Hearth Record

Hospice Care Team

A hospice in Beaumont, Texas 77702

2688 Calder Street, Beaumont, Texas 77702. (409) 832-3311.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 11 hospices serving ZIP code 77702 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 16, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 16, 2025: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 803 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed ensure the plan of care included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions including a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs for 1 of 14 patients whose records were reviewed. (Patient #1) This failure has the potential of placing patients at risk of receiving ineffective and inappropriate hospice care and services. Findings include: Record review of the hospice plan of care for Patient #1 dated 03/20/25 to 06/17/25 included a physician’s order for skilled nursing services twice a month. Record review of the agency’s active patient roster indicated Patient #1 had a start of care date of 12/20/24. Record review of the nursing tab visit management calendar for Patient #1 dated 03/20/25 to 06/17/25 indicated SN visits were completed on Thursday 03/20/25, Tuesday 03/25/25, Thursday 03/27/25, Tuesday 04/01/25, Thursday 04/03/25, Monday 04/07/25, Thursday 04/10/25, and Tuesday 04/15/25. The nursing tab visit management calendar for Patient #1 dated 03/20/25 to 06/17/25 indicated SN visits were scheduled for Thursday 04/17/25, Monday 04/21/25, Thursday 04/24/25, Monday 04/28/25, Thursday 05/01/25, Monday 05/05/25, Thursday 05/08/25, Monday 05/12/25, Thursday 05/15/25, Monday 05/19/25, Thursday 05/22/25, Monday 05/26/25, Thursday 05/29/25, Monday 06/02/25, Thursday 06/05/25, Monday 06/09/25, Thursday 06/12/25, and Monday 06/16/25. SN visits were scheduled to be completed twice a week rather than twice a month. Record review of the IDG Meeting for Patient #1 dated 04/04/25 skilled nursing services frequency was twice a month. The summary/ comments indicated IDT/IDG met today discussion of patient’s occurred and we reviewed patient issues and concerns. Plan Of Care for each patient reviewed and addressed/updated as needed. No indication skilled nursing services had been updated to twice a week. During an interview and record review on 04/15/25 at 9:20 a.m., RN Case Manager I said Patient #1’s SN visit frequency was twice a week. RN Case Manager I said Patient #1’s visit frequency had been twice a week since early on when she went on services with the agency. RN Case Manager I said she increased Patient #1’s SN visits to twice a week after a couple of weeks of her being on service. RN Case Manager I reviewed Patient #1’s current POC visit frequency and acknowledged the POC reflected Patient #1’s SN visit frequency was twice a month. RN Case Manager I said Patient #1’s SN visit frequency on the POC was wrong. RN Case Manager I said the POC should accurately reflect the visit frequency for each discipline. RN Case Manager I said she did not know why Patient #1’s SN visit frequency was incorrect on the POC. RN Case Manager I said when orders such as visit frequency are entered, they become effective immediately. Attempted a telephone interview on 04/15/25 at 4:54 p.m., with Family Member Y no answer voicemail left identifying surveyor and requested a call back. During an interview on 04/16/25 at 12:45 p.m., the Alternate Supervising Nurse said the RN Case Manager was responsible for completing the plan of care. The Alternate Supervising Nurse said the patient’s plan of care should accurately reflect the patients care needs. The Alternate Supervising Nurse said the plan of care should be reviewed typically at least every 2 weeks. The Alternate Supervising Nurse said the plan of care should be reviewed and updated during IDG every two weeks as long as the change was not urgent. The Alternate Supervising Nurse said if the change was urgent the plan of care would be revised immediately. The Alternate Supervising Nurse said she thought when RN I entered Patient #1’s plan of care she miss-clicked the frequency drop down box to month rather than week. The Alternate Supervising Nurse said Patient #1’s plan of care should have been updated and reviewed. During an interview on 04/16/25 at 1:00 p.m., the Alternate Administrator/Supervising Nurse said the Case Manager was responsible for completing the plan of care. The Alternate Administrator/Supervising Nurse said the patient’s plan of care should accurately reflect the patient’s needs and care delivered. The Alternate Administrator/Supervising Nurse said the patient’s plan of care should be reviewed at every visit. The Alternate Administrator/Supervising Nurse said Patient #1’s plan of care should have been updated to reflect the SN visit frequency of twice a week. During an interview on 04/16/25 at 1:14 p.m., the Administrator said the RN Case Manager was responsible for completing the plan of care. The Administrator said the patient’s plan of care should accurately reflect the patient’s care. The Administrator said the plan of care should be reviewed every 14 days during IDG. The Administrator said Patient #1’s SN visit frequency should have been updated to twice a week. The Administrator said the RN Case Manager made a mistake when selecting the frequency.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 696 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the registered nurse conducted an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide for 1 of 14 patients whose records were reviewed. (Patient #3) There were no hospice aide supervisory visit from 01/03/25 to 04/02/25 (90 days) for Patient #3. This failure has the potential of placing patients at risk of receiving ineffective and inappropriate hospice care and services. Findings include: Record review of the hospice plan of care for Patient #3 dated 01/03/25 to 04/02/25 included a physician’s order for skilled nursing services twice a week and hospice aide services twice a week. Record review of the aide tab visit management calendar for Patient #3 dated 01/03/25 to 04/02/25 gave no indication any RN visits for supervision of the hospice aide were conducted. Record review of the clinical record for Patient #3 did not include a hospice aide supervisory visit from 01/03/25 to 04/02/25 (90 days). During an interview and record review on 04/15/25 at 10:49 am RN Case Manager J said hospice aide supervisory visits should be conducted every 14 days. RN Case Manager J said aide supervisory visits were documented under the aide tab in the EHR system. RN Case Manager J reviewed the aide tab for Patient #3 for supervisory visits from 01/03/25 to 04/02/25 and said she did not see any aide supervisory visits. RN Case Manager J said the aide supervisory visits for Patient #3 were not put in from 01/03/25 to 04/02/25. RN Case Manager J said there should have been aide supervisory visits put in from 01/03/25 to 04/02/25. RN Case Manager J said she had no idea why the aide supervisory visits were not put in. RN Case Manager J said she was responsible for ensuring the aide supervisory visits were completed. RN Case Manager J said she should have checked the aide supervisory visits. During a telephone interview on 04/15/25 at 4:58 p.m., Patient #3 said the nurse ask her often if she is satisfied with the hospice aide’s care. Patient #3 said she could not remember exactly when the nurses had asked her about the hospice aide’s care. Patient #3 said she had been very satisfied with her hospice aide. During an interview on 04/16/25 at 12:45 p.m., the Alternate Supervising Nurse said the RN Case Manager was responsible for completing aide supervisory visits. The Alternate Supervising Nurse said the aide supervisory visit should be completed every 14 days. The Alternate Supervising Nurse said the agency typically conducts aide supervisory visits weekly to prevent an overage if there is a missed visit. The Alternate Supervising Nurse said Patient #3 should have had aide supervisory visits from 01/03/25 to 04/02/25. The Alternate Supervising Nurse said Patient #3 had just had aide services started and it was somehow missed in the EHR system. During an interview on 04/16/25 at 1:00 p.m., the Alternate Administrator/Supervising Nurse said the Case Manager was responsible for completing aide supervisory visits. The Alternate Administrator/Supervising Nurse said the aide supervisory visits should have been completed every 14 days. The Alternate Administrator/Supervising Nurse said the agency usually completes the aide supervisory visit every week to try to avoid missing one. The Alternate Administrator/Supervising Nurse said Patient #3 should have had aide supervisory visits from 01/03/25 to 04/02/25. During an interview on 04/16/25 at 1:14 p.m., the Administrator said the RN Case Manager was responsible for completing aide supervisory visits. The Administrator said Patient #3 should have had supervisory visits from 01/03/25 to 04/02/25. The Administrator said there should not have been stretch of time like that, that a patient did not receive an aide supervisory visit. The Administrator said it should not have happened. Record review of an Employee Supervision policy dated 09/01/24 revealed, “… A registered nurse (RN) must make an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the Hospice Interdisciplinary Group/Team (IDG/IDT) meet the patient’s needs. …””

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 16, 2025Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 19, 2010.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 6.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 65% at home, 10% in assisted living, 22% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day6.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.3%
Visits near death97.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Hospice Care Team, Inc. runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Gregory Hamilton Taylor (corporate director, 25%); Darran Dollarhide (corporate officer, 25%); Jason Bootz (corporate officer, 25%); Joe Chapman (managing employee (under contract), 25%); Darran Dollarhide (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jason Bootz (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Chad W Hammett (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Hospice Care Team, Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)100%Mar 31, 2018

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.78% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 69.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 11 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77702, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 2.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 11 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 77702
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Altus Hospice5
Hospice Care Team This hospice2
Best Hospice Care of Texas8
Gentiva27
Harbor Hospice House1
Heart to Heart Hospice of the Gulf Coast4
Compassion Hospice0
Three Oaks HospiceNot given
Gentiva15
At Home Hospice1
Doctor’s Choice Hospice28

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.