Hospice & Palliative Care of the Blue Ridge, Inc.
A hospice in Spruce Pine, North Carolina 28777
236 Hospital Drive, Spruce Pine, North Carolina 28777. (828) 765-5677.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 13 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 5of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
13 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 5 hospices serving ZIP code 28777 had 5.
The last inspection on record was on Jan 15, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jan 15, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 7: Patient admitted 1/31/24. Initial spiritual assessment documented 2/8/24.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 241 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #2,3,4,9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring All COS: Patient 2,3: Medication list with order for Miralax: Miralax 17 grams by mouth every morning as directed. There is no evidence of dilutants on the medication list. Patient 4: Medication list with order for Miralax: Miralax 17 grams by miscellaneous every morning as directed. There is no evidence of appropriate route or dilutants on the medication list. Patient 9: Medication list with the following orders: Miralax 17 grams by mouth every morning as directed. There is no evidence of dilutants on the medication list. Triamcinolone acetonide 0.1 percent ointment topical. 1 dose to affected area 4 times daily as needed. There is no evidence of application site on the medication list. Fluticasone propionate spray – inhale 100mcg of fluticasone propionate (50mcg/actuation spray, suspension) into nostril daily. There is no evidence of instructions re: which nostril on the medication list. Lidocaine adhesive patch. Apply 2 adhesive patch, medicated of lidocaine (4 percent patch) topically daily. There is no evidence of application site or on/off instructions on the medication list.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 91 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #18) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 18: There is no evidence of bereavement assessments in patient’s medical record.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 300 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #2,3,9,10,11,13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. All COS: Patient 2: Identified needs: dyspnea with oxygen as an intervention, high risk for falls, bleeding precautions, pain. No evidence of problems, goals, interventions on the plan of care: oxygen as an intervention, high risk for falls, bleeding precautions. Patient 3: Identified needs: dyspnea with oxygen as an intervention, high risk for falls, bleeding precautions, pain, aspiration precautions, dysphagia, constipation, mobility, weakness. No evidence of problems, goals, interventions on the plan of care: oxygen as an intervention, high risk for falls, bleeding precautions, constipation. Patient 9: Identified needs: dyspnea with oxygen as an intervention, high risk for falls, bleeding precautions, nausea, edema, weakness, pain. No evidence of problems, goals, interventions on the plan of care: high risk for falls. Patient 10: Identified needs: high risk for falls, edema, urinary catheter, integumentary including active wound, weakness, pain. No evidence of problems, goals, interventions on the plan of care: edema, weakness, high risk for falls. Patient 11: Identified needs: high risk for falls, bleeding precautions, dyspnea with oxygen, mobility, weakness, pain. No evidence of problems, goals, interventions on the plan of care: bleeding precautions, weakness, mobility, high risk for falls. Patient 13: Identified needs: high risk for falls, bleeding precautions, edema, neuro for hallucinations and confusion, aspiration, dyspnea, weakness, pain. No evidence of problems, goals, interventions on the plan of care: bleeding precautions, dyspnea, edema, aspiration.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 209 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #2,3,4,9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. All COS: Patient 2,3: Plan of care with order for Miralax: Miralax 17 grams by mouth every morning as directed. There is no evidence of dilutants on the plan of care. Patient 4: Plan of care with order for Miralax: Miralax 17 grams by miscellaneous every morning as directed. There is no evidence of appropriate route or dilutants on the plan of care. Patient 9: Plan of care with the following orders: Miralax 17 grams by mouth every morning as directed. There is no evidence of dilutants plan of care. Triamcinolone acetonide 0.1 percent ointment topical. 1 dose to affected area 4 times daily as needed. There is no evidence of application site plan of care. Fluticasone propionate spray – inhale 100mcg of fluticasone propionate (50mcg/actuation spray, suspension) into nostril daily. There is no evidence of instructions re: which nostril plan of care. Lidocaine adhesive patch. Apply 2 adhesive patch, medicated of lidocaine (4 percent patch) topically daily. There is no evidence of application site or on/off instructions plan of care.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: Identified DME needs not on the plan of care: hospital bed with alternating pressure pad, overbed table, high back wheelchair.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #14) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 14: Physician’s respiratory visit frequency order is monthly. There is evidence of RT visit made only 11/04/2024.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 118 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #18) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient 18: There is no evidence of contact for bereavement before or after patient expired.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 173 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #1,2,3) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1,2,3: There is no evidence of stated frequencies for aide tasks on the aide care plans. COS Patient 1: There is no evidence of aspiration precautions on the aide care plan COS Patient 2,3: There is no evidence of oxygen order on the aide care plan. COS”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #10) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 10: Physician’s aide visit frequency order is twice weekly, written 12/13/24. There is no evidence of aide visit made until the week of 12/16/24.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 111 words
“Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #3,5) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 3: Aide supervisory visits documented 12/10/24 and 12/26/24, 16 days apart. There is no evidence of aide supervisory visit between these dates. Patient 5: Aide supervisory visits documented 11/22/2024 and 12/20/2024, 28 days apart. There is no evidence of aide supervisory visit between these dates.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 212 words
“Upon patient client record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #1,5,6,9,11,12) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 All COS: Patient 1: Hospice Election Statement: attending physician election has physician’s name only. No NPI or address filled in. Election addendum signed by responsible party 09/30/2022. No reason given re: patient cannot sign, despite section provided on document. Patient 5: Hospice Election Statement: attending physician election has physician’s name and NPI only. No address filled in. Patient 6: Hospice Election Statement: no evidence of effective date of hospice election, despite section provided on document. Patient 9: Hospice Election Statement: attending physician election has physician’s name and NPI only. No address filled in. Section at top of document: Medicare election/Medicaid election. Neither is chosen despite patient being a Medicare beneficiary. Patient 11: Hospice Election Statement: attending physician election has physician’s name and NPI only. No address filled in. Responsible party’s signature is not dated. Informed consent was signed by responsible party. No reason is given re: patient cannot sign, despite section provided on document. Patient 12: Hospice Election Statement: attending physician election has physician’s name and NPI only. No address filled in.”
-
Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 106 words
“Upon inpatient contract review, 1 of 2 (contract-Greens at Spruce Pine) did not have evidence that the hospice patient’s inpatient clinical record includes a record of all inpatient services furnished and events regarding care that occurred at the facility; that a copy of the discharge summary be provided to the hospice at the time of discharge; and that a copy of the inpatient clinical record is available to the hospice at the time of discharge. Does not contain verbiage that discharge summary will be provided to hospice at time of discharge from one level of care to another when patient is a resident of facility. COS”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 13 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 9, 1993.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.8% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 77% at home, 7% in assisted living, 16% in a nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 9.2 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 5.8% |
| Visits near death | 94.8% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 7 owners or officers are people: Christina H Jenkins (corporate officer, 0%); Christina H Jenkins (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Christina H Jenkins (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Jennifer E Larson (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Sheila Williams (corporate officer); Sheila Williams (managing employee (on the payroll)); Sheila Williams (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 93% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 94% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 98.36% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 52.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 5 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 28777, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 13.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Hospice & Palliative Care of the Blue Ridge, Inc. This hospice | 13 |
| Amorem | 4 |
| Via Health Partners - Cleveland | 16 |
| Medi Home Hospice | 5 |
| Hospice of Yancey County | 0 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.