Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Flint, Michigan 48532

4458 Oakbridge Dr, Ste D, Flint, Michigan 48532. (810) 733-7250.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 25 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

25 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 32 hospices serving ZIP code 48532 had 6.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 10, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

25 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

25 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 10, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 200 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patients #4,#5,#6,#7,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 4: Upon home visit medication reconciliation, the patient denied taking chlorthalidone for edema that was listed on the profile as a medication scheduled daily. Patient 5: Upon home visit medication reconciliation, the facility medication profile contained a dose of Depakote 500mg compared to hospice 125mg, and senna plus 2 tablets twice daily instead of 1 capsule twice daily. The hospice medication profile contained potassium chloride oral packets with no instructions to mix with a diluent. Patient 6: The medication profile contained multiple medications with conflicting route of oral and instructions to administer via peg tube. Patient 7: Upon home visit medication reconciliation, the facility medication profile contained vitamin B12 daily that was not on the hospice profile, and diclofenac topical gel four times daily as needed instead of twice daily as needed as profiled by the hospice. Patient 9: The medication profile contained differing oxygen PRNs for 2-4L dated 5/16/26 and 2L dated 5/18/26. There was no evidence the previous instructions were removed from the medication profile when the order changed.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 8: There was no evidence of coccyx wound measurement from 6/23/26 to 7/7/26. Agency policy requires weekly measurements.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 191 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #2,#6,#7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 2: The medical record contains nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient has COPD and dyspnea with minimal exertion. There is no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to respiratory dysfunction included in the plan of care. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient has COPD requiring oxygen, and a seizure disorder. There is no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to respiratory dysfunction and seizure precautions included in the plan of care. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient has dyspnea with minimal exertion. There is no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to respiratory dysfunction included in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 222 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patients #4,#5,#6,#7,#13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 4: Upon home visit medication reconciliation, the patient denied taking chlorthalidone for edema. There was no evidence the hospice agency discussed with the physician to receive an order to discontinue the medication due to patient not taking. Patient 5: Upon home visit medication reconciliation, the facility medication orders contained a dose of Depakote 500mg compared to hospice 125mg, and senna plus 2 tablets twice daily instead of 1 capsule twice daily. The hospice medical record contained an order for potassium chloride oral packets with no instructions to mix with a diluent. Patient 6: The medication orders contained multiple medications with conflicting route of oral and instructions to administer via peg tube. Patient 7: Upon home visit medication reconciliation, the facility medication orders contained vitamin B12 daily that was not on the hospice record, and diclofenac topical gel four times daily as needed instead of twice daily as needed as per hospice order. Patient 13: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient has an indwelling catheter. There was no evidence of an order for catheter balloon size, change frequency, and maintenance.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #5,#6,#11,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of half rails on hospital bed. There was no evidence of an order for the rails included in the plan of care. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a hospital bed, bed rails, commode, tube feeding supplies, over bed table, oxygen and nebulizer. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Patient 11: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a shower chair. There was no evidence of an order for the chair included in the plan of care. Patient 14: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of a cane for ambulation. there was no evidence of an order for the cane included in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 1: The plan of care was not updated to remove problems, goals, and interventions to be completed by the chaplain after spiritual services were discontinued 5/26/26.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    “Upon observation and home visits, 2 of 4 (Patient #1,7) there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient #1: During home visit, the RN removed a bandage from patient’s leg for weeping edema without gloves. Patient #7: During home visit, the LPN placed bag on floor and community chair at a facility. Agency bag technique policy requires barrier beneath bag or to be placed on a hard, cleaned surface.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #15,#17) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved Patient 15: The bereavement care plan contained tasks to send a holiday letter and memorial service invitation. There was no evidence of those tasks being completed. Patient 17: The bereavement care plan contained tasks to send a sympathy card, holiday letter and memorial service invitation. There was no evidence of those tasks being completed.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 173 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 2 of 15 (Personnel #4,#6) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel 4,6: There was no evidence each of the required tasks observed through demonstration and assessed as competent by an RN.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Home Health Aide competency evaluation is performed by a Registered Nurse in consultation with other skilled professionals, as appropriate. 2 of 3 aide personnel files reviewed contained skills competencies completed by another aide instead of an RN.”

    Rule L0617. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #12) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are specific to the patient needs. Patient 12: The medical record contained an order for patient diet requiring finely chopped meats with gravy. The aide care plan contained a task to assist patient with meals if present during meal time, but no instructions to inform the aide of diet restrictions.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 14: There was no evidence of an aide supervisory visit by the RN completed between 6/12/26 and 7/1/26.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #4) did not have evidence that the hospice employees have received orientation on their specific job requirements. Personnel 4: There was no evidence of orientation in the personnel file.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 8: The medical record contained a DNR order with empty sections of the form that provided identification of the physician’s printed name signing the order.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #11) did not have evidence of criminal background checks being obtained in accordance with state requirements. Personnel 11: There was no evidence of a federal criminal background check completed as required by the state of Michigan.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

Jan 5, 2026: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care1 deficiency
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #3,4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3: The medical record indicated that the patient started treatment for a UTI on 12/31/2025. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related UTI or infection included in the current plan of care. Corrected on site, plan of care updated during the survey. Patient 4: The medical record indicated that the patient admitted on treatment for a chronic UTI. Patient is currently prescribed Cipro 250mg daily prophylactically. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to the genitourinary chapter, chronic UTI, or infections included in the current plan of care. Corrected on site, plan of care updated during the survey.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

Nov 10, 2025: complaint inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 140 words

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 5 (Patients #4,#5) did not have evidence that the plan of care included IDG’s documentation of the patient’s or families level of understanding, involvement and agreement with the plan of care. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient fall 8/30/25 resulting in patient report of soreness to bottom. There was no evidence of family involvement with developing a plan of care related to the fall. Agency completed an internal investigation regarding the incident and completed nursing education to staff 10/28/25. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient fall 10/27/25 resulting in patient report of leg pain, inability to bear weight on left leg, and skin tear with bruising to right arm. There was no evidence of family involvement with developing a plan of care related to the fall.”

    Rule L0513. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #2) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 2: The medication profile contained a stat order for morphine still current and Miralax oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent. Corrected on site with order clarification received and medication profile update.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(8))

    The inspectors’ words, 135 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patients #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that as part of the patient-specific comprehensive assessment the hospice may determine the need for a referral and/or further evaluation by other appropriate health professionals. Patient 4: The medical record contained a nursing visit 8/30/25 in response to a fall with reports of some soreness to patient’s bottom. There was no evidence of a comprehensive assessment with examination of potentially injured area with report to physician to determine if further evaluation needed. Fall report stated there was no injury however nursing visit 8/31/25 did indicate pain and swelling to right hip resulting from fall 8/30/25 and patient was sent to the emergency room. Agency completed an internal investigation of incident and provided education to nursing staff on 10/28/25.”

    Rule L0532. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 131 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patients #4,#5) did not have evidence that the hospice follows the individualized plan of care developed in in collaboration with the attending physician (if any), the patient or representative, and the primary caregiver in accordance with the patient’s needs if any of them so desire. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient fall 8/30/25 resulting in patient report of soreness to bottom. There was no evidence of physician notification regarding the fall. Agency completed an internal investigation regarding the incident and completed nursing education to staff 10/28/25. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient fall 10/31/25 resulting in patient sustaining bumps to left side and back of head. There was no evidence of physician notification regarding the fall.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patients #4,#5) did not have evidence that each patient and family received education and training provided as appropriate to their responsibilities for the care and services identified in the plan of care. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient fall 8/30/25 resulting in patient report of soreness to bottom. There was no evidence of family education related to the fall. Agency completed an internal investigation regarding the incident and completed nursing education to staff 10/28/25. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient fall 10/27/25 resulting in patient report of leg pain, inability to bear weight on left leg, and skin tear with bruising to right arm. There was no evidence of family education related to the fall.”

    Rule L0544. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patients #2,#3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 2: The medical record contained a prescription for Eliquis. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to risk for bleeding included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with plan of care update. Patient 3: The medical record contained a prescription for Plavix. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to risk for bleeding included in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #2) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: The medical record contained an order for Miralax oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent. Corrected on site with order clarification received.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice investigates all adverse events, incidents, accidents, variances or unusual occurrences that involve patient care and develops a plan of correction to prevent the same or similar event from occurring again. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation 10/31/25 identifying patient fall reported that morning. There was no evidence of agency investigation of the incident.”

    Rule L0569. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 10, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies cited
Jan 5, 2026Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care1 deficiency cited
Nov 10, 2025Complaint inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 14, 1987.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 9 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 55% at home, 29% in assisted living, 14% in a nursing facility, 3% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.5%
Visits near death93.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Odyssey Healthcare Operating B, LP owns 100% directly since Feb 1, 2016.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer); Eron Sheroski (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer); Janet L Combs (corporate officer); Rommel Aquino (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2009
Odyssey Healthcare Operating B, LPOwns 5% or more directly100%Feb 1, 2016
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Holding CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2009
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies99%Feb 1, 2009
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies1%Feb 1, 2016

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 81% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.69% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 58.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 32 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 48532, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6.5; this one had 25.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.