Medi Home Hospice
A hospice in Newland, North Carolina 28657
1955 Newland Hwy, PO Box 1357, Newland, North Carolina 28657. (828) 733-0663.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
5 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 5 hospices serving ZIP code 28657 had 4.
The last inspection on record was on Sep 16, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jun 12, 2024: recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 531 words
“Based on policy and procedure, clinical record review and staff/patient interview the agency failed to include all current medications on the plan of care for 3 of 4 home visits conducted [ #3,4,and 7]. Findings included: 3. Patient # 7 had a Start of Care date of 12/29/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Senile Dementia. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 3/28/24-6/25/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 12 weeks. On 6/11/24, at approximately 8:30 am, a joint visit was conducted with RN # 16. During the visit a medication review was conducted using a medication profile provided by the agency. The following discrepancies were noted: The medication profile listed Furosemide [fluid medication] 20 mg, take 1 tablet on Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday and Sunday. Review of the medication administration record at the assisted living facility [ALF] revealed the patient was taking Furosemide 20 mg – 2 tablets [40 mg] on Monday, Wednesday and Friday and 20 mg on Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday and Sunday with a start date of 4/26/24. The medication profile listed Meloxicam [anti-inflammatory] 7.5 mg, take 1 tablet daily as needed for pain and Meloxicam 7.5 mg, take 1 tablet daily [medication listed twice on the profile-both entries had a start date of 12.29/23]. The medication administration record from the ALF revealed the patient had Meloxicam 7.5 mg daily, there was no PRN order noted. During an interview with RN # 1 on 6/12/24 at approximately 10 am, RN # 1 confirmed the medication profile was not correct. Review of a policy “;Medication Management”, revised 09/2023 was received from agency staff on 06/11/24 at 3:45 p.m. The policy stated,” ...the patients medications are reviewed and assessed during every comprehensive visit...”. 1.Patient #3 was admitted on 03/29/24 with diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain (loss of intellectual ability), and hypothyroidism (low thyroid). The Plan of Care for 03/29/24- 06/26/24 included orders for skilled nursing 1 time a week for 14 weeks, medical social work 1 time a month for 3 months, and chaplain 1 time a month for 3 months. A home visit was conducted on 6/11/24 at 8:30 a.m. with the skilled nurse. A review of the facility MAR (medication administration record) was conducted and revealed the following medication was not included on the patient plan of care: Melatonin 10 mg (milligrams) take 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime for sleep Interview with the agency skilled nurse on 6/11/24 at 8:42 a.m. confirmed the medication should have been included on the medication administration record. 2. Patient #4 was admitted on 10/20/2020 with diagnoses of copd, pulmonary hypertension, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and type 2 diabetes. The Plan of Care for 06/01/24-07/30/24 included orders for skilled nursing 1 time a week for 9 weeks. A home visit was conducted on 6/11/24 at 9:00 a.m. with the registered nurse. A review of the medications was conducted and revealed the following medication was not included on the plan of care: Vitamin B12 1 capsule daily by mouth as a supplement Interview with the patient on 6/11/24 at 9:27 a.m. confirmed the patient has been taking this supplement for over a year.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 760 words
“Based on policy and procedure, clinical record review and staff interview the agency failed to have visit frequency projections every 15 days for the chaplain IDG (interdisciplinary group) for 7 of 19 records reviewed [#3,14, 15,1, 11, 12, and 16]. Findings included: 4. Patient # 1 had a Start of Care date of 9/5/23 with terminal diagnoses of unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition and unspecified dementia. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 5/2/24-6/30/24 included orders for chaplain services 1 time a month for 2 months. Review of the IDG [interdisciplinary group] minutes dated 5/7/24, 5/21/24 and 6/4/24 revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days from the chaplain. During an interview with Chaplain # 8 on 6/12/24 at 9:45 am, the chaplain confirmed he failed to project the visit frequency during the meetings. 5. Patient # 11 had a Start of Care date of 12/23/23 with terminal diagnoses of unspecified serve protein calorie malnutrition and encephalopathy [a group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 3/2/24-5/30/24 included orders for chaplain visits 1 time a month for 3 months. Review of the IDG [interdisciplinary group] minutes dated 3/12/24 and 3/26/24 [patient expired 3/27/24] revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days from the chaplain. During an interview with Chaplain # 8 on 6/12/24 at 9:45 am, the chaplain confirmed he failed to project the visit frequency during the meetings. 6. Patient # 12 had a Start of Care date of 1/16/24 with a terminal diagnosis of COPD [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-lung condition making it difficult to breath]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 1/14/24-4/14/24 included orders for chaplain visits 1 time a month for 3 months. Review of the IDG [interdisciplinary group] minutes dated 1/30/24-3/14/24 revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days from the chaplain for 5 of 5 IDG meetings. During an interview with Chaplain # 8 on 6/12/24 at 9:45 am, the chaplain confirmed he failed to project the visit frequency during the meetings. 7. Patient # 16 had a Start of Care date of 12/23/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimers Disease. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 3/22/24-9/19/24 included orders for Chaplain 1 time a month for 3 months. Review of the IDG [interdisciplinary group] meetings dated from 3/28/24-6/6/24 revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days from the chaplain for 6 of 6 IDG meetings. During an interview with Chaplain # 8 on 6/12/24 at 9:45 am, the chaplain confirmed he failed to project the visit frequency during the meetings. Review of a policy “;Plan of Care”, revised 10/2023 was received from agency staff on 06/11/24 at 3:45 p.m. The policy stated,” ...revises and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patients condition requires, but no less frequently than every 15 calendar days...” 1.Patient #3 was admitted on 03/29/24 with diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain (loss of intellectual ability), and hypothyroidism (low thyroid). The Plan of Care for 03/29/24- 06/26/24 included orders for skilled nursing 1 time a week for 14 weeks, medical social work 1 time a month for 3 months, and chaplain 1 time a month for 3 months. The IDG on 5/9/24 and 06/6/24 did not include a projected individualized plan for the next 2 weeks for the chaplain for 2 of 2 meetings. 2. Patient #14 was admitted on 05/24/24 with diagnosis of unspecified protein malnutrition, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease and anxiety disorder. The Plan of Care for 05/24/24-07/22/24 included orders for skilled nursing 1 time a week for 1 weeks, and 2 times a week for 8 weeks, and chaplain 1 time a month for 3 months. The IDG on 6/6/24 did not include a projected individualized plan for the next 2 weeks for the chaplain for 1 of 1 meetings. 3. Patient #15 was admitted on 04/18/24 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain, dementia, anxiety, depression, and parkinson disease. The Plan of Care for 04/18/24-07/16/24 included orders for skilled nursing 1 visit every week for 13 weeks, and chaplain 1 visit every month for 3 months. The IDG on 05/09/24 5/23/24, and 06/06/24 did not include a projected individualized plan for the next 2 weeks for the chaplain for 3 of 3 meetings. Interview with Employee #8 on 6/12/24 at 9:15 a.m. revealed, “;I have my frequencies for monthly and have prns built in, I dont usually project my visits any differently”.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
The inspectors’ words, 430 words
“Based on agency policy, direct observation and staff interviews, the Registered Nurse failed to follow agency policy related to infection control practices for 2 of 4 homes visits [#6 and 7]. The findings included: The policy, Bag Technique HC.56 [10/23] , was provided by the agency director on 6/11/24 at 11:35 am. The policy stated, “...After performing hand hygiene, all the clean supplies and equipment needed for the visit are removed from the bag. The bag is then closed...” 1. Patient # 6 had a Start of Care date of 8/19/22 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimers Disease. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 6/9/24-8/7/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 8 weeks, 1 time a week for 1 week. On 6/11/24, at approximately 9:30 am a joint visit was made with RN # 17. During the visit the RN was noted to place her nursing bag on a barrier on the bedside table. After placing the nursing bag on the barrier, and performing hand hygiene, the RN unzipped the nursing bag to remove the vital sign equipment. The RN failed to rezip the nursing bag after removing the vital sign equipment and the nursing bag remained open the entirety of the visit. During an interview with RN # 1 on 6/11/24 at approximately 3 pm, RN # 1 confirmed the nursing bag should have been rezipped after the RN removed the vital sign equipment. RN # 1 confirmed RN #17 failed to follow agency policy related to infection control practices. 2. Patient # 7 had a Start of Care date of 12/29/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Senile Dementia. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 3/28/24-6/25/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 12 weeks. On 6/11/24, at approximately 8:30 am, a joint visit was conducted with RN # 16. During the visit the RN was noted to place her nursing bag on a barrier on the bedside table. The nurse removed vital sign equipment and gloves for the visit. After removing the vital sign equipment and the gloves, the RN failed to rezip the middle and outer sections of the nursing bag. The bag remained unzipped [both compartments] throughout the entire of the visit. During an interview with RN # 1 on 6/11/24 at approximately 3 pm, RN # 1 confirmed the nursing bag should have been rezipped after removing the items. RN # 1 confirmed RN # 16 failed to follow agency policy related to infection control practices.”
-
Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 347 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the skilled nurse failed to assess/measure skin tears in accordance with agency policy for 1 of 2 patients with a wound [#5]. The findings included: The policy, Wound Care [11/23], was provided by agency staff on 6/11/24 at approximately 11:46 am. The policy stated, “...The skilled nurse will assess the wound and document the wound status at every visit. The wound measurements will be documented at least weekly... Patient # 5 had a Start of Care date of 12/5/22 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimers Disease. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 3/29/24-5/27/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 8 weeks. Further review of the POC revealed a nursing intervention related to a skin tear on the left calf/ankle area. The intervention was to clean the wound and apply Silvadene and cover with a foam dressing. The skin tear was identified on 3/14/24. Review of the clinical record revealed the SN completed wound care to the left calf/ankle area on 3/20/24, 4/4/24, 4/9/24, 4/18/24, 4/23/24, 5/2/24 and resolved the intervention on 5/7/24. There were no wound assessment/measurements documented in 6 of 6 SN visits. The RN was not available for interview. An interview was conducted with RN # 1 on 6/12/24 at approximately 11 am, during the interview the RN confirmed the wound should have been assessed each visit and measured weekly. On 3/28/24 a skin tear was identified to the right ankle/calf with an order to clean the wound with wound cleanse and apply Silvadene to wound and cover with foam dressing. Change 2 times per week and as needed. Review of the clinical record revealed the wound care was completed on 4/4/24, 4/9/24, 4/18/24, 4/23/24, 5/2/24 and 5/16/24. There were no wound measurements or wound assessments documented related to the skin tear for 6 of 6 visits. During an interview with RN # 1 on 6/12/24 at approximately 11:15 am, the RN confirmed the wound should be been measured weekly and assessed with each visit.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 446 words
“Based on policy and procedure, clinical record review and staff interview the agency failed to follow the aide care plan for 2 of 19 records reviewed with an aide [#13 and #16]. Findings included Patient # 16 had a Start of Care date of 12/23/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimers Disease. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 3/22/24-9/19/24 included orders for hospice aide 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 12 weeks, 1 time a week for 1 week. Review of the aide care plan dated 3/22/23 and completed by RN # 13 included instructions [related to personal care] for the aide to do a complete bed bath each visit if the patient was unable to tolerate a complete shower. The aide POC also included the following verbiage “;..._____ [name of assisted living staff [not RN] may direct care”. Review of the aide documentation revealed the patient received 21 aide visits from 3/22/24-6/10/24. Out of those 21 visits the patient received 7 bed baths directed by the facility staff, not in accordance with the POC. During an interview with RN # 1 on 6/12/24 at approximately 10:15 am, the RN stated, “;The facility staff usually directs the aide when the aide feels like the patient isnt up to a complete shower. The facility staff isnt always and RN. The facility staff in this situation is not a RN.” Review of a policy “;Personal Care Instructions”, revised 02/2024 was received from agency staff on 06/11/24 at 3:45 p.m. The policy stated,” ...the hospice aide is only allowed to document on care within the care plan...” 1.Patient #13 was admitted on 5/24/24 with diagnoses of copd (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), hypertension, depression and anxiety. The Plan of Care for 5/24/24- 8/21/24 included orders for skilled nursing 1 time a week for 1 week, and 2 times a week for 13 weeks, hospice aide 2 times a week for 13 weeks. The hospice aide plan of care included orders for a complete shower every visit. Review of the aide visit completed on 5/28/24 revealed the aide had given the patient a partial bed bath. Review of the aide visit on 6/10/24 revealed the aide had given the patient a complete bath. Interview with Employee #9 on 6/12/24 at 8:38 a.m. revealed, “;No, it is not on my care plan that I can do a partial bath, I told the RN but Im not sure if she updated the care plan”. Interview with Employee #4 on 6/12/24 at 9:11 a.m. revealed, “;they both did tell me that he was refusing, and I was supposed to update the care plan”.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2024 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Jun 12, 2024 | Recertification inspection by the state | 5 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 20, 1988.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.6% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 41% at home, 45% in assisted living, 14% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.5 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 10.1% |
| Visits near death | 97.6% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- The Young Family Trust F/B/O Patrick Wayne Jeffcoat, Jr. owns 100% directly since Dec 7, 2020.
- Medical Services of America Inc. runs it.
- 7 owners or officers are people: Patrick W Jeffcoat (corporate officer); Patrick W Jeffcoat (corporate director); Patrick W Jeffcoat (managing employee (on the payroll)); Christina M Jeffcoat (corporate officer); Christina M Jeffcoat (corporate director); Thomas L Kirkland (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Lareeca Johnson (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Young Family Trust F/B/O Patrick Wayne Jeffcoat, Jr. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Dec 7, 2020 |
| Medical Services of America Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Jun 1, 2009 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 73.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 5 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 28657, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 5.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Medi Home Hospice This hospice | 5 |
| Amorem | 4 |
| Liberty Home Care II, LLC | 4 |
| Hospice of Yancey County | 0 |
| Hospice & Palliative Care of the Blue Ridge, Inc. | 13 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.