Hearth Record

Gentle Care Hospice

A hospice in Las Vegas, Nevada 89117

8689 W. Sahara Avenue Ste 280, Las Vegas, Nevada 89117. (702) 462-5181.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 87 hospices serving ZIP code 89117 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 25, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 25, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Primary/Alternate Means for Communication (42 CFR 418.113(c)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan must includes a primary and alternate means for communicating with hospice’s employees and Federal, state, tribal, regional, and local emergency management agencies. No evidence of communication plan for federal, state, tribal, regional, and local emergency management agencies.”

    Rule E0032. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 6 (Patient #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #6: The patient was admitted on 7/17/24. The record indicates that the spiritual assessment was completed on 7/24/24.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 6 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #5: There is no evidence of an initial spiritual assessment being completed.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 302 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 6 (Patient #1,#2,#3,#4,#6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1: The record indicates patient has a diagnoses of Congestive heart failure with pulmonary hypertension and requires use of oxygen. There was not evidence that the plan of care reflected patient goals and interventions based on cardiovascular problems and oxygen use. Patient #2: The records indicates patient has a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s dementia and dysphagia. There was not evidence that the plan of care reflected patient goals and interventions based on Alzheimer’s/dementia or for issues related to dysphagia. Corrected on site. Patient #3: The record indicates patient required oxygen 2 LPM via NC, puree diet with nectar thick liquids, had difficulty swallowing , and incontinence. There was not evidence that the plan of care reflected the patients goals and interventions related to oxygen use, dietary needs, difficulty swallowing, or incontinence. Patient #4: The record indicates that on 6/14, 6/18, and 7/5 the aide documented behavioral issues with patient during care which she reported to the Admin and owners. There was not evidence of the plan of care reflecting the patients goals and interventions related to behavioral changes in patient. Corrected on site Patient #6: The record indicates on the RN initial assessment that patient has high risk skin breakdown and incontinence. There was not evidence that the plan of care reflected goals and interventions related to high risk of skin breakdown and incontinence. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 194 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 6 (Patient #2,4,5) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #2: The record indicated the 4/17 order for nurse frequency at 1 time per week and 2 PRN. The week of 4/17/24 there was documentation of 2 scheduled visits on 4/17 and 4/19. Corrected on site. Patient #4: The record indicated the 6/13 order for nurse frequency at 1 time per week and 2 prn. The week of 6/16 two nurse visits were documented on 6/19 and 6/21 and were documented as scheduled visits. The record indicated the 6/13 order for MSW frequency was 1 time per week and 1 prn. The only MSW visits were documented as being once a month on 6/17 and 7/22. The record indicated the 6/13 order for spiritual visits at 1 time per week and 1 prn. Spiritual visit was only made on 6/14 and 7/23. Corrected on site. Patient #5: The record indicated the 4/2 order for MSW frequency was 1 time per week. The only MSW visit was documented on 4/6. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 6 (Patient #1,#4,#5) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient#1: The record indicates Aide visit frequency at 2 time per week. The week of 4/14 pt was seen on 4/15, 4/17, and 4/18. Corrected on Site Patient #4: The record indicates order for aide visit frequency is 2 times per week. The week of 6/13 only one visit was documented on 6/14. Corrected on site. Patient #5: The record indicates order for aide visit frequency is 2 times per week. The week of 4/14 only one aide visit was made on 4/14. On the week of 4/28 only one aide visit was documented on 4/29. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Role (42 CFR 418.78(b))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence volunteers are used in day to day administrative and/or direct patient care roles. At this time there is no use of volunteers by the agency.”

    Rule L0644. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice documents and demonstrates viable and ongoing efforts to recruit and retain volunteers. There is no documentation at this time as the agency has not yet started efforts for recruiting.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 236 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 6 (Patient #1,#4) did not have evidence that each patient record contains responses to medications, symptom management, treatments, and services. Patient #1: The record indicates on RN visit for 4/12 the nurse documented patient complaining of generalized body pain at 2 out of 10 on the numerical pain scale. The patient was given Tylenol per POC. There is no evidence of follow-up on response to medication or if pain improved. The record indicates on RN visit for 6/7 patient reported pain a 5 out of 10 on numerical pain scale to left hand with swelling. The nurse documented advising patient to take IBU 800 and to elevate hand/arm. There is no evidence on follow-up if symptom management was effective. The record indicates on RN visit for 5/31 The patient reported leg pain at a 4 out of 10 on the numerical pain scale. The pain assessment indicates patient having pain “all the time”. There is documentation that the nurse educated on management and treatment of peripheral edema. There is no evidence of any follow-up with or response to symptom management. Patient #4: The record indicates during RN visit for 6/19 the patient was anxious and agitated. The RN ordered lorazepam 0.5 take 1 every 8 hours as needed for anxiety and quetiapine 25 take one daily for agitation. There is no evidence of follow-up on effectiveness or response to treatment.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 25, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 8, 2024.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Robby Ann Sembrano Quintos (managing employee (under contract), 100%); Citadel M Chavez (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Citadel M Chavez (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Tadeo Ivan Chavez (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 87 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89117, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.