Hearth Record

Legacy Lifecare Home Health and Hospice Care- West

A hospice in Longmeadow, Massachusetts 01106

770 Converse Street, Longmeadow, Massachusetts 01106. (978) 471-5146.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 9 hospices serving ZIP code 01106 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 2, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 3, 2025: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 239 words

    “Based on clinical record review, policy review and interview, the agency failed to ensure services provided for wound care were part of the individualized written plan of care for 1 patient (#3), out of a total sample 19 patients.Findings include: Review of the agency’s policy entitled Physician Orders, undated, indicated the following:*Nursing and other services that require a physician’s order will be provided in accordance with a physician’s order.Patient #3 was admitted to the agency in July 2025 with a diagnosis of Squamous Cell Cancer.Review of the physician ordered Hospice Plan of Care, dated 7/14/25 through 10/11/25, did not include orders for wound care.Review of a skilled nursing note dated 8/14/25, indicated the patient had a fall and sustained skin injuries to the right forearm and right elbow.Review of a skilled nursing note dated 8/21/25, indicated the patient had sustained another fall causing a left knee abrasion. Additionally, the note indicated wound care was provided to the left knee and right elbow.Review of a skilled nursing note dated 8/24/25, indicated the patient was provided with wound care to the right forearm and elbow.Further review of the clinical record did not include a physician’s order for treatment of wounds.During an interview on 9/3/25 at 2:30 P.M., the Senior Director of Home and Community Services said all services provided by staff should have a physician’s order. She said there were no orders to provide wound care for Patient #3, as required.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 852 words

    “Based on record review, policy review and interview, the agency staff failed to A. develop and implement an individualized care plan to address wounds for 2 patients (#7 and #3) and B. update the Hospice Plan of Care upon receiving verbal physician orders for 1 patient (#6), out of a total sample of 19 patients.Findings include: 2. For Patient #3, the agency failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan after wounds were identified and treated.Patient #3 was admitted to the agency in July 2025 with a diagnosis of Squamous Cell Cancer.Review of a skilled nursing note dated 8/14/25, indicated the patient had a fall and sustained skin injuries to the right forearm and right elbow.Review of a skilled nursing note dated 8/21/25, indicated the patient had sustained another fall causing a left knee abrasion. Additionally, the note indicated wound care was provided to the left knee and right elbow.Review of a skilled nursing note dated 8/24/25, indicated the patient was provided with wound care to the right forearm and elbow.Further review of the clinical record did not include a wound care plan including treatment and goals for the new wounds the patient had sustained.During an interview on 9/3/25 at 2:30 P.M., the Senior Director of Home and Community Services said a care plan was not developed when wounds were identified and treated, as required.B. For Patient #6, the agency failed to update the plan of care upon receiving verbal physician orders.Review of the agency’s policy entitled Physician Orders, undated, indicated the following:*Oral orders are put in writing, signed and dated with the date of receipt by a Registered Nurse (or qualified therapist) responsible for furnishing or supervising care. *Care and services provided will be provided according to the physician orders. Orders are current and updated.Patient #6 was admitted to the agency in May 2025 with a diagnosis of Intrahepatic (refers to structures or conditions within the liver) Bile Duct Cancer.Review of the clinical record indicated a verbal physician’s order was obtained on 5/29/25 which included the following:*Admit to Hospice.*Discontinue routine weights, vitals, and labs unless otherwise ordered for medication administration.*Laxative/enema of choice as needed for constipation/impaction.*May insert Foley Catheter (thin flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) as needed for signs of retention and/or requested by the patient or caregiver.*May perform registered nurse (RN) pronouncement.*Oxygen by nasal canula at 2-4 liters per minute as needed for comfort.*Peritoneal (relates to the peritoneum; the serous membrane lining the abdominal cavity and covering most of the abdominal organs) drainage via Aspira Drainage System, drain abdomen as needed for comfort. Change dressing each time drain is accessed. Monitor abnormal drainage, redness, heat or cloudy return and any other signs/symptoms of acute infection.Further review of the verbal order indicated it was not signed by the nurse who obtained the order until 7/17/25 and was not signed by the physician until 7/18/25.Review of the physician ordered Hospice Plan of Care, dated 5/28/25 through 8/25/25, did not include all of the 5/29/25 ordered interventions, including the following:*Discontinue routine weights, vitals, and labs unless otherwise ordered for medication administration.*May insert Foley Catheter (thin flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) as needed for signs of retention and/or requested by the patient or caregiver.*May perform registered nurse (RN) pronouncement.*Oxygen by nasal canula at 2-4 liters per minute as needed for comfort.During an interview on 9/3/25 at 3:00 P.M., the Clinical Manager said the 5/29/25 verbal orders should have been signed and dated by the registered nurse when obtained and added to the Hospice Plan of Care when received, as required. A. Review of the agency policy entitled, Interdisciplinary Care Planning Process, undated, indicated the following:*An individualized written plan of care is developed for each patient. The plan of care reflects patient and family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions.......1. Patient #7 was admitted to the agency in July 2025 with a diagnosis of acute systolic Congestive Heart Failure (a sudden and severe condition when the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body’s needs).Review of the Registered Nurse (RN) Hospice Initial Assessment, dated 7/10/25, indicated Patient #7’s skin was fragile with multiple areas of breakdown, including a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (a full thickness skin loss that extends into the layer of fat and connective tissue that lies beneath the skin but does not involve muscle, tendon, or bone) to the sacrum (a bone at the base of the spine) and the right buttock.Patient #7 resided in a nursing facility and wound care was provided by the facility staff. Review of the care plans in the clinical record did not contain any documentation that a Plan of Care addressing Patient #7’s Stage 3 pressure ulcers was developed.During an interview on 9/3/25 at 2:00 P.M., the Senior Director of Home and Community Services, after reviewing the clinical record said a Plan of Care addressing Patient #7’s wounds was not developed, as required.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Based on document review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the Volunteer cost savings program met the required 5 percent (%) minimum.Findings include: Review of the agency’s monthly Percentage of Volunteer Hours to Direct Patient Care Staff Hours from January 2025 to June 2025 indicated the following percentages:*January - 2.9%, February - 4.8%, March - 3.6%, April 3.7%, May - 4.6%, June 4.3%.During an interview on 9/3/25 at 1:40 P.M., the Volunteer Coordinator said the Volunteer cost savings is less than the required 5% from January 2025 to June 2025.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 268 words

    “Based on record review, policy review and interview, the agency failed to ensure entries were dated in accordance with hospice policy and currently accepted standards of practice, for 2 patients (#3 and #8), out of total sample of 19 patients.Findings include: Review of the agency’s policy entitled Timely Submission of Patient Documentation, undated, indicated the following:*Itineraries, with all visit reports attached, are expected to be submitted within 48 hours but not to exceed 7 days.1.Patient #3 was admitted to the agency in July 2025 with a diagnosis of Squamous Cell Cancer.Review of the physician ordered Hospice Plan of Care, dated 7/14/25 through 10/11/25, indicated the following:*Chaplain visits: 1-2 times a month for 3 months.Review of the clinical record indicated a Chaplain visit was provided on 8/1/25. The documentation was completed and submitted on 9/1/25, and not within 7 days of the visit, as required.2. Patient #8 was admitted to the agency in August 2025 with a diagnosis Parkinson’s Disease (neurodegenerative disease).Review of the physician ordered Hospice Plan of Care, dated 8/12/25 through 11/9/25, indicated the following:*Skilled Nursing visits: once a week for 13 weeks.Review of the clinical record indicated a Skilled Nursing visit was provided on 8/26/25. The documentation was completed and submitted on 9/3/25, and not within 7 days of the visit, as required.During an interview on 9/3/25 at 11:45 A.M., the Clinical Manager said staff are expected to complete and upload their visit notes within 48 hours of the visit but have up to 7 days to complete it. She said the visit documentation noted above were both completed late and the policy was not followed.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 2, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Sep 3, 2025Recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 10, 2008.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 14.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 13% at home, 18% in assisted living, 69% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends14.6%
Visits near death96.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Jgs Lifecare Corporation owns 100% directly since Jun 15, 1994.
  • 24 owners or officers are people: Carol Casartello (corporate director, 6%); Stuart A Anfang (corporate director, 6%); Christopher Carr (corporate director, 6%); Martha Finkel (corporate director, 6%); Susan Kline (corporate director, 6%); Susan Goldsmith (corporate director, 6%); Michael Webber (corporate director, 6%); Gerald Lazarus (corporate director, 6%); Rudy D’agostino (corporate director, 6%); Steven Dane (corporate director, 6%); Adam S Berman (corporate officer, 6%); Adam S Berman (corporate director, 6%); Peter Greenberg (corporate director, 6%); Michelle Feinstein (corporate director, 6%); Barry S Berman (corporate director, 6%); Richard Halpern (corporate director, 6%); James S Rosenthal (corporate director, 6%); Susan M Megas (corporate director); Jennifer Santerre (corporate officer); Udaya B Jagadeesan (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Margaret A Mastrangelo (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Madeline Presz (managing employee (on the payroll)); Barry S Berman (corporate officer); Donna Crescenzo (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Jgs Lifecare CorporationOwns 5% or more directly100%Jun 15, 1994
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 10, 2019
Legacy Lifecare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companiesJan 1, 2021

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 90% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.86% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 78.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 9 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 01106, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 9 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 01106
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Legacy Lifecare Home Health and Hospice Care- West This hospice4
Baystate Hospice5
Hospice Life Care3
New England Hospice II, LLC10
Overlook Hospice Services1
Compassus - Greater Boston2
Beacon Hospice, An Amyedisys Company0
Hospice Services of Western & Central Mass7
Brookhaven Hospice15

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.