Hearth Record

Bridge Home Health and Hospice

A hospice in Findlay, Ohio 45840

15100 Birchaven Lane, Findlay, Ohio 45840. (419) 423-5351.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 14 hospices serving ZIP code 45840 had 8.5.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 14, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 7, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies
  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 discharged patient records reviewed with Revocation, During HOSRRDC# 1’s patient record it was noted the organization had not ensured a Revocation was signed when a discharge was requested by the family. For example: review of HOSRRDC# 1’s patient record revealed HOSRRDC# 1 was to be discharged for extended prognosis. Further review of the patient record revealed HOSRRDC# 1’s daughter requested patient be discharged immediately and not continue with the hospice. Review of HOSRRDC# 1’s patient record revealed a signed Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage signed the same day of discharge. However, there was no documentation of a Revocation. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Outpatient Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0505. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 380 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 23 patient records reviewed, During HOSRRHV# 3’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured it assessed and reassessed the patient that included pertinent physical findings. For example: review of HOSRRHV# 3’s start of care plan of care revealed an order to flush the Medi-port monthly for port maintenance. Review of the start of care RN comprehensive assessment revealed no documentation of a Med- port. Review of the patient record revealed documentation in two Skilled Nurse visit notes, one approximately 30 days after the start of care and one approximately 60 days after that start of care that included the port was flushed and the patient tolerated it well, with no documentation of the location of the port or assessment of the port site. Further review of the patient record revealed documentation approximately 86 days after the start of care with documentation of where the port was located and the port site assessment. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Outpatient Hospice. Manager. Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 3 home visits conducted with skilled nurse, During HOSRRHV# 3 and HOSRRHV# 6’s home observations it was noted the organization had not ensured the hospice conducted a patient-specific comprehensive assessment and reassessment that included all areas of the hospice care related to the severity of symptoms. For example: during HOSRRHV# 3’s home observation the RN was observed assessing edema in the bilateral lower extremities by pulling up the patient’s pant leg and assessing the shin area. However, the RN never removed the patient’s socks to assess the skin or edema of the feet. During HOSRRHV# 6’s home observation HOSRRHV# 6 shared pain of 3/10 in the patient’s right heel. Review of HOSRRHV# 6’s patient record revealed HOSRRHV# 6 had a stage 1 pressure ulcer to the right heel and the left heel. During HOSRRHV# 6’s home observation the RN did not assess the skin of the feet/heel during the assessment. The RN shared she was told the Wound Doctor had seen her earlier in the day so the RN did not need to assess the heels because the Nursing Facility staff told her the pressure ulcers were resolved. This was observed, discussed, and validated with the Outpatient Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(iii))

    The inspectors’ words, 177 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted with medication reconciliation, During HOSRRHV# 6’s home observation it was noted the organization had not ensured the RN completed a medication assessment per organization policy 12.13 Bridge Medication Review that included Medication reconciliation should be performed in the home at the soc roc, recertification, during the first visit by each new clinical discipline, first visit by case manager, at least weekly and with all medication changes identified by the patient or caregiver. The in-home medications will be reconciled, the paper medication list in the home will be updated during the visit, and the EMR medication list will be updated promptly. For example: during HOSRRHV# 6’s home observation the RN completed a medication reconciliation by comparing the hospice medication profile to the SNF/NF medication list. The RN shared the hospice did not look at the actual medications in the SNF/NF. The Outpatient Hospice Manager shared the hospice did not review medications as the SNF/NF used their own pharmacy and had the pharmacy print out the medication lists.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 23 of 23 patient records reviewed, During patient records review it was noted the organization had not ensured the plan of care included goals with time frames required to meet those goals. For example: review of the patient records revealed all MSW goals Medical Social Worker to establish a plan of care with no documentation of when the plan of care should be established. Further review of the patient records revealed Chaplain goals Chaplain to establish a plan of care with no documentation of when the plan of care should be established. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Outpatient Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 169 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 23 patient records reviewed, During HOSRRHV# 6’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured the plan of care included all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions to include interventions to manage pain and symptoms. For example: review of HOSRRHV# 6’s Skilled Nurse visit note dated one day after the start of care revealed documentation of right heel stage 1 pressure wound, 6x3.5 cm, Red, non-blanchable apply foam dressing to right heel. Change every 3 days and as needed for dislodgement. Left Heel stage 1 pressure wound 3x4 cm, Red, non-blanchable apply foam dressing to left heel. Change every 3 days and as needed for dislodgement. Further review of the Skilled Nurse visit revealed documentation the nurse applied the foam dressing to the bilateral heels. Review of the plan of care revealed no documentation of wounds or wound dressing changes. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Outpatient Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 2 home visits conducted with Hospice Aide, During HOSRRHV# 4’s home observation it was noted the organization had not ensured the hospice aide provided services as ordered in the plan of care. For example: during HOSRRHV# 4’s home observation the hospice aide applied a pink paste to the patient’s coccyx per the hospice aide. Review of the hospice aide written patient care instructions revealed no documentation of the task of applying pink paste to the patient. This was observed, discussed, and validated with the Outpatient Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 107 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 SNF/NF patient records reviewed, During HOSRRHV# 6’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured it identified the care and services that are needed and specifically which provider is responsible for performing the respective functions. For example: review of HOSRRHV# 6’s patient record revealed HOSRRHV# 6 was a SNF/NF resident and had bilateral heel stage 1 pressure ulcers with a wound dressing. Further review of HOSRRHV# 6’s patient record revealed no documentation indicating if the SNF/NF or the hospice would provide the wound dressing changes. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Outpatient Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(i))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 2 home visits conducted in a SNF/NF, During HOSRRHV# 6’s home observation it was noted the organization had not ensured it provided the SNF/NF the hospice plan of care. For example: review of the patient’s medical record, hospice binder, and electronic communication between the SNF/NF and the hospice revealed no documentation a plan of care had been provided to the SNF/NF. This was observed, discussed, and validated with the Outpatient Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(iii))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 2 home visits conducted in a SNF/NF, During HOSRRHV# 5 and HOSRRHV# 6’s home observations it was noted the organization had not ensured it had a process to ensure it provided the physician certification and recertification of the patient’s terminal illness to the skilled nursing facility/nursing facility. For example: review of HOSRRHV# 5’s SNF/NF hospice binder and medical record revealed no documentation of the initial certification of terminal illness (CTI) or subsequent recertification CTI. Review of HOSRRHV# 6’s SNF/NF hospice binder and medical record revealed no documentation of the initial CTI. This was observed, discussed, and validated with the Outpatient Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(vi))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 2 home visits conducted in a SNF/NF, During HOSRRHV# 6’s home observation it was noted the organization had not ensured it provided the SNF/NF medication information. For example: review of the patient’s medical record, hospice binder, and electronic communication between the SNF/NF and the hospice revealed no documentation a medication list/profile had been provided to the SNF/NF. This was observed, discussed, and validated with the Outpatient Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 14, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 7, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 7, 1985.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 16 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 41% at home, 23% in assisted living, 22% in a nursing facility, 8% in a skilled nursing facility, 5% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day16.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11%
Visits near death97.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Blanchard Valley Continuing Care Services owns 100% directly since Jun 1, 2002.
  • 22 owners or officers are people: Frank Cosiano (corporate director, 0%); Richard Michael Polder (corporate director); Dan Kennard (corporate director, 0%); Michael Brough (corporate director, 0%); Elizabeth Kroetz (corporate director, 0%); Ginger Jones (corporate director, 0%); Jeffery Shrader (corporate director, 0%); Kyle Mcgraw (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Adele Webb (corporate director, 0%); Jamie Stall (corporate director, 0%); Kimberly K Stumpp (corporate director); Joseph F Longo (corporate director); Myron Lewis (corporate director, 0%); Myron Lewis (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Cheryl Buckland (corporate director, 0%); Richard States (corporate director, 0%); James Pf Dowling (corporate director, 0%); David Cytlak (corporate officer); David Cytlak (corporate director); William Hopkins (corporate director, 0%); Sarah Foust (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); John Reineke (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Blanchard Valley Continuing Care ServicesOwns 5% or more directly100%Jun 1, 2002

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.71% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 78.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 45840, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8.5; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.