Hearth Record

Steel City Hospice

A hospice in Hermitage, Pennsylvania 16148

3150 Highland Road, Suite 104, Hermitage, Pennsylvania 16148. (724) 996-7580.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

15 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 16 hospices serving ZIP code 16148 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 22, 2025: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

15 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 6, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies
  • Medical director (42 CFR 418.102)

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice designates a physician to serve as Medical Director which includes: • When the Medical Director is not available, a physician designated by the hospice assumes the same responsibilities and obligations as the Medical Director. The hospice does not currently have a medical director designee.”

    Rule L0664. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 10 of 14 (Patient #1,4,5,6,7,8,10,12,13,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death. Patient 1,4,5,6,7,8,10,12,13,14: The comprehensive assessment does not contain the consideration for imminence of death.”

    Rule L0528. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 158 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #3,4,9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: Patient 3: The Hospice medication profile contains Haloperidol 0.5mg tablet 2 times daily, 1 tab at bedtime. The facility has the Haloperidol is ordered as liquid 2mg/ml, 1ml 3 times daily. Corrected on site, order updated. Patient 4: The medication profile contains an order for Acetaminophen 500 mg, 2 tabs every 6 hours PRN mild pain, hydrocodone/acetaminophen 7.5/325, 1 tab every 6 hours PRN severe pain and 1 tab at bedtime. There is no evidence of maximum allowable acetaminophen amount. Corrected on site, order updated. Patient 9: The medication profile contains an order to irrigate the foley with 60 ml NS. The patient does not have a foley. Corrected on site, med profile updated.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 5: The patient has a wound to coccyx with ordered wound care. The agency has a Policy 4-121 the SN is to assess and measure all wounds weekly at time of visit. The patient is being seen twice weekly by the RN and the wound has not been measured yet this certification period.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 204 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #3,8,9,10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 3: The POC 10/22/25 contains Haloperidol 0.5mg tablet 2 times daily, 1 tab at bedtime. The facility has the Haloperidol is ordered as liquid 2mg/ml, 1ml 3 times daily. The facility has applying A&D ointment to perirectal area and heels topically every shift these are not included on the hospice POC. Corrected on site, orders updated. Patient 8: The SN documented on 10/27/25 the patient using O2 at 2 liters per minute, there is no order for oxygen at 2 liters per minute. Corrected on site, order added. Patient 9: The POC 10/11/25 contains an order to irrigate the foley with 60 ml NS. The patient does not have a foley. Corrected on site, POC updated. Patient 10: Pt has a foley per POC 9/5/25 the SN has goals and interventions to teach regarding foley care and irrigation orders for a foley however, there is no evidence of orders with the foley size or how often to change the foley. Corrected on site, orders updated.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #1,7) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The SN documented 10/14/25 patient using a quad cane to ambulate. This was not included on the POC. Corrected on site, order added. Patient 7: The POC has Oxygen 5 LPM concentrator with kit under DME supplies though no order with frequency on the POC. Pt is no longer on oxygen and this has not been removed from the POC. Corrected on site, oxygen removed from DME list.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 131 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #7,8) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 7: The IDG note on 10/23/25 contains an order to downgrade the diet to mechanical soft as patient having choking episodes. There was no risk for aspiration care plan added. Corrected on site, care plan added. Patient 8: The POC 9/24/25 contains an order to teach facility staff, patient, caregiver on performing wound care cleanse with NS, pat dry, apply calcium alginate and cover with dry dressing daily. The order for the wound remains on the current POC and the wound was resolved on 9/4/25. Corrected on site, POC updated.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 4: The POC contains an order to measure the wounds weekly. There was no wound measurement completed the week of 10/5/25, the coccyx wound was not measured the week of 10/19/25. The low back and right heel wounds were not measured the week of 10/12/25. No wounds were measured the week of 10/26/25.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Physician services (42 CFR 418.64(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence the hospice medical director, physician employees, and contracted physician(s) of the hospice, in conjunction with the patient’s attending physician, are responsible for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and conditions related to the terminal illness. This is demonstrated by any of the following: Patient 3: The patient chose an attending physician other than the medical director on the election of benefits. The patient began having increase behaviors with changes to medications on 10/22/25, 10/29/25,10/31/25 and 11/3/25 there is evidence that the hospice medical director was called however, no evidence the attending physician of record was contacted.”

    Rule L0590. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 11 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) Personnel 5: The aide did not have a competency of performing the appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include: ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 165 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #7,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 7: The aide POC contains oxygen precautions, patient is no longer on oxygen. Corrected on site, aide POC updated. Patient 8: The aide POC does not contain oxygen precautions and oxygen is ordered. Corrected on site, aide POC updated.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: Patient 2: The POC 10/19/25 contains an order for aide twice weekly. The aide saw the patient 10/23/25, there was no evidence of second visit made and no missed visit documentation.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 4: The aide began seeing patient 10/7/25, there was no supervisory visit completed until 11/3/25.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 169 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #4,5,8) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 4: The SN documented performing wound care by restating the wound care order and then “wound care completed per order”. This is not complete and clear documentation as there is no evidence specific details of the order were followed on 10/27/25,10/30/25, 11/3/25. Patient 5: The SN documented performing wound care on 10/8/25, 10/22/25,10/24/25, 10/27/25 by restating the order. It is unclear of the details of the order were followed. Patient 8: The patient has PRN oxygen in the facility, there is an area where the SN must answer the question “Is oxygen safely stored?” on many of the visits including 10/16, 10/20, 10/23 it is answered as N/A.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient 4: The physician orders 10/13/25, 10/23/25 for wound care do not state who is to perform the wound care. Corrected on site, orders updated.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 22, 2025Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareNo deficiencies cited
Nov 6, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 28, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 27.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 77% at home, 13% in assisted living, 10% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day27.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11.7%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Addus Healthcare Inc. owns 100% directly since Aug 1, 2025.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: William Bradley Bickham (corporate officer, 100%); Travis Blaser (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Brian T Monahan (corporate officer, 0%); William Bradley Bickham (managing employee (on the payroll)); Rodney Dirk Allison (corporate officer, 0%); Heidi Susan Bee (managing employee (under contract)); Heather B Dixon (corporate officer); Heather B Dixon (managing employee (on the payroll)); Heather B Dixon (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Brian W Poff (corporate officer, 0%); Amber Hall (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Addus Homecare CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 1, 2025
Addus Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Aug 1, 2025
Black Rock Institutional Trust Company NAOwns 5% or more through other companies16%Aug 1, 2025
Capital One NAHolds 5% or more of the mortgage11.6%Aug 1, 2025
Bank of America, N.A.Holds 5% or more of the mortgage9.2%Aug 1, 2025
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Holds 5% or more of the mortgage9.2%Aug 1, 2025
Fifth Third Bank, National AssociationHolds 5% or more of the mortgage9.2%Aug 1, 2025
Pnc BankHolds 5% or more of the mortgage9.2%Aug 1, 2025
Bmo Bank, N.A.Holds 5% or more of the mortgage9.2%Aug 1, 2025
Vanguard Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies6.8%Aug 1, 2025
Citizens Bank NAHolds 5% or more of the mortgage5.4%Aug 1, 2025
The Huntington National BankHolds 5% or more of the mortgage5.4%Aug 1, 2025
Synovous Bank, National AssociationHolds 5% or more of the mortgage5.4%Aug 1, 2025
Regions BankHolds 5% or more of the mortgage5.4%Aug 1, 2025
Royal Bank of CanadaHolds 5% or more of the mortgage5.4%Aug 1, 2025
Us Bank, N.A.Holds 5% or more of the mortgage5.4%Aug 1, 2025

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 93% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 97% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.33% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 83.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 16 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 16148, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 15.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.