Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Mineral Wells, Texas 76067

100 E. Hubbard St Ste 101, Mineral Wells, Texas 76067. (940) 468-4194.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 22 hospices serving ZIP code 76067 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 11, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 11, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #2,#3) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient#2:Upon home visit observation, it was identified that lorazepam 0.5mg was listed as active medications on the agency medication profile. There was no evidence of this medication on the facility profile. Patient#3: Upon home visit observation, it was identified that the medication atropine 0.75 place 2 drops under tongue every 2 hours PRN for secretions was present in the home. There is no evidence of this medication on the agency medication profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient#8: Upon review of record, there was documentation indicating the person to be a moderate risk on 10/21/25. No evidence that a follow-up was completed or that anything was done to start supporting the person at the time that the need was identified. No evidence that the bereavement care plan was updated to reflect the persons needs. There is documentation that prior to 10/21 a mock survey was completed on 10/02/25 and a plan of correction was put in place on 10/02.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient#2: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient required daily use of c-collar. There is no evidence of orders for DME/Supplies that included this item in plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #3,#11,#13) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient#3: The skilled nurse frequency is ordered at 2 times per week. On the week of 1/7/26 there is only evidence of 1 visit completed. There was no evidence of missed visits. Patient#11: The skilled nurse frequency is ordered at 2 times per week. On the week of 01/01/26 there is only evidence of 1 visit being completed. There was no evidence of missed visits. Patient#13: The skilled nurse frequency is ordered at 2 times per week. On the week of 12/04/25 there is only evidence of 1 visit being completed. There was no evidence of missed visits.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient#8: There was documentation indicating the person to be a moderate risk on 10/21/25. No evidence that a follow-up was completed or that anything was done to start supporting the person at the time that the need was identified. No evidence that the bereavement care plan was updated to reflect the persons needs. There is documentation that prior to 10/21 a mock survey was completed on 10/02/25 and a plan of correction was put in place on 10/02.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 107 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #14) did not have evidence that the IDG shares information on a on-going basis with non-hospice healthcare providers furnishing services unrelated to the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient#14:There was documentation in the chaplain visit on 12/15/25 stating that a non-facility vascular nurse was giving the patient an IV infusion. There is no evidence in the record that this was coordinated between the facility and the hospice agency. Upon the administrator inquiring about this occurrence, the facility indicated that this infusion was scheduled prior to the hospice admit and they did not cancel nor communicate it with the hospice.”

    Rule L0558. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 228 words

    “Upon patient record review 5 of 19 (Patient #1,#2,#5,#6,#14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient#1: The Plan of Care indicates aide frequency is ordered at 3 times per week. On the week of 1/27/26 only 1 in person visit is documented. There was no evidence of missed visits. Patient#2: The Plan of Care indicates aide frequency is ordered at 3 times per week. On the week of 11/23/25 only 1 in person visit is documented. There was no evidence of missed visits. Patient#5: The Plan of Care indicates aide frequency is ordered at 5 times per week. On the week of 01/19/26 only 2 in person visits are documented. There was no evidence of missed visits. Patient#6: The Plan of Care indicates aide frequency is ordered at 5 times per week. On the week of 11/25/25 only 2 in person visits are documented. There was no evidence of missed visits. Patient#14: The Plan of Care indicates aide frequency is ordered at 5 times per week. On the week of 12/01/25 only 1 in person visit is documented. There was no evidence of missed visits.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The 2024 volunteer utilization was 4.63%. The 2025 volunteer utilization was 4.84%. The agency has a PIP in place which started on 9/15/25.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #14) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient#14: The skilled nurse frequency is ordered at 2 times per week. On the week of 12/11/25 there is only evidence of 1 visit being completed. There was no evidence of missed visits.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 11, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 7, 2001.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 60% at home, 14% in assisted living, 26% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.3%
Visits near death98.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Curo Health Services LLC owns 100% directly since Mar 1, 2022.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Latasha Gray (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); Ronald C Lazas (corporate director); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); Marshall Morrison (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Mar 1, 2022
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 87.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 76067, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.