Oldham Hospice Services LLC
A hospice in Stigler, Oklahoma 74462
801 W Main St, Ste D, Stigler, Oklahoma 74462. (918) 552-8066.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 17 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- Not available CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
17 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 16 hospices serving ZIP code 74462 had 7.
The last inspection on record was on Nov 8, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
17 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Nov 8, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care2 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 92 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #4: During the home visit it was noted Donepezil on the hospice medication list, was not available in the home.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Physician certification and recertification of terminal illness. Patient #3: The NP signed the initial certification of terminal illness instead of the physician.”
Sep 11, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies
-
Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)
“Condition of Participation: Initial and Comprehensive Assessment of the Patient.”
-
Primary/Alternate Means for Communication (42 CFR 418.113(c)(3))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan must includes a primary and alternate means for communicating with hospice’s employees and Federal, state, tribal, regional, and local emergency management agencies. Corrected on site.”
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
“Upon patient record review 2 of 11 (Patient #4,#6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #4: SOC date 8/23/2024, psychosocial assessment occurred 8/29/2024, which is day 6. Patient #6: SOC date 7/19/2024, psychosocial assessment occurred 7/25/2024, which is day 6.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))
The inspectors’ words, 106 words
“Upon patient record review 7 of 11 (Patient #2,#3,#4,#7,#8,#9,#11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #2: No evidence of spiritual assessment. Patient #3: No evidence of spiritual assessment. Patient #4: No evidence of spiritual or psychosocial assessment. Patient #7: No evidence of spiritual assessment. Patient #8: No evidence of spiritual or psychosocial assessment. Patient #9: No evidence of psychosocial assessment. Patient #11: No evidence of psychosocial assessment.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 210 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 11 (Patient #1,#4,#6,#7,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1: Medication profile dated 6/19/2024 included O2 6-10 L via simple mask continuous, no evidence of parameters for dosing. Nitroglycerine 0.4mg SL 1 Q 5 minutes PRN Chest pain, no evidence of parameters/limits to dosing. Corrected on site. Patient #4: Medication profile dated 8/23/2024 included O2 2L via NC PRN, no evidence of and indication for O2. Corrected on site. Patient #6: O2 on DME list and noted in SN SOC nursing notes. On narrative 9/5/2024 documented “on oxygen”. No evidence on medication profile for O2. Patient #7: Medication profile dated 8/21/2024 included O2 6-10L via simple mask, 4-6 L continuous for SOB. No evidence of a clear order or parameters for dosing. Patient #10: Medication profile dated 8/2/2024 included Nitroglycerine 0.4mg SL 1 Q 5 minutes PRN as needed, no evidence of parameters/limits or indication to dosing.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 11 (Patient #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #4: No evidence of a bereavement assessment.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 272 words
“Upon patient record review, 8 of 11 (Patient #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#9,#11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1: Identified as diabetic with frequent BS checks by caregivers, no evidence on POC for DM. Pt found on SOC to have no funeral home planning or DNR, then on SW assessment “arrangements made” No evidence of arrangements and no evidence on POC for funeral planning/DNR. Corrected on site. Patient #2: Patient on Xarelto blood thinner, no evidence on POC of at risk for bleeding. Corrected on site. Patient #3: Patient on Eloquis blood thinner, no evidence on POC of at risk for bleeding. Corrected on site. Patient #4: Patient scores 14 (moderate risk) on Norton scale for risk of skin breakdown, no evidence on POC for problems/goals/interventions for integumentary. Corrected on site. Patient #5: Admitted with brain mass frontal lobe and no funeral home arrangements, no evidence on POC of problem/goals/interventions for neuro or funeral home planning. Corrected on site. Patient #6: Patient on Apixaban blood thinner, no evidence on POC of at risk for bleeding. Patient #9: SN identified as high fall risk on SOC, no evidence on POC for problem/goals/interventions for safety/falls. Patient #11: SN on SOC identified pain level at “8” on scale 1-10 “severe”, no evidence on POC for problem/goals/interventions pain.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 173 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 11 (Patient #1,#4,#6,#7,#10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: Order dated 6/19/2024 included O2 6-10 L via simple mask continuous, no evidence of parameters for dosing. Nitroglycerin 0.4mg SL 1 Q 5 minutes PRN Chest pain, no evidence of parameters/limits to dosing. Corrected on site. Patient #4: Order dated 8/23/2024 included O2 2L via NC PRN, no evidence of an indication for O2. Corrected on site. Patient #6: O2 on DME list and noted in SN SOC nursing notes. On narrative 9/5/2024 documented “on oxygen”. No evidence of an order for O2. Patient #7: Order dated 8/21/2024 included O2 6-10L via simple mask, 4-6 L continuous for SOB. No evidence of a clear order or parameters for dosing. Patient #10: Order dated 8/2/2024 included Nitroglycerin 0.4mg SL 1 Q 5 minutes PRN as needed, no evidence of parameters/limits or indication to dosing.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patients #1,#2: RN entered clean bag several times during patient care without cleansing hands.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 140 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 11 (Patient #9) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #9: Pt on oxygen, no evidence on aide POC/assignment of patient on oxygen precautions.”
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is directed by a Board of Directors/governing body which assumes full legal authority and responsibility for the operation of the hospice. No evidence in meeting minutes provided of an appointed Administrator. He is listed as a member of the committee but not formally appointed in any minutes.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 9 (Personnel #6) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel #6: No evidence of a skills assessment initially during orientation.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 11 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #5: On consents/EOB area for attending is blank.”
-
Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(C))
“Upon client record review, 11 of 11 (Patient #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10,#11) did not have evidence that the written policies and procedures for managing controlled drugs was provided and discussed. Patients #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10,#11: No evidence that written policies and procedures for managing controlled drugs was provided and discussed.”
-
Inpatient care pain & symptom control (42 CFR 418.108(a)(1))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence of a contract for short term inpatient care for pain control and symptom management with a Medicare certified hospice, if applicable. Contract was obtained on 9/11/2024. Corrected on site.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2024 | Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Sep 11, 2024 | Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 15 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 21, 2024.
- CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 4 owners or officers are people: Stoney W Oldham (managing employee (under contract), 50%); Stoney W Oldham (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Stoney W Oldham (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Marsha A Oldham (owns 5% or more directly).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oldham Hospice Services LLC | Limited partner | 50% | Feb 13, 2024 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 16 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74462, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 17.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Sans Bois Hospice, LLC | 4 |
| Oldham Hospice Services LLC This hospice | 17 |
| Saint Francis Hospice | 8 |
| Northeastern Health System Sequoyah | 23 |
| Heart of Hospice, LLC | 3 |
| Elara Caring Xi | 4 |
| Choice Health at Home - Henryetta Hospice | 2 |
| Good Shepherd Hospice, Inc. | 6 |
| Elara Caring Xxiii | 6 |
| Heartland Hospice (Mcalester) | 12 |
| Gentiva X | 20 |
| Compassus - Muskogee | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.