Hearth Record

Agape Hospice Care

A hospice in Mesquite, Texas 75150

3030 Town Centre Drive Suite 200, Mesquite, Texas 75150. (972) 279-1000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 101 hospices serving ZIP code 75150 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 9, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 9, 2024: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 465 words

    “Based on record review and interviews, the agency failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment was completed no later than 5 days after the election of benefits for 5 (3, 5, 6, 7, 8) of 8 active patients reviewed. This failure placed the patients at risk of having an inadequate plan of care and receiving inappropriate or inadequate care. Findings: Record review of patient 3s medical record revealed informed consents signed 3/25/24. The social worker completed the psychosocial assessment 4/3/24. This was 10 days after admission. Record review of patient 5s medical record revealed informed consents signed 10/6/23. The psychosocial assessment portion of the comprehensive assessment was not located in the medical record. Record review of patient 6s medical record revealed informed consents signed 10/20/23. The psychosocial assessment portion of the comprehensive assessment was not located in the medical record. Record review of patient 7s medical record revealed informed consents signed 11/3/23. The psychosocial assessment portion of the comprehensive assessment was not located in the medical record. Record review of patient 8s medical record revealed informed consents with an election date of 6/21/24. The psychosocial assessment portion of the comprehensive assessment was not located in the medical record. On 7/3/24 at 12:15 p.m. the OM informed the surveyor that the current SW is contracted through an agency. On 7/8/24 at 12:20 p.m., the surveyor discussed with the ADON when the comprehensive assessment had to be completed and what was included in the comprehensive assessment. The ADON stated, “;We call her [SW D] but she doesnt make it in the 5 days. Shes [SW D] just too busy.” In an interview 7/9/24 at 2:30 p.m., the ADM stated, “;The comprehensive assessment should be done within the 5 days. I dont know why they arent.” The agency had a policy titled; “;Assessments” dated 1/31/15. The policy read in parts: “;...Policy: The hospice must conduct and document in writing a patient-specific comprehensive assessment that identifies the patients need for hospice care and services, the patients need for physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual care. Procedure: ...Time frame for completion of the Comprehensive Assessment B. The hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individuals attending physician (if any), will complete the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care...” The agency had a policy titled; “;Plan of Care” dated 3/25/25. The policy read in parts: “;...Policy: The hospice interdisciplinary group (IDG) must prepare an individualized and patient specific written plan of care for each patient. ...Procedure: ...C. Based on the needs identified in the comprehensive assessments (performed no later than 5 days after the election of hospice), the IDG will, in collaboration with the patients attending physician, if any, Hospice Medical Director, patient or representative and primary caregiver further develop the written plan of care...””

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1)(i)-(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 675 words

    “Based on record reviews and interviews, the agency failed to ensure the IDT included a social worker in 7 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) of 8 active patient records reviewed. This failure placed the patients at risk of not having their psychosocial needs met. Findings: Record review of patient 1s medical record revealed informed consents signed 4/14/23 and a plan of care dated 4/17/23. IDT meeting notes dated 4/9/24, 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, and 6/4/24 were located but did not contain evidence of input from a social worker. Record review of patient 2s medical record revealed informed consents signed 4/27/24 and a plan of care dated 4/27/24. IDT meeting notes dated 5/7/24, 5/21/24, 6/4/24, and 6/17/24 were located but did not contain evidence of input from a social worker. Record review of patient 3s medical record revealed informed consents signed 3/25/24 and the initial plan of care dated 3/25/24. IDT meeting notes dated 4/9/24, 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, 6/4/24, 6/17/24, and 7/2/24 were located but did not contain evidence of input from a social worker. Record review of patient 4s medical record revealed informed consents with an election date of 4/7/24 and an initial plan of care dated 4/7/24. IDT meeting notes dated 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, 6/4/24, 6/17/24, and 7/2/24 were located but did not contain evidence of input from a social worker. Record review of patient 5s medical record revealed informed consents signed 10/6/23 and an initial plan of care dated 10/6/23. IDT meeting notes dated 4/9/24, 4/23/24, 5/7/24, and 5/21/24 were located but did not contain evidence of input from a social worker. Record review of patient 6s medical record revealed informed consents signed 10/20/23 and an initial plan of care dated 10/20/23. IDT meeting notes dated 4/9/24, 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, and 6/4/24 were located but did not contain evidence of input from a social worker. Record review of patient 7s medical record revealed informed consents signed 11/3/23 and an initial plan of care dated 11/3/23. IDT meeting notes dated 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, 6/4/24, and 6/18/24 were located but did not contain evidence of input from a social worker. On 7/3/24 at 12:15 p.m. the OM stated, “;SW E left the agency 4/16/24. SW D an agency social worker started 5/2/24. To my knowledge no social worker attends IDT meetings.” On 7/8/24 at 12:20 p.m., the surveyor asked who attended IDT and how is team involvement documented. The ADON responded, “;me the OM, the chaplain, the aide, and the medical director attends the meeting, but no one signs it [the meeting notes] but me and the doctor.” The surveyor asked if the social worker attended IDT and the ADON stated, “;the social worker does not attend even by phone.” In an interview 7/9/24 at 2:30 p.m., the ADM stated, “;the social worker attends the IDT.” The AA corrected him saying, “;no they dont.” The ADM then stated, “;theyre supposed to.” The agency had a policy titled; “;Core Service” dated 1/31/15. The policy read in parts: “;Policy: A hospice must routinely provide substantially all core services directly by hospice employees and in a manner consistent with acceptable standards of practice. Procedure: Core Services: A. Core services will be provided directly by hospice employees and include the following: ...3. Medical Social Services...” The agency had a policy titled; “;Interdisciplinary Group (IDG)” dated 3/25/15. The policy read in parts: “;Policy: The hospice must designate an interdisciplinary group (ID) or groups which, in consultation with the patients attending physician, if any, must work together to meet the physical, medical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs of the hospice patients and families facing terminal illness and bereavement. Procedure: IDG Members: A. The IDG will include, but is not limited to, individuals who are qualified and competent to practice in the following professional roles: ...3. Medical Social Worker...F. The meeting will include: ...4. Discussion by IDG for the update or ongoing plan of care for each problem by each service provided. This may include: ...b. Social Services ...G. The discussion and updates will be documented on the plan of care...””

    Rule L0541. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 956 words

    “Based on record review and interviews the agency failed to ensure the plan of care included a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of the services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs in 7 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) of 8 active patient records reviewed. This failure placed the patients at risk of receiving inadequate or inappropriate care. Findings: Record review of patient 1s medical record revealed informed consents signed 4/14/23 and a plan of care dated 4/14/23. The initial plan of care documented the visit frequencies as follows: nurse 1-2 times a week, social worker 1 time a month, aide 3 times a week, and the chaplain was checked but did not contain a frequency. IDT meetings were held 4/9/24, 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, and 6/4/24 but the notes did not contain a detailed statement what services were needed or the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the client and family needs. Record review of patient 2s medical record revealed informed consents signed 4/27/24 and a plan of care dated 4/27/24. The initial plan of care documented the visit frequencies as follows: nurse 1time a week, aide 2 times a week, and the chaplain was to visit within the first 5 days of admission. IDT meetings were held 5/7/24, 5/21/24, 6/4/24, and 6/17/24 but the notes did not contain a detailed statement what services were needed or the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the client and family needs. Record review of patient 3s medical record revealed informed consents signed 3/25/24 and the initial plan of care dated 3/25/24. The initial plan of care documented the visit frequencies as follows: nurse 1time a week, and the chaplain was to visit within the first 5 days of admission. IDT meetings were held 4/9/24, 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, 6/4/24, 6/17/24, and 7/2/24 but the notes did not contain a detailed statement what services were needed or the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the client and family needs. Record review of patient 4s medical record revealed informed consents with an election date of 4/7/24 and an initial plan of care dated 4/7/24. The initial plan of care documented the visit frequencies as follows: nurse 1time a week, aide 5 times a week, and the social worker and chaplain were to visit within the first 5 days of admission. IDT meetings were held 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, 6/4/24, 6/17/24, and 7/2/24 but the notes did not contain a detailed statement what services were needed or the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the client and family needs. Record review of patient 5s medical record revealed informed consents signed 10/6/23 and an initial plan of care dated 10/6/23. The initial plan of care documented the visit frequencies as follows: social worker 1 time a week. The nurse and chaplain were checked but no frequency was documented. IDT meetings were held 4/9/24, 4/23/24, 5/7/24, and 5/21/24 but the notes did not contain a detailed statement what services were needed or the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the client and family needs. Record review of patient 6s medical record revealed informed consents signed 10/20/23 and an initial plan of care dated 10/20/23. The initial plan of care documented the visit frequencies as follows: nurse every day, aide 2 times a week, social worker 1 time a month, chaplain 1 time a month. IDT meetings were held 4/9/24, 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, and 6/4/24 but the notes did not contain a detailed statement what services were needed or the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the client and family needs. Record review of patient 7s medical record revealed informed consents signed 11/3/23 and an initial plan of care dated 11/3/23. The initial plan of care documented the visit frequencies as follows: nurse 2 times a week, aide 2 times a week, social worker 1 time a month, chaplain 1 time a month. IDT meetings were held 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, 6/4/24, and 6/18/24 but the notes did not contain a detailed statement what services were needed or the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the client and family needs. On 7/8/24 at 12:20 p.m., the surveyor discussed with the ADON what should be included on the plan of care. The ADON stated, “;I didnt realize the frequencies had to be on there or why they arent on this new EMR system.” In an interview 7/9/24 at 2:30 p.m., the ADM stated, “;the frequencies arent on the plan of care? Have you told all of them [OM, ADON, AA] about it so they know what to do?” The agency had a policy titled; “;Plan of Care” dated 3/25/25. The policy read in parts: “;...Policy: The hospice interdisciplinary group (IDG) must prepare an individualized and patient specific written plan of care for each patient. ...Procedure: ...B. The written plan of care will include the following: ...3. ...b. A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs.” The agency had a policy titled; “;Interdisciplinary Group (IDG)” dated 3/25/15. The policy read in parts: “;Policy: The hospice must designate an interdisciplinary group (IDG) or groups which, in consultation with the patients attending physician, if any, must work together to meet the physical, medical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs of the hospice patients and families facing terminal illness and bereavement. Procedure: IDH Meetings: ...F. The meeting will include: ...4. Discussion by IDG for the update or ongoing plan of care for each problem by each service provided. This may include: ...l. Frequency of visits by all services involved. ...G. The discussion and updates will be documented on the plan of care...””

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 677 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the IDT revised and documented the patients individualized plan of care every 15 days in 7 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) of 8 active patients reviewed. This failure placed the patients at risk for receiving inappropriate or inadequate care. Findings: Record review of patient 1s medical record revealed informed consents signed 4/14/23 and a plan of care dated 4/17/23. IDT meetings were held 4/9/24, 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, and 6/4/24 but there were no plans of care or plan of care updates after 4/17/23 located in the medical record. Record review of patient 2s medical record revealed informed consents signed 4/27/24 and a plan of care dated 4/27/24. IDT meetings were held 5/7/24, 5/21/24, 6/4/24, and 6/17/24 but there were no plans of care or plan of care updates after 4/17/24 located in the medical record. Record review of patient 3s medical record revealed informed consents signed 3/25/24 and the initial plan of care dated 3/25/24. IDT meetings were held 4/9/24, 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, 6/4/24, 6/17/24, and 7/2/24 but there were no plans of care or plan of care updates after 3/25/24 located in the medical record. Record review of patient 4s medical record revealed informed consents with an election date of 4/7/24 and an initial plan of care dated 4/7/24. IDT meetings were held 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, 6/4/24, 6/17/24, and 7/2/24 but there were no plans of care or plan of care updates after 4/7/24 located in the medical record. Record review of patient 5s medical record revealed informed consents signed 10/6/23 and an initial plan of care dated 10/6/23. IDT meetings were held 4/9/24, 4/23/24, 5/7/24, and 5/21/24 but there were no plans of care or plan of care updates after 10/6/23 located in the medical record. Record review of patient 6s medical record revealed informed consents signed 10/20/23 and an initial plan of care dated 10/20/23. IDT meetings were held 4/9/24, 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, and 6/4/24 but there were no plans of care or plan of care updates after 10/20/23 located in the medical record. Record review of patient 7s medical record revealed informed consents signed 11/3/23 and an initial plan of care dated 11/3/23. IDT meetings were held 4/23/24, 5/7/24, 5/21/24, 6/4/24, and 6/18/24 but there were no plans of care or plan of care updates after 11/3/23 located in the medical record. On 7/8/24 at 12:20 p.m., the surveyor discussed with the ADON how often the plan of care should be reviewed and/ or updated. The ADON stated, “;I didnt realize we were supposed to update it every two weeks.” In an interview 7/9/24 at 2:30 p.m., the ADM stated, “;I dont know about the plan of care updates. Have you told all of them [OM, ADON, AA] about it so they know what to do?” The agency had a policy titled; “;Interdisciplinary Group (IDG)” dated 3/25/15. The policy read in parts: “;Policy: The hospice must designate an interdisciplinary group (IDG) or groups which, in consultation with the patients attending physician, if any, must work together to meet the physical, medical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs of the hospice patients and families facing terminal illness and bereavement. Procedure: IDH Meetings: E. The IDG Members will meet, at a minimum, every 15 days to review and update the written plan of care for each patient. ...F. The meeting will include: ...4. Discussion by IDG for the update or ongoing plan of care for each problem by each service provided. ...G. The discussion and updates will be documented on the plan of care...” The agency had a policy titled; “;Plan of Care” dated 3/25/25. The policy read in parts: “;...Policy: The hospice interdisciplinary group (IDG) must prepare an individualized and patient specific written plan of care for each patient. ...Procedure: ...D. Based on the updated comprehensive assessments, in collaboration with the individuals attending physician, if any, the IDG will review, revise, and document the individualized plan as frequently as the patients condition requires, but no less frequently than every 15 calendar days...””

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 9, 2024Recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 22, 2011.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 50% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.2%
Visits near death50.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 10 owners or officers are people: Shiney Daniel (owns 5% or more directly, 83%); Shiney Daniel (corporate officer, 83%); Shiney Daniel (corporate director, 83%); Shiney Daniel (managing employee (on the payroll), 83%); Shaji Daniel (owns 5% or more directly, 17%); Shaji Daniel (corporate officer, 17%); Shaji Daniel (corporate director, 17%); Shaji Daniel (managing employee (on the payroll), 17%); Annamma Cherian (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kunjamma Baby (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 101 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75150, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.