Hearth Record

Cape Fear Valley Hospice and Palliative Care

A hospice in Fayetteville, North Carolina 28305

2301 Robeson Street Suite 202, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28305. (910) 609-6710.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 8 hospices serving ZIP code 28305 had 14.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 8, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 8, 2026: recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 214 words

    “Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the Medical Social Worker (MSW) failed to notify the registered nurse of a patients report of pain for 1 of 16 patients receiving MSW visits (#8).Findings included: A policy, Pain Assessment (revised 11/1/17) received on 7/6/26 at 12:23 PM from the volunteer coordinator stated, “All patients have the right to have their pain assessed and measures taken to reduce pain.”Findings included:Patient #8 was admitted on 6/4/26 with a diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease of the native coronary artery without angina pectoris (plaque build up in arteries without pain). The plan of care for 6/14/26-9/1/26 included orders for medical social worker (MSW) visits 1 time a month for 3 months with 3 PRN (as needed). Review of the clinical record revealed that on 6/5/26 MSW #13 documented, “PT [patient] reports that she can not sleep through the night due to pain…” Further review revealed that there was no documentation of the registered nurse being notified of the patients report of pain.An interview conducted on 7/8/26 at 11:40 AM with MSW #13 revealed that the registered nurse was not notified.An interview conducted on 7/8/26 at approximately 12:00 PM with the Executive Director revealed that the expectation is for unmanaged symptoms to be reported to the nurse.”

    Rule L0512. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 725 words

    “Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the registered nurse failed to document if the home hospice aide (HHA) was following the plan of care, if the patient/family was satisfied with the care provided by the HHA, if the aide was following infection control guidelines, or if the aide was reporting changes of condition during supervisory visits for 4 of 11 patients with orders for HHA visits (#4, 6, 9, & 14).Findings included: A policy, Hospice Aide Supervision (revised 11/1/22). Received on 7/8/26 at 10:05 from the Executive Director stated, “The Registered Nurse will supervise the Hospice Aides according to specific State guidelines and Federal Regulations Conditions of Participation… At least every 14 days…”Federal Condition of Participation §418.76(h)(3) stated, “The supervising nurse must assess an aide’s ability to demonstrate initial and continued satisfactory performance in meeting outcome criteria that include, but is not limited to– i. Following the patient’s plan of care for completion of tasks assigned to the hospice aide by the registered nurse; ii. Creating successful interpersonal relationships with the patient and family; iii. Demonstrating competency with assigned tasks; iv. Complying with infection control policies and procedures; v. Reporting changes in the patient’s condition…”1. Patient #4 was admitted 6/1/26 with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the prostate. The plan of care for 6/1/26-8/5/26 included orders for SN visits 2 times a week for 10 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed) and HHA visits 2 times a week for 9 weeks and 1 time a week for 1 week. Review of the clinical record revealed that RN #6 documented HHA supervisory visits on 6/10/26, 6/15/26, 6/18/26, 6/15/26,6/18/26, 6/22/26, and 6/29/26 that stated, “NOT OBSERVED” for the following: “DOES THE HOSPICE AIDE REPORT ABNORMAL FINDINGS TO APPREATE STAFF” “DOES THE HOSPICE AIDE OBSERVED STANDARD PRECAUTIONS…?” “IS THE PATIENT/FAMILY PLEASE WITH CARE PROVIDED?” 2. Patient #6 was admitted on 5/26/26 with a diagnosis of Pick’s Disease (abnormal buildup of protein in the brain). The plan of care for 6/9/26-8/7/26 included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 8 weeks with 6 PRN (as needed) and home hospice aide (HHA) visits 2 times a week for 1 week and 3 times a week for 8 weeks. Review of the clinical record revealed that registered nurse (RN) #6 documented weekly supervisory visits on 6/11/26, 6/17/26, 6/25/26, and 7/2/26 that stated, “NOT OBSERVED” for the following: “DOES THE HOSPICE AIDE REPORT ABNORMAL FINDINGS TO APPREATE STAFF” “DOES THE HOSPICE AIDE OBSERVED STANDARD PRECAUTIONS…?” “IS THE PATIENT/FAMILY PLEASE WITH CARE PROVIDED?”3. Patient #9 was admitted on 8/1/25 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The plan of care for 6/17/26-8/15/26 included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 every other week for 2 weeks, 1 time a week for 7 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed) and home hospice aide (HHA) visits 2 times a week for 1 week and 3 times a week for 8 weeks. Review of the clinical record revealed that registered nurse (RN) #6 documented supervisory visits on 6/17/26 and 6/23/26 that stated, “NOT OBSERVED” for the following: “DOES THE HOSPICE AIDE REPORT ABNORMAL FINDINGS TO APPREATE STAFF” “DOES THE HOSPICE AIDE OBSERVED STANDARD PRECAUTIONS…?” “IS THE PATIENT/FAMILY PLEASE WITH CARE PROVIDED?”4. Patient #14 was admitted on 3/3/26 with a diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (progressive degenerative disease affecting the brain and spinal cord). The plan of care for 6/1/26-8/29/26 included orders for skilled nurse visits 2 times a week for 13 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed) and home hospice aide (HHA) visits 2 times a week for 13 weeks. Review of the clinical record revealed that registered nurse (RN) #6 documented supervisory visits on 6/1/26, 6/4/26, 6/10/26, and 6/12/26 that stated, “NOT OBSERVED” for the following: “DOES THE HOSPICE AIDE REPORT ABNORMAL FINDINGS TO APPREATE STAFF” “DOES THE HOSPICE AIDE OBSERVED STANDARD PRECAUTIONS…?” “IS THE PATIENT/FAMILY PLEASE WITH CARE PROVIDED?”During an interview conducted on 7/8/26 at 12:00 PM RN #6 stated, “I thought that the aide had to physically be there during my visits to document it. On Monday of this week, I educated on supervisory visits.”An interview conducted on 7/8/26 at approximately 12:15 AM with the Executive Director revealed that the expectation is for the registered nurses to interview the patient/family to document the assigned supervisory task.”

    Rule L0633. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 263 words

    “Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the registered nurses failed to include a discharge summary for 2 of 2 patients with live discharges (#16 & 17).Findings included: A policy, Hospice Medical Record (revised 10/01/24) received on 7/6/26 at 12:23 PM from the volunteer manager stated, “The hospice medical record shall contain the following clinical information… Transfer/Discharge summaries.”1. Patient #16 was admitted on 5/12/26 with a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease without heart failure (heart damage from long term unmanaged high blood pressure), The plan of care for 5/12/26-8/9/26 included orders for skilled nurse visits 2 times a week for 13 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed). Review of the clinical record revealed that on 5/15/26 registered nurse #6 documented a live discharge due to a patient revocation (patient voluntary discharge from hospice). Further review revealed that there was no discharge summary documented.2. Patient #17 admitted on 8/25/25 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (lack of oxygen in the brain from a blood clot). The plan of care for 4/11/26-6/9/26 included orders for skilled nurse visit 1 every other week for 2 weeks, 1 time a week for 7 weeks, with 3 PRN and discharge for extended prognosis. Review of the clinical record revealed that on 6/10/26 registered nurse #1 documented a live discharge due to the patient no longer qualifying for hospice. Further review revealed that there was no discharge summary documented.During an interview conducted on 7/8/26 at 10:19 AM the Executive Director stated, “The discharging nurse needs to put in a discharge summary the day of the discharge.””

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

Apr 8, 2025: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 529 words

    “Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to document coordination of care for 2 of 3 patients. (Patient’s #1 and 2.)Findings included: A policy, Hospice Medical Record (revised 10/01/2024) received on 04/08/2025 at 2:20 PM from the executive director stated, “The hospice medical record shall contain the following information: … Documentation and communication with the patient, caregiver, and physicians.”A policy, Plan of Care (revised 10/01/2024) received on 04/08/2025 at 2:20 PM stated, “The plan of care must include… Coordination of Care.”Patient #1 was admitted on 09/27/2022 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease (progressive disorder that affects memory and behavior). The plan of care (POC) for 03/15/2025-05/13/2025 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 2 every 2 weeks for 2 weeks, 2 times a week for 7 weeks, and 3 PRN (as needed). Review of the clinical record revealed that on 03/28/2025 RN #6 documented, “Urine smelly with lots of SEDK,ENT [sic], low grade fever [98.2]. 5 day antibiotic ordered…” Further review revealed that there was no documentation of RN #6 contacting the physician.During an interview conducted on 04/08/2025 at 1:28 PM RN #6 stated, “I usually say [in the clinical record] that I reached out and got approval [from a physician].” Patient #2 was admitted on 02/26/2025 with a diagnosis of Malignant Neoplasm of Head of Pancreas (pancreatic cancer). The plan of care for 02/26/2025-05/26/2025 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 2 times a week for 13 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed), MSW visits 1 time a month for 4 months, and volunteer visits 1 time a month for 1 month. Review of the clinical record revealed that on 03/13/2025 the volunteer coordinator documented, “Patient was experiencing an increase in pain during visit. Writer called the patients [sic] case manager [registered nurse (RN) #5’s name] and asked that [RN #5’s name] direct her [caregiver] in interventions to try.” Further review revealed no documentation of RN #5 educating the patient/caregiver on pain management. Further review revealed that on 04/03/2025 Medical Social Worker (MSW) #7 documented, “Not a good day for patient as patient was experiencing dizziness… Patient reports ealier [sic] that morning he thought he saw spiders in the bed…” There was no documentation in the clinical record of the nurse case manager being notified of a change of condition.An interview conducted on 04/08/2025 at 1:24 PM with the volunteer coordinator revealed that RN#5 was notified by telephone during the visit and RN #5 spoke with the caregiver during the call.During an interview conducted on 04/08/2025 at 2:17 PM RN #5 stated, “I did speak with the family about pain and normally I would document it.”During an interview conducted on 04/08/2025 at 1:45 PM MSW #7 stated, “I don’t think that I did notify the case manager.”An interview on 04/08/2025 at 1:31 PM with the executive director revealed that care coordination should be documented in the clinical record.During an interview conducted on 04/08/2025 at 1:52 PM the patient care manager stated, “I would recommend them [MSW] to call the case manager or the patient care manager.”An interview on 04/08/2025 at approximately 2:20 PM revealed that the expectation is to document all communications.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Oct 21, 2024: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(8))

    The inspectors’ words, 435 words

    “Based on agency policy review, clinical record review, staff and caregiver interview, failed to coordinate the discharge plan of care with the patient/caregiver for 1 of 3 live discharge records reviewed. (Patient #2) Findings included: Patient Rights and Responsibilities were received from the agency director on 10/21/24 at 3:42 PM and revealed, “;A patient has the right to...be advised of the agencys procedures for discharge... receive information about the scope of services that hospice will provide and specific limitation on those services...” Policy 2.007, titled “;Live Discharge/Transfer of the Hospice Patient” was received from the agency director on 10/21/24 at 11:35 AM. This policy revealed, “;If a patient has elected to enter a non-contracted facility a discharge from hospice services is not automatically required. The hospice agency must consider the amount of time that the patient is anticipated to remain in the facility as well as the effect on the hospice plan of care. If there is little impact on the hospice plan of care, discharge from hospice service could be deemed inappropriate and a violation of the patient rights.” Patient #2 was admitted to the agency on 06/03/24 with a principal hospice diagnosis of Alzheimers disease. The Plan of Care from 06/03/24 to 08/31/24 revealed orders for skilled nursing three times per week for 13 weeks, medical social work one time per month for one month, home health aide two times per week for 13 weeks, chaplain one time per month for one month, and volunteer one time per month for one month. Patient #2 was treated with antibiotics, steroids and antihistamines (allergy medicine) for low grade fever and respiratory symptoms intermittently throughout the 44 days that she received hospice services and on 07/16/24 her daughter/responsible party took her to the hospital because of the ongoing symptoms. The agency discharged Patient #2 on 07/16/24 due to the patient going to a hospital where the agency was not contracted to provide services. There was no documented evidence that the patient/responsible party were educated about options for hospitalization and treatment at non-contracted facilities or evidence that the agency attempted any alternative methods to avoid discharging the patient. In an interview on 10/21/24 at 3:12 PM, Employee #1, agency director, stated that Patient #2s responsible party “;kept taking her to different hospitals and went to [name of the non-contracted hospital] without contacting us...I asked the nurses to [educate the responsible party about options for hospitalization and treatment at non-contracted facilities] but Im not sure if that was followed up on...” The agency nurses who visited Patient #2 were not available for interview at the time of survey.”

    Rule L0519. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 8, 2026Recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited
Apr 8, 2025Complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency cited
Oct 21, 2024Complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 17, 1992.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 89% at home, 4% in assisted living, 4% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.9%
Visits near death93.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • North Carolina Health CARE Group LLC owns 67% directly since Oct 1, 2008; Cumberland County Hospital System Inc. owns 33% directly since Oct 1, 2008.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer, 0%); Crystal Britt (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer, 0%); Catherine M Kelly (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Wendy Daigle (corporate director, 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Amy Cormier (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies67%Feb 22, 2023
North Carolina Health CARE Group LLCOwns 5% or more directly67%Oct 1, 2008
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies67%Oct 1, 2008
Cumberland County Hospital System Inc.Owns 5% or more directly33%Oct 1, 2008

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 66% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 8 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 28305, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 14; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 8 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 28305
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Cape Fear Valley Hospice and Palliative Care This hospice5
Gentiva18
3hc8
Bayada HospiceNot given
Liberty Home Care and Hospice11
Pruitthealth Hospice - Rocky Mount20
Amedisys Hospice Care14
Medi Home Hospice14

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.