First Hospice Care, Inc.
A hospice in Flint, Michigan 48507
G-3316 Miller Rd, Flint, Michigan 48507. (810) 407-6514.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 1 immediate jeopardy citation, CMS’s most serious finding (needs attention)
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 8of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
- Immediate jeopardy
- CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3.
What did inspectors find?
7 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 23 hospices serving ZIP code 48507 had 7.
The last inspection on record was on Sep 26, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
Patients in immediate jeopardy, CMS’s most serious finding: Core services (42 CFR 418.64), Apr 11, 2024
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
7 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Condition-level, immediate jeopardy. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Sep 26, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 208 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #2,3,6,7) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #2-Orders on 11/7/2024 for Acetaminophen dosage could exceed 4000mg and no evidence of orders for “Not to exceed” parameters on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient #3-Orders on 10/21/2024 for Nitro 0.4mg tab, no evidence of orders stating what to do when the medication is ineffective after the ordered 3 doses on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient #6-Orders on 5/23/2025 for Miconazole Nitrate to be applied externally, no evidence of specific location on medication profile. Orders for Norco 5-325mg and Acetaminophen 650mg RS exceed the 4000mg/ day and no evidence of ‘Not to exceed” parameters on medication profile. Corrected on Site. Patient #7-Orders on 9/8/2025 for Cipro x10 days, no evidence of medication discontinued on medication profile. POC contains Oxygen concentrator, no evidence of Oxygen admin orders on medication profile. Corrected on Site.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 138 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #2,3,6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #2-Orders on 11/7/2024 for Acetaminophen dosage could exceed 4000mg and no evidence of orders for “Not to exceed” parameters on POC. Corrected on site. Patient #3-Orders on 10/21/2024 for Nitro 0.4mg tab, no evidence of orders stating what to do when the medication is ineffective after the ordered 3 doses on POC. Corrected on site. Patient #6-Orders on 5/23/2025 for Miconazole Nitrate to be applied externally, no evidence of specific location on medication profile. Orders for Norco 5-325mg and Acetaminophen 650mg RS exceed the 4000mg/ day and no evidence of ‘Not to exceed” parameters on POC. Corrected on Site.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #2-11/7/2024 POC states patient utilizes a walker for ambulation, no evidence of walker DME on POC.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 122 words
“Upon patient record review 3 of 14 (Patient #2,3,6) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #2-Aide visit 9/8/2025, no evidence aide completed the task for pain rating per aide care plan. Patient #3-Aide visits 9/2/2025-9/18/2025, no evidence aide complete the task for Shampoo, Clean/file nails and Change bed linen weekly as per the aide care plan. Patient #6-Aide visits 9/2/2025-9/18/2025, no evidence aide complete the task for shampoo and clean/file nails weekly as per the aide care plan.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #12-Patient revoked 11/19/2024 and the discharge summary was not sent to the attending physician.”
Apr 11, 2024: complaint inspection by the state2 deficiencies
-
Core services (42 CFR 418.64)
The inspectors’ words, 92 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to perform an assessment on patients for 3 records (P-1, 6, 10) of 10 sampled patients, resulting in the potential for negative patient outcomes. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) to the health and safety of P-1, with falls, injury, pain, and subsequent death. (see L-591). Findings include: The cumulative effect of these systemic problems resulted in the hospice’s inability to ensure the provision of quality health care in a safe environment for the Condition of Participation of 42 CFR §418.64, Core Services.”
-
Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 1,235 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to perform an assessment on a patient for 3 records (P-1, 6, 10) of 10 sampled patients, resulting in the potential for negative patient outcomes. Findings include: P-6: The patient was admitted to hospice services on 11/2/23 with a terminal illness of Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure. The Hospice plan of care ordered Skilled Nursing (SN), Spiritual Care (SC), Medical social Work (MSW) and Hospice Aide (HHa) services to be provided. During the clinical record review on 4/10/24 at 10:35 a.m., a Care Coordination Note authored by the Director of Nursing (DON-1) dated 11/11/23 documented, “ 2:45 a.m. Telephone call received from family stating that patient was still not sleeping and that he had given her the Restoril like he was supposed to and that she had been up all night screaming and carrying on that she was dying and yelling out “Help me, help me I’m dying!” Family stated that he was getting no sleep and did not know what to do. RN (Registered Nurse) instructed family to get patient another Restoril and see if that would help and the RN would check on her in the morning and if that did not work then RN would call doctor for other suggestions. 9:00 a.m. RN checked with family regarding the extra Restoril. Family stated that patient slept for 1 hour and then started screaming again.” Upon further review, there was no documented evidence that the Director of Nursing sent a nurse to evaluate the patient and reported symptomology. A Coordination note, again authored by the Director of Nursing, dated 12/24/23 documented, “11:30 a.m. telephone call from RN at [Facility] stating patient had been crying out/screaming in pain since yesterday, stating help me, help me. This RN (DON-1) asked where the patient was in pain. According to the facility, patient was stating all over..., This RN heard the facility RN state to the patient that she was talking to her RN..., she (patient) was crying out “help me, help me.” Hospice contacted doctor and obtained an order to restart Seroquel and to give a dose immediately upon arrival at the facility. There was no documented evidence that the Director of Nursing had a Hospice nurse go out and evaluate the patient and reported symptoms. It was further noted that the plan of care ordered SN visits at a frequency of 2x/wk. x 10 weeks. The record reflected that SN saw the patient twice during the first, third and fifth week of services, and only made one visit during the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th weeks of care. The Hospice failed to provide Nursing services that adequately addressed and managed the identified needs of the patient. These findings were reviewed with and confirmed by the Director of Nursing during an interview on 4/10/24 at 12:30 p.m., and again on 1:20 p.m. P-10: The patient was admitted to Hospice services on 10/11/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure. The plan of care ordered SN, MSW, SC, HHa and Physical Therapy (PT) services to be provided. During the record review on 4/11/24 at 9:25 a.m., it was noted that a Coordination Note, authored by the Director of Nursing, dated 10/20/23 documented, on 10/19/23 “9:00 p.m. telephone call from daughter stating the patient’s left foot was extremely swollen. Instructed daughter to get patient’s foot elevated through the night and call RN in the morning..., Primary RN saw patient today (10/20/23) and there was no mention of any edema in her note.” Upon further review, there was no documented evidence that the Director of Nursing informed the RN of the patient’s complaints of extreme left foot swelling. Additionally, there was no documented evidence that the Director of Nursing sent a nurse to evaluate the patient and associated symptoms. A Care Coordination Note authored by the Director of Nursing dated 11/6/23 documented, “11/5/23 1:00 p.m., telephone call received from patient’s daughter stating that her father was saying that he could not breath, so she checked his oxygen with the pulse oximeter and that it read 69%. She (daughter) had him (patient) use his inhaler and the oxygen level went up to 99%. The patient’s daughter stated that patient was still complaining that he could not breath and that he had fluid in the back of his throat. RN (Director of Nursing) stated that he needed to cough up the fluid in the back of his throat but that his breathing was good as his O2 was at 99%...” Upon further review of the record, there was no documented evidence that the Director of Nursing sent a nurse to evaluate the patient’s breathing status in the patient’s home. These findings were reviewed with and confirmed by the Director of Nursing during a telephone interview on 4/11/24 at 12:36 p.m. who reported, I would be expecting the nurses to make an onsite visit to assess the patient. P-1: This patient was admitted to hospice care on 11/29/23, with terminal diagnoses of Alzheimers disease and dementia. During record review on 4/10/24, a Care Coordination Note dated 12/26/23 stated, “On 12/26/23, the patient (P-1) had a fall with combativeness.” On 12/27/23 at 8:05 a.m., a call from the assisted living facility (ALF) was made to the hospice regarding the patient falling. The ALF stated, “The patient was weak and in pain and wanted a nurse to check him out.” The hospice Director of Nursing (DON-1) said they would, “make sure the registered nurse (Staff-1) saw the patient today.” During an interview on 4/10/24 at 12:27 p.m., DON-1 said she informed the primary registered nurse, Staff-1, at approximately 8:10-8:15 a.m., to go see the patient. The ALF called again at 3:30 p.m., asking again, “To have the RN out to check on the patient.” The Care Coordination Note states, “Staff-1 again paged to go see the patient.” At 4:22 p.m., Staff-1 stated that she would call the facility and ask them what was wrong with the patient. Staff-1 called DON-1 back and stated that the patient had diarrhea and a fever and that was to be expected because he had COVID and that she told them she would be there in the morning. At 6:45 p.m., a telephone call was received by the hospice notifying them that the patient had passed away. There was no documented evidence that the hospice assessed the patient after the fall. During an interview on 4/10/24 at 12:27 p.m., DON-1 was asked if the agency provided a skilled nursing visit on 12/26 or 12/27, to assess the patient (P-1) after the falls. DON-1 stated, “;A nurse did not go out to see the patient on the 26th or the 27th. I talked to the nurse and told her she needed to go see the patient.” During an interview on 4/10/24 at 2:43 p.m., Staff-1 was asked about the patients falls on 12/26 and 12/27. Staff-1 said she had no recollection of the falls. During an interview on 4/10/24 at 4:00 p.m., DON-1 was asked for any more details about the falls on 12/26 and 12/27. DON-1 said there were two falls on 12/26, but one was undocumented. The hospice failed to assess the patient’s change in condition related to falls, resulting in injury, untreated pain, and subsequent death. During an interview on 4/10/24 at 4:20 p.m., the administrator (ADM-1) and DON-1 acknowledged the findings.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 5 deficiencies cited |
| May 30, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Apr 11, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 31, 2019.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited for CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. to patients’ health or safety in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 7.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 82.5% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 61% at home, 38% in assisted living, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 7.8 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 6.4% |
| Visits near death | 82.5% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 3 owners or officers are people: Kaleem Ahmad (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Kaleem Ahmad (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Kaleem Ahmad (corporate director).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 95.83% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 42.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 8 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 23 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 48507, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 7.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Heartland Hospice (Flint) | 5 |
| The Medical Team | 4 |
| The Care Team Hospice | 17 |
| First Hospice Care, Inc. This hospice | 7 |
| Swan Hospice | 21 |
| Gentiva | 25 |
| Heart to Heart Hospice of Flint | 6 |
| All Americans Hospice Care, Inc. | 5 |
| Mid Michigan Home Health & Hospice, LLC | 11 |
| Best Care Hospice, LLC | 7 |
| Compassus - Grand Blanc | 10 |
| Mclaren Hospice | 1 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.