Hearth Record

Traditions Health

A hospice in Wichita, Kansas 67207

9415 East Harry Street, Suite 306, Wichita, Kansas 67207. (316) 687-2273.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 19 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

19 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 22 hospices serving ZIP code 67207 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 14, 2024: a complaint inspection by the state.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

19 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

19 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 15, 2024: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission2 deficiencies
  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 4 patient records reviewed, the update of the comprehensive assessment did not include changes occurring since the initial assessment. For example, in record RRNHV#2 a nurse documented that the patient had fallen, however the plan of care was not updated and this was not discussed in the following interdisciplinary meeting. This RFI was reviewed and validated with the Administrator and Branch Directors.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 4 patient records reviewed, the plan of care did not include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. For example, in records RRNHV#1 and RRNHV#4 the patient was provided with fungal cream or powder but there were no orders documented in the plan of care. This RFI was reviewed and validated with the Administrator and Branch Directors.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

Feb 9, 2024: initial inspection by The Joint Commission17 deficiencies
  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Leadership Session. Leaders did not manage implementation of patient care policies and procedures governing the provision of care as evidenced by condition level findings at §418.54 and §418.56. This RFI was reviewed with the Regional Clinical Specialist, Administrator and Branch Director.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(1))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 4 of 4 home visits conducted, the hospice did not inform patients of their rights both orally and in writing. The election of benefits and consent were signed at the start of care. The patient was given a blank template of these that was similar, but not exactly like the signed document. Also, the template did not contain the same patient specific information as the original document. This RFI was reviewed with the Regional Clinical Specialist, Administrator and Branch Director.”

    Rule L0502. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 19 patient records reviewed, the hospice did not assess patients according to defined timelines. For example, in record RRNHV#3 the initial bereavement risk assessment was not completed until 20 days after the admission date. And in record RRNHV#4 the initial bereavement risk assessment was not completed until 50 days after the admission date. This RFI was reviewed with the Regional Clinical Specialist, Administrator and Branch Director.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 19 patient records reviewed, the hospice failed to conduct and document a patient-specific comprehensive assessment that identified the patient’s need for hospice care and services. For example, in record RRHV#1 there was documentation that the patient was admitted, revoked for treatment of a fractured hip and then was re-admitted. An initial bereavement assessment was completed in the first benefit period, but not the second. In record RRHV#4 initial comprehensive spiritual, social work, and bereavement assessments were not documented. This RFI was reviewed with the Regional Clinical Specialist, Administrator and Branch Director.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 15 of 19 patient records reviewed, where the interdisciplinary group met more than twice, the organization did not update comprehensive assessments to reflect changes that had occurred since the initial assessment. Meeting notes did not consistently document on-going patient decline, progress toward goals, and plans for the next two weeks in the records of RRHV#1, RRHV#4, RRNHV#1, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3, RRNHV#4, RRNHV#5, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#9, RRDC#1, RRDC#2, RRBR#1, and RRBR#3. For example, a patient was injured and went to an emergency department for care; and a patient death was not addressed in the following meeting. This RFI was reviewed with the Regional Clinical Specialist, Administrator and Branch Director.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 19 of 19 patient records reviewed, patient goals were generic, few were specific, and most were not measurable. Some were to be met by the end of the benefit period, but most had no identified completion target. Additionally, many goals were not revised during the benefit period. For example: Pain will be managed at a level acceptable to the patient. Patient/caregiver: will verbalize/demonstrate appropriate pain management reduction or relief of cardiopulmonary symptoms; have safety needs met; will follow an effective bowel program to prevent/relieve constipation; will receive assistance with personal care and hygiene and other activities of daily living as needed; will have decreased fear/anxiety regarding death and dying process. This RFI was reviewed with the Regional Clinical Specialist, Administrator and Branch Director.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 19 patient records reviewed, the plan of care did not include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions in the plan of care. For example, in record of RRHV#1 diminished breath sounds, shortness of breath, mild dyspnea, and 2+ pitting edema were identified. Similar omissions were found in records RRHV#2, RRHV#3, RRHV#4, RRNHV#1, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3, RRNHV#4, RRNHV#5, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#9, and RRNVH#10. None of these problems were addressed in the plans of care. This RFI was reviewed with Administrators and Branch Directors.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 107 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 19 patient records reviewed, the plan pf care did not include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. For example, in record RRHV#4 a registered nurse documented the presence of an indwelling foley catheter, and the need for a Hoyer lift. There were no orders for these items, nor a catheter change order. In RRNHV#3 a foley catheter was also documented. There was an order to change the catheter every 30 days, but no order for the catheter itself. This RFI was reviewed with the Regional Clinical Specialist, Administrator and Branch Director.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 19 patient records reviewed, hospice failed to provide the patient with care, treatment, or services according to their individualized plan of care. In record RRHV#1 an occupational therapy evaluation was ordered but was not completed. In the records of RRHV#1 and RRHV#4 oxygen and oral suction machines were ordered but not fulfilled. This RFI was reviewed with the Regional Clinical Specialist, Administrator and Branch Director.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 patient records reviewed, a registered nurse did not supervise the hospice aide every 14 days or less. In record RRHV#1 there was a span of 18 days. In record RRNHV#1 more than 14 days elapsed seven times in three and a half months. In record RRNHV#3 there were spans of 15 and 24 days. In record RRNHV#4 there were spans of 20 and 23 days. This RFI was reviewed with the Regional Clinical Specialist, Administrator and Branch Director.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    “Observed in Competency Session. In 2 of 9 HR files reviewed, the hospice did not ensure that staff were oriented to their job duties. In file HR#2 RN and HR#9 MT staff did not receive a description of their job duties as part of orientation. This RFI was reviewed with the Regional Clinical Specialist, Administrator and Branch Director.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in Competency Session. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, the hospice did not assess and document staff competence as part of orientation. There was no competence assessment completed by another physician during the orientation process in the file of HR#1 MD. This RFI was reviewed with the Regional Clinical Specialist, Administrator and Branch Director.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 2 home visits conducted, where medication reconciliation was performed, the list in one home was inaccurate. For example, at the visit for RRHV#4 Acetaminophen 650 mg rectal suppository was on the list but there were none in the home. Tamsulosin 0.4 mg capsule was to be given once daily on the list, however it was written as twice daily on the label. Chamoxyn with Manuka Honey was being applied to the right hip twice a week and as needed but was not on the medication list. RFI was reviewed with Administrators and Branch Directors.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 discharge records reviewed, the hospice did not notify the patient’s physician of the availability of a discharge summary. This was found in record RRDC#2 where the patient was discharged for extended prognosis. This RFI was reviewed with the Regional Clinical Specialist, Administrator and Branch Director.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 discharge records reviewed, the hospice did not provide a discharge summary and provide a copy to the patient’s physician. In record RRDC#1 the patient revoked for aggressive care following a fall. This RFI was reviewed with the Regional Clinical Specialist, Administrator and Branch Director.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 114 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 4 home visits conducted, the hospice did provide education and training to the patient in the following areas: procedures to follow if care, treatment, or services were disrupted by a natural disaster or emergency. At home visits RRHV#2 and RRHV#4 there were no individualized emergency plans found. The daughter for RRHV#2 confirmed that she did not verbally receive this information. The patient at RRHV#2 lived alone and could not attest to verbally receiving the information. As well at RRHV#2 the daughter stated that she did not receive information on how to set up the oxygen concentrator or tank. This RFI was reviewed with Administrators and Branch Directors.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(a))

    “Observed in Competency Session. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, the hospice did not verify and document staff credentials using the primary source when certification is required by law and regulation. In the file HR#9 MT there was a license for her role as a certified occupational therapy aide. However, there was no certification for her role as a massage therapist, which is what she was hired to do. This RFI was reviewed with the Regional Clinical Specialist, Administrator and Branch Director.”

    Rule L0784. Standard-level.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 14, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jul 11, 2024Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 15, 2024Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission2 deficiencies cited
Feb 9, 2024Initial inspection by The Joint Commission17 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 8, 2015.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 19.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 36% at home, 34% in assisted living, 29% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day19.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.3%
Visits near death97.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.58% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 72.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 67207, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 19.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.