Riceland Hospice LP
A hospice in Beaumont, Texas 77707
85 Interstate 10 N, Ste 208a, Beaumont, Texas 77707. (409) 842-1112.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 7of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 23 hospices serving ZIP code 77707 had 4.
The last inspection on record was on Mar 7, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Mar 7, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies
-
Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))
The inspectors’ words, 137 words
“It is required that the hospice designate a registered nurse member of the Interdisciplinary group (IDG) to: Provide coordination of care; Ensure continuous assessment of each patient’s and family’s needs; Ensure the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. This standard was not met as evidence by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical record review with hospice aide services revealed the agency did not ensure the implementation of the IDG plan of care by the registered nurse (RN). CLINICAL RECORD 11: The Plan of Care (POC)Order dated 03/15/2024 identified that the clinical record did not include an order for hospice aide services that included a frequency. During a joint record review and interview on 03/07/2025, the Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse confirmed no documented evidence of physician order that included the aide frequency.”
-
Medical social services (42 CFR 418.64(c))
The inspectors’ words, 614 words
“It is required that medical social services are provided based on a psychosocial assessment, according to the patient’s and family’s needs and acceptance of these services, per the plan of care, under the direction of a physician. The psychosocial assessment addresses the patient’s and the family’s adjustment to the terminal illness, the social and emotional factors related to the terminal illness, the presence or absence of adequate coping mechanisms, family dynamics and communication patterns, financial resources and any constraints, the caregiver’s ability to function effectively, obstacles and risk factors that may affect compliance with the plan of care, family support systems to facilitate coping with end-of-life issues. The psychosocial assessment is revised as new information is acquired and as progress toward goals is made. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 5 of 14 (36%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that medical social services were provided based on a psychosocial assessment, according to the patient’s and family’s needs and acceptance of these services. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient’s date of election was 10/13/2023. The Plan of Care Order dated 10/13/2023 documented medical social worker (MSW) frequency 1/mo. (once a month) and prn. The MSW missed visit form dated 02/02/2024 stated, “SW (social worker) attempted to complete routine visit via telephone. Pt did not respond or call back. SW will follow up next month.” There was no further attempt for February 2024. CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient’s date of election was 12/20/2023. The IDT Meeting note dated 03/01/2024 documented “MSW frequency 1/mo. and prn.” The MSW visit dated 03/01/2024 had a status of “not started,” and there was no other documented evidence for the March 2024 visit. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient’s date of elections was 01/31/2024. The IDT Meeting note dated 07/05/2024 documented “MSW frequency 1/mo. and prn.” The MSW missed visit form dated 07/31/2024 stated, “Attempt to reach to schedule visit, no answer to phone or return call from patient’s family.” There was no documented evidence of an attempt for July 2024. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient’s date of election was 07/04/2023. The IDG Meeting note dated 10/27/2023 documented Medical Social Worker frequency 1/mo. (once a month) and prn. There was no documented evidence for a MSW visit for November 2023. The IDT Meeting notes dated 03/01/2024, 07/05/2024, 08/02/2024, 09/27/2024, and 11/08/2024 documented “MSW frequency 1/mo. and prn.” The MSW Visit dated 03/01/2024 had a status of “not started,” and there was no other documented evidence for the March 2024 visit. The MSW missed visit form dated 07/31/2024 stated, “Attempt to make monthly visit. No answer to phone to schedule visit. No MSW visit this month. Will attempt visit again next month and PRN (as needed).” The MSW missed visit form dated 08/30/2024 stated, “Attempt to make monthly visit. No answer to phone to schedule visit. No MSW visit this month. Will attempt visit again next month and PRN (as needed).” The MSW missed visit form dated 10/25/2024 stated, “No answer to phone calls to patient to schedule visit. Will attempt visit again next month and PRN patient request.” There was documented evidence of further attempts for July, August, and October 2024 MSW visits. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient’s date of election was 08/15/2022. The IDT Meeting note dated 07/05/2024 documented “MSW frequency 1/mo. and prn.” The MSW visit dated 03/01/2024 had a status of “not started,” and there was no other documented evidence for the March 2024 visit. During a joint record review and interview on 03/07/2025, the Administrator/Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse/Chaplain/Bereavement Coordinator/Volunteer Coordinator confirmed that there was no documented evidence that social work services were provided during the times identified”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 174 words
“It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. The record contains correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. The record may be maintained electronically or on paper. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum Physician order. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure physician orders were included in the clinical record. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient’s date of discharge was 08/07/2024. There was no documented evidence of a physician’s order to discharge the patient due to no longer being terminally ill. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The Plan of Care (POC)Order dated 03/15/2024 identified that the clinical record did not include an order to establish the hospice aide services. During a joint record review and interview on 03/07/2025, the Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse confirmed no documented evidence of physician orders for the discharge and for the aide services.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 186 words
“It is required that all entries must be legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with hospice policy and currently accepted standards of practice This standard was not met as evidence by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that all physician orders were complete. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient’s date of election was 12/12/2024. The Plan of Care dated 12/12/2024 stated in part, “Patient with unstageable pressure areas to bilateral hips, left shoulder blade and mid back on her spine. All areas cleansed with wound cleanser, pat dry, Dakin’s wet to dry dressings applied and covered with dry dressing.” The Physician Order dated 12/12/2024 documented “Dakins (1/4 strength) External Solution 0.125%... apply to necrotic wound bed with scheduled wound care and prn dressing change - do not apply to healthy skin.” There was no documented evidence in the clinical record for the frequency for the wound care. During a joint record review and interview on 03/07/2025, the Director of Nursing confirmed the physician’s orders for the above wound care was incomplete.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 226 words
“It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician a copy of the hospice discharge summary and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 5 (80%) clinical records for discharged patients reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure the discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient’s date of discharge was 08/07/02024. There was no documented evidence that a discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient’s date of discharge was 07/12/2024. There was no documented evidence that a discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient’s date of discharge was 11/02/2024. There was no documented evidence that a discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient’s date of discharge was 12/05/02024. There was no documented evidence that a discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. During a joint record review and interview on 03/07/2025, the Administrator/Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse/Chaplain/Bereavement Coordinator/Volunteer Coordinator confirmed that the records lacked evidence that the discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 460 words
“It is required that the hospice discharge summary provided to a facility receiving a hospice patient for care—or to the patient’s community attending physician upon hospice discharge—includes at least the following a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management; the patient’s current plan of care; the patient’s latest physician orders; and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the receiving facility or the attending physician. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 5 (80%) clinical records for discharged patients reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure the discharge summary was forwarded to the hospice discharge summary provided to a facility receiving a hospice patient for care—or to the patient’s community attending physician upon hospice discharge—includes at least the following: a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management; the patient’s current plan of care; the patient’s latest physician orders; and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the receiving facility or the attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient’s date of discharge was 08/07/2024. There was no documented evidence that the discharge summary included the patient’s current plan of care; the patient’s latest physician orders; and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient’s date of discharge was 07/12/2024. There was no documented evidence that the discharge summary included the patient’s current plan of care; the patient’s latest physician orders; and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient’s date of discharge was 11/02/2024. There was no documented evidence that the discharge summary included the patient’s current plan of care; the patient’s latest physician orders; and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient’s date of discharge was 12/05/2024. There was no documented evidence that the discharge summary included the patient’s current plan of care; the patient’s latest physician orders; and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care to the patient’s attending physician. During a joint record review and interview on 03/07/2025, the Administrator/Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse/Chaplain/Bereavement Coordinator/Volunteer Coordinator confirmed that the record lacked evidence of a completed discharge summary that included a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management; the patient’s current plan of care; the patient’s latest physician orders; and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care to the patient’s attending physician.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner | 6 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 11, 2012.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 6.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 83.9% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 97% at home, 1% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 6.7 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 4.1% |
| Visits near death | 83.9% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Kindhearted Gp LLC Partner owns an unstated share directly since Sep 24, 2010.
- 4 owners or officers are people: Saad T Javed (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Martha Licatino (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Muhammad Javed (owns 5% or more directly); Mohammed Danishmund (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindhearted Gp LLC Partner | Owns 5% or more directly | Sep 24, 2010 | |
| Kindhearted Gp LLC Partner | General partner | Sep 24, 2010 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 95.65% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 34.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 7 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 23 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77707, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 6.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Riceland Hospice LP This hospice | 6 |
| Altus Hospice | 5 |
| Gentiva | 27 |
| Harbor Hospice House | 1 |
| Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of Texas | 2 |
| Heart to Heart Hospice of the Gulf Coast | 4 |
| Compassion Hospice | 0 |
| Hospice Care Team | 2 |
| Best Hospice Care of Texas | 8 |
| Three Oaks Hospice | Not given |
| Trinity Hospice | 9 |
| Hospice Care Team Inc. | 0 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.