Hearth Record

Amedisys Hospice of South Carolina

A hospice in Florence, South Carolina 29501

500 Pamplico Highway, Suite D, Florence, South Carolina 29501. (803) 774-4036.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 12 hospices serving ZIP code 29501 had 10.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 12, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 12, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies
  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 260 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #9) did not contain evidence that a Registered Nurse was designated to ensure the continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs, and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG): Patient #9: The Physician SOC CTI noted, “Chronic wound LLE recently re-opened due to sheer and friction. Wound care ongoing.” The RN 10/17/25 SOC assessment prompt for, “Is wound care ordered for this patient?, was answered as no”. At the body diagram section the RN entered, “LLE pressure ulcer Stage III. Wound care not provided, as caregiver had already completed.” It was not clear as to what wound care the caregiver had provided. Further along the RN documented, “LLE wound not assessed on admission. Daughter showed admitting RN a picture of wound; which had had a dressing placed prior to hospital discharge that same day. RN Case Manager to follow-up/assess for Physician wound care orders”. There was no documentation located reflecting that the RN assessed or followed up on proper wound care to be provided. The next SNV dated 10/18/25 documented, “Wound care not ordered at this visit. Wound not assessed. Left leg wound dressing was recently changed.” The next SNV dated 10/19/25 documented, “Wound not assessed. Caregiver has completed wound care.” Not documented as to what that wound care consisted of. The next SNV dated 10/21/25 documented, “Wound was assessed. RN provided wound care”. This patient was admitted 10/17/25. The Hospice nurse did not ensure continuous patient assessment, by not viewing a wound of concern until 10/21/25.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 134 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 27 (Patients #3, 12, and 17) did not contain evidence that the Plan of Care included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: A detailed statement of both the frequency and scope of all services necessary to meet the specific patient and family need: Patient #3: The IDG POC dated 11/26/25, did not include a scope of planned SW interventions. Patient #12: The IDG POC dated 11/26/25 contained a SW entry of, “Patient making progress toward goals. SW will continue to support as desired.” This POC did not include a ‘scope’ of individualized SW interventions to meet previously identified patient needs. Patient #17: The IDG POC dated 12/04/25 did not include the ‘scope’ of planned Volunteer services.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 291 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 27 (Patients #4, 9, and 16) did not contain a Plan of Care which included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments: Patient #4: A verbal order was obtained on both 12/02/25 and 12/08/25 for, “Cleanse right heel area with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Betadine twice daily, and PRN, without an indication for such PRN dressing change. A verbal order was obtained on 12/08/25 for, “Triad Paste to sacrum B.I.D.” This order is not clear as to ‘who’ is to provide such B.I.D. treatment. An additional verbal order was obtained on 12/08/25 for, “Sacrum and right heel wounds: Cleanse with dermal wound cleanser, apply medi-honey to wound bed, cover with dry dressing. Daily and as needed; without an indication for such ‘as needed’ dressing change. The interim Administrator confirmed that this written wound procedure was worded incorrectly, as the listed interventions are only applicable to the patient’s sacrum wound and not applicable to the patient’s right heel wound. Patient #9: A verbal order was obtained on 12/09/25 for, “Clean calf wound with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply petroleum dressing, then dry gauze. Caregiver may provide wound care in absence of RN”. There is no physician-ordered ‘frequency’ for the provision of this wound care. Patient #16: The 90-day SOC POC included, “SN to instruct on care/management of Nephrostomy. Cleanse with normal saline, apply gauze, stabilization device, transparent dressing. May change drainage bag PRN; without an indication for such PRN bag change. May flush with 10cc normal saline two times daily and PRN.; without an indication for such PRN flush. Change dressing Q week and PRN; without an indication for such PRN dressing change”.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 27 (Patients #2, 5, and 6) did not contain a Plan of Care which included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs: Patient #2: During survey home visit on 12/08/25, it was noted that the patient had the following DME: 1) Hospital Bed; and 2) Bedside Table. These DME items were not included on either the IDG POC dated 11/26/25, nor the 60-day POC beginning 10/20/25. Patient #5: The Medical Director’s CTI for certification period beginning 11/17/25 documented, “Patient has fallen out of bed the past two months, now has ‘fall mats’ in place.” Fall mats were not included on the Hospice POC. Patient #6: During survey home visit on 12/09/25, it was noted that the patient had the following DME: 1) Hospital Bed; 2) Bedside Table; 3) Air pressure mattress; and 4) Wheelchair. These DME items were not included on the POC.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 194 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 27 (Patients #2, 6, and 20) did not contain evidence that the revised Plan of Care included information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment: Patient #2: The 60-day POC beginning 10/15/25 listed a Chaplain visit frequency of, “1 x per month x2 effective 11/01/25.” However, the IDG POC dated 11/26/25 included: 1) Patient refusing Chaplain services. Will develop POC and provide services if requested; and 2) Chaplain to conduct a Spiritual Care assessment and develop POC. This 11/26/25 IDG POC not current/updated. The Chaplain was making visits which included the date of 11/07/25. Patient #6: The 11/06/25 90-day SOC POC ordered, “Chaplain 1x per month. An 11/08/25 phone call documented, “Patient/family refuse Chaplain care/services.” However, the 11/28/25 IDG meeting notes, Spiritual Counselor section, continued to include, “Patient encouraged through ministry.” The POC was not current/updated. Patient #20: A verbal order was obtained on 11/10/25 for, “Cleanse wound #2 on back with soap/water, pat dry, apply Barrier Cream, cover with Opti-foam. Change every 4 days and PRN soiling. This wound care treatment was not forwarded to all subsequent IDG Plans of Care. The wound did not heal until 12/05/25.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #9) did not contain evidence that the IDG had ensured that all care and services were provided in accordance with the Physician-ordered Plan of Care: Patient #9: The SOC Physician CTI noted, “Chronic wound LLE. Wound care ongoing.” The 10/17/25 RN SOC visit documented, “RN Case Manager to follow-up/assess for Physician wound care orders”. There was no subsequent documentation reflecting that the RN had contacted a Physician for such wound orders. The SNV dated 10/21/25 documented, “RN cleansed with wound wash, applied Xeroform to wound bed, then ABD, then gauze wrap.” However, there was no Physician order obtained for this provided wound care until 12/09/25.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #9) did not contain evidence that the IDG had documented the sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement: Patient #9: The RN SOC visit documented a BP of 199/72. There was no documented evidence that the nurse had reported this potential need for Plan Of Care modification to the Medical Director.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 139 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #9) did not contain evidence that Hospice Aide assignments and duties were: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a Hospice Aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a Hospice Aide Patient #9: The Aide POC’s assigned the task of weigh patient every visit. The patient is bedbound, with use of Hoyer Lift for any transfers. On the Aide home visit reports dated 10/20, 10/22, 10/24, 10/27/25, and multiple other visits, the Aide had documented “Not completed” for this assigned task. The task of weigh patient every visit was no longer applicable for this patient, and the RN had not maintained a current individualized Aide POC.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 27 (Patients #6 and 9) did not contain evidence that the Hospice Aide had provided care/services that were: • Ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group • Included in the Plan of Care Patient #6: The Aide POC(s) effective 11/06/25 and 12/09/25, both assigned the Aide to obtain a T, P, R, and BP every visit. The Aide did not obtain/document the provision of these tasks on either the 12/08 or 12/09/25 visits. Patient #9: The Aide POC dated 12/09/25 assigned the task of weigh patient every visit. The patient is bedbound, with use of Hoyer Lift for any transfers. On the Aide home visit reports dated 10/20, 10/22, 10/24, and 10/27/25, and multiple other visits, the Aide documented “Not completed” for this assigned task.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #19) did not contain evidence that a Registered Nurse had made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the Hospice Aide, and to ensure that services ordered by the Hospice Interdisciplinary Group are meeting the patient’s needs: Patient #19: The first Aide visit was made on 10/30/25. There was not evidence of a documented Aide Supervisory visit on or prior to day 14 (11/13/25).”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation and interview with the Alternate Administrator there was not evidence of the Hospice’s use of Volunteers, providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services, in an amount that at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid Hospice employees and contract personnel. The 2024 calendar year Volunteer Report reflected a 1.57% utilization of Volunteers.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #18) did not contain evidence that all entries were legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice: Patient #18: The Aide POC effective 11/24/25 assigned, “Aide to report pain”, with a provided reporting parameter of >4. The Aide visit notes section, prompting the “Aide to report pain” on visit notes dated 11/25, 12/03, and 12/08/25, resulted in the Aide documenting a response of “Yes”. These Aide home visit notes did not document evidence of the Aide having assessed for patient pain level, as there was no pain level documented. This is unclear documentation.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #14) did not contain evidence that the Hospice had forwarded a summary, and a copy of the patient record if requested, to the Facility when transferring the patient to that Facility: Patient #14: The Hospice transitioned a patient from their home setting to an in-patient facility on 11/03/24, to receive temporary Respite services. There was no documented evidence that the Hospice had provided the facility with a summary of the patient’s history and health needs while at the facility.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #23) did not contain evidence that the Hospice had created a Discharge Summary which included all CMS-required information: Patient #23: Discharged 06/02/25. There was no documented evidence of the Hospice having created/established a DC Summary document to include the following CMS-required information: • A summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms and pain management • The patient’s current plan of care • The patient’s latest physician orders • Any other documentation that will assist in post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the attending physician or receiving facility”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 12, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 25, 2005.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 79% at home, 11% in assisted living, 9% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.8%
Visits near death96.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Amedisys Hospice, L.L.C. owns an unstated share directly since Aug 1, 2009.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Carter Owens (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Carter Owens (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Scott G Ginn (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (corporate officer); Travis Miglicco (corporate officer); Kristina J Braud (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Amedisys Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 20, 2015
Amedisys Hospice, L.L.C.Owns 5% or more directlyAug 1, 2009
Amedisys Holding LLCOwns 5% or more through other companiesJan 29, 2010

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.95% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 83.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 29501, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 10; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.