Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15205

5315 Campbells Run Road, Suite 190, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15205. (412) 920-5500.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 30 hospices serving ZIP code 15205 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on May 16, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 16, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 208 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 30 (Patients #1,#2,#4,#5,#6,#11,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 1: The medication profile contained duplicative polyethylene glycol listings and oxygen not listed. The medical record contained nursing documentation 5/2/24 identifying patient use of oxygen. Corrected on site. Upon observation during the home visit medication reconciliation, the facility medication profile did not contain bisocodyl suppositories, dextromethorphan-guaifenesin and albuterol inhaler orders that were on the hospice medication profile. Patient 2: The medication profile contained duplicative Miralax listings. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The medication profile contained differing oxygen listings for PRN and continuous. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medication profile contained Biofreeze topical gel with no area defined for administration. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medication profile contained duplicative lorazepam PRN orders for oral tablets and concentrate. There was no evidence of instructions to differ when administration appropriate or if allowed together. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of the oxygen listed on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 13: The medication profile contained duplicative Tylenol PRN listings. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 20 (Patient #13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 13: The medical record contained an initial bereavement assessment completed 7/5/23 with a start of care 6/28/23.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 152 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 20 (Patients #4,#15) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation 4/23/24 identifying patient issues with constipation and nausea. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to constipation and nausea included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 15: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification 3/18/24 identifying patient has episodes of chest pain relieved by nitro. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to the chest pain. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 161 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 20 (Patients #1,#5,#6,#11) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation 5/2/24 identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient had a wound to the left hip. There was no evidence of an order for wound care to the left hip wound. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medical record contained duplicative lorazepam PRN orders for oral tablets and concentrate. There was no evidence of instructions to differ when administration appropriate or if allowed together. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 344 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 20 (Patients #1,#4,#7,#8,#11,#12,#13,#15) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission and recertification identifying patient use of a hospital bed, bedside table, and oxygen equipment. There was no evidence of orders for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a shower chair. There was no evidence of an order for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification 4/4/24 identifying patient use of a commode. There was no evidence of an order for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification 4/29/24 identifying patient use of bedrails. There was no evidence of an order for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification 4/30/24 identifying patient use of a Hoyer lift and the medication profile contained an albuterol prescription requiring a nebulizer. There was no evidence of orders for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 12: The medical record contained nursing documentation 4/29/24 identifying patient use of a wheelchair. There was no evidence of an order for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 13: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification 4/10/24 identifying patient use of bedrails and bedside table. There was no evidence of orders for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 15: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a walker and catheter supplies. There was no evidence of an order for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 163 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 20 (Patients #1,#2,#6,#7,#8,#11,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are specific to the patient needs. whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1: The aide care plan did not contain instructions on transfer assistance needed. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The aide care plan did not contain instructions on transfer assistance needed. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The aide care plan did not contain instructions on transfer assistance needed. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The aide care plan did not contain instructions on transfer assistance needed. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The aide care plan did not contain instructions on transfer assistance needed. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The aide care plan did not contain instructions on need for 2 person assist with Hoyer lift. Corrected on site. Patient 14: The aide care plan did not contain instructions on transfer assistance needed. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 20 (Patient #20) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 20: The medical record contained an order for patient to discharge due to going to non-contracted facility, however the discharge summary states transfer to another hospice. Agency confirmed the patient was a discharge and not a transfer and that the discharge reason was coded inaccurately resulting in the conflicting information.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 20 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contained an ordered nursing frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 4/14/24. Corrected on site with a late order entry to reduce the visits to once weekly that week per patient request.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 20 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient 5: The medical record contained a wound care order 5/15/24 that did not indicate wound location and specify hospice and facility responsibility for performing care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 16, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 26, 1996.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 27% at home, 36% in assisted living, 27% in a nursing facility, 10% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.7%
Visits near death95.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLC owns 99% directly since Jul 1, 2001; Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLC owns 1% directly since Jul 1, 2001.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); James L Gardner (managing employee (under contract)); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Amanda Dellinger (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 1, 2001
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Holding CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 1, 2001
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCOwns 5% or more directly99%Jul 1, 2001
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCLimited partner99%Jul 1, 2001
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLCOwns 5% or more directly1%Jul 1, 2001
Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLCGeneral partner1%Jul 1, 2001

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 90% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.68% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 78% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 30 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 15205, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.