse E was responsible for putting in registered nurse clinical notes. The Surveyor asked who was responsible for revising changes in the interdisciplinary group plan of care. Registered Nurse E stated, “If it was medication changes, that would be done in the same visit, changes to the plan of care was not my responsibility. “The Surveyor asked who would be responsible if changes were made in frequencies for the Chaplain or Social Worker. Registered Nurse E informed the Surveyor that anyone can do it; Registered Nurse, the Director of Nursing, or they can do their own. Registered Nurse E stated, “Everyone was responsible for the interdisciplinary group documentation, not just the registered nurse case manager. During an interview of 9/9/2026 with Registered Nurse D, (case manager), the Surveyor asked what Registered Nurse D’s responsibilities for the interdisciplinary group were. Registered Nurse D stated, “We do our own notes. We sit in on interdisciplinary group meetings. The Surveyor asked who would be responsible for changes in the plan of care, changes in frequency. Registered Nurse D state, “That would be the case manager.” Registered Nurse D informed the Surveyor that Registered Nurse D had struggled with that; writing an order was not a one stop, had to go to multiple places to get it done, write an order, go to the scheduler (electronic medical record schedule); the agency’s electronic medical record system was new for Registered Nurse D. The Surveyor asked who would be responsible to revise for changes in Chaplain or Social Worker frequencies. Registered Nurse D stated, “It would be the case manager, then go into the scheduler. The scheduler (electronic medical record software scheduler) was not user friendly; would have to go in and make sure the scheduler does not reflect its weekly visits.” Review of the agency’s policy titled “Plan of Care Process PC.30,” last reviewed on 3/16/2026 read in part; “Purpose To ensure that the care provided is in accordance with the written Plan of Care (POC), appropriately planned, and delivered in a timely manner to meet the patient’s and family’s specific needs. Policy...III. The Hospice will review and revise patient care in accordance with changes in the patient’s condition; spiritual status; psychosocial status, residential environment; patient’s response to care; and changes that have occurred regarding diagnosis, treatment, medications, precautions, and limitations. Procedure...The Hospice IDG/IDT, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any, will review, revise, and document the individualized plan of as frequently as the patient’s conditions requires, but no less frequently than every 15 calendar days...””

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 901 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to have individuals that provided hospice aide services, complete a competency evaluation where tasks listed at 42 Code of Federal Regulations Chapter 418, at 418.76(b)(3), (iii), (ix), (x), and (xi) were evaluated by observation of the aide’s performance of the tasks with a patient or pseudo-patient for 3 (Hospice Aide F, Hospice Aide G, and Hospice Aide H) of 3 hospice aides where their personnel records were reviewed. The failure placed patients at risk of receiving inadequate or unsafe care from the hospice aides. The 42 Code of Federal Regulations, dated 6/7/2024, Chapter 418 at 418.76 (b)(3), (i), (iii), (ix), (x) and (xi) listed the following tasks that a registered nurse must observe an aide perform were: (i) Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, representatives, and caregivers, as well as to other hospice staff; . . . (iii) Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration; . . . (ix) Appropriate and safe techniques in performing personal hygiene and grooming tasks that include— (A) Bed bath; (B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath; (C) Hair shampooing in sink, tub, and bed; (D) Nail and skin care; (E) Oral hygiene; (F) Toileting and elimination; (x) Safe transfer techniques and ambulation; (xi) Normal range of motion and positioning...” Hospice Aide F:Record review of Hospice Aide F’s personnel record revealed an application for employment that was dated 3/6/2026; a signed job description for Hospice Aide dated 3/6/2026; and Orientation dated 3/7/2026. Hospice Aide F’s personnel record did not contain an evaluation by observation of Hospice Aide F performing the tasks for reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration; appropriate and safe techniques in performing personal hygiene and grooming tasks that included a bed bath; sponge, tub, and shower bath; Hair shampooing in sink, tub, and bed; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination; safe transfer techniques and ambulation; and normal range of motion and positioning. Hospice Aide G:Record review of Hospice Aide G’s personnel record revealed an application for employment that was not dated; a job description for Hospice Aide signed by the Alternate Administrator dated 4/27/2026; and Orientation, undated. Hospice Aide G’s personnel record did not contain an evaluation by observation of Hospice Aide G performing the tasks for reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration; appropriate and safe techniques in performing personal hygiene and grooming tasks that included a bed bath; sponge, tub, and shower bath; Hair shampooing in sink, tub, and bed; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination; safe transfer techniques and ambulation; and normal range of motion and positioning. Hospice Aide H:Record review of Hospice Aide H’s personnel record revealed an application for employment dated 8/18/2026; a signed job description for Hospice Aide dated 8/19/2026; and Orientation dated 8/19/2026. Hospice Aide H’s personnel record did not contain an evaluation by observation of Hospice Aide H performing the tasks for reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration; appropriate and safe techniques in performing personal hygiene and grooming tasks that included a bed bath; sponge, tub, and shower bath; Hair shampooing in sink, tub, and bed; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination; safe transfer techniques and ambulation; and normal range of motion and positioning. The Hospice Aide Job Description listed under Job Qualifications read in part; “Skills...Successful completion of the Aide Competency Evaluation Skills Checklist that meets 418.76 and written Skills Test.” Hospice Aide F, Hospice Aide G, and Hospice Aide H’s personnel records contained documents titled “Hospice Aide- Skill Competency Checklist Determined by Direct Observation of the Aide.” The documents were blank. During an interview with the Administrator, Alternate Administrator, and the Director of Nursing, the Surveyor discussed that the Hospice Aide F, Hospice Aide G, and Hospice Aide F that the hospice aides had blank Competency Checklists documents. The Surveyor asked why the Competency had not been done and who would be responsible for them being done. The Director of Nursing stated, “I didn’t know they had to be done.” Record review of the agency’s policy titled “Hospice Aide/Homemaker Competency Evaluation HR (Human Resources).45,” last reviewed on 9/1/2024, read in part; “Purpose To establish the competency evaluation for both written and skills demonstration for hospice aides...Policy I. The Hospice will ensure that each hospice aide successfully completes a hospice aide skills and competency evaluation in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations prior to the aide performing care independently...Procedure I. Hospice Aides...B. The competency evaluation and skills checklist will be administered by a Registered Nurse in consultation with other skilled professionals as appropriate and will be scheduled during the orientation period. The Registered Nurse will document observation of skills as required and will sign and date the completed checklist; 1. The following subject areas must be evaluated by observing an aide’s performance of the task with a patient or pseudo-patient: a. Communication, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, representatives and caregivers, and other Hospice staff; b. Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration;c. Appropriate and safe techniques in performing personal hygiene and grooming tasks, including: (1) Bed bath, (2) Sponge, tube and shower bath, (3) Hair shampooing in sink, tub, and bed, (4) Nail and Skin care, (5) oral hygiene, (6) Toileting and elimination, (7) Normal range of motion and positioning, and (8) Safe transfer techniques and ambulation...””

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 9, 2026Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 8, 2013.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 56% at home, 44% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Christopher Cain (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Christopher Cain (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Jeffrey Santos (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Elizabeth J Wanner (managing employee (under contract)); Christopher Cain (corporate officer); Christopher Cain (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 76088, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 2.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 22 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 76088
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
St Gabriels Hospice and Palliative Care LLC This hospice2
Alpha Omega Hospice10
Beyondfaith Hospice, LLCNot given
Community Healthcare of Texas2
Vitas Healthcare of Texas, L.P.3
Solaris Hospice Inc.5
Gentiva9
Hospice Plus18
Heart to Heart Hospice of Fort Worth, LLC6
Reliant at Home8
Elara Caring0
Enhabit Hospice1

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.