Hearth Record

Lutheran Hospice

A hospice in White Rock, South Carolina 29177

102 Fortress Drive, PO Box 805, White Rock, South Carolina 29177. (803) 749-7770.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 6 hospices serving ZIP code 29177 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 7, 2023: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 7, 2023: recertification inspection by the state11 deficiencies
  • EP Program Patient Population (42 CFR 418.113(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Based on review of the hospice’s Emergency Preparedness Program and interview, the hospice failed to ensure that the entire patient population was included in the hospice’s Emergency Preparedness Plan (EP) for 1 of 15 patient charts reviewed for an EP plan, Patient #15 was not assigned a risk level on the hospice admission documents. Patient #15 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer was admitted 6/24/2020. Review of the hospice documents revealed the patient was not assigned a Risk Level per the hospice’s Emergency Preparedness Plan. The finding was confirmed in an interview with the Clinical Operations Manager on 12/7/23 at 10:00 AM.”

    Rule E0007. Standard-level.

  • Names and Contact Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(1))

    “Based upon review of the hospice’s Emergency Preparedness Program plan and interview, the hospice failed to ensure that the Emergency Plan contact list was accurate. The findings are: Review of the contact list for Volunteers in the hospice’s Emergency Plan on 12/07/2023 at 10:00 AM revealed there were no contact telephone numbers associated with the volunteer list. The finding was confirmed with the Patient Care Coordinator on 12/7/23 at 10:00 AM.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 435 words

    “This standard is NOT MET as evidenced by: Based on review of 3 of 4 patient medical records (Patient #1, #2, and #4) and interviews, it was determined physician orders were not followed for medications, wounds, and diet. Home visit on 12/04/2023 at 1:05 PM reveals, Patient #2 reports taking Flomax 0.4 mg tablet by mouth once a day and Reglan 5 mg one tablet by mouth three times a day. These medications are not on the agency medication list. On 12/04/2023 at 1:30 PM, Skilled Nurse (SN) #1 confirms the finding. The findings include: Patient #1 is in a local facility with a diagnosis of Failure to Thrive. The current physician orders per the residential facility are a ground diet but the hospice orders are for a regular diet, which is delivered to the patient on the 12/4/23 11:00 AM during the patient visit. The patient, having no teeth, has been losing weight since she is unable to chew. The meal was immediately changed out to a ground diet. In an interview with the hospice Patient Care Coordinator on 12/4/2023 at 2:00 PM, it was verified that the hospice failed to ensure the patient was receiving the proper diet. Patient #4 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s is in a residential facility, admitted 10/17/23. During the patient visit on 12/4/23 at 10:00 AM, it is noted that the facility medicine administration record (MAR) does not match with the hospice’s MAR. Specifically, the hospice MAR lists Prozac 10 milligram capsule every day while the residential facility lists 2.5 milliliter Fluoxetine (Prozac) 20mg/5ml solution. Further the residential facility lists MediHoney 80% topical gel to wounds. This alerted us to the fact that the patient had wounds. There are no wounds listed on the hospice care plan, or hospice Interdisciplinary Discipline Team (IDT) notes for this patient. The hospice’s admitting diagnosis section lists “Pressure ulcer of right buttock, unstageable, pressure ulcer of other site, stage 2, pressure ulcer of other site, stage 3”. In an interview on 12/4/23 at 2:00 PM, the Patient Care Coordinator explains that an outside wound care agency cares for the wounds, but there is no coordination between that agency and the hospice. This leaves open the question of the medications/services the patient is receiving versus what the hospice holds claim to. Facility policy# PC.M50 reads: “A Medication profile is maintained for every patient and includes a listing of the current medication orders for each patient and specifies whether the medication is or is not related to the patient’s terminal illness....includes all prescription medications, over the counter drugs, vitamins and herbal and alternative supplements.””

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 151 words

    “Based on record reviews, interviews, and the hospice policy, entitled, “;CLINICAL RECORDS”, the hospice failed to provide in the initial Plan of Care (POC) a data system to measure patient outcomes for 17 of 19 patient records reviewed. (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #17, and #19) The Findings include: On 12/05/2023 and 12/06/2023, review of the plan of care for patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #17, and #19 revealed none of the patient plan of cares had goals in the initial assessments to measure performance or quality. On 12/06/2023 at 11:00 AM, the Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator verified the findings and reported “;issues with our computer system.” Hospice policy, entitled, “;CLINICAL RECORDS”, revealed “;Each patients clinical record includes, at a minimum, the following: g. outcome measure data elements”.”

    Rule L0534. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 761 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice staff failed to follow physician orders and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Plans of Care for 9 out of 19 patients regarding visit schedules, wound care, medications and diet (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #9, #14, #15, and #19). Chart review on 12/06/2023 at 2:00 PM for Patient #1 reveals the home health aide (HA) orders for the HA are for 1-3 visits per week yet the HA visited the patient 4 times in week one of this episode. This information was verified in an interview with the Patient Care Coordinator on 12/6/23 at 2:45 PM. Chart review on 12/06/2023 at 2:00 PM for Patient #4 reveals the Home Health Aide (HA) is to visit 3-5 times per week, yet only visited twice in weeks 1 and 4 with no missed visit notes. This information was verified in an interview with the Patient Care Coordinator on 12/6/23 at 2:45 PM. Chart review on 12/06/2023 at 2:00 PM for Patient #5 reveals the home health aide (HA) is to visit the patient 3 times per week, yet visited only once in week 1, with no missed visit notes to explain the 2 absences. Likewise, in week 4 the HA visited twice, with no missed visit note to explain the missed third visit. This information was verified in an interview with the Patient Care Coordinator on 12/6/23 at 2:45 PM. Chart review on 12/06/2023 at 2:00 PM for Patient #15 reveals initial physician orders are for the registered nurse (RN) to visit twice per week and the home health aide (HA) is to visit twice per week. The RN made no visits in week 2 with no missed visit notes. The HA visited only once in week 1, with no missed visit note. The social worker visited twice in week 2 without any orders to visit. This information was verified in an interview with the Patient Care Coordinator on 12/6/23 at 2:45 PM. The Findings include: Chart review on 12/05/2023 at 9 AM for Patient #2 reveals, wound care orders for hepatic drain of Right Upper Quadrant, “;Cleanse with : Cleaner, Dress with: split gauze dressing, Cover with: Medipore tape Start effective date: 07/19/2023”. Nursing Assessment notes dated 11/03/2023 and 11/07/2023 reports”; Wound Care provided, Cleansed with Betadine & wound cleanser”. This is not the care ordered. Hospice Nursing Clinical Note dated 11/15/2023 reveals Patient #2 fell and experienced a skin tear of right forearm. SN reports “;Wound Care Provided, Neosporin and bandage”. There is no documentation of the physician being notified of the fall and no orders for wound care to the skin tear. Interview on 12/06/2023 at 12:23 PM, Administrator verifies the finding. Chart review on 12/05/2023 at 12:30 PM for Patient #3 reveals, frequencies for HHA 1 visit per week for 9 weeks starting 11/18/2023 and RN 1 visit per week for 9 weeks starting 11/18/2023. There are no visits by the Registered Nurse (RN) or Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) for the week of 11/18/2023. Interview on 12/06/2023 at 12:50 PM, Administrator verifies the finding. Chart review on 12/05/2023 at 2:35 PM for Patient #9 reveals, frequencies for RN 1 visit per week for 9 weeks starting 09/20/2023. There are no visits documented by the RN for the week of 09/20/2023. Interview on 12/06/2023 at 12:52 PM, Administrator verifies the finding. Chart review on 12/06/2023 at 9:08 AM for Patient #14 reveals, frequencies for CNA 2 visit per week for 13 weeks starting 11/22/2023. There are no visits documented by the CNA for the week of 11/22/2023. Skilled Nurse (SN) note dated 12/02/2023 reports “;BP 90/64. Dtr stated pt os taking Coreg 3.25mg twice daily. Lasix increased yesterday r/t ascites and SOB. T/c to Dr Orick, orders received to stop coreg, continue Lasix for now, dtr stated she will take the Coreg out of the pts pill box.” Physician orders from Dr Orick dated 12/03/2023 report “;Increase Lasix to 60 mg by mouth twice a day x 3 days”. Verbal order read back and verified. There are no documentation for physician orders to hold the Coreg. Interview on 12/06/2023 at 1:35 PM, Administrator verifies the finding. Chart review on 12/06/2023 at 10:13 AM for Patient #19 reveals, frequencies for RN 2 x week for 13 weeks starting 03/28/2023. There is documentation for SN visit on 03/30/2023, 04/6/2023, 04/13/2023 and 04/20/2023. This is once a week for 4 weeks. There is no documentation for a second visit the first 4 weeks of the episode. Interview on 12/06/2023 at 1:44 PM, Administrator verifies the finding.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 136 words

    “Based on patient record review, interview, and hospice policy, entitled, “;COORDINATION OF SERVICES”, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) failed to provide a means to identify and measure goals in the ongoing Plan of Care (POC) for 17 of 19 patient charts reviewed. (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #17, and #19). The Findings include: Patient chart review on 12/05/2023 and 12/06/2023 revealed 17 patient POCs that had no goals in the POC’s assessments to coordinate the patient care. Interview on 12/06/2023 at 11:00 AM, the Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator verified the findings. Hospice policy, entitled, “;COORDINATION OF SERVICES”, revealed, “All members of the IDG participate in care planning and document problems, interventions, goals, observations, and outcomes based on the assessed and reassessed needs of the patient/caregiver”.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 364 words

    “This standard is NOT MET. Based on record review of 2 of 4 patient medical records and interview, the hospice failed to ensure a system of communication and integration, in accordance with the hospice’s own policies and procedures, to ensure that the patient’s care and services were provided in accordance with the patient’s plan of care. The findings include: Patient #1is in a facility with a diagnosis of Failure to Thrive. The current physician orders per the residential facility are a ground diet, but the hospice orders are for a regular diet which was delivered to the patient on the 12/4/23 11:00 AM during the patient visit. The patient had no teeth is unable to chew. In an interview with the hospice Patient Care Coordinator on 12/4/2023 at 2:00 PM, he/she verified the hospice did not ensure the patient received the ordered diet. The meal was immediately changed to a ground diet. Patient #4 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s is in a residential facility. During the patient visit on 12/4/23 at 10:00 AM, review of the patient’s it facility medicine administration record (MAR) revealed the facility MAR did not match with the hospice’s MAR. The hospice MAR listed Prozac 10 milligram (mg) capsule every day while the residential facility listed 2.5 milliliter Fluoxetine (Prozac) 20mg/5ml (milliliter) solution. The residential facility listed MediHoney 80% (percent)topical gel to wounds. There were no wounds listed on the patient’s hospice care plan, or hospice Interdisciplinary Discipline Team (IDT) notes. The hospice’s admitting diagnosis section lists “Pressure ulcer of right buttock, unstageable, pressure ulcer of other site, stage 2, pressure ulcer of other site, stage 3”. In an interview on 12/4/23 at 2:00 PM, the Patient Care Coordinator revealed an outside wound care agency cares for the patient’s wounds, but there was no coordination between the wound care agency and the hospice. Hospice policy, titled,# PC.M50 reads, “A medication profile is maintained for every patient and includes a listing of the current medication orders for each patient and specifies whether the medication is or is not related to the patient’s terminal illness. The medication profile includes all prescription medications, over the counter drugs, vitamins, herbal and alternative supplements. “”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 218 words

    “Based on observations and interview, the hospice staff failed to follow accepted principles for potential cross transmission of infectious agents in the hospice setting for 2 of 4 applicable patients. (Patient #2 and Patient #3) The Findings include: Home observation visit on 12/04/2023 at 1:05 PM with Patient #2 revealed the Skilled Nurse (SN) #1 used bare un-sanitized hands to reach into his/her uniform pocket to remove scissors, and then cut gauze, and then placed the scissors back into his/her pocket without sanitizing the scissors or performing hand hygiene. SN #1 reached into the clean side of equipment bag to retrieve equipment without performing hand hygiene. SN #1 placed barrier on a couch, placed his/her equipment bag on the barrier, and then removed clean equipment from bag and placed the clean and used equipment on the same barrier. On 12/06/2023 at 12:23 PM, the Administrator reported “;We need to do some education.” Home observation visit on 12/04/2023 at 3:10 PM with Patient #3 reveals, SN #2 used electronic device for charting, failed to sanitize at the end of the visit, placed device under her arm then placed device into equipment device without sanitizing. This surveyor asked when equipment is sanitized, SN #2 reported “;I have a clean and dirty side in the bag...clean the equipment in the car”.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “This standard is NOT MET. Based on record reviews and interview, the hospice failed to ensure supervisory visits of the Home Health Aides (HHA) were completed every 14 days for 1 of 15 patient charts reviewed for supervisory visits of the HHA. (Patient #6) The findings are: Patient #6 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer and contractures in the episode #32 of hospice care revealed physician orders for the Registered Nurse (RN) to visit 1-3 times per week. The Home Health Aide (HA) visits 3 times per week. There was no documentation that a registered nurse made supervisory visits for the home health aide (HA) in week 7 and week 9 of service.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 246 words

    “This standard is NOT MET. Based on record reviews and interview, the hospice failed to ensure patient wounds and wound care was charted for 1 of 2 patient charts reviewed for wound care. (Patient #4) The findings are: Patient #4 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer was admitted into a residential facility 10/17/23. During the patient visit on 12/5/23 at 10:00 AM, the residential facility’s medicine administration record (MAR) listed MediHoney 80%(percent) topical gel and Anasept 0.057% topical gel to wounds. The medications were not on the hospice medicine administration profile for the patient. There were no wounds documented on the patient’s hospice care plan, or in the hospice Interdisciplinary Discipline Team (IDT) notes for the patient. The hospice’s admitting diagnosis section listed pressure ulcer of right buttock, unstageable, pressure ulcer of other site, stage 2, pressure ulcer of other site, stage 3 at the end of a long list of diagnoses. In an interview 12/6/23 at 10:15 AM, the Patient Care Coordinator reported an outside wound care agency provides care for the patient’s wounds, but there was no coordination documented between the wound care agency and the hospice. Hospice policy, titled, #PC.M50, reads,” Under 4. A medication profile is maintained for every patient and includes a listing of the current medication orders for each patient and specifies whether the medication is or is not related to the patient’s terminal illness. It must include all prescription medications, over the counter drugs, vitamins, and herbal and alternative supplements.””

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 149 words

    “Based on record reviews, interviews, and review of the hospice policy, entitled, “;CLINICAL RECORDS”, the hospice failed to assign goals in the patient’s initial and ongoing Plan of Care (POC) for 17 of 19 patient charts required to assess patient outcomes, quality of care, and patient needs. (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #17 and #19) The Finding includes: On 12/05/2023 and 12/06/2023, review of patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #17 and #19’s charts revealed the patients’ POCs had no goals in the POC assessment for the hospice to accurately measure patient care. On 12/06/2023 at 11:00 AM, the Adminisrator and Patient Care Coordinator verified the findings. Hospice policy, entitled, “;CLINICAL RECORDS”, revealed “;Each patients clinical record includes, at a minimum, the following: g. outcome measure data elements”.”

    Rule L0675. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 7, 2023Recertification inspection by the state11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 19, 1995.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 35% at home, 19% in assisted living, 45% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.9%
Visits near death94.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: John Gould (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Gregory A Estes (managing employee (on the payroll)); Frank T Shepke (corporate officer); Charles D Coleman (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.62% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 63.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 29177, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.