Hearth Record

Caring Professionals Hospice

A hospice in Las Vegas, Nevada 89117

2595 Montessouri St, Las Vegas, Nevada 89117. (702) 485-5562.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 87 hospices serving ZIP code 89117 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 18, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 12, 2025: recertification inspection by the state6 deficiencies
  • Core services (42 CFR 418.64)

    The inspectors’ words, 174 words

    “Based on interview and document review, the agency failed to provide the core services of nursing care and bereavement care as ordered by the physician. The systemic failure of not providing the ordered services placed one Patient (P)11 at risk for the lack of care and symptom management and P11s family at risk for inappropriate grieving. Findings include: The agency failed to provide nursing services as ordered by the physician for one of 14 patients (Patient (P) 11) whose records were reviewed. The failure to provide nursing services as ordered by the physician placed the patient at risk for the lack of symptom management and preparation of the family for changes in the patients health status, including impending death. Refer to L-591. The agency failed to perform a bereavement assessment and subsequent communication for one of two patients (Patient (P) 11) whose records were reviewed for bereavement concerns. The agencys failure to perform the bereavement assessment and provide subsequent communication with the bereaved placed the family at risk for inappropriate grief. Refer to L-596.”

    Rule L0587. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 247 words

    “Based on record review and staff interview, the agency failed to perform a comprehensive bereavement assessment within five days of admission to hospice services for one of 14 patients (Patient (P) 11) whose records were reviewed. The agencys failure to perform a comprehensive assessment of P11s familys bereavement risk for inappropriate grieving placed P11s family at risk for unassessed bereavement needs. Findings include: Review of the agency’s undated Admission packet, provided to each patient and family upon admission, revealed staff were required to perform a bereavement assessment within five days of a patients admission to hospice. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for P11 revealed an admission date of 06/06/24 with diagnoses that included cancer of the larynx (throat). It was recorded that P11 died on 07/24/24. Review of P11’s Assessment tab of the EMR revealed no documented evidence that a comprehensive bereavement assessment was completed with the family of P11. During an interview on 02/12/25 at 3:30 PM, the Bereavement Coordinator confirmed the clinical record lacked evidence of a bereavement assessment conducted within five days of P11s admission to hospice. The Bereavement Coordinator stated that if the bereavement assessment had been done, the results would have indicated the family was a “;moderate to high risk” of inappropriate grief and may have required additional resources and support to manage the grief. The agencys failure to perform an initial bereavement assessment placed P11s family at risk for the lack of services to assist P11s family with grief.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 222 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to complete a review of the plan of care by the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) every 15 days for one of 14 patients (Patient (P) 11) whose records were reviewed. The agencys failure to perform IDG reviews every 15 days placed P11 at risk of the lack of symptom management, lack of education regarding the disease process, and placed P11s family at risk for inappropriate grieving. Findings include: Review of the facility’s undated policy titled Interdisciplinary Group, revealed staff was to perform an IDG review of each patient on service every 15 days and as needed. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for P11 revealed an admission date of 06/06/24 with diagnoses that included cancer of the larynx (throat). It was recorded that P11 died on 07/24/24. Review of the IDG tab of the EMR revealed an IDG note dated 06/06/24. There was no documented evidence any other IDG review of the plan of care for P11 was completed. During an interview on 02/11/25 at 3:00 PM, the Executive Nurse confirmed the lack of IDG review and notes in P11s EMR. The agencys failure to perform an IDG review of P11 placed P11 at risk for the lack of symptom management and disease education and placed P11s family at risk for inappropriate grieving.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 253 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to provide nursing services as ordered by the physician for one of 14 patients (Patient (P) 11) whose records were reviewed. The failure to provide nursing services as ordered by the physician placed the patient at risk for the lack of symptom management and preparation of the family for changes in the patients health status, including impending death. Findings include: The agency failed to provide a policy directing staff to follow physicians orders. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for P11 revealed an admission date of 06/06/24 with diagnoses that included cancer of the larynx (throat). It was recorded P11 died on 07/24/24. Review of the Plan of Care tab of the EMR, revealed a physician’s order for once weekly skilled nurse visits. Review of the EMR revealed no documented evidence of skilled nurse visits from 07/07/24 through 07/23/24, a period of 20 days. It was recorded a visit was made on 07/24/24 when the patient died. During an interview on 02/11/25 at 4:30 PM, the Administrative Nurse revealed they were the skilled nurse assigned to P11 and confirmed the lack of documentation of the SN visits from 07/04/24 through 07/23/24. The Administrative Nurse stated their home was near P11, with neighborly visits made, but confirmed SN visits, as ordered by the physician, were not made. The agencys failure to follow physician orders and provide SN visit placed the patient at risk for unmanaged symptoms and lack of education of their disease process.”

    Rule L0591. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 246 words

    “Based on document review and interview, the agency failed to perform a bereavement assessment and subsequent communication for one of two patients (Patient (P) 11) who were reviewed for bereavement concerns. The agencys failure to perform the bereavement assessment and provide subsequent communication with the bereaved placed the family at risk for inappropriate grief. Findings include: Review of the agency’s undated Admission packet, provided to each patient and family upon admission, revealed staff were required to perform a bereavement assessment within five days of a patients admission to hospice. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for P11 revealed an admission date of 06/06/24 with diagnoses that included cancer of the larynx (throat). It was recorded P11 died on 07/24/24. Review of P11’s EMR revealed no documented evidence of a bereavement assessment conducted with the family. During an interview on 02/12/25 at 3:30 PM, the Bereavement Coordinator confirmed a bereavement assessment had not been conducted within five days of P11s admission to hospice. The Bereavement Coordinator stated that if the bereavement assessment had been done, the results would have indicated the family was a moderate to high risk of inappropriate grief and may have required additional resources and support to manage the grief. The Bereavement Coordinator confirmed that post-death bereavement activities, including mailings and phone calls, were not done after the agency sent a sympathy card. The agencys failure to provide post-death bereavement activities for P11s family placed the family at a risk of inappropriate grieving.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 131 words

    “Based on document review and staff interview, the agency failed to perform Criminal Background Checks (CBC) for one of ten staff members (Physician 1) whose personnel records were reviewed. This had the potential to place the safety and well-being of patients at risk of harm. Findings include: Review of Nevada’s Department of Health and Human Service’s website, located at https://dpbh.nv.gov/Reg/HealthFacilities/dta/FAQs/Health_Facilities_-_Background_Check_FAQ_s/, revealed all hospice agencies must perform Criminal Background Checks (CBC) on all employees. Review of the personnel file for Physician 1 revealed a hire date of 11/10/20 and a job description that included direct care for hospice patients. The personnel filed lacked evidence of a CBC upon hire. During an interview on 02/12/25 at 3:00 PM, the Executive Director confirmed the agency had failed to perform a CBC on Physician 1.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 18, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 12, 2025Recertification inspection by the state6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 29, 2020.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 75% at home, 25% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5%
Visits near death95.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Nona L Bautista (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Nona L Bautista (corporate officer, 100%); Nona L Bautista (corporate director, 100%); Nona L Bautista (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Troy Bertoli (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 93.62% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 61.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 87 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89117, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.