Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in San Marcos, Texas 78666

1911 Corporate Drive Suite 104, San Marcos, Texas 78666. (512) 392-9138.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 62 hospices serving ZIP code 78666 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 25, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 25, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care7 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 236 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #1,#3,#4,#5,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1: Miconazole was on the facility medication profile, but not on the hospice medication profile. COS Patient #3: The patient indicated she was taking Flonase and using Systane daily; there was no evidence of either on the medication profile. COS Patient #4: The patient’s sister indicated the patient was taking Magnesium Glycinate, but there was no evidence this was on the medication profile. COS Patient #5: On 08-28-25 and 09-11-25, the SN documented the patient was using medicated mouthwash that was helping with dental sores and fever blisters, however medicated mouthwash was not on the medication profile. In addition, on 09-11-25 the SN documented the patient “will use mag Citrate for constipation”, however, there was no evidence that mag Citrate was on the medication profile. COS Patient #9: On 09-02-25, the NP and the RN documented the patient was “currently on antibiotics” and on 09-04-25, the MD documented the patient was taking Keflex for a UTI. However, Keflex was not on the medication profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 120 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #6: At admission, the SN indicated the patient had a foley catheter and the MD documented the patient had a foley catheter on the CTI signed 08-04-25. However, there was no evidence the initial plan of care included the foley catheter or related care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1,#3,#4,#5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: Miconazole was on the facility medication profile, but no evidence of order. COS Patient #3: The patient indicated she was taking Flonase and using Systane daily; there was no evidence of orders. COS Patient #4: The patient’s sister indicated the patient was taking Magnesium Glycinate, but there was no evidence orders. COS Patient #5: The SN visit notes dated 08-28-25 and 09-11-25 indicated the patient was using medicated mouthwash and Mag Citrate, but there was no evidence of a physician’s order. COS”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #11,#13) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #11: On the recert CTI dated 06-04-25, the MD indicated the patient had decided to no longer check his blood sugar daily and he had discontinued anti-glycemics. However, there was no evidence the care plan interventions were updated after 06-04-25 for daily glucose monitoring via FSBS. COS Patient #13: Upon admission, the MSW reached out to the patient to schedule an evaluation on 08-22-25 and 08-25-25 with no response. The plan of care dated 09-02-25 indicated the social work frequency was one time for eval, however there was no evidence of further contacts or documentation the patient declined a social work visit.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #17) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved. Patient #17: The bereavement plan of care documented the need for a sympathy card within 2 weeks of death. However, there was no evidence a sympathy card had been sent.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 178 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #6: The aide was ordered 3 x week beginning 07-28-25, but the aide completed 15 missed visit notes dated 08-01-25, 08-04, 08-08, 08-11, 08-15, 08-18, 08-25, 08-29, 09-01, 09-03, 09-10, 09-12, 09-15, and 09-17-25. However, there was no evidence the aide care plan was updated by the responsible RN during this time.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 136 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #3,#5,#8) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #3; A supervisory visit was completed on 07-10-25, but there was no evidence of a CNA visit until 07-14-25. Patient #5: An aide supervisory visit was documented on 03-26-25, but there was no evidence of a CNA visit until 05-13-25. Patient #8: An aide supervisory was completed on 08-21-25 and 08-28-25 and the SN documented “yes” the aide had visited in the last 14 days. However, the last evidence of an aide visit was 07-31-25.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 25, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 14, 1996.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 8.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 67% at home, 14% in assisted living, 18% in a nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day8.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.9%
Visits near death95.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Fhi LP, Inc. owns 99% directly since Mar 31, 1995.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); Juan Ivan Ramirez (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); Sean Chramega (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 6, 2008
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Fhi Health Systems, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 31, 1995
Odyssey Healthcare Holding CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 6, 2008
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Vistacare LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 17, 1998
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Fhi LP, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly99%Mar 31, 1995
Fhi LP, Inc.Limited partner99%Mar 31, 1995
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Fhi Gp, Inc.General partner1%Mar 31, 1995

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.38% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 69.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 62 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78666, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.