Hearth Record

Lighthouse Hospice LLC

A hospice in Eagle, Idaho 83616

1079 S Ancona Ave, Ste 130, Eagle, Idaho 83616. (208) 576-6383.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 22 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

22 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 22 hospices serving ZIP code 83616 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 3, 2024: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

22 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

22 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 16, 2023: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care22 deficiencies
  • Federal, state, local laws & regulations (42 CFR 418.116)

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice has the appropriate licenses/permits required by state or local rules and regulations. During selection of home visits, it was observed that the agency had 7 of the 41 current patients located in the state of Oregon. Upon inquiry, the agency verified they do not have a hospice licensure in Oregon.”

    Rule L0797. Condition-level.

  • Develop EP Plan, Review and Update Annually (42 CFR 418.113(a))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice has developed and maintained an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every two years. The agency provided last revision dated 11/16/2020.”

    Rule E0004. Standard-level.

  • Arrangement with Other Facilities (42 CFR 418.113(b)(5))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence of contracts/agreements with other facilities/agencies/hospices to receive patients in the event the hospice cannot provide care to their patients during an emergency.”

    Rule E0025. Standard-level.

  • Methods for Sharing Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(4))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan includes: • A method for sharing information and medical documentation for patients under the hospice’s care, as necessary, with other health care providers to maintain the continuity of care • A means, in the event of an evacuation, to release patient information as permitted under 45 CFR 164.510(b)(1)(ii) • A means of providing information about the general condition and location of patients under the facility’s care as permitted under 45 CFR 164.510(b)(4)”

    Rule E0033. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #6,#8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 6: The medication profile contained diclofenac and lidocaine topicals with no area defined for administration. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medication profile contained multiple pain medications including hydromorphone, morphine and oxycodone without instructions to differentiate appropriate indications for use. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 3: The medical record contained an initial bereavement assessment 4/20/23 with a start of care 4/11/23.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 231 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patients #6,#7,#8,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 6: The medical record stated patient has comorbidities including coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to cardiac dysfunction. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient risk for skin impairment. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to risk for skin impairment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient had a chest port, nausea, and dyspnea. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to the chest port, nausea, and dyspnea included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient had a chest port. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to the chest port included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 146 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patients #6,#9,#10) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient 6: The medical record contained an order for social work frequency as needed. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medical record contained an order for social work frequency as needed. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained an order for social work frequency as needed. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #6,#8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 6: The medical record contained orders for diclofenac and lidocaine topical medications with no area defined for administration. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medical record contained orders for multiple pain medications including hydromorphone, morphine, and oxycodone without instructions to differentiate appropriate use. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a wheelchair. There was no evidence of the wheelchair included as DME in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contained a social work visit 10/25/23. There was no evidence of an order for social work util 11/1/23.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice investigates all adverse events, incidents, accidents, variances or unusual occurrences that involve patient care and develops a plan of correction to prevent the same or similar event from occurring again. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying a patient fall 10/23/23. There was no evidence of an investigation and prevention of reoccurrence.”

    Rule L0569. Standard-level.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice’s governing body is responsible for ensuring that the hospice-wide Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement efforts address priorities for improved quality of care and patient safety, and that all improvement actions are evaluated for effectiveness. No evidence in governing body minutes of updates for QAPI.”

    Rule L0575. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patients #2) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 2: There was no evidence of an order for aide visits. The medical record contained aide visits completed twice weekly since admission.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice documents and demonstrates viable and ongoing efforts to recruit and retain volunteers.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 8: The medical record contained an election statement identifying the patient elected to receive the Notification of Hospice Non-Covered Items upon admission 10/23/23. The patient did not receive the addendum until 10/30/23.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(4))

    “Upon inpatient contract review, 1 of 5 (Karcher Estates contract) did not have evidence that the inpatient facility has identified an individual within the facility who is responsible for the implementation of the provisions of the agreement.”

    Rule L0714. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(5))

    “Upon inpatient contract review, 2 of 5 (Saint Alphonsus and Karcher Estates contracts) did not have evidence that the hospice retains responsibility for ensuring that the training of personnel who will be providing the patient’s care in the inpatient facility has been provided and that a description of the training and the names of those giving the training are documented.”

    Rule L0715. Standard-level.

  • Written agreement (42 CFR 418.112(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Upon SNF/NF contract review, 1 of 5 (Karcher Estates contract) did not have evidence that specifies the provision of hospice services in the facility, including: A provision that the SNF/NF or ICF/IID immediately notifies the hospice if: • A significant change in a patient’s physical, mental, social or emotional status occurs • Clinical complications appear that suggest a need to alter the plan of care • When a need to transfer a patient from the SNF/NF or ICF/MR arises, and the hospice makes arrangements for, and remains responsible for, any necessary continuous care or inpatient care necessary related to the terminal illness and related conditions • A patient dies”

    Rule L0765. Standard-level.

  • Written agreement (42 CFR 418.112(c)(3))

    “Upon SNF/NF contract review, 1 of 5 (Karcher Estates contract) did not have evidence of a provision stating that the hospice assumes responsibility for determining the appropriate course of hospice care, including the determination to change the level of services provided.”

    Rule L0766. Standard-level.

  • Written agreement (42 CFR 418.112(c)(8))

    “Upon SNF/NF contract review, 1 of 5 (Karcher Estates contract) did not have a provision stating that the hospice reports all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of patient property by anyone unrelated to the hospice to the SNF/NF administrator within 24 hours of the hospice becoming aware of the alleged violation.”

    Rule L0771. Standard-level.

  • Written agreement (42 CFR 418.112(c)(9))

    “Upon SNF/NF contract review, 1 of 5 (Karcher Estates contract) did not have a delineation of the responsibilities of the hospice and the SNF/NF to provide bereavement services to SNF/NF personnel.”

    Rule L0772. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 3, 2024Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareNo deficiencies cited
Nov 16, 2023Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care22 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 30, 2017.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 39% at home, 61% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.3%
Visits near death97.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Wada LLC owns 50.4% directly since Nov 7, 2016; Gmhc LLC owns 33.6% directly since Nov 7, 2016; Shhc LLC owns 16% directly since Nov 7, 2016.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Temperance Ann Mcdaniel-Guthneck (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Josh Leavitt (managing employee (under contract), 100%); Kellie A Stanger (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Cline M Waddell (owns 5% or more through other companies, 16.8%); Gary Walker (owns 5% or more through other companies, 16.8%); Michael Fife (owns 5% or more through other companies, 16.8%); Eric N Dahle (owns 5% or more through other companies, 16.8%); Jon M Dahle (owns 5% or more through other companies, 16.8%); Sean G Walker (owns 5% or more through other companies, 16%); Sean G Walker (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Wada LLCOwns 5% or more directly50.4%Nov 7, 2016
Gmhc LLCOwns 5% or more directly33.6%Nov 7, 2016
Shhc LLCOwns 5% or more directly16%Nov 7, 2016

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 93% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 52.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 83616, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 22.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.