Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Amarillo, Texas 79109

3232 Hobbs Road, Amarillo, Texas 79109. (806) 372-7696.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 22 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

22 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 10 hospices serving ZIP code 79109 had 1.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 22, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

22 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

22 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 22, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care22 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #4,#8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 4: The medication profile contained active Paxlovid instructions for an order 12/21/25 that was for 5 days only. Corrected on site with medication profile updated. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen included on the medication profile. Corrected on site with medication profile updated.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient 13: There was no evidence of a comprehensive physical assessment by an RN between 12/23/25 and 1/13/26.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 150 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #2,#3,#6) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 2: There was no evidence of a wound assessment and measurement prior to receiving wound care orders 1/16/25 as required per agency policy. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient had a peritoneal wound. There was no evidence of weekly wound assessments and measurements as required per agency policy. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient had wounds to bilateral heels. There was no evidence of weekly wound assessments and measurements between 12/31/25 and 1/14/26 as required per agency policy.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 262 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #3,#9,#12,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient history of a CVA and seizures. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to neurological dysfunction and seizure precautions included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with plan of care update. Patient 9: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient history of a CVA and seizures. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to neurological dysfunction included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with plan of care update. Patient 12: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient history of falls. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to fall safety included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with plan of care update. Patient 14: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient history of CVA and varices related to liver disease. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to neurological dysfunction and risk for bleeding included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with plan of care update.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 106 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #2,#8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: The aide care plan identified patient had an indwelling catheter. There was no evidence of an order for catheter type, size, change frequency and maintenance. Corrected on site with order clarifications. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen rate, frequency, and delivery method. Corrected on site with order clarifications.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 240 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patients #3,#4,#7,#8,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a shower chair. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with order received. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment 12/17/25 identifying patient use of a cane. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with order received. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a shower chair. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment 11/19/25 identifying patient use of a lift for transfers. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with order received. Patient 14: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a walker and shower chair, and 1/7/26 identifying use of trapeze bar. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with order received.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #7,#18) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 7: The plan of care included two active code statuses of both full code and DNR. The plan of care was not updated to remove the full code status when DNR form was signed. Corrected on site with plan of care update. Patient 18: The patient was discharged from hospice 12/17/25. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to included problems, goals, and interventions related to discharge planning.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 106 words

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #10, 11) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 10: The medical record contained an order for a PT assessment 12/10/25. There was no evidence the agency arranged for the PT evaluation to be completed. Corrected on site with agency communication with contracted agency. Patient 11: The medical record contained an order for spiritual care visits once weekly. There was no evidence of a visit completed the week of 12/7/25. Corrected on site with late data entry of reason for missed visit.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence a written plan of correction is developed in response to any QAPI activity that does not meet an acceptable threshold. During QAPI meeting 11/13/25, the hospice agency completed patient chart audits identifying compliance of 90% was not met for medication and treatment orders, following plan of care, aide and LPN supervisory visits, and wound care. There was no evidence of a plan of corrections to address the topics when threshold was not met.”

    Rule L0570. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    “Upon observation and home visit, 1 of 4 (Patients #5) there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. During observation of the home visit, the RN placed stethoscope around neck prior to and after use on patient, and prior to and after cleansing, before placing back into the bag. The RN also did not use gloves while cleansing the equipment and held the equipment between cleansing and returning them to the bag.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #17) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved Patient 17: The medical record contained a bereavement care plan with task for monthly contact with the bereaved unless refused and evaluated as low risk, due to initial bereavement assessment as high risk. There was no evidence of any contact with the bereaved after death.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 203 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #6,#7) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 6: The medical record contained wound care orders 12/25/25 and 1/14/26. There was no evidence of instructions for the aide regarding treatment of wounds during showers on the aide care plan. Corrected on site with aide care plan update. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient is a max assist for transfers. There was no evidence of transfer instructions on the aide care plan. Corrected on site with aide care plan update.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care Patient 8: The medical record contained an order for aide visits three times weekly. There was no evidence of visits completed the week of 12/14/25. Corrected on site with late data entry of facility refusal.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. Agency volunteer utilization rate was 1.54% for 2025.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #15) did not have evidence the hospice employees and contract employees have received orientation on the hospice philosophy. Personnel 15: There was no evidence the contracted personnel received orientation to hospice philosophy prior to patient contact.”

    Rule L0661. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient had a medical power of attorney in place. There was no evidence of MPOA documentation in the record.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #18) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient 18: Patient was discharged from hospice 12/17/25 with no evidence of a physician order to discharge.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(1))

    “Upon inpatient contract review, 1 of 7 (Kirkland contract) did not have evidence that the hospice supplies the inpatient provider with a copy of the patient’s plan of care and specifies the inpatient services to be furnished.”

    Rule L0711. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(2))

    “Upon inpatient contract review, 1 of 7 (Kirkland contract) did not have evidence that the inpatient provider has established patient care policies consistent with those of the hospice and agrees to abide by the palliative care protocols and plan of care established by the hospice for its patients.”

    Rule L0712. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(3))

    “Upon inpatient contract review, 1 of 7 (Kirkland contract) did not have evidence that the hospice patient’s inpatient clinical record includes a record of all inpatient services furnished and events regarding care that occurred at the facility; that a copy of the discharge summary be provided to the hospice at the time of discharge; and that a copy of the inpatient clinical record is available to the hospice at the time of discharge.”

    Rule L0713. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(6))

    “Upon inpatient contract review, 1 of 7 (Kirkland contract) did not have evidence of a method for verifying that the requirements for ACHC standard HSP1-8B and CFR 418.108c (1)-418.108c(5) are met.”

    Rule L0716. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 6: The medical record contained an order for nursing visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 1/4/26. Corrected on site with late data entry of patient refusal for visit.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 22, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care22 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 5, 1997.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 61% at home, 9% in assisted living, 29% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.6%
Visits near death95.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Curo Health Services LLC owns 100% directly since Aug 11, 2022.
  • Curo Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); Rachel Herrera (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); Mazin A Saadaldin (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Aug 11, 2022
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)0%Aug 11, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.78% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 69.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 10 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 79109, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 1; this one had 22.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.