Hearth Record

Willow Hospice and Palliative Care LLC

A hospice in Tinley Park, Illinois 60477

18400 Maple Creek Dr, Ste 500, Tinley Park, Illinois 60477. (708) 719-6533.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

18 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 38 hospices serving ZIP code 60477 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 20, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

18 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 20, 2024: recertification inspection by the state18 deficiencies
  • Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Based on the review of the hospice documents and Staff interview, it was determined the hospice failed to implement, and maintain an effective, ongoing, hospice-wide data-driven quality assessment and performance improvement program. This has the potential to affect all Pts. receiving hospice care services. Findings include: 1.The hospice failed to maintain/track/analyze the quality assessment in all areas of the operations. (L562) 2. The hospice failed to ensure the frequency and details of the quality assessment and performance improvement program were approved. (L565) 3. The hospice failed to ensure the ongoing maintenance and annual evaluation of the QAPI program. (L574) The cumulative effect of these systemic practices resulted in the Hospices inability to ensure an effective QAPI Program.”

    Rule L0559. Condition-level.

  • Volunteers (42 CFR 418.78)

    The inspectors’ words, 177 words

    “Based on Staff list review, clinical record review and Staff interview, it was determined that the hospice failed to use volunteers in day to day administrative roles or direct patient care roles, failed to maintain documentation and demonstrate ongoing efforts to recruit and maintain volunteers and failed to document any positions held by volunteers, amount of time spent by volunteers in those positions and estimate the cost savings related to use of volunteers. This has the potential to affect services provided to patients Findings include: 1. The hospice failed to use volunteer services in day to day administrative or direct patient care roles. (L644) 2. The hospice failed to maintain documentation and demonstrate ongoing efforts to recruit and maintain volunteers. (L645) 3. The hospice failed to ensure it documented any positions held by volunteers, amount of time spent by volunteers in those positions and estimate the cost savings related to use of volunteers. (L646) The cumulative effect of these systemic practices resulted in the hospices inability to ensure that the hospice volunteer services were provided to patients.”

    Rule L0641. Condition-level.

  • Short-term inpatient care (42 CFR 418.108)

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Based on Staff interview, it was determined that the hospice failed to ensure the hospice has an agreement with a facility to provide pain control, symptom management, and respite purpose. This has the potential to affect services provided to patients Findings include: 1. The hospice failed to have a facility agreement for inpatient care of symptom management and pain control. (L706) 2. The hospice failed to have a facility agreement for respite purpose. (L708) 3. The hospice failed to have an inpatient care under arrangement. (L711) The cumulative effect of these systemic practices resulted in the hospices inability to ensure that the hospice patients receive services in an inpatient facility for pain control and respite care.”

    Rule L0704. Condition-level.

  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1)-(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Based on a review of the Hospice Emergency Preparedness Plan and staff interview, it was determined the Hospice failed to ensure the Emergency Preparedness Plan was based on a facility and community risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach. Findings include: 1. The Hospice Emergency Preparedness Plan was reviewed on 12/18/24 at 11:00 AM. The plan lacked documentation that the Emergency Preparedness Plan was based on a facility-based and or community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach. 2. Findings of the Hospice Emergency Preparedness Plan lacking the risk assessment was confirmed during an interview with the Administrator on 12/19/24 at 12:30PM.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “Based on a review of the Hospice Emergency Preparedness Plan, and Staff interview, it was determined that the Agency failed to ensure that the Hospice conducted / participated in a full-scale Community Based Exercise or Facility Based Exercise to ensure the effectiveness of the Agency’s Emergency Preparedness Plan. Findings Include: 1. The Hospice Emergency Preparedness Plan was reviewed on 02/18/24 at 11:00 AM. The Emergency Preparedness Plan failed to include documentation indicating that the Agency conducted / participated in any testing of the Emergency Preparedness Plan. 2. During an interview with the Administrator on 12/19/24, the Administrator confirmed that the Agency failed to conduct / participate in a community and/or facility-based testing or drill. Findings Include: 1. The Hospice Emergency Preparedness Plan was reviewed on 12/18/24 at 11:00 AM. The Emergency Preparedness Plan failed to include documentation indicating that the Agency conducted / participated in any testing of the Emergency Preparedness Plan. 2. During an interview with the Administrator on 12/19/24, the Administrator confirmed that the Agency failed to conduct / participate in a community and/or facility-based testing or drill.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Based on the clinical records review and Staff interview, it was determined in 1 of 2 (Pts. # 3) clinical records reviewed, the IDG failed to meet every 15 days to review the POC. Findings include: 1. Pt. #3 was admitted to the hospice services on 12/12/23 with diagnosis of Chronic Systolic (Congestive) Heart Failure. The clinical record was reviewed on 12/17/24. The clinical record included IDG meetings dated 12/15/23 and 01/11/24 (more than 15 days). 2. The findings were confirmed during the interview on 12/18/24 at 11:30 AM, with the Agency Supervisor.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 103 words

    “Based on the review of the Governing Board minutes, QAPI documents and Staff interview, it was determined the hospice failed to maintain/track/analyze the quality assessment in all areas of the operations. Findings include: 1. The Governing Board minutes for 2023 and 2024 were reviewed on 12/18/24 at 11:00 AM and lacked the measurements/tracking for QAPI indicators. 2. The QAPI documents were reviewed on 12/18/24 at 11:00 AM, and lacked the measurements/tracking. The hospices quality assessment and performance improvement program was last documented as: “;01/2021 4th quarter”. 3. The findings were confirmed during the interview on 12/18/24 at 11:30 AM, with the QA Director.”

    Rule L0562. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Based on the review of the Governing Board minutes and Staff interview, it was determined the hospice failed to ensure the frequency and details of the quality assessment and performance improvement program were approved. Findings include: 1. The Governing Board minutes for 2023 and 2024 were reviewed on 12/18/24 at 11:00 AM, and lacked documentation of the Governing Body approval for QAPI projects and QAPI indicators. 2. The hospice quality assessment and performance improvement program was reviewed on 12/18/24 at 11:00 AM and lacked documentation that the Governing body met to approve the data collection frequency and details of the quality assessment and performance improvement program. 3. The findings were confirmed during the interview on 12/18/24 at 11:30 AM, with the QA Director.”

    Rule L0565. Standard-level.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Based on the review of the Governing Board minutes and Staff interview, it was determined the hospice failed to ensure the ongoing maintenance and annual evaluation of the QAPI program. Findings include: 1. The Governing Board minutes for 2023 and 2024 were reviewed on 12/18/24 at 11:00 AM and lacked the annual QAPI evaluation, for 2023 and 2024. 2. The hospice quality assessment and performance improvement program was reviewed on 12/18/24 at 11:00 AM and lacked the annual QAPI evaluation for 2023 and 2024. 3.The findings were confirmed during the interview on 12/18/24 at 11:30 AM, with the QA Director.”

    Rule L0574. Standard-level.

  • Licensed professional services (42 CFR 418.62(c))

    “Based on the review of the quality improvement program documents and Staff interview, it was determined the hospice failed to ensure the licensed staff participated in the quality assessment and performance improvement program. Findings include: 1. The hospice quality assessment and performance improvement program was reviewed on 12/17/24 at 1:30 PM and lacked documentation that the licensed Staff participated in the quality assessment and performance improvement program. 2. The findings were confirmed during the interview on 12/18/24 at 11:30 AM, with the QA Director.”

    Rule L0586. Standard-level.

  • Role (42 CFR 418.78(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Based on Staff interviews, Staff list review and clinical record review, it was determined that the hospice failed to use volunteer services in day to day administrative or direct patient care roles. . Findings include: 1. During entrance interview with the Agency Supervisor on 12/17/24 at 11:32 AM and with the Social Worker on 12/18/24 at 9:30 AM, both stated that there are no volunteers for the hospice. 2. The Staff list was reviewed on 12/18/24 and lacked hospice volunteers. 3. The clinical records for Pts. # 1, 2, 3 and 4 were reviewed from 12/17/24 to 12/18/24. The clinical records lacked the use of volunteers. 4. During an interview with the Agency Supervisor on 12/18/24 at 9:48 AM, the Agency Supervisor confirmed that the hospice did not provide or use volunteer services in day to day administrative or direct patient care roles.”

    Rule L0644. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Based on hospice volunteer program review and Staff interview, it was determined that the hospice failed to maintain documentation and demonstrate ongoing efforts to recruit and maintain volunteers. Findings include: 1. The hospice volunteer program was reviewed on 12/18/24. There was no documentation for ongoing recruitment efforts for volunteers. 2. During interview with the Agency Supervisor on 12/18/24 at 9:48 AM and 11:45 AM, the Agency Supervisor stated that the census is low at this time and confirmed that the hospice did not have ongoing efforts to recruit volunteers.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 120 words

    “Based on a review of the hospice volunteer program and Staff interview, it was determined that the hospice failed to ensure it documented any positions held by volunteers, amount of time spent by volunteers in those positions and estimate the cost savings related to us of volunteers. Findings include: 1. The hospice volunteer program was reviewed on 12/18/24. There was no documentation that the hospice identified volunteers, positions held, amount of time spent and estimated cost savings related to use of volunteers. 2. During an interview with the Agency Supervisor on 12/18/24 at 11:45 AM, the Agency Supervisor confirmed that the hospice did not have any volunteers and therefore have no documentation of cost savings related to use of volunteers.”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 118 words

    “Based on review of the hospice patient admission folder and staff interview, it was determined the hospice Administrator failed to ensure the patient admission folder contained the correct hospice name and hospice contact information. Findings include: 1. The hospice patient admission folder was reviewed on 12/18/24. The admission folder contained “1st Choice Total Senior Care” as the name of the hospice and not Willow Hospice and Palliative Care. 2. On 12/17/24 the telephone number displayed on the patient admission folder was called by surveyor, the telephone number corresponds to “1st Choice Senior Care”. 3. During an interview with the Administrator, on 12/18/24 at 2:00 PM, the Administrator confirmed the admission folder contains incorrect hospice name and contact information.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 192 words

    “Based on clinical record review and Staff interview, it was determined that in 1 of 1 (Pts. #3 ) live discharge records reviewed, the hospice failed to ensure that a hospice discharge summary was completed. 2. Pt. #3 was admitted to the hospice services on 12/12/23 with diagnosis of Chronic Systolic (Congestive) Heart Failure. The clinical record was reviewed on 12/17/24. The clinical record included a live-discharge note dated 01/19/24 and lacked the discharge summary. 3. Pt. #4 was admitted to the hospice services on 04/15/23 with diagnosis of Unspecified Chronic Systolic (Congestive) and Diastolic Heart Failure. The clinical record was reviewed on 12/17/24. The clinical record included a live-discharge note dated 05/25/23 and lacked the discharge summary. 4. The findings were confirmed during the interview on 12/18/24 between 11:30 AM and 1:00 PM, with the Agency Supervisor. Findings include: 1. Pt. #2 was admitted to hospice services on 09/19/22 with the diagnosis of: Chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure. The clinical record was reviewed on 12/17/24. The clinical record included a live discharge note dated 05/14/23, indicating Pt. was discharged to home. There was no hospice discharge summary.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care pain & symptom control (42 CFR 418.108(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 120 words

    “Based on document request and Staff interview it was determined that the hospice failed to have an arrangement agreement with a facility to provide inpatient care for pain control and symptom management. Findings include: 1. On 12/18/24 a request was made to the Agency Supervisor for hospice agreement document for inpatient care facility. 2. During an interview with the Agency Supervisor on 12/18/24 at 12:00 PM. The Agency Supervisor stated that the hospice does not have an agreement with any facility to provide inpatient care for pain control and symptom management. 3. During an interview with the Administrator on 12/19/24 at 12:30 PM, the Administrator confirmed that the hospice does not have an agreement with any facility for inpatient care.”

    Rule L0706. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care for respite purposes (42 CFR 418.108(b)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Based on document request and staff interview it was determined that the hospice failed to have an arrangement agreement with a facility to provide respite care. Findings include: 1. On 12/18/24 a request was made to the Agency Supervisor for hospice agreement document for inpatient respite care facility. 2. During an interview with the Agency Supervisor on 12/18/24 at 12:00 PM. The Agency Supervisor stated that the hospice does not have an agreement with any facility to provide respite care. 3. During an interview with the Administrator on 12/19/24 at 12:30 PM, the Administrator confirmed that the hospice does not have an agreement with any facility for respite care.”

    Rule L0708. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Based on document request and staff interview it was determined that the hospice failed to have an arrangement agreement with a facility to provide short-term inpatient care. Findings include: 1. On 12/18/24 a request was made to the Agency Supervisor for hospice agreement document for short term inpatient care facility. 2. During an interview with the Agency Supervisor on 12/18/24 at 12:00 PM. The Agency Supervisor stated that the hospice does not have an agreement with any facility to provide short term inpatient care. 3. During an interview with the Administrator on 12/19/24 at 12:30 PM, the Administrator confirmed that the hospice does not have an agreement with any facility for short term inpatient care.”

    Rule L0711. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 20, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 14, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Dec 20, 2024Recertification inspection by the state18 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 28, 2014.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 17% at home, 83% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Eric Zelany (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Eric Zelany (managing employee (on the payroll)); Yaquta Mustafa Patni (managing employee (under contract)); Rious G Manabat (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 38 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 60477, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 18.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.