Gentiva
A hospice in Aiken, South Carolina 29801
1690 University Parkway, Aiken, South Carolina 29801. (803) 648-2117.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 10 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
10 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 17 hospices serving ZIP code 29801 had 6.
The last inspection on record was on Jun 5, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jun 5, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 197 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 23 (Patient #4,11,13,15) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 4: Upon home visit medication reconciliation the facility and hospice medication profiles did not match. The facility has medication profiles includes Fenofibrate 145mg one tablet daily. Hospice medication profile did not have that medication listed. Patient 11: The active medication profile has an entry for Cipro 500mg/5ml 2 times daily without a stop date. The medication was ordered on 04/27/2026 to be given for 7 days only. Patient 13: The active medication profile has duplicate medication orders for Carbidopa/levodopa ER. Both ordered for the same dosage and to be given the same amount of times a day. Patient 15: The plan of care has orders for Zithromax Z-pak 250mg tabs to be given per instructions. No evidence that those instructions contained for a stop date.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 120 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 11: The medical record indicated that the patient was admitted for Alzheimer’s, has an active wound, and uses oxygen PRN. No evidence that problems, goals, and interventions related to neurological deficits, altered skin integrity, or oxygen safety was included on the plan of care.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 138 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 23 (Patient #4,13,15) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 4: During home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication profiles did not match. The facility has medication orders that included Fenofibrate 145mg one tablet daily. Hospice plan of care did not have orders for that medication. Patient 13: The current plan of care duplicate medication orders for Carbidopa/levodopa ER. Both ordered for the same dosage and to be given the same amount of times a day. Patient 15: The plan of care has orders for Zithromax Z-pak 250mg tabs to be given per instructions. No evidence that those instructions contained for a stop date for the antibiotic.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 215 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 23 (Patient #3,4,7,8,10,13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 3: The medical record indicated that the patient uses a wheelchair daily due to altered mobility. No evidence that the current DME supply list included a wheelchair. Patient 4: The current supply list has wound care supplies listed. No evidence that the patient has active wounds. Patient 7: The medical record indicated that the patient was admitted with a wound. The wound was discontinued on 05/19/2026. No evidence that the current supply list was updated to remove wound care supplies from the supply list. Patient 8: The medical record indicated that the patient used a rollator due to altered mobility. No evidence that the current DME supply list included a rollator. Patient 10: The medical record indicated that patient used a Hoyer lift, walker, wheelchair, and a rollator due to altered mobility. No evidence that the current DME supply list included a rollator, walker, wheelchair, or Hoyer lift. Patient 13: The medical record indicated that the patient uses a PureWick catheter for urinary incontinence. No evidence that the current supply list included a PureWick catheter.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #18) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patient 18: The medical record show that the patient chose an attending physician at the time of admit. No evidence that IDG was conducted in collaboration with the attending physician every 15 calendar days.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 250 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 23 (Patient #1,4,9,10,12) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record indicated that the patient had multiple wounds that were documented as healed. No evidence that the plan of care was updated to remove those active wound care orders. Patient 4: The current plan of care includes interventions for the nurse to obtain copies of the patients advanced directives, however, the document was received upon admission with paperwork but plan of care was not updated. Patient 9: The medical record indicated that the patient’s level of care at the admission was routine home care. The plan of care included level of care goals and interventions for continuous care. No evidence that the patient had received continuous care during the time on hospice. Patient 10: The plan of care has problems, goals, and interventions related to spiritual care and oxygen safety. The medical record indicated that the patient declined chaplain services on 05/15/2026 and has not active oxygen orders since admission. No evidence that plan of care was updated to remove problems, goals, and interventions related to spiritual care or oxygen safety. Patient 12: MSW documentation indicated that the family had requested help with VA benefits and finding sitter services. No evidence that the plan of care was updated to include care coordination problems, goals, and interventions.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 7: The plan of care has MSW visit frequency as weekly. No evidence that the MSW completed visits for the week of May 11th, May 18, and May 25th 2026.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 101 words
“Upon patient record review 1 of 23 (Patient #16) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 16: The aide POC has visit frequencies ordered as 5 times a week. No evidence that the patient received 5 visits for the week of 05/25/2026. No evidence that the visit was missed at the request of the patient or the caregiver.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #17) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient 17: No evidence that advance directives were identified at the time of admission.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))
“Upon client record review, 2 of 23 (Patient #19, 20) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient 19: No evidence that a discharge summary was completed at the time of discharge. Patient 20: No evidence that a discharge summary was completed at the time of discharge.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 10 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since May 14, 2004.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 64% at home, 21% in assisted living, 14% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.2 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 5.1% |
| Visits near death | 95.0% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Regency Healthcare Holdings LLC owns an unstated share directly since Apr 15, 2011.
- Regency Healthcare Group LLC runs it.
- 10 owners or officers are people: Matthew Lambert (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); Jennifer Turner (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); Linda Livingston (managing employee (on the payroll)); Stacey Speakman (managing employee (on the payroll)); Nicholas J Sanito (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 5, 2015 |
| Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Nov 9, 2011 |
| Charlotte Midco, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Falcon Hospice, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Charlotte Buyer, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 11, 2018 |
| Curo Health Services LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Nov 9, 2011 |
| Kah Hospice Company, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Ch Services Group Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 5, 2015 |
| Ch Services Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 5, 2015 |
| Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 60% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Humana Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Centerwell Health Services Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Regency Healthcare Holdings LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | Apr 15, 2011 | |
| Regency Healthcare Group LLC | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | Feb 17, 2006 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 99.82% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 69.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 17 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 29801, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 10.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Gentiva This hospice | 10 |
| Trinity Hospice of Aiken | Not given |
| Enhabit Hospice | Not given |
| Helping Hands Hospice of South Carolina LLC | Not given |
| Empyrean Hospice of South Carolina | Not given |
| Pruitthealth Hospice-Augusta | 0 |
| Georgia Hospice Care | 1 |
| Medical Services of America Hospice-Columbia | 12 |
| Agape Care South Carolina II | 6 |
| Amedisys Hospice of South Carolina | 14 |
| Kindred Hospice | 6 |
| Pruitthealth Hospice- Charleston | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.