Hearth Record

Schneck Medical Center Hospice

A hospice in Seymour, Indiana 47274

415 S Walnut Street, Seymour, Indiana 47274. (812) 522-0508.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 14 hospices serving ZIP code 47274 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 2, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 21, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission14 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 14 patient records reviewed, the hospice goals were not individualized to meet the patients’ needs based on the assessments. All of the goals listed for Hosp RR#2, RR#3, #4, #5 #7, #8 and #10 included the following target dates- In Progress. This observation was discussed with the director.”

    Rule L0545. Condition-level.

  • Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)

    “Observed in Leadership Session. Based on a review of the available data there was no comprehensive QAPI plan for 2024. There were several projects however these projects did not reflect the complexity of the services provided by the hospice. For example, the data collection/analysis did not address volunteer services, bereavement services, contract oversight, and or the levels of care specifically continuous care. This was discussed with the director.”

    Rule L0559. Condition-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Leadership Session. There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by condition level deficiencies - 418.100, 418.56, and 418.58.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, did not have all interventions included on the comprehensive care plan based on the assessment. Bereavement RR#1 had a Foley and the comprehensive hospice care plan did not include orders for the Foley related to the size of the catheter, balloon size, or frequency of change. This observation was discussed with the director.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Observed in Individual Tracer. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the hospice plan of care goals were not revised based on the comprehensive assessment. Hosp RR#1 HV had 5 recertification periods. The initial certification period had the following goal-Patient will describe measures to protect skin/ wound care teach back within 48 hours. This goal remained on the current certification plan of care. This observation was discussed with the director.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(2))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. There was no identification of the frequency of data collection/reporting/ and or analysis of required data points therefore limited opportunities to internally benchmark and reprioritize performance improvement initiatives as necessary in 2024 or 2025. This observation was discussed with the director.”

    Rule L0575. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(2)(ii))

    “Observed in Data Session. Based on a review of the available data, the hospice and home care only collected hand hygiene data on the nursing staff. These programs provided therapy, chaplain, social work , and volunteer services to patients. This observation was discussed with the director.”

    Rule L0581. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Observed in Individual Tracer. In 2 of 6 patient records reviewed, that had a hospice aide, the care plan did not reflect all of the written instructions required by on the assessment. RR#1 had a colostomy and this device was not reflected on the care plan. Hos RR#12 had multiple wounds and the aide care plan did not reflect wound precautions. This observation was discussed with the director.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Services (42 CFR 418.100(c)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Leadership Session. Based on a review of admission data provided to patients, there was no process in place to educate patients related to all levels of hospice care. While the policy specifically detailed continuous care as a option under the hospice benefit, this language did not appear in patient data given. Additionally, per the director, continuous care has not been provided within the past 3 years due to staffing. There was no discussion of continuous care in the QAPI minutes and or annual evaluation.”

    Rule L0652. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 8 HR files reviewed, did not have discipline specific competencies. HR#5 was a hospice social worker and there were no competencies completed and or developed that addressed her specific duties. The competency completed was general. Additionally, this social worker also functioned as the bereavement coordinator and there was no specific competencies defined for this role. This observation was discussed with the director.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Observed in Individual Tracer. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, entries in the hospice record were not appropriately authenticated. Two consent forms in Hosp RR#1 were signed but not dated. This observation was discussed with the director.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(ii))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, that were live discharges, did not provide the discharge summary to the next provider. DC RR#1 was transferred to another hospice and there was no transfer/discharge summary or documentation in the record that this summary was provided to the receiving hospice. This observation was discussed with the director.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(i))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, that resided in a nursing home, did not have updated hospice documents in the facility. Hosp RR#1 HV has been recerted 5 times and only the initial certification plan of care was located in the nursing home chart. This was discussed with the RN.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. In 1 of 2 tracers conducted, did not have appropriate language in the contract. The nursing home contract did not have a stipulation that the criminal background checks would be obtained for all employees that have patient contact. This observation was discussed with the director.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 2, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 21, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission14 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 9, 1994.
  • Ownership: government.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 90% at home, 8% in a nursing facility, 2% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.1%
Visits near death90.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Jackson County Schneck Memorial Hospital owns 100% directly since Jun 24, 1940.
  • 15 owners or officers are people: Jack L Mccory (corporate director); Rick L Smith (corporate director); Andrew B Markel (corporate director); Pamela H Snook-Tidd (managing employee (on the payroll)); Courtney B Kleber (corporate director); Deborah A Mann (corporate officer); Deborah A Mann (managing employee (on the payroll)); Rachel L Bullard (managing employee (on the payroll)); Matthew K Reedy (corporate director); Terrence L Gilliland (corporate director); Susan D Bevers (corporate director); Eric D Fish (corporate officer); Eric D Fish (managing employee (on the payroll)); Brandon J Harpe (corporate director); Robert D Gillaspy (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Jackson County Schneck Memorial HospitalOwns 5% or more directly100%Jun 24, 1940

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.52% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 54.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 47274, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.