Hearth Record

At Home With Blue Bonnet Hospice

A hospice in Wimberley, Texas 78676

12111 Ranch Rd 12 Ste 114, Wimberley, Texas 78676. (512) 537-8950.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 38 hospices serving ZIP code 78676 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 27, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 27, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission7 deficiencies
  • EP Program Patient Population (42 CFR 418.113(a)(3))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During the Emergency Management session, it was noted that the organizations Emergency Operations Plan did not identify the patient population(s) that it served and the types of services it would have the ability to provide in an emergency. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator / Director of Nursing.”

    Rule E0007. Standard-level.

  • Policies/Procedures-Volunteers and Staffing (42 CFR 418.113(b)(4))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During the Emergency Management session it was noted that the organizations Emergency Operations Plan did not include methods for contacting off-duty staff. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator / Director of Nursing.”

    Rule E0024. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure that the plan of care goals included outcome measures for specific care activities. For example, during a review of the medical record for RRNHV#4, the following goal statement(s) were noted, “Instructed caregiver to ensure pt take Lasix as prescribed” and Family/caregivers will verbalize safe feeding techniques. The goal statement(s) did not include a method to measure the effectiveness of problem interventions. Example #2: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#5, the following goal statement was noted, “Patient will be supported with maximum symptom reduction”. The goal statement did not include a method to measure the effectiveness of problem interventions. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 172 words

    “Observed in Individual Tracer. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure medication orders were clear and accurate. For example, during individual tracer activities for RRHV#2, it was noted that the patient’s medication list included the following information: Acetaminophen 325mg oral tablet - 1 tablet every 8 hours as needed for fever or pain; Morphine O/SYR 10 mg/0.5ml 1 prefilled syringe every 4 hours as needed for pain or shortness of breath; Acetaminophen 325mg / Hydrocodone bitartrate 5mg oral tablet - 1 tablet every 4 hours as needed for pain. The order nor the organization’s policy specified which medication to use first. In addition, the following information was noted: Lactulose 667mg/ml - 10g/15ml - 15ml oral solution every night at bedtime as needed for constipation, Docusate sodium 50mg / sennosides, USP 8.6mg - 1 oral capsule daily as needed for constipation. The order nor the organization’s policy specified which medication to use first. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator / Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)

    “Observed in Data Session. The organization leaders did not ensure that a quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program was developed that involved all services provided by the organization. For example, the QAPI plan did not include indicators to evaluate the following areas: volunteer services, bereavement services, durable medical equipment, and/or supplies. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0559. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 125 words

    “Observed in HR File Review. A review of 2 of 2 applicable human resource files, revealed the organization did not fulfill the requirement to directly observe the Hospice Aide demonstrate needed tasks with a patient/psuedo patient. For example, a review of the competence evaluation for hospice aide #1, and hospice aide #2, revealed that the following subject areas were not evaluated via direct observation during patient care activities: 1) Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include bed, sponge, tub, or shower bath; sink, tub, or bed shampoo; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; and toileting and elimination. 2) Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. 3) Normal range of motion and positioning. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator / Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Observed in Individual Tracer. In 1 of 2 applicable Individual tracers, a review of the medication list for RRHV#3, revealed that the Assisted Living Facility medication list did not include an accurate description of the medication’s the patient was currently taking. For example, the following medications were not listed: Nystatin 100,000 unit/ml topical cream - 1 ml topical cream 3 times a day as needed for peri area rash; Bisacodyl 10mg rectal suppository 10mg - 1 rectal suppository every 3 days as needed for constipation. The Assisted Living Facility medication list did not match the medication list in the hospice agency medical record for this patient. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator / Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 27, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 16, 2012.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 15.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 40% at home, 58% in assisted living, 2% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends15.1%
Visits near death97.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Scott Ritter (owns 5% or more directly); Scott Ritter (corporate director); Alberto Santos (corporate officer); Alberto Santos (corporate director); Colleen Ritter (corporate officer); Colleen Ritter (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 95% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 96% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.91% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 62.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 38 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78676, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.