Hearth Record

Bristol Hospice - Eugene LLC

A hospice in Springfield, Oregon 97477

400 International Way, Suite 200, Springfield, Oregon 97477. (541) 844-0151.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 7 hospices serving ZIP code 97477 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 26, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 26, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 445 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 5 of 23 (22%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the hospice interdisciplinary group (IDG) completed an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/13/2024. A clinical record review revealed evidence of a Chaplain’s initial comprehensive assessment dated 03/20/2024, which was six (6) days after the election of hospice care. There was no evidence that the patient and family/caregiver refused Chaplain services during the five (5) day period after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 6: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/31/2024. A clinical record review revealed evidence of a Chaplain’s initial comprehensive assessment dated 06/06/2024, which was six (6) days after the election of hospice care. There was no evidence that the patient and family/caregiver refused Chaplain services during the five (5) day period after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/02/2024. A clinical record review revealed evidence of a Chaplain’s initial comprehensive assessment dated 05/08/2024, which was six (6) days after the election of hospice care. There was no evidence that the patient and family/caregiver refused Chaplain services during the five (5) day period after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 16: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/11/2024. A clinical record review revealed evidence of a Chaplain’s initial comprehensive assessment dated 07/18/2024, which was seven (7) days after the election of hospice care. There was no evidence that the patient and family/caregiver refused Chaplain services during the five (5) day period after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 22: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/28/2024. A clinical record review revealed evidence of a Chaplain’s initial comprehensive assessment dated 03/05/2024, which was six (6) days after the election of hospice care. There was no evidence that the patient and family/caregiver refused Chaplain services during the five (5) day period after the election of hospice care. During an interview on 07/26/2024, the Executive Director, Director of Patient Care Services, Regional Director of Clinical Operations, and Clinical Supervisor/Alternate Director of Patient Care Services confirmed that the hospice IDG completed the initial comprehensive assessments more than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 240 words

    “It is required that the update of the comprehensive assessment is completed by the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, who, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any, consider the changes that have taken place since the initial assessment. The update of the comprehensive assessment includes information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes and reassessment of the patient’s response to care. The assessment update is completed as frequently as the condition of the patient requires and no less frequently than every 15 days. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 23 (4%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the comprehensive assessment was updated by the registered nurse (RN) no less frequently than every 15 days. Clinical Record 23: The patient elected hospice care on 10/25/2023 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, unspecified. The POC ordered skilled nursing (SN) services two (2) times per week. There was evidence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) visits dated 06/13/2014, 06/17/2024, 06/21/2024, 06/24/2024, and 06/28/2024. A clinical record review revealed RN comprehensive assessments dated 06/10/2024 and 07/01/2024, with twenty (20) days between the two (2) RN comprehensive assessment visits. During an interview on 07/26/2024, the Executive Director, Director of Patient Care Services, Regional Director of Clinical Operations, and the Clinical Supervisor/Alternate Director of Patient Care Services confirmed that the comprehensive assessment updates by the RN were completed less frequently than every 15 days.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 422 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: reflects patient and family goals; [and] identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 23 (17%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the plan of care (POC) reflected patient and family goals and interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected hospice care on 05/23/2024 with the diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. The initial nursing assessment dated 05/23/2024 documented the patient’s dysphagia and use of oxygen. The medication profile dated 05/23/2024 documented, “Oxygen 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula continuous.” The POC dated 05/23/2024 ordered: “Oxygen, as ordered.” The POC dated 05/23/2024 did not document a planned intervention and goal based on the patient’s identified problem with dysphagia. Additionally, the POC did not include documentation of the flow rate, frequency, and route of administration for oxygen. Clinical Record 10: The patient elected hospice care on 06/19/2024 with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. The initial nursing assessment dated 06/19/2024 documented in “Concerns noted” that the patient experienced shortness of breath (SOB). The medication profile dated 06/19/2024 documented, “Oxygen 2-5 liter per minute via nasal cannula, as needed for SOB.” The POC dated 06/19/2024 ordered: “Oxygen per physician order.” The POC did not include documentation of the flow rate, frequency, and route of administration for oxygen. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected hospice care on 03/04/2024 with a diagnosis of alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver with ascites. The initial nursing assessment dated 03/04/2024 documented, “The patient carries a new diagnosis of dysphasia w/ new difficulty swallowing food/liquids/ medication.” The POC dated 03/04/2024 did not document a planned intervention and goal based on the patient’s identified problem with dysphagia. Clinical Record 16: The patient elected hospice care on 07/11/2024 with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the rectosigmoid junction. The initial nursing assessment dated 07/11/2024 documented, “The patient has Foley catheter in place.” The POC dated 07/11/2024 did not document a planned intervention and goal based on the patient’s identified genitourinary problem. During an interview on 07/26/2024, the Executive Director, Director of Patient Care Services, Regional Director of Clinical Operations, and the Clinical Supervisor/Alternate Director of Patient Care Services confirmed that the POC did not include all goals and interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 232 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed of patients that received Hospice Aide (HA) services, the agency did not ensure that the Registered Nurse (RN) provided the HA with written patient care instructions. Clinical Record 21: The patient elected hospice care on 04/15/2024 with a diagnosis of other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions following cerebral infarction. The initial nursing assessment dated 04/15/2024 documented the patient was receiving tube feedings. The HA care plan dated 04/16/2024 assigned the HA the relevant task: “Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) feeding, family to do all feeding, thickened liquids, and seated shower.” The HA care plan did not provide the HA with instructions regarding managing the G-tube during the seated shower and what to report to the RN about the “G-tube site.” During an interview on 07/26/2024, the Executive Director (ED), Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), Regional Director of Clinical Operations, and Clinical Supervisor/Alternate Director of Patient Care Services (Alt DPCS) confirmed that the HA did not receive specific written care instructions regarding the “G-tube site.””

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 290 words

    “It is required that a hospice aide provides services: included in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, interview, and document review. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed for patients receiving Hospice Aide (HA) services, the agency did not ensure that the HA provided services included in the care plan. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected hospice care on 01/03/2024 with a diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease of the native coronary artery without angina pectoris. The HA care plan dated 07/10/2024 assigned the HA the relevant task: “seated shower (while being treated for shingles give bed bath only).” The HA visit note dated 07/10/2024 documented that the patient refused the “seated shower” and that a “sponge bath” was performed. The HA care plan did not assign the HA the task “sponge bath.” Clinical Record 21: The patient elected hospice care on 04/15/2024 with a diagnosis of other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions following cerebral infarction. The HA visit note dated 07/15/2024 documented, “Applied gait belt around her prior to transferring the patient.” During a phone interview with the HA on 07/25/2024, the HA stated, “A gait belt was used for this patient every visit.” The HA care plan dated 07/15/2024 did not assign the HA to use a gait belt during patient transfers. There was no documented evidence of HA communication with the Registered Nurse (RN) regarding using the gait belt for transfers. During an interview on 07/26/2024, the Executive Director (ED), Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), Regional Director of Clinical Operations, and the Clinical Supervisor/Alternate Director of Patient Care Services (Alt DPCS) confirmed that the HA provided services that were not included on the HA care plan.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 375 words

    “It is required that hospice aides must report changes in the patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, and/or social needs to a registered nurse (RN) as the changes relate to the plan of care and any quality assessment and improvement activities. The hospice aide must also complete appropriate records of service, including the report of changes in the patient’s needs. This standard was not met, as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed of patients who received Hospice Aide (HA) services, the agency did not ensure that the HA reported changes in the patient’s needs to the Registered Nurse (RN) as changes related to the HA care plan. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected hospice care on 01/03/2024 with a diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease of the native coronary artery without angina pectoris. The HA care plan dated 07/10/2024 assigned the HA the relevant task: “seated shower (while being treated for shingles give bed bath only).” The HA visit note dated 07/10/2024 documented that the patient refused the “seated shower” and that a “sponge bath” was performed. A clinical record review revealed no evidence that the HA notified the RN of the change in the patient’s care plan needs related to the assigned task “seated shower.” Clinical Record 21: The patient elected hospice care on 04/15/2024 with a diagnosis of other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions following cerebral infarction. The HA visit note dated 07/15/2024 documented, “Applied gait belt around her prior to transferring the patient.” During a phone interview with the HA on 07/25/2024, the HA stated, “A gait belt was used for this patient every visit.” The HA care plan dated 07/15/2024 did not assign the HA to use a gait belt during patient transfers. A clinical record review revealed no evidence that the HA notified the RN of the need to utilize a gait belt during patient transfers. During an interview on 07/26/2024, the Executive Director (ED), Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), Regional Director of Clinical Operations, and the Clinical Supervisor/ Alternate Director of Patient Care Services (Alt DPCS) confirmed that the HA did not report changes in the patient’s care needs to the RN as the changes related to the HA care plan.”

    Rule L0628. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 300 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are supervised by a registered nurse who makes an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and ensure that services ordered by the hospice Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) meet the patient’s need. The hospice aide does not need to be present. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 10 (20%) clinical records reviewed for patients receiving Hospice Aide (HA) services for 14 or more days, the agency did not ensure that the HA was supervised by a Registered Nurse (RN) on-site no less frequently than every 14 days. Clinical Record 1: The patient elected hospice care on 04/19/2024 with a diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease of the native coronary artery without angina pectoris. A review of the clinical record and HA supervisory visits for 05/24/2024 through 06/19/2024 revealed RN supervisory visits dated 05/24/2024 and 06/19/2024, with twenty-six (26) days outstanding. There was no evidence that the Hospice Aide supervisory visits were completed no less frequently than every 14 days. Clinical Record 23: The patient elected hospice care on 10/25/2023 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, unspecified. A review of the clinical record and HA supervisory visits for 06/10/2024 through 07/01/2024 revealed RN supervisory visits dated 06/10/2024 and 07/01/2024, with twenty (20) days outstanding. There was no evidence that the Hospice Aide supervisory visits were completed no less frequently than every 14 days. During an interview on 07/26/2024, the Executive Director (ED), Director of Patient Care Services *DPCS), Regional Director of Clinical Operations, and the Clinical Supervisor/Alternate Director of Patient Care Services (Alt DPCS) confirmed that the aide supervisory visits were completed less frequently than every 14 days.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 26, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 10, 2018.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 43% at home, 38% in assisted living, 14% in a nursing facility, 5% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.7%
Visits near death95.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Bristol Hospice, L.L.C. owns 100% directly since Mar 9, 2018.
  • 12 owners or officers are people: Alex Edward Mauricio (corporate officer, 0%); Alex Edward Mauricio (corporate director, 0%); Alex Edward Mauricio (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); John Charles Garbarino (corporate officer, 0%); John Charles Garbarino (corporate director, 0%); Michael Derrick (corporate officer, 0%); Betty J Brennan (corporate director, 0%); Hyrum Kirton (corporate director, 0%); Kurtis Breneman (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Samuel Suk (managing employee (under contract), 0%); David A Malm (corporate officer, 0%); David A Malm (corporate director, 0%).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Bristol Hospice Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 9, 2018
Bristol Ultimate Holdco, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2023
Bristol Hospice, L.L.C.Owns 5% or more directly100%Mar 9, 2018
Bristol Hospice Topco Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 9, 2018
Webster Equity Partners Bristol Cf LPOwns 5% or more through other companies69.8%Mar 1, 2023
Aware Super Pty, Ltd.Owns 5% or more through other companies8.28%Jan 24, 2022
Webster Equity Partners IV Bristol Cf LPOwns 5% or more through other companies5.72%Mar 1, 2023

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 84% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 44.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 7 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 97477, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 7 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 97477
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Sacred Heart Hospice5
Bristol Hospice - Eugene LLC This hospice7
Cascade Health3
Amedisys Hospice Care5
Serenity Hospice14
Brighton Hospice6
Signature Healthcare at HomeNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.