Hearth Record

Southern Care Youngstown

A hospice in Youngstown, Ohio 44512

970 Windham Court, Suite 9, Youngstown, Ohio 44512. (330) 797-8940.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 16 hospices serving ZIP code 44512 had 3.5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 13, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 13, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 509 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 27 (Patient #2,#3,#11,#13,#14,#15,#17,#18) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient#2: The medication profile indicates Dulcolax as a scheduled medication. However, the instructions state to take as needed if no results 8 hours after taking milk of magnesium. The medication profile indicates Imodium AD 2mg as a scheduled medication. However, the directions indicates to take as needed for diarrhea. Patient#3: During home visit, it was noted that patient has a bottle of atorvastatin 40mg 1 daily filled 7/21/26. However, the agency medication profile indicates atorvastatin is 20mg daily. It was also noted that patient medication profile indicates patient on oxygen PRN. However, there is no oxygen equipment noted in the home. Patient confirms she does not have or use oxygen. Patient#11: The medication profile indicates trazadone is schedule daily. However, the instructions state take at bedtime if melatonin ineffective. Docusate 50mg is listed on profile as scheduled but instructions read as 4th line bowel regimen. Milk of magnesia is also listed as scheduled but instructions indicate take as third line bowel regimen if no bowel movement for 4 days. MiraLAX 17grams is also listed as scheduled. However, instructions state third line of bowel regimen if no BM for 4 days. Patient#13: Medication profile indicates patient currently on oxygen PRN. However, CTI on 7/14/26 and nurse visit 7/30 indicate patient is on continuous oxygen. Patient#14: The medication profile indicates patient is on oxygen 2-4LPM NC PRN. However, nurse documentation on 7/27/26 and IDG 7/28/26 states patient using oxygen continuously. The medication profile list lidocaine patch 4% as being scheduled. However, the instructions state apply one to affected area twice a day as needed. There is also no specified area of application. Patient#15: Medication profile indicates patient is on oxygen 2-4 lpm PRN. However, nurse documentation on 8/4/26, 8/5, and 8/6 indicates patient now using continuous oxygen. Patient#17: The medication profile marks the following medications as “no” for not having reviewed directions, purpose, side effects or interactions of the following medications: ASA 81mg, cilostazol 50mg, finasteride 5mg, Insulin glargine 100 units sub-q pen, metoprolol 25, Plavix, Protonix, Tylenol arthritis 650mg. Patient#18: The medication profile indicates side effects and interactions were not reviewed for Morphine 100/5ml. The medication profile also indicates the following medications were marked “no” for not having reviewed directions, purpose, side effects and interactions: amantadine HCL 100mg, amlodipine 10mg, aspirin 325mg, Ativan 0.5mg, bisacodyl 10mg, Levsin 0.125mg, methimazole 10mg, and Senna. Also, the following medications are listed as the route being oral, however patient has PEG tube for nutrition and hydration. Medications are amlodipine, methimazole, amantadine, ASA, ondansetron. Patient is listed as NPO per recert plan of care on 5/12/26. These medications were all ordered 5/13/26 or 4/13/26.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient#4: The record indicates patient has surgical wound to abdomen from PEG tube placement 7/6/26. Nurse assessed and measured on 7/7/26. There is no indication of measurement after this date but wound remains active in chart.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 293 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 27 (Patient #1,#2,#3,#4,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient#1: The record indicates patient is using prescription topicals for antifungal under breast and a topical for rectal buttock area. However, there is no evidence of problems, goals or interventions related to maintaining skin integrity on POC. Patient#2: Patient is a diabetic and is ordered Baqsmi PRN for low blood sugar. There is no evidence of problems, goals or interventions related to controlling or monitoring her blood sugar. Patient#3: The nurse documentation and aide POC indicate patient struggles with dyspnea on exertion there is no evidence of interventions for this on POC. POC indicates patient is using oxygen and has interventions regarding safe and appropriate use in the home. However during home visit it was noted there was no oxygen in home as patient refused it. Patient#4: There is no evidence of problems goals or interventions on the main plan of care for speech and communication issues for patient. Documentation by nurse and chaplain indicates on multiple visits patient unable to speak or having great difficulty speaking due to pain related to disease process. Patient#9: Nurse documents Alzheimer’s patient lives alone. The granddaughter monitors him from her house with cameras. There is no evidence of problems, goals or interventions related to home safety. However, nurse and MSW document working on options, educating, and discussing these issues with family.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 27 (Patient #3,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient#3: During home visit, it was noted that patient has a bottle of Atorvastatin 40mg 1 daily filled 7/21/26. However, the agency order indicates Atorvastatin is 20mg daily. It was also noted that patient is currently ordered oxygen PRN. However, there is no oxygen equipment noted in the home. Patient indicates she refused it awhile ago and does not use or require oxygen. Patient#14: The medication order indicates patient is on Oxygen 2-4LPM NC PRN. However, nurse documentation on 7/27/26 and IDG 7/28 states patient using oxygen continuously. There is also evidence of a medication order that list Lidocaine patch 4% with instructions to apply to affected area twice a day as needed. There is also no specified area of application.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 165 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 27 (Patient #1,#3,#8,#15) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient#1: IDG notes from 7/2/26 indicate patient is ordered nectar thick liquids. There is no evidence of thickener on the supply order for plan of care. Patient#3: DME supply order indicates patient currently requires oxygen equipment however there was none noted in home during home visit. Patient indicates she doesn’t need it and refused delivery. Patient#8: The record indicates patient has weakness and dyspnea with exertion requiring assistance. There is no evidence of bath or shower equipment on supply/DME order for plan of care. Patient#15: The plan of care indicates nurse to monitor fasting blood sugar and report to physician if less than 65 or over 400. There is no evidence of glucometer used at the facility on the supply order for the plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that the IDG documents the sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement. Patient#1: Plan of care intervention states hospice nurse/facility nurse to perform fasting blood sugar monitoring two times daily using patient/facility equipment and report to MD if below 60 or greater than 250. During home visit agency RN obtained blood sugar monitoring log from facility. Between 6/21/26 - 8/7/26 there were 27 occurrences of blood sugar being elevated over 250. The highest being 539. There is no evidence of this being reported to MD.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 209 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 27 (Patient #3,#6,#19) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient#3: The main plan of care indicates patient requires skin precautions. However, there is no indication of skin precautions on the aide plan of care. Patient#6: The aide plan of care indicates patient requires bleeding precautions. However, patient is no longer on anticoagulant medication and bleeding precautions have been removed from the main plan of care. Patient#19: There is no evidence of aspiration precautions on the aide plan of care. The main plan of care indicated aspiration precautions, goals and interventions are dated 6/1/26.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #13) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient#13: IDG note 7/30/26 nurse documents yes to patient having aide services. However, the previous notes by RN indicate patient declined this service.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 248 words

    “Upon client record review, 4 of 27 (Patient #1,#5,#13,#15) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient#1:Plan of care indicates hospice nurse and facility nurse are to monitor fasting blood sugars. There is no evidence of documentation indicating coordination, collaboration, or documentation in chart of blood sugars being monitored. There is no evidence of any results documented in the patient record. Patient#5: Plan of care indicates hospice nurse and facility nurse are to monitor fasting blood sugars. Patient is prescribed 2 medications for diabetes. There is no evidence of documentation indicating coordination, collaboration, or documentation in chart of blood sugars being monitored. There is no evidence of any results documented in the patient record. Patient#13: On 7/28/26 the nurse documents facility requesting nectar thick liquids for patient. There is no evidence of follow up on this request. The record indicates patient current plan of care list oxygen as PRN. However, CTI on 7/14/26 and nurse visit 7/30 indicate patient is on continuous oxygen. Patient#15: Plan of care indicates hospice nurse and facility nurse are to monitor fasting blood sugars. There is no evidence of documentation indicating coordination, collaboration, or documentation in chart of blood sugars being monitored. Medication profile indicates patient is on Oxygen 2-4lpm PRN. However, nurse documentation on 8/4, 8/5, and 8/6 indicates patient now using continuous oxygen.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 13, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited
Jan 15, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Oct 29, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jun 27, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 31, 2004.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 41% at home, 23% in assisted living, 16% in a nursing facility, 21% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.1%
Visits near death95.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Southerncare Holdings, Inc. owns 100% directly since Jun 6, 2014.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); Ronald C Lazas (corporate director, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (other role (CMS gives no detail), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); Amanda Starcher (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Bruce Daniel Willner (managing employee (under contract), 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate director, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Curo Hospice SC LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Ksoc Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Southerncare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jun 6, 2014
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.16% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 78.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 16 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 44512, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3.5; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.