Hearth Record

Hospice Circle of Love

A hospice in Enid, Oklahoma 73701

314 S 3rd Street, Enid, Oklahoma 73701. (580) 234-2273.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 12 hospices serving ZIP code 73701 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 19, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 19, 2026: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1)-(2))

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an All Hazards Risk Assessment was updated every two years for all patients, staff and volunteers. Findings: A review of Emergency Preparedness Program showed an All Hazards Risk Assessment dated 07/31/23. No other dated All Hazards Risk Assessment was present. On 06/18/26 at 9:57 a.m., Staff A stated the Emergency Preparedness Program did not include an All Hazards Risk Assessment for calendar years 2025 or 2026.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the plan of care included the frequency of a suprapubic catheter change for one (Pt #4) of nineteen patients. Findings: A plan of care dated 12/29/25 to 03/28/26 had no orders to change the patient’s suprapubic catheter. Comprehensive nurses’ notes dated 01/07/26, 01/21/26, 02/04/26, and 02/16/26 all document the patient’s suprapubic catheter was placed 09/22/25 and showed no date the catheter was changed through the patient’s discharge date of 02/19/26. On 06/18/26 at 12:59 p.m., Staff B stated the POC did not contain orders to change the suprapubic catheter monthly.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure that a facility had a current POC for one (Pt #10) of four patients who reside in a facility. Findings: Pt #10The surveyor requested the hospice folder with the POC. The request yielded no results. On 06/17/26 at 4:00 p.m., Staff 1 stated the facility had not been provided with a hospice folder or a POC.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the wound care orders were complete for one (Pt #1) of nineteen patients. Findings: Pt #1A review of the POC dated 01/16/26 - 03/16/26 and an order with an effective date of 02/17/26 read in part: “Wound care to right foot - Cleanse with wound cleanser, apply medi-honey, silver alginate, cover with a cushioned bandage.” The order did not contain a frequency for wound care to be performed. On 06/18/26 at 12:30 p.m., Staff A stated the wound care order did not contain a frequency.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

Feb 7, 2024: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 521 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to: 1. ensure completion of the initial spiritual assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care for five (Patients #2, 8, 16, 17 and 18) of 19 patients; and 2. ensure completion of the initial psychosocial assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care for three (Patients #11, 16 and 17) of 19 patients. 1. Patient #2 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 11/28/23 with no completion of the initial spiritual assessment from 11/28/23 to 02/07/24 (71 days after the election of the hospice benefit) with no documentation of patient or caregiver refusal of visits. Patient #8 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 11/08/23 with no completion of the initial spiritual assessment from 11/08/23 to 02/05/24 (90 days after the election of the hospice benefit) with no documentation of patient or caregiver refusal of visits. Patient #16 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 12/06/23 with no completion of the initial spiritual assessment from 12/06/23 to 12/27/23 (21 days after the election of the hospice benefit) with no documentation of patient or caregiver refusal of visits. Patient #17 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 12/08/23 with no completion of the initial spiritual assessment from 12/08/23 to 12/19/23 (12 days after the election of the hospice benefit) with no documentation of patient or caregiver refusal of visits. Patient #18 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 11/09/23 with no completion of the initial spiritual assessment from 11/09/23 to 11/21/24 (12 days after the election of the hospice benefit) with no documentation of patient or caregiver refusal of visits. 2. Patient #11 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 12/08/23 with no completion of the initial psychosocial assessment from 12/08/23 to 02/07/24 (60 days after the election of the hospice benefit) with no documentation of patient or caregiver refusal of visits. Patient #16 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 12/06/23 with no completion of the initial psychosocial assessment from 12/06/23 to 12/27/23 (21 days after the election of the hospice benefit) with no documentation of patient or caregiver refusal of visits. Patient #17 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 12/08/23 with no completion of the initial psychosocial assessment from 12/08/23 to 12/19/23 (12 days after the election of the hospice benefit) with no documentation of patient or caregiver refusal of visits. On 02/07/24 at 12:15 pm, Staff B stated: 1.the initial spiritual assessments for Patients #2, 8, 16, 17 and 18 were not completed within the first 5 calendar days after the election hospice care, and 2. the initial psychosocial assessments for Patients # 11, 16 and 17 were not completed within the first 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,038 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the plan of care was fully developed to include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness for eighteen (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19) of 19 patients reviewed. Patient #1 A plan of care dated 10/17/23 to 12/15/23 documented a primary diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #2 A review of the plan of care dated 11/28/23 to 02/25/23 documented a primary diagnosis of cancer of the breast and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #3 A plan of care dated 09/20/23 to 12/08/23 documented a primary diagnosis of age-related cognitive decline and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #4 A plan of care dated 01/31/24 to 04/29/24 documented a primary diagnosis of multiple myeloma showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #5 A plan of care dated 12/01/23 to 02/28/24 documented a primary diagnosis of age-related cognitive decline and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #6 A plan of care dated 01/31/24 to 04/29/24 documented a primary diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #7 A plan of care dated 10/19/23 to 12/17/23 documented a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #8 A plan of care dated 11/08/23 to 02/05/24 documented a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #9 A plan of care dated 12/13/23 to 03/11/24 documented a primary diagnosis of cancer of the prostate and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #10 A plan of care dated 12/21/23 to 03/19/24 documented a primary diagnosis of age-related cognitive decline and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #11 A plan of care dated 12/08/23 to 03/06/24 documented a primary diagnosis of cancer of the bladder and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #12 A plan of care dated 12/01/23 to 02/28/24 documented a primary diagnosis of age-related cognitive decline and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #13 A plan of care dated 10/26/23 to 01/23/24 documented a primary diagnosis of progressive supranuclear ophthalmoplegia and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #14 A plan of care dated 11/19/23 to 02/16/24 documented a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #16 A plan of care dated 12/06/23 to 03/04/24 documented a primary diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #17 A plan of care dated 12/08/23 to 03/06/24 documented a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #18 A plan of care dated 11/09/23 to 02/06/24 documented a primary diagnosis of senile degeneration and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. Patient #19 A plan of care dated 12/11/23 to 02/08/24 documented a primary diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease and showed no plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Documentation showed no services or treatment related to either the primary or secondary diagnoses. On 02/07/24 at 1:35 pm, Staff B stated the plans of care for Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19 failed to include services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(1))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure quality indicator data was used in the design of the QAPI program for all 24 current patients and any new patients admitted to the hospice. A review of QAPI records showed no use of quality indicator data in the QAPI program documentation for 2022 and 2023. On 02/07/24 at 1:30 pm, Staff B stated the QAPI program did not include the use of quality indicator data.”

    Rule L0563. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 164 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to the ensure plans of care was coordinated with the long-term care facility for four (Patients #1, 2, 3 and 5) of 19 patients reviewed. Patient #1 A plan of care dated 10/17/23 to 12/15/23 documented no specific responsibilities to be provided by the nursing home or the hospice. Patient #2 A plan of care dated 11/28/23 to 02/25/24 documented no specific responsibilities to be provided by the nursing home or the hospice. Patient #3 A plan of care dated 09/20/23 to 12/18/23 documented no specific responsibilities to be provided by the nursing home or the hospice. Patient #5 A plan of care dated 12/01/23 to 02/28/24 documented no specific responsibilities to be provided by the nursing home or the hospice. On 02/07/24 at 1:50 pm, Staff stated the plan of care for Patients #1, 2, 3 and 5 did not outline the specific responsibilities to be provided by the nursing home or the hospice.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 19, 2026Recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited
Feb 7, 2024Recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 8, 1986.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 36% at home, 30% in a nursing facility, 34% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.7%
Visits near death95.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 2 owners or officers are people: Chad Caldwell (corporate director); Chad Caldwell (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 90% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.5% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 72.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73701, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.