Hearth Record

New Hope Hospice

A hospice in Las Vegas, Nevada 89117

8290 W Sahara Ave Ste 190, Las Vegas, Nevada 89117. (702) 849-3116.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 87 hospices serving ZIP code 89117 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on May 23, 2025: an initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 23, 2025: initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 299 words

    “It is required that the comprehensive assessment includes an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 5 of 5 (100%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that an initial bereavement assessment was completed as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/26/2025. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/04/2025. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/17/2025. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/05/2024. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/03/2024. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. The Administrator/Registered Nurse (RN), Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), Alternate DPCS, and Bereavement Coordinator stated in an interview on 05/22/2025 that the agency did not ensure that an initial bereavement assessment was completed as part of the comprehensive assessment. The Administrator/RN stated, “The electronic medical record (EMR) has had some challenging areas of learnings.” The agency had identified how-to add the initial bereavement assessment to the clinician assignment prior to this site visitor completing the exit conference.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 315 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care reflects patient, and family goals and identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 5 (80%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure the plan of care (POC) reflected patient and family goals and interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. CLINICAL RECORD 1: The initial nursing assessment narrative dated 04/26/2025 stated, “She’s skipping meals and takes one (1) Ensure supplement instead of a meal a day”. The interdisciplinary group (IDG) POC dated 04/26/2025 lacked evidence that the POC included Ensure and goals and interventions for the altered nutritional status. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The initial nursing assessment narrative dated 03/04/2025 stated, “Patient has poor food and fluid intake and Ensure is provided by the agency to help nutritional intake”. The IDG POC dated 03/04/2025 lacked evidence that the POC included Ensure and goals and interventions for the altered nutritional status. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The initial social work and spiritual counselor assessments dated 03/21/2025 and 03/19/2025 respectively had a visit frequency of one (1) time per month with one (1) as needed visit for psychosocial or spiritual crisis. The interdisciplinary group (IDG) POC dated 03/25/2025 lacked evidence of goal(s) and intervention(s) for both the social worker and the spiritual counselor. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The initial nursing assessment dated 12/05/2024 stated for the locator “Nutrition/Hydration” - “Dysphagia - Yes”. The IDG POC dated 12/05/2024 lacked evidence of the goal(s) and intervention(s) for dysphasia. The Administrator/Registered Nurse, Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), and Alternate DPCS stated in an interview on 05/22/2025 that the agency did not ensure the POC reflected patient and family goals and interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 233 words

    “It is required that counseling services include an organized program for providing bereavement services delivered by or under the supervision of a qualified professional with experience or education in grief or loss counseling. The bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved per a bereavement plan of care that includes the types of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed for patients that expired revealed the agency did not ensure a post-death bereavement plan of care (POC) was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient death was on 01/03/2025. There was evidence of a completed post-death bereavement assessment, but the record lacked evidence of a post-death bereavement POC. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient death was on 02/09/2025. There was evidence of a completed post-death bereavement assessment, but the record lacked evidence of a post-death bereavement POC. The Administrator/Registered Nurse (RN), Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), Alternate DPCS, and Bereavement Coordinator stated in an interview on 05/22/2025 that the agency did not ensure a post-death bereavement plan of care (POC) was completed. The Administrator/RN stated, “The electronic medical record (EMR) has had some challenging areas of learnings.” The agency had identified how-to add a post-death bereavement POC for the survivors prior to this site visitor completing the exit conference.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Role (42 CFR 418.78(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 229 words

    “It is required that volunteers are used in day-to-day administrative and/or direct patient care roles. Volunteer services are noted in the plan of care and documented in the patient record. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed for patients that elected volunteer services revealed the agency did not ensure the plan of care (POC) included the volunteer goals and interventions. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The interdisciplinary group (IDG) POC dated 12/05/2024 ordered the volunteer services frequency as one (1) time per week with one (1) visit, as needed per patient/family request. There was evidence of volunteer visits completed on 12/06/2024, 12/11/2024, 12/18/2024, 12/20/2024, 12/23/2024, and 01/03/2025. The IDG POC dated 12/05/2024 lacked goal(s) and intervention(s) for the volunteer. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The IDG POC dated 12/03/2024 ordered the volunteer services frequency as one (1) time per week with one (1) visit, as needed per patient/family request. There was evidence of volunteer visits completed on 12/05/2024, 12/12/2024, 12/19/2024, 12/26/2024, 01/2/2025, 01/9/2025, 01/16/2025, 01/23/2025, 01/30/2025 and 02/06/2025. The IDG POC dated 12/05/2024 lacked goal(s) and intervention(s) for the volunteer. The Administrator/Registered Nurse, Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), Alternate DPCS, and Volunteer Coordinator stated in an interview on 05/23/2025 that the agency did not ensure the POC included the goal(s) and intervention(s) for the volunteer services being provided.”

    Rule L0644. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 23, 2025Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 10, 2025.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: Aileen Cabading Brawner (owns 5% or more directly, 34%); Aileen Cabading Brawner (corporate officer, 34%); Engelberto Nullar (owns 5% or more directly, 33%); Engelberto Nullar (corporate officer, 33%); Liduvina Chongson (owns 5% or more directly, 33%); Liduvina Chongson (corporate officer, 33%); Aileen Cabading Brawner (managing employee (on the payroll)); Crispino Santos Santos (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 87 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89117, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.