Liberty Home Care II, LLC
A hospice in Raeford, North Carolina 28376
336 South Main Street, Raeford, North Carolina 28376. (910) 565-5226.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 15 hospices serving ZIP code 28376 had 8.
The last inspection on record was on May 21, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
May 21, 2025: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 188 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to include treatment orders on the plan of care for 1 of 1 patient requiring a Trilogy (a mechanical device used to assist with breathing) (#8).Findings included: A policy, Admission and Initial Comprehensive Assessment and Development of the Plan of Care (revised 02/2025), received on 05/19/2025 at 12:27 PM from licensed practical nurse #13 stated, “Agency staff receiving or verifying a referral will try to obtain the following baseline information: … Treatment orders.”Patient #8 was admitted on 08/18/2023 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory failure. The plan of care for 04/09/2025-06/07/2025 included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time a week for 9 weeks with 8 PRN (as needed). Review of the clinical record revealed that on 04/18/2025 clinical manager #8 documented, “has been using Trelegy [sic] every night.” Further review revealed that the Trilogy machine was not included in the plan of care.During an interview conducted on 05/20/2025 at 9:10 AM clinical manager #8 stated, “I would have expected that [Trilogy machine] to be included in the plan of care.””
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 294 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to coordinate care with the physician’s for 2 of 3 patients who are not taking medications as ordered. (#8 & 22)Finidngs included: A policy, Case Management, Coordination and Communication Activities (revised 11/2020) received on 05/21/2025 at 12:00 PM from the agency director stated, “Hospice staff maintains ongoing communication with the physician… that addressed the following, at a minimum: … Changes have occurred regarding … medications…”A policy, Clinical Record Content (revised 02/2025) received on 05/19/2025 at 12:27 PM from licensed practical nurse #13 stated, “Each time a patient is seen a clinical note is documented that includes: …Discussions with physician’s or other persons involved…”Patient #8 was admitted on 08/18/2023 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory failure. The plan of care for 04/09/2025-06/07/2025 included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time a week for 9 weeks with 8 PRN (as needed). Review of the clinical record revealed that on 05/07/2025 clinical manager #8 documented, “Patient is refusing the use of Zyprexa [antipsychotic medication] … Patient has not performing [sic] breathing treatment.” Further review revealed no documentation that the physician was notified. 2. Patient #22 was admitted on 02/26/2025 with a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease (high blood pressure) and chronic kidney disease with heart failure. The plan of care for 02/26/2025-05/26/2025 included orders for skilled nurse visits 2 times a week for 13 weeks with 4 PRN (as needed). Review of the clinical record revealed that on 04/17/2025 registered nurse #15 documented, “Patient had started on a new medication (Neurontin) [treats nerve pain] … Discussed with wife, who feels more comfortable holding the medication.” Further review revealed no documentation that the physician was notified that order was not followed.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
The inspectors’ words, 584 words
“Based on agency policy, observation, and staff interviews, the agency failed to follow agency procedures to prevent the spread of infection for 3 of 5 conducted home visits. (patients #1, 3,19)Findings included: A policy, Bag technique, home care (revised 05/20/2024) received on 05/19/2025 at 4:00 PM from the clinical manager stated, “Perform hand hygiene before entering the bag… Never place any soiled or dirty items into the bag, Clean and disinfect reusable items according to your agency’s guidelines… Place a nonwheeled bag on a flat surface that appears clean and dry.”A policy, Hand Hygiene (revised 08/19/2024) received on 05/19/2025 at 4:00 PM from the clinical manager stated, “An alcohol-based hand rub is appropriate for decontaminating the hands: … after contact with the patient… after contact with inanimate objects in the patient’s environment…”Patient #1 was admitted on 11/23/2024 with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure and was a resident of a skilled nursing facility. The plan of care for 02/21/2025-05/21/2025 included orders for home health aide (HHA) 3 times a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 1 week, and 5 times a week for 8 weeks. During a home visit conducted on 05/20/2025 at 8:00 AM HHA #3 placed the clinical bag on a chair, on top of the patient’s shoes.During an interview conducted on 05/21/2025 at 8:32 AM HHA #3 stated, “I didn’t notice the shoes under my bag. No, I would not normally place the bag on shoes.”During an interview on 05/21/2025 at 8:34 AM the agency administrator stated, “They [clinical bags] should be placed on a clean surface.” 2. Patient #3 was admitted on 10/09/2024 with a diagnosis of abnormal weight loss and was a resident of a skilled nursing facility. The plan of care for 05/07/2025-07/05/2025 included orders for medical social work (MSW) visits 1 times a month for 2 months with 2 PRN (as needed). During a home visit conducted on 05/20/2025 at 1:30 PM MSW #4 placed the documentation tablet on the patient’s cloth chair then moved the tablet to the patient’s bedside table, documented on the tablet and placed the tablet into the clinical bag without sanitizing the tablet. MSW #3 touched personal items throughout the patient’s room and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to reaching into the clinical bag.An interview conducted on 05/21/2025 at 8:37 AM with MSW#3 revealed that MSW #3 was not aware that cloth furniture is not considered clean, that hand hygiene must be performed prior to entering the clinical bag, and the documentation tablet should be cleaned prior to placing it in the clinical bag. 3. Patient #19 was admitted on 05/01/2025 with a diagnosis of abnormal weight loss and was a resident of an assisted living facility. The plan of care for 05/01/2025-07/29/2025 included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time a week for 10 weeks. During a home visit conducted on 05/20/2025 at 2:00 PM licensed practical nurse (LPN) #9 placed a stethoscope on the patient’s bed and failed to sanitize the stethoscope prior to placing it in the clinical bag.LPN #9 was not available for an interview.During an interview on 05/20/2025 at approximately 2:30 PM the clinical manager stated, “They [staff] should clean the equipment before putting it back in the bag.”During an interview conducted on 05/21/2025 at 8:49 AM the agency administrator stated, “The expectation is that any staff member will sanitize their hands before they go into their clinical bag. Any equipment should be cleaned and sanitized before it goes back into the bag.””
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 443 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to document responses to medications for 2 of 2 facility patients with unmanaged symptoms. (patient #1, 21)Findings included: A policy, Clinical Record Content (revised 02/2025) received on 05/19/2025 at 12:27 PM from licensed practical nurse #13 stated, “Each hospice record will contain the following information, at a minimum: … A description of the patient’s condition … including response to medication, symptom management…”Patient #1 was admitted on 11/23/24 with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (condition in which the heart doesn’t pump enough blood). The plan of care for 02/21/2025-05/21/2025 included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 8 weeks, 8 PRN (as needed), and “skilled nurse observation of S/SX UTI [signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection].” Review of the clinical record revealed that on 04/14/2025 registered nurse (RN) #16 documented, “Facility staff suspect UTI d/t [due to] pts [patient’s] behavior… Nurse [facility nurse’s name] states they have already notified the facility provider and is waiting for a response. Plan for next 2 weeks is possibly treat UTI.” Further review revealed that there was no follow-up documentation.During an interview conducted on 05/21/2025 at 8:51 AM RN #16 stated, “I didn’t see her for 16 days [after the suspected UTI]. I didn’t feel like she had a UTI. Yes [normally communicates concerns to the licensed practical nurse [to follow-up]. 2. Patient #21 was admitted on 01/16/2025 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that blocks air flow). The plan of care for 04/16/2025- 07/14/2025 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 2 times a week for 8 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed) and “SN to assess exacerbations… that present themselves.” Review of the clinical record revealed that during the SN visit on 04/29/2025 registered nurse (RN) #14 documented, “Patient appears to be having an anxiety attack… Patient was assisted to bed, and encouraged to rest after receiving PRN dose of morphine… Will follow-up tomorrow.” Further review revealed that there was no follow-up documentation.During an interview conducted on 05/21/25 at 9:12 AM RN #14 stated, “I’m sure that I did [follow-up], it looks like another nurse saw her for me, I don’t remember. I do [normally document my follow-up]. I do know that I was there with her on 04/30 I did see her, I think that I just didn’t chart it.”During an interview on 05/21/2025 at 9:18 AM the agency administrator stated, “If an issue it identified, then it should be followed up on based on company policy or the limit that they set and document it.””
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2025 | Recertification inspection by the state | 4 deficiencies cited |
| Apr 15, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 29, 1988.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 86.7% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 43% at home, 10% in assisted living, 39% in a nursing facility, 7% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.3 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7.3% |
| Visits near death | 86.7% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 12 owners or officers are people: John Albert Mcneill (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Ronald Benjamin Mcneill (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Kimmie Fox (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Angela Sluder (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Barbara Ring (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Theresa Komisar (managing employee (on the payroll)); Theresa Komisar (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Brandy Harris (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Donna Turlington (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ronald Benjamin Mcneill (corporate director); Ronald Benjamin Mcneill (managing employee (on the payroll)); Christopher Michael Wood (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 97.04% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 43.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 15 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 28376, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 4.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Liberty Home Care II, LLC This hospice | 4 |
| Hospice of the Carolina Foothills | 9 |
| Firsthealth Hospice | 8 |
| Medi Home Health and Hospice | 0 |
| Healthkeeperz Inc. | 4 |
| Hospice of Scotland County | 3 |
| Richmond County Hospice Inc. | 0 |
| Cape Fear Valley Hospice and Palliative Care | 5 |
| Liberty Home Care and Hospice | 11 |
| Gentiva | 18 |
| Pruitthealth Hospice - Rocky Mount | 20 |
| Amedisys Hospice Care | 14 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.