Lightways Hospice and Serious Illness Care
A hospice in Joliet, Illinois 60431
250 Water Stone Circle, Joliet, Illinois 60431. (815) 740-4104.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
5 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 26 hospices serving ZIP code 60431 had 7.
The last inspection on record was on Nov 3, 2023: a complaint and recertification inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Nov 3, 2023: complaint and recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 154 words
“Based on clinical record review, document review and staff interview, it was determined the Hospice failed to ensure the patient and/or patient’s representative was informed and involved in updating the plan of care. This was found in 1 of 27 (Pt. #25) records reviewed. 1. Patient #25 was admitted to hospice services on 02/04/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Cerebral Ischemia. The clinical record was reviewed on 10/31/23. The record included a hospice nursing visit note dated 07/23/23 at 10:52 AM. The visit note included, “...Wound has white looking bugs or worms in head (possible maggots).” The nursing visit note lacked documentation of the patient’s representative being informed of the condition of the wound. 2. During an interview with the Clinical Supervisor on 11/09/23 at 10:05 AM, the above findings were confirmed. The Clinical Supervisor confirmed the patient’s representative was not notified of the change in patient’s wound status and updated plan of care.”
-
Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))
The inspectors’ words, 739 words
“Based on the clinical record review, policy review and staff interview, it was determined the Hospice Staff did not provide the care and services in accordance with the plan of care. This was found in 6 of 27 (Pts. #25, 14, 16, 1, 11 and13) records reviewed. 4. Patient #1 was admitted to hospice on 09/14/23 with the primary diagnosis of Demyelinating disease of central nervous system. The Plan of Care for the certification period of 09/14/23 to 12/12/23 required, “other orders: Decubitus/Pressure Ulcer stage 1/ Left lower buttock gluteal fold, cleanse left hip with soap and water or non-rinse foam soap, pat dry and apply remedy “Phtoplex” silicone cream twice a day and as needed...start date 09/14/23.” Patient #1s clinical record was reviewed and included the following documentation on a Hospice follow up visit dated 10/16/23: “;Left lower buttock gluteal fold/decubitus...onset 09/14/23...cleansed with wound cleanser, application/packing: calcium alginate...” The clinical record did not have updated wound orders on 10/16/23. The RN did not follow ordered wound treatment on the Plan of Care. 5. Patient #11 was admitted to hospice on 09/19/23 with the primary diagnosis of Hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney disease or End Stage Renal Disease. The Plan of Care for the certification period of 9/19/23 to 12/17/23 included, “additional services: Several tiny stage 2 open areas on coccyx, moisture associated...follow hospice protocols for pain and symptom management as needed.” Patient #11s clinical record was reviewed and included documentation on the Hospice Initial Assessment dated 9/19/23 and on a Hospice follow up visit dated 10/11/23: “;Medial buttocks coccyx scattered tiny openings/other stage II onset date 9/19/23...” The record also indicated on a Hospice follow up document dated 11/01/23 that the status of the wound on the same location – healed. The record lacked documentation of a weekly wound assessment as required by the Hospice policy. 6. Patient #13 was admitted to hospice on 09/25/23 with the primary diagnosis of Dysphagia following cerebral infarction. The Plan of Care for the certification period of 09/25/23 to 12/23/23 did not include an order for Physical Therapy. As of review of 11/02/23, the clinical record included documentation of Physical Therapy services that were provided to the patient on 10/04/23, 10/12/23, 10/13/23 and 10/20/23. The Hospice provided services that were not indicated in the Plan of Care. 7. The policy “;Wound Assessment and Documentation” with a review date of 2/23, was reviewed and required: “;Policy Purpose: 2. To document an accurate, ongoing assessment of wound in the medical record. The (Hospice) recognizes that a systemic, ongoing wound assessment is necessary to determine the response to nursing care and treatment modalities. A complete wound assessment will be done by a nurse for all wounds, ulcers, and other impairments in the skin integrity. The wound assessment will be documented during the initial assessment and weekly thereafter on the (electronic record) wound flowsheet. The weekly wound assessment will include - date and time of assessment, wound classification, wound location, staging (for pressure ulcers), degree (burn), description of the wound bed, color of the wound bed, drainage, wound edges, color of the wound, surrounding skin and odor, wound measurements and wound related pain.” 8. The above findings were confirmed during the interview with the Director of Clinical Services on 11/02/23 between 2:00 PM and 3:20 PM and with the Chief Executive Officer, Director of Clinical Services, Senior Director of Operations and Chief Operating Officer on 11/03/23 at 1:45 PM. Findings include: 1. Patient #25 was admitted to hospice 02/04/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Cerebral Ischemia. The clinical record includes a plan of care dated 05/05/23 for Aide services two times a week. The Aide did not provide care two times a week for the weeks of 06/25/23 and 07/02/23. 2. Patient #14 was admitted to hospice 09/12/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with heart failure. The record included an initial plan of care dated 09/12/23 for Aide services two times a week. The Aide did not provide care two times a week for the weeks of 09/10/23, 09/17/23,10/01/23 and 10/22/23. 3. Patient #16, was admitted to hospice 08/07/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with heart failure. The record included an initial plan of care dated 08/07/23 for Aide services two times a week. The Aide did not provide care two times a week for weeks of 10/22/23 and 10/29/23.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 244 words
“Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the Hospice did not ensure the Interdisciplinary Group was notified of changes in wound symptoms in order to maintain responsibility for directing, coordinating and supervising patient care. This was found in 1 of 27 (Pts. # 25) records reviewed. Findings include: 1.Patient #25 was admitted to hospice 02/04/23 with a terminal diagnosis of Cerebral Ischemia. The clinical record was reviewed on 10/31/2023. The record included a plan of care dated 05/05/23 that included, “;Hospice MD to symptom manage.” 2. The clinical record also included a nursing visit note dated 07/23/23 at 10:52 AM. The visit note documented, “;Beefy Red Pink Wound Edges Dehiscence Detached Drainage Amount Moderate Color Other: Red blood Odor None... Patient has open raise mass cancerous wound to posterior head. Blood dry in tingles hair... Blood dry and dark. Continue to assess. Wound has white looking bugs or worms in head (possible maggots).” The record lacked documentation of coordination with the Medical Director on new onset of symptoms associated with the wound. 3. During staff interviews with the Director of Clinical Services on 11/02/23 from 3:00 PM to 3:20 PM, it was stated that the Hospice MD was not notified because it did not require a change in the level of care and the RN handled the concerns. 4.The above findings were confirmed during the interview with the Director of Clinical Services on 11/02/23 between 2:00 PM and 3:20 PM.”
-
Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 319 words
“Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the Hospice did not ensure the patients needs were met. This was found in 1 of 27 (Pts. # 25) records reviewed. Findings include: 1.Patient #25 was admitted to Hospice on 02/04/23, with a terminal diagnosis of Cerebral Ischemia. The clinical record was reviewed on 10/31/23. The record included Employee #6s nursing visit note, dated 07/23/23 at 10:52 AM. The visit note documented, “;Beefy Red Pink Wound Edges Dehiscence Detached Drainage Amount Moderate Color Other: Red blood Odor None Dressing/Wound Vac: Wound Cleansing/Dressing Change Per Care Plan Care Performed: With assistance.... Patient has open raise mass cancerous wound to posterior head. Blood dry in tingles hair... Blood dry and dark. Continue to assess. Wound has white looking bugs or worms in head (possible maggots).” The record lacked documentation of the patients new onset of symptoms being met by the nurse. 2. The clinical record also included a communication note form Employee # 6 dated 07/23/23 at 5:25 PM, that documented, “;...made phone call to...” Director of Facility, “;...reports patient was sent out to... hospital, due to persistence of family.” The same communication note also documented phone call to POA, “;...POA has questions on maggots in patient wound and why no further action taken...Education given on maggots and role of maggots with wound healing... POA reports patient is in severe pain... education given on morphine, POA verbalized understanding... followed up if patient is going to the hospital, POA confirmed.” 3. During staff interview with the Director of Clinical Services on 11/02/23 from 3:00 PM to 3:20 PM, it was stated that the Hospice MD was not notified because it did not require a change in the level of care and that the RN handled the concerns. 4. The above findings were confirmed during the interview with the Director of Clinical Services on 11/02/23 between 2:00 PM and 3:20 PM.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 169 words
“Based on the clinical record review and Staff interview, it was determined the Hospice Staff did not complete the discharge summaries. This was found in 2 of 3 (Pts. #25 and 26) live-discharge records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Patient #25 was admitted to hospice on 08/24/23 with a diagnosis of Cerebral Ischemia. The clinical record was reviewed on 10/31/23. The discharge summary lacked a summary of the patient’s stay including treatments, symptoms and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, and the patient’s latest physician orders. 2. Patient #26 was admitted to hospice on 10/28/23, with a diagnoses of “Hyp Chr Kidney Disease w stage5 chr Kidney Disease or ESRD.” The clinical record was reviewed on 10/31/23. The discharge summary lacked a summary of the patient’s stay including treatments, symptoms and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, and the patient’s latest physician orders. 3. The above findings were confirmed during the interview with the Director of Clinical Services on 11/02/23 between 2:00 PM and 3:20 PM.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2023 | Complaint and recertification inspection by the state | 5 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 3, 1990.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 12% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 99.4% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 56% at home, 12% in assisted living, 26% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% in an inpatient hospice, 1% elsewhere.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.9 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 12% |
| Visits near death | 99.4% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Joliet Area Community Hospice Corporation runs it.
- 28 owners or officers are people: Jane Wetterling-Clifford (corporate director); Katheryn Doyle (corporate director, 0%); Rob Stanek (corporate director); Michael Mutterer (corporate director); Mary K Sheehan (corporate officer); Mary K Sheehan (corporate director); Mary K Sheehan (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bryan Niehaus (corporate director); Muhamad Krad (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Alyssa Knoderer (corporate director); Helen H Ross (corporate director); Karen Sorbero (corporate director); Tracey Durns (corporate officer, 0%); Tracey Durns (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Cathy Schley (corporate director, 0%); Nannette Alton-Labus (corporate director); Nancy Agajeenian (corporate director, 0%); Stephen Masters (corporate director, 0%); Rahel Legesse (corporate officer); Rahel Legesse (managing employee (on the payroll)); Allison Gunnink (managing employee (on the payroll)); William C Benoit (corporate director); Matthew Baskerville (corporate director, 0%); Kathleen Peterson (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Katherine A Proctor (corporate director, 0%); Patricia Ahern (corporate director, 0%); Thomas W Senesac (corporate director, 0%); Colette Safford (corporate director).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 93% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 98.06% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 80.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 26 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 60431, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 5.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Lightways Hospice and Serious Illness Care This hospice | 5 |
| Advocate Hospice | 1 |
| Residential Hospice | 10 |
| Journeycare - Barrington | 17 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation of Illinois | 5 |
| Unity Hospice of Chicagoland, LLC | 5 |
| Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of Illinois | 18 |
| OSF Hospice | 3 |
| Providence Hospice | 3 |
| Gentiva I | 12 |
| Heartland Hospice (Frankfort) | 12 |
| Family Centered Hospice | 13 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.