Hearth Record

SSM Health at Home Hospice - Oklahoma

A hospice in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103

601 NW 11th Street, Suite 200, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103. (405) 231-3755.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 20 hospices serving ZIP code 73103 had 9.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 23, 2024: an initial inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 23, 2024: initial inspection by The Joint Commission11 deficiencies
  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(i))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 3 of 3 volunteer HR files reviewed,, the pharmacist surveyor noted that there was no initial EM training for volunteer staff documented and on interview with the volunteer coordinator, the surveyor validated that emergency management training was not part of the onboarding training for volunteers at the time of the survey. The volunteer staff currently part of the hospice, had not yet had their second anniversary to review ongoing training compliance in emergency management required to be completed every two years.
”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))

    “Observed in Document Review. During review of documents included in the patient handbook and admission paperwork it was noted that the organization did not provide written information regarding its policies on advance directives. This was discussed with hospice leadership on site.”

    Rule L0503. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 224 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 16 patient records reviewed, it was noted that for hospice services the plan of care did not contain goals that were measurable or timed. In record reviews for hospice home visits #1, 2, 3 all of the goals were stated to be met by the end of the certification period. For example, in record for hospice home visit the following goal was stated for pain issues, Patient pain/physical discomfort will be reduced to the patient stated goal and will verbalize understanding of the pain management plan. There was no date or measurable time to reach the goal and no patient stated goal to measure the effectiveness of pain management. In hospice home visit #1 record review all goals were stated to be reached by the end of the 90 day certification period. For example, for the problem of history of falls, the following was stated, Patient and caregiver will implement strategies to reduce fall risk by end of 90 day certification period. Decrease fall frequency and reduction in injury risk. In review of record for hospice home visit #3 a stated goal was Cg will verbalize understanding of medication regimen by the end date of the certification period which was three months from now. The patient was imminent. This was discussed with the hospice supervisor and manager.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 16 patient records reviewed, during review of record for hospice home visit #4 it was noted that there was no order or update to the plan of care for volunteer services which had been provided the previous weekend. Additionally there is no formal process in place to document volunteer assignment or communication between the volunteer and the volunteer coordinator until the next IDG meeting. This was validated by the hospice supervisor.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 16 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the medication sheet for hospice home visit #2 contained multiple medications that were ordered for pain but were not clear for the indications. For example, Tylenol was ordered for pain, Naproxen was ordered for mild/general pain and Percocet was ordered for acute pain. There was no use of pain scale to differentiate when to give which medication. In review of record for hospice visit #3 and record review #2 it was noted that there was no indication for Morphine and was stated as PRN for pain. In record review #3 the Morphine was documented on the medication profile as follows 30 tabs po every 12 hours. In hospice record reviews #5, #9 and #10 the morphine was ordered for pain. In record review #6 the pain medications were stated as morphine for pain, Tylenol pain, Norco acute with no indication for severity or pain scale. This was discussed and reviewed with the hospice supervisor and manager.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 135 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, it was noted that the organization’s bag technique was not followed. For example, in hospice home visit #4 the nurse placed a barrier on the floor and then placed her bag on the barrier. She needed to step over the bag many times during the visit and the handle of the bag was laying on the floor off of the barrier. Review of agency policy for bag technique stated that the bag be placed on either a solid surface, doorknob or soft surface with a barrier. Additionally, the nurse was wearing a crossbody bag and this made contact with the patient bed and linen several times during the visit. This was discussed and confirmed with the hospice supervisor who was present on the visit.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, for those patients with hospice aide services, it was noted in review of record for hospice home visit #2 that the aide assignment sheet did not include that the patient had a pluerex drain in place and requested it be covered with saran wrap during the shower. Additionally, the aide assignment included both bed bath and shower. In review of hospice record #3 the aide care plan did not include any instructions regarding the use of oxygen during the shower for this patient who was using oxygen at 3L/nc continuously. This was observed by and discussed with the hospice supervisor present on the visit.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, with hospice aide services it was noted in hospice record review #1 that in January 2024 the aide supervisory visits were not done at least every 14 days. For example there was a 21 day period between supervisory visits in January. In hospice record review #9 there was a 15 day period between supervisory visits. This was reviewed with the hospice supervisor assisting with record review.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Professional management responsibility (42 CFR 418.100(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 204 words

    “Observed in Document Review. During a review of the pharmacy contract, the pharmacy surveyor noted that according to the pharmacy contract the following would be completed: by the contract: background checks on all of the pharmacy employees with record access or direct patient contact and validate that the pharmacists were operating within scope of their licenses or registration. In addition, the contract specified that pharmacists would offer clinical support 24 hours per day 7 days per week and provide patient medication profile reviews initially and on request by the hospice organization. However, the contract did not specify how clinical skills of the pharmacy staff would be maintained to provide these clinical services in a manner that the hospice would be able to validate that the contract pharmacy individuals would be able to be deemed qualified to provide these clinical services to the hospice patients effectively. This omission was validated with the hospice director at the time of the survey. The pharmacy provided the Hospice an addendum to the current pharmacy benefit management agreement validating on 2/22/24 that licensed pharmacists and staff would complete ongoing education and be trained to develop and maintain clinical service for patients in pain and with palliative care hospice needs,”

    Rule L0655. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 203 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 4 home visits conducted, it was noted that in review of record for hospice home visit #1 that the hospice medication profile did not match the Skilled Nursing Facility medication profile. For example, the facility medication profile contained Vitamin D3, Multivitamin and Ferrous Sulfate none of which were in the hospice record. Additionally, the frequency for Isosorbide was listed as BID on the facility profile and TID on the hospice profile and lastly Duo Neb was listed as a PRN medication on the facility profile and as regularly scheduled every 6 hours on the hospice profile. In another example in review of record for hospice home visit #4 it was noted that the medication profile and what was present in the home did not match. For example, Klor Chon was being given daily but was not on the medication profile and Wellbutrin was stated on the medication profile as 75 mg, take 2 tabs BID. The bottle in the home stated Wellbutrin 300mg daily and what was in the nurse’s computer was stated as Wellbutrin 150 mg, one tab BID. This was discussed with and confirmed by the hospice supervisor who was present on the visits.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, for live discharge record review #2 it was noted that the discharge summary did not include documentation regarding the patient’s continued use of an implanted pain pump. This was verified by the hospice supervisor assisting with record review.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 23, 2024Initial inspection by The Joint Commission11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 26, 2022.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 16.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 87% at home, 6% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day16.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.8%
Visits near death98.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • SSM Health Businesses owns an unstated share directly since May 23, 1984.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Karen D Rewerts (corporate director); Waddah Nassar (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Gaynell Schieber Anderson (corporate director, 0%); Kari Krueger (corporate director); Sydney E Haggins (corporate director, 0%); Douglas P Long (corporate director); Carol Smith (managing employee (on the payroll)); Melody J Raby (corporate director, 0%); Laura Kaiser (corporate director); Steven Smoot (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.85% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 80.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 20 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73103, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 20 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 73103
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Emerald Hospice I5
1st Choice Hospice Care7
SSM Health at Home Hospice - Oklahoma This hospice11
Mercy Hospice10
Integris Hospice House5
Apex Hospice7
Integris Hospice House7
Enhabit Hospice13
Valir Hospice Care, LLC4
Complete Hospice Care of Oklahoma City4
Suncrest Hospice11
Cura-Hpc Edmond19

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.