Hearth Record

Medi Home Hospice

A hospice in Newland, North Carolina 28657

1955 Newland Hwy, PO Box 1357, Newland, North Carolina 28657. (828) 733-0663.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 5 hospices serving ZIP code 28657 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 16, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 12, 2024: recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 531 words

    “Based on policy and procedure, clinical record review and staff/patient interview the agency failed to include all current medications on the plan of care for 3 of 4 home visits conducted [ #3,4,and 7]. Findings included: 3. Patient # 7 had a Start of Care date of 12/29/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Senile Dementia. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 3/28/24-6/25/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 12 weeks. On 6/11/24, at approximately 8:30 am, a joint visit was conducted with RN # 16. During the visit a medication review was conducted using a medication profile provided by the agency. The following discrepancies were noted: The medication profile listed Furosemide [fluid medication] 20 mg, take 1 tablet on Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday and Sunday. Review of the medication administration record at the assisted living facility [ALF] revealed the patient was taking Furosemide 20 mg – 2 tablets [40 mg] on Monday, Wednesday and Friday and 20 mg on Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday and Sunday with a start date of 4/26/24. The medication profile listed Meloxicam [anti-inflammatory] 7.5 mg, take 1 tablet daily as needed for pain and Meloxicam 7.5 mg, take 1 tablet daily [medication listed twice on the profile-both entries had a start date of 12.29/23]. The medication administration record from the ALF revealed the patient had Meloxicam 7.5 mg daily, there was no PRN order noted. During an interview with RN # 1 on 6/12/24 at approximately 10 am, RN # 1 confirmed the medication profile was not correct. Review of a policy “;Medication Management”, revised 09/2023 was received from agency staff on 06/11/24 at 3:45 p.m. The policy stated,” ...the patients medications are reviewed and assessed during every comprehensive visit...”. 1.Patient #3 was admitted on 03/29/24 with diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain (loss of intellectual ability), and hypothyroidism (low thyroid). The Plan of Care for 03/29/24- 06/26/24 included orders for skilled nursing 1 time a week for 14 weeks, medical social work 1 time a month for 3 months, and chaplain 1 time a month for 3 months. A home visit was conducted on 6/11/24 at 8:30 a.m. with the skilled nurse. A review of the facility MAR (medication administration record) was conducted and revealed the following medication was not included on the patient plan of care: Melatonin 10 mg (milligrams) take 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime for sleep Interview with the agency skilled nurse on 6/11/24 at 8:42 a.m. confirmed the medication should have been included on the medication administration record. 2. Patient #4 was admitted on 10/20/2020 with diagnoses of copd, pulmonary hypertension, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and type 2 diabetes. The Plan of Care for 06/01/24-07/30/24 included orders for skilled nursing 1 time a week for 9 weeks. A home visit was conducted on 6/11/24 at 9:00 a.m. with the registered nurse. A review of the medications was conducted and revealed the following medication was not included on the plan of care: Vitamin B12 1 capsule daily by mouth as a supplement Interview with the patient on 6/11/24 at 9:27 a.m. confirmed the patient has been taking this supplement for over a year.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 760 words

    “Based on policy and procedure, clinical record review and staff interview the agency failed to have visit frequency projections every 15 days for the chaplain IDG (interdisciplinary group) for 7 of 19 records reviewed [#3,14, 15,1, 11, 12, and 16]. Findings included: 4. Patient # 1 had a Start of Care date of 9/5/23 with terminal diagnoses of unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition and unspecified dementia. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 5/2/24-6/30/24 included orders for chaplain services 1 time a month for 2 months. Review of the IDG [interdisciplinary group] minutes dated 5/7/24, 5/21/24 and 6/4/24 revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days from the chaplain. During an interview with Chaplain # 8 on 6/12/24 at 9:45 am, the chaplain confirmed he failed to project the visit frequency during the meetings. 5. Patient # 11 had a Start of Care date of 12/23/23 with terminal diagnoses of unspecified serve protein calorie malnutrition and encephalopathy [a group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 3/2/24-5/30/24 included orders for chaplain visits 1 time a month for 3 months. Review of the IDG [interdisciplinary group] minutes dated 3/12/24 and 3/26/24 [patient expired 3/27/24] revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days from the chaplain. During an interview with Chaplain # 8 on 6/12/24 at 9:45 am, the chaplain confirmed he failed to project the visit frequency during the meetings. 6. Patient # 12 had a Start of Care date of 1/16/24 with a terminal diagnosis of COPD [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-lung condition making it difficult to breath]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 1/14/24-4/14/24 included orders for chaplain visits 1 time a month for 3 months. Review of the IDG [interdisciplinary group] minutes dated 1/30/24-3/14/24 revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days from the chaplain for 5 of 5 IDG meetings. During an interview with Chaplain # 8 on 6/12/24 at 9:45 am, the chaplain confirmed he failed to project the visit frequency during the meetings. 7. Patient # 16 had a Start of Care date of 12/23/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimers Disease. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 3/22/24-9/19/24 included orders for Chaplain 1 time a month for 3 months. Review of the IDG [interdisciplinary group] meetings dated from 3/28/24-6/6/24 revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days from the chaplain for 6 of 6 IDG meetings. During an interview with Chaplain # 8 on 6/12/24 at 9:45 am, the chaplain confirmed he failed to project the visit frequency during the meetings. Review of a policy “;Plan of Care”, revised 10/2023 was received from agency staff on 06/11/24 at 3:45 p.m. The policy stated,” ...revises and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patients condition requires, but no less frequently than every 15 calendar days...” 1.Patient #3 was admitted on 03/29/24 with diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain (loss of intellectual ability), and hypothyroidism (low thyroid). The Plan of Care for 03/29/24- 06/26/24 included orders for skilled nursing 1 time a week for 14 weeks, medical social work 1 time a month for 3 months, and chaplain 1 time a month for 3 months. The IDG on 5/9/24 and 06/6/24 did not include a projected individualized plan for the next 2 weeks for the chaplain for 2 of 2 meetings. 2. Patient #14 was admitted on 05/24/24 with diagnosis of unspecified protein malnutrition, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease and anxiety disorder. The Plan of Care for 05/24/24-07/22/24 included orders for skilled nursing 1 time a week for 1 weeks, and 2 times a week for 8 weeks, and chaplain 1 time a month for 3 months. The IDG on 6/6/24 did not include a projected individualized plan for the next 2 weeks for the chaplain for 1 of 1 meetings. 3. Patient #15 was admitted on 04/18/24 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain, dementia, anxiety, depression, and parkinson disease. The Plan of Care for 04/18/24-07/16/24 included orders for skilled nursing 1 visit every week for 13 weeks, and chaplain 1 visit every month for 3 months. The IDG on 05/09/24 5/23/24, and 06/06/24 did not include a projected individualized plan for the next 2 weeks for the chaplain for 3 of 3 meetings. Interview with Employee #8 on 6/12/24 at 9:15 a.m. revealed, “;I have my frequencies for monthly and have prns built in, I dont usually project my visits any differently”.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 430 words

    “Based on agency policy, direct observation and staff interviews, the Registered Nurse failed to follow agency policy related to infection control practices for 2 of 4 homes visits [#6 and 7]. The findings included: The policy, Bag Technique HC.56 [10/23] , was provided by the agency director on 6/11/24 at 11:35 am. The policy stated, “...After performing hand hygiene, all the clean supplies and equipment needed for the visit are removed from the bag. The bag is then closed...” 1. Patient # 6 had a Start of Care date of 8/19/22 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimers Disease. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 6/9/24-8/7/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 8 weeks, 1 time a week for 1 week. On 6/11/24, at approximately 9:30 am a joint visit was made with RN # 17. During the visit the RN was noted to place her nursing bag on a barrier on the bedside table. After placing the nursing bag on the barrier, and performing hand hygiene, the RN unzipped the nursing bag to remove the vital sign equipment. The RN failed to rezip the nursing bag after removing the vital sign equipment and the nursing bag remained open the entirety of the visit. During an interview with RN # 1 on 6/11/24 at approximately 3 pm, RN # 1 confirmed the nursing bag should have been rezipped after the RN removed the vital sign equipment. RN # 1 confirmed RN #17 failed to follow agency policy related to infection control practices. 2. Patient # 7 had a Start of Care date of 12/29/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Senile Dementia. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 3/28/24-6/25/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 12 weeks. On 6/11/24, at approximately 8:30 am, a joint visit was conducted with RN # 16. During the visit the RN was noted to place her nursing bag on a barrier on the bedside table. The nurse removed vital sign equipment and gloves for the visit. After removing the vital sign equipment and the gloves, the RN failed to rezip the middle and outer sections of the nursing bag. The bag remained unzipped [both compartments] throughout the entire of the visit. During an interview with RN # 1 on 6/11/24 at approximately 3 pm, RN # 1 confirmed the nursing bag should have been rezipped after removing the items. RN # 1 confirmed RN # 16 failed to follow agency policy related to infection control practices.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 347 words

    “Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the skilled nurse failed to assess/measure skin tears in accordance with agency policy for 1 of 2 patients with a wound [#5]. The findings included: The policy, Wound Care [11/23], was provided by agency staff on 6/11/24 at approximately 11:46 am. The policy stated, “...The skilled nurse will assess the wound and document the wound status at every visit. The wound measurements will be documented at least weekly... Patient # 5 had a Start of Care date of 12/5/22 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimers Disease. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 3/29/24-5/27/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 8 weeks. Further review of the POC revealed a nursing intervention related to a skin tear on the left calf/ankle area. The intervention was to clean the wound and apply Silvadene and cover with a foam dressing. The skin tear was identified on 3/14/24. Review of the clinical record revealed the SN completed wound care to the left calf/ankle area on 3/20/24, 4/4/24, 4/9/24, 4/18/24, 4/23/24, 5/2/24 and resolved the intervention on 5/7/24. There were no wound assessment/measurements documented in 6 of 6 SN visits. The RN was not available for interview. An interview was conducted with RN # 1 on 6/12/24 at approximately 11 am, during the interview the RN confirmed the wound should have been assessed each visit and measured weekly. On 3/28/24 a skin tear was identified to the right ankle/calf with an order to clean the wound with wound cleanse and apply Silvadene to wound and cover with foam dressing. Change 2 times per week and as needed. Review of the clinical record revealed the wound care was completed on 4/4/24, 4/9/24, 4/18/24, 4/23/24, 5/2/24 and 5/16/24. There were no wound measurements or wound assessments documented related to the skin tear for 6 of 6 visits. During an interview with RN # 1 on 6/12/24 at approximately 11:15 am, the RN confirmed the wound should be been measured weekly and assessed with each visit.”

    Rule L0591. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 446 words

    “Based on policy and procedure, clinical record review and staff interview the agency failed to follow the aide care plan for 2 of 19 records reviewed with an aide [#13 and #16]. Findings included Patient # 16 had a Start of Care date of 12/23/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimers Disease. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 3/22/24-9/19/24 included orders for hospice aide 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 12 weeks, 1 time a week for 1 week. Review of the aide care plan dated 3/22/23 and completed by RN # 13 included instructions [related to personal care] for the aide to do a complete bed bath each visit if the patient was unable to tolerate a complete shower. The aide POC also included the following verbiage “;..._____ [name of assisted living staff [not RN] may direct care”. Review of the aide documentation revealed the patient received 21 aide visits from 3/22/24-6/10/24. Out of those 21 visits the patient received 7 bed baths directed by the facility staff, not in accordance with the POC. During an interview with RN # 1 on 6/12/24 at approximately 10:15 am, the RN stated, “;The facility staff usually directs the aide when the aide feels like the patient isnt up to a complete shower. The facility staff isnt always and RN. The facility staff in this situation is not a RN.” Review of a policy “;Personal Care Instructions”, revised 02/2024 was received from agency staff on 06/11/24 at 3:45 p.m. The policy stated,” ...the hospice aide is only allowed to document on care within the care plan...” 1.Patient #13 was admitted on 5/24/24 with diagnoses of copd (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), hypertension, depression and anxiety. The Plan of Care for 5/24/24- 8/21/24 included orders for skilled nursing 1 time a week for 1 week, and 2 times a week for 13 weeks, hospice aide 2 times a week for 13 weeks. The hospice aide plan of care included orders for a complete shower every visit. Review of the aide visit completed on 5/28/24 revealed the aide had given the patient a partial bed bath. Review of the aide visit on 6/10/24 revealed the aide had given the patient a complete bath. Interview with Employee #9 on 6/12/24 at 8:38 a.m. revealed, “;No, it is not on my care plan that I can do a partial bath, I told the RN but Im not sure if she updated the care plan”. Interview with Employee #4 on 6/12/24 at 9:11 a.m. revealed, “;they both did tell me that he was refusing, and I was supposed to update the care plan”.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 16, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jun 12, 2024Recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 20, 1988.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 41% at home, 45% in assisted living, 14% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.1%
Visits near death97.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • The Young Family Trust F/B/O Patrick Wayne Jeffcoat, Jr. owns 100% directly since Dec 7, 2020.
  • Medical Services of America Inc. runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Patrick W Jeffcoat (corporate officer); Patrick W Jeffcoat (corporate director); Patrick W Jeffcoat (managing employee (on the payroll)); Christina M Jeffcoat (corporate officer); Christina M Jeffcoat (corporate director); Thomas L Kirkland (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Lareeca Johnson (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
The Young Family Trust F/B/O Patrick Wayne Jeffcoat, Jr.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 7, 2020
Medical Services of America Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)100%Jun 1, 2009

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 73.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 28657, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 5 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 28657
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Medi Home Hospice This hospice5
Amorem4
Liberty Home Care II, LLC4
Hospice of Yancey County0
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Blue Ridge, Inc.13

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.