Lighthouse Hospice Group, LLC
A hospice in Irmo, South Carolina 29063
110 Oak Park Drive Unit C, Unit C, Irmo, South Carolina 29063. (803) 781-1935.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 8of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 20 hospices serving ZIP code 29063 had 6.5.
The last inspection on record was on Jan 10, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jan 10, 2025: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
The inspectors’ words, 502 words
“Based on record review, interview and review of the hospice’s policies, the hospice failed to complete updated comprehensive assessments for 7 of 7 patient records reviewed (Patients #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7). Review of Patient #1’s record on 01/07/25 at 11:08 AM revealed no documented evidence of any updates to the comprehensive assessment for the benefit period 11/20/24 to 01/18/25. In an interview with the Administrator (ADM) and the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) on 01/09/25 at 1:56 PM, they reviewed the record and confirmed the findings. Review of Patient #2’s record on 01/07/25 at 3:10 PM revealed no documented evidence of any updates to the comprehensive assessment for the benefit period 11/22/24 to 02/19/25. In an interview with the ADM and the ADON on 01/09/25 at 2:20 PM, they reviewed the record and confirmed the findings. Review of Patient #3’s record on 01/07/25 at 11:23 AM revealed no documented evidence of any updates to the comprehensive assessment for the benefit period 11/15/24 to 01/13/25. In an interview with the ADM and the ADON on 01/09/25 at 2:46 PM, they reviewed the record and confirmed the findings. Review of Patient #4’s record on 01/08/25 at 10:25 AM revealed no documented evidence of any updates to the comprehensive assessment for the benefit period 07/29/24 to 10/26/24. In an interview with the ADM and the ADON on 01/09/25 at 3:09 PM, they reviewed the record and confirmed the findings. Review of Patient #5’s record on 01/08/25 at 2:20 PM revealed no documented evidence of any updates to the comprehensive assessment for the benefit period 07/17/24 to 10/14/24. In an interview with the ADM and the ADON on 01/09/25 at 3:00 PM, they reviewed the record and confirmed the findings. Review of Patient #6’s record on 01/08/25 at 3:20 PM revealed no documented evidence of any updates to the comprehensive assessment for the benefit period 02/16/24 to 05/15/24. In an interview with the ADM and the ADON on 01/09/25 at 3:11 PM, they reviewed the record and confirmed the findings. Review of Patient #7’s record on 01/09/25 at 9:20 AM revealed no documented evidence of any updates to the comprehensive assessment for the benefit period 07/05/24 to 09/02/24. In an interview with the ADM and the ADON on 01/09/25 at 3:33 PM, they reviewed the record and confirmed the findings. Review of the hospice’s policy titled, “Reassessment/Update to the Comprehensive Assessment,” dated 2009, on 01/09/25 revealed, “The update of the comprehensive assessment must be accomplished by the Hospice IDG (in collaboration with the patient’s attending physician, if any) and must consider changes that have taken place since the initial assessment. It must include information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes, as well as a reassessment of the patient’s response to care. The assessment updates must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days...The update to the comprehensive assessment will include assessments of changes in physical, psychosocial, emotional and spiritual needs...””
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 520 words
“Based on observation, interview and record review, the hospice failed to ensure the plan of care was updated when changes occurred with the patients for two of seven patient records reviewed (Patients #4 and #5). Findings included: Review of Patient #4’s record on 01/08/25 at 10:25 AM revealed Patient #4 was admitted to the hospice on 07/29/24 with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease. Review of the Hospice Nursing Initial Comprehensive Admission Assessment dated 07/29/24 revealed, “Requires max (maximum) assistance with increasing unsteadiness on feet even with assistive devices...” Review of the hospice initial plan of care for the benefit period 07/29/24 to 10/26/24 revealed, “...Fall Precautions Start Effective Date 07/29/2024...Musculoskeletal...Assess, perform, instruct safe transfers Start...07/29/2024...Provide assistive devices...WALKER, WHELCHAIR Start...07/29/2024...Patient will maintain optimal mobility...Start...07/29/2024...Patient will remain safe in environment...Start...07/29/24...” Review of the Hospice Nursing Clinical Note dated 08/16/24 revealed, “...Patient’s [family member] reports complaints of patient having ‘wobbly legs’ since last visit...Patient’s [family member] reports that patient has had 2 ‘near falls’ where he got very wobbly on his legs attempting to ambulate...” Review of the next IDG Meeting Review dated 8/27/24 revealed no update/changes to the plan of care. Review of the IDG Meeting Review with a nursing visit date of 09/24/24 revealed, “[family member] reports increased episodes of difficulty with mobility.” There was no update/changes to the plan of care. Further review of the record, including the nursing visit notes dated 10/01/24 and 10/02/24 revealed Patient #4 had a fall on 10/01/24 and was hospitalized. In an interview with the Administrator (ADM) and the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) on 01/09/24 at 3:09 PM, they reviewed the record and confirmed the findings. Review of Patient #5’s record on 01/08/25 at 2:20 PM revealed Patient #5 was admitted to hospice 04/18/24 with a diagnosis of Nutritional Deficiency. Review of the initial plan of care for the benefit period 04/18/24 to 07/16/24 revealed, “Fall Precautions Start Effective Date 04/18/2024...Musculoskeletal...Assess, perform, instruct safe transfers...Patient will maintain optimal mobility...Patient will remain safe in environment...” There were no other care plan problems involving the patient’s fall risk and safety. Review of the Patient Incident Report dated 06/04/24 revealed, “Pt (patient) had a fall while getting up from toilet. Pt fell back against the wall...” The IDG Meeting Review dated 06/18/24 revealed no update/changes to the plan of care after the fall. Review of a Patient Incident Report dated 10/17/24 revealed, “Patient’s [family member] reported patient had a fall with injury to her nose...” Review of the undated IDG Meeting Review with a nursing visit date of 10/22/24 revealed there was no update/changes to the plan of care. In an interview with the ADM and the ADON on 01/09/25 at 3:00 PM, they reviewed the record and confirmed the findings. Review of the hospice’s policy titled, “IDG Careplanning Process,” dated 2009 on 01/09/24 revealed, “The IDG...reviews, revises and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently than every 15 calendar days...the revised plan of care includes information from the ptient’s updated comprehensive assessment and notes the patient’s progress toward outcomes and goals specified in the plan of care.””
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 577 words
“Based on observation, record review and interview the hospice failed to follow the plan of care when Hospice Aide (HA) visits were not completed according to the plan of care for 3 of 6 patients reviewed receiving HA services (Patients #1, #2, and #3). Findings include: Patient #1’s record was reviewed on 01/07/25 at 11:08 PM. Review of the undated IDG (Interdisciplinary Group) Meeting Review for the benefit period 11/20/24 - 01/18/25 with a nursing visit date of 12/31/24 revealed, “FREQUENCIES...Active...HHA...5 x week for 9 weeks starting 11/20/2024.” Review of the Hospice Aide Assignment dated 11/20/24 revealed, “Frequency...5 x Week (Monday - Friday).” Review of the HA visits to Patient #1 from 11/20/24 - 01/06/25 revealed the following: No HA visit on 11/28/24 (Thursday) and only four HA visits completed that week; No HA visit on 12/16/24 (Monday) and only four HA visits completed that week; No HA visit on 12/25/24 (Wednesday) only four HA visits completed that week; and No HA visit on 01/01/25 (Wednesday) and only four HA visits completed that week. In an interview with the Administrator (ADM) and the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) on 01/09/25 at 1:56 PM, they confirmed the findings. During a home visit observation to Patient #2 on 01/07/25 at 12:52 PM, a family member (FM) stated the HA visited five days a week, Monday through Friday. The FM stated if HA visits were available on Christmas Day, it would have been helpful for Patient #2’s primary care giver (PCG) to have a visit that day. Patient #2’s record was reviewed on 01/07/25 at 3:10 PM. Review of the undated IDG Meeting Review for the benefit period 11/22/24 - 02/19/25 revealed, “FREQUENCIES...Active...HHA...5 x week for 13 weeks starting 11/24/24...” Review of the HA Assignment dated 11/22/24 revealed, “Frequency...5 x Week (Monday - Friday)...” Review of the HA visits to Patient #2 from 11/22/24 to 1/7/25 revealed the following: No HA visit on 11/28/24 (Thursday) and only four HA visits completed that week; No HA visit on 12/25/24 (Wednesday) and only four HA visits completed that week; and No HA visit on 01/01/25 (Wednesday) and only four HA visits completed that week. In an interview with the ADM and the ADON on 01/09/25 at 2:15 PM, they confirmed the findings. Patient #3’s record was reviewed on 01/07/25 at 3:34 PM. Review of the “IDG MEETING REVIEW” for the benefit period 11/15/24 to 01/13/25 with a nursing visit date of 12/31/24 revealed, “FREQUENCIES...Active...HHA...5 x week for 10 weeks...” Review of the “HOSPICE AIDE ASSIGNMENT” dated 11/15/24 revealed, “Frequency...5x/week Monday through Friday...” Review of the HA visits to Patient #3 from 11/15/24 to 01/07/25 revealed the following: No HA visit on 11/28/24 (Thursday) and only four HA visits completed that week; No HA visit on12/17/24 (Tuesday) and only three visits completed that week with one missed visit note; No HA visit on 12/25/24 (Wednesday) and only four HA visits completed that week; and No HA visit on 01/01/25 (Wednesday) and only four HA visits completed that week. In an interview with the ADM and the ADON on 01/09/25 at 2:28 PM, they confirmed the findings. Review of the hospice’s undated policy titled, “IDG Care Planning Process” on 01/09/25 revealed, “All care and services furnished to patients and their families follows an individualized written plan of care established by the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician (if any), the patient or representative and the primary caregiver in accordance with the patient’s needs.””
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
The inspectors’ words, 739 words
“Based on observation, interview and document review, the hospice failed to ensure hospice staff followed infection prevention practices during 3 of 3 patient visits observed. Observation of a home nursing visit to Patient #1 by Registered Nurse (RN) #1 was conducted on 01/07/25 at 9:08 AM. RN #1 was observed to remove a small bottle of hand sanitizer from her/his pocket and use it during the assessment portion of the patient visit. RN #1 was observed to enter the nursing bag to get the blood pressure monitor after touching the patient and without disinfecting her/his hands first. RN #1 was also observed to return the blood pressure monitor and the pulse oximeter to the nursing bag without first disinfecting her/his hands. In an interview with RN #1 at 10:20 AM RN #1 confirmed her/his pocket had other items in it and was not a clean area for the bottle of hand sanitizer to be kept. RN #1 also confirmed she/he did not not sanitize her/his hands before re-entering the nursing bag. In an interview with the Administrator (ADM) and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 01/09/25 at 1:55 PM, they confirmed RN #1 should not have kept the hand sanitizer in her/his pocket and should have sanitized her/his hands prior to entering and re-entering the nursing bag. Observation of a home visit to Patient #2 by the ADON was conducted on 01/07/25 at 12:52 PM. The ADON was observed to open a large side pocket on the nursing bag which lowered flat and she/he placed the vital signs equipment (i.e. blood pressure cuff, thermometer, pulse oximeter) and a bottle of hand sanitizer on it without a barrier. The ADON used the vital signs equipment to take Patient #2’s vital signs and then placed the equipment back on the lowered side pocket. The ADON cleaned the blood pressure cuff with a sanitizing wipe and placed it back on the same open lowered part of the nursing bag on which the used blood pressure cuff had been placed after use on the patient. The ADON was also observed to keep the stethoscope around her/his neck before and after using it to assess the patient and did not disinfect it. The ADON was observed to remove her/his gloves and place them in a side area of the nursing bag during the patient assessment and nursing visit. In an interview with the ADON on 01/07/25 at 2:00 PM, she/he confirmed the findings. She/he stated she/he kept a small open plastic trash can on the side of the nursing bag which she/he put soiled gloves and trash in during the visit and then she/he emptied the plastic trash can into a trash in the car. The ADON said she/he did this with every nursing visit. In an interview with the ADM and the ADON on 01/09/25 at 2:14 PM, they confirmed a plastic trash can in the side pocket of the nursing bag should not be used for soiled trash, and they confirmed the open and lowered side pocket of the nursing bag should not be used to place vital signs equipment directly on (i.e. without use of a barrier) after use on a patient, after equipment is cleaned it should not be placed back on the same (dirty) area it had been, and the stethoscope should be disinfected before/after use. Observation of a home visit to Patient #3 by Hospice Aide (HA) #1 was conducted on 01/08/25 at 12:25 PM. HA #1 was observed to provide pericare (genito-rectal area) to Patient #3 and without removing her gloves, HA #1 used a hair brush to brush Patient #3’s hair and with the same gloves on placed the gloved hand into a container of ointment and rubbed the ointment on Patient #3’s face. During an interview with HA #1 immediately after the visit at 1:16 PM, HA #1 confirmed the findings. In an interview with the ADM and the ADON on 01/09/25 at 1:39 PM, they confirmed HA #1 should have removed the gloves after providing pericare and before touching anything else. Review of the Nursing Education Binder on 01/09/25 at 11:48 AM revealed an undated document titled, “Nursing Bag Technique,” which indicated to wash hands prior to entering the equipment (nursing) bag and “...If re-entry into the equipment bag is necessary, wash your hands before removing supplies...” and after completing the visit to “Wash your hands and replace supplies in the equipment bag.””
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2025 | Recertification inspection by the state | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 12, 2011.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 8.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 67.2% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 41% at home, 36% in assisted living, 23% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 8.4 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 6.4% |
| Visits near death | 67.2% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Lighthouse Hospice Group, LLC owns 100% directly since May 20, 2011.
- 4 owners or officers are people: Benjamin J Levinson (managing employee (under contract), 100%); Nicole Lee Frost (corporate officer, 100%); Nicole Lee Frost (corporate director, 100%); Nicole Lee Frost (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lighthouse Hospice Group, LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | May 20, 2011 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 94.55% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 9.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 8 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 20 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 29063, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6.5; this one had 4.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Lighthouse Hospice Group, LLC This hospice | 4 |
| All Seasons Healthcare, Inc. | 2 |
| Prisma Health Hospice Midlands | 3 |
| MUSC Health Hospice Kershaw | 7 |
| Hospice & Palliative Care Palmetto Region- Greenville County | 16 |
| Lutheran Hospice | 11 |
| Medical Services of America Hospice-Columbia | 12 |
| Interim Healthcare of the Upstate Hospice | 16 |
| Agape Care South Carolina II | 6 |
| Gentiva | 10 |
| Pruitthealth Hospice- Columbia | 5 |
| Abbey Road Hospice, LLC | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.