Hearth Record

Harrison’s Hope

A hospice in Meridian, Idaho 83642

3137 S Meridian Rd, Suite 120, 3137 S Meridian Rd, Suite 120, Meridian, Idaho 83642. (208) 947-6800.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 23 hospices serving ZIP code 83642 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 3, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 3, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #3,6,9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: Patient 3: The medication profile contains an order for albuterol 0.083% with no dose and Polyethylene Glycol with no diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medication profile on 3/4/25 contains an order for Cyclobenzaprine 10mg 0.5-1 tab as needed. There are no instructions listed for frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medication profile contains an order for Gavilax 17gm daily with no diluent. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 287 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient # 1,2,4,5,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 1: The POC 3/11/25 contains orders for ASA and Eliquis there is no risk for bleeding care plan with goals and interventions. Patient has a diagnosis of dysphagia and there is no risk for aspiration care plan with goals and interventions. Corrected on site. Pt is incontinent of bowel and bladder with frequent episodes of diarrhea and there is no care plan for risk for skin breakdown with goals and interventions. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The POC 3/13/25 the SN documented in the comprehensive assessment that the patient has dysphagia with recurrent aspiration and is a high fall risk, there was no care plan for risk for aspiration or high risk of falls with goals and interventions. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The patient had a fall during the current certification period and is incontinent of bladder, there was no fall risk or risk for skin break down care plans with goals and interventions. Corrected on site. Patient 5: Patient has a diagnosis of dysphagia with no risk of aspiration care plan and is up with a walker with no fall risk care plan with goals. Corrected on site. Patent 8: The POC contains a goal for risk for skin breakdown with no goals or interventions. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 504 words

    “Upon patient record review, 10 of 14 (Patient #1-10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including measurable outcomes are anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care for each patient by using data elements identified by the hospice and is used as part of the Hospice’s QAPI program. Patient 1: The most recent revised plan of care contains a goal of “Pt caregiver verbalizes understanding of the administration and side effects of pain medication” this goal is not measurable. “Pt/caregiver/facility staff will verbalize understanding of methods to decrease choking risks and prevent aspiration” the goal is not measurable. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The most recent revised POC contains a goal of “caregiver to verbalize measures to promote comfort related to respiratory system in a terminal patient”. “Pt/caregiver verbalizes understanding of administration and side effects of pain medication”. These goals are not measurable. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The most recent revised POC contains a goal of “ Caregiver/pt. verbalizes medication (dosage route frequency) to be given to prevent constipation”. “Pt./caregiver verbalizes proper nutrition and fluid intake in order to maintain proper bowel movement”. These goals are not measurable. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The most recent revised POC contains goal “Pt/caregiver verbalizes the importance and rationale for use of support surfaces to prevent skin breakdown”. “Pt./caregiver verbalizes dietary and fluid required to promote healing process and healthy skin”. These goals are not measurable. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The most recent revised POC contains a goal of “Pt/caregiver verbalizes understanding of proper safety measures related to fall awareness”. “Pt/caregiver demonstrates appropriate measures to prevent infection”. These goals are not measurable. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The most recent revised POC contains a goal of Caregiver to verbalize understanding of seizure precautions” and Pt/caregiver verbalizes understanding of measures to manage cardiac symptoms”. These goals were not measurable. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The most recent revised POC contains a goal of “Pt/caregiver verbalizes the importance and rationale for use of support surfaces to prevent skin breakdown”. “Pt./caregiver verbalizes dietary and fluid required to promote healing process and healthy skin”. These goals are not measurable. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The most recent plan of revised POC “Pt/caregiver understands the causes of pain”. “Pt/caregiver verbalizes understanding of the administration and side effects of medication”. These goals are not measurable. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The most recent revised POC contains goals of “Pt tolerates administration of pain medication, understands the pain scale, medication regimen including administration and potential side effects”. “Pt/caregiver administers prescribed medication properly as a result of nurse filled”. “Pt/caregiver verbalizes understanding phycological effects of incontinence and measures”. These goals are not measurable. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The POC 1/30/25 contains goals of “Pt/caregiver verbalizes understanding of the administration and side effects of pain medication”. “Pt/caregiver verbalizes understanding psychological effects of incontinence and measures to improve/maintain dignity”. These goals are not measurable.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 142 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #3,6,9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 3: The POC 3/1/25 contains an order for albuterol 0.083% with no dose and Polyethylene Glycol with no diluent. Corrected on site. The SN documented on 3/27/25 “pt. on 3.5L of O2” and on 3/17/25 O2 was increased from 3L to 3.5L. There was no evidence of an order for the Oxygen level to be increased. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The POC on 3/4/25 contains an order for Cyclobenzaprine 10mg 0.5-1 tab as needed. There are no instructions listed for frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The POC 2/9/25 contains an order for Gavilax 17gm daily with no diluent. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 182 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The skilled nurse documented on 3/17/24, “ordered gel mattress overlay” there was no order on the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The SN documented on SOC comprehensive assessment patient has grab bars and a walker they were not included on the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The Pt is on albuterol 0.083% solution for nebulization. There is no nebulizer added to the plan of care. The SN documented on 3/17/25 that patient is using a CPAP and is using it four hours a day instead of BIPAP every afternoon, these items were not included on plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The SN documented on 3/19/25 Pt. has a walker, hospital bed, over the bed table and a shower chair. These items were not included on the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 2: Upon home visit finding, the SN removed the patient’s sock to assess a wound on his great left toe for signs and symptoms of infection. She educated patient and his spouse that the wound needs to be open to air and to continue to watch for signs and symptoms of infection. There is no orders on the POC for this wound. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: Patient 1: The POC 1/22/25 contains the directive fall precautions with no frequency. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 2: The POC 3/13/25 contains an order for Fluticasone for “COPK”. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 3, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 21, 2006.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 53% at home, 41% in assisted living, 6% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.9%
Visits near death92.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Hospice Partners of America LLC owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2015.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Travis Blaser (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Travis Blaser (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Louise Xian Ye-Liew (managing employee (on the payroll)); Brian T Monahan (corporate officer); William Bradley Bickham (corporate officer); Rodney Dirk Allison (corporate officer); Wendy R Shell (corporate director, 0%); Heather B Dixon (corporate officer); Heather B Dixon (managing employee (on the payroll)); Brian W Poff (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
NEW Capital Partners II- Hs, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 1, 2019
Addus Homecare CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 1, 2022
Addus Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 1, 2022
Hospice Partners of America LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2015
Black Rock Institutional Trust Company NAOwns 5% or more through other companies16%Feb 1, 2022
Capital One NAHolds 5% or more of the mortgage11.6%Feb 1, 2022
Bank of America, N.A.Holds 5% or more of the mortgage9.2%Feb 1, 2022
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Holds 5% or more of the mortgage9.2%Feb 1, 2022
Fifth Third Bank, National AssociationHolds 5% or more of the mortgage9.2%Feb 1, 2022
Pnc BankHolds 5% or more of the mortgage9.2%Jan 1, 2025
Bmo Bank, N.A.Holds 5% or more of the mortgage9.2%Jan 1, 2025
Vanguard Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies6.8%Feb 1, 2022
Citizens Bank NAHolds 5% or more of the mortgage5.4%Feb 1, 2022
The Huntington National BankHolds 5% or more of the mortgage5.4%Feb 1, 2022
Synovous Bank, National AssociationHolds 5% or more of the mortgage5.4%Jan 1, 2025
Regions BankHolds 5% or more of the mortgage5.4%Jan 1, 2025
Royal Bank of CanadaHolds 5% or more of the mortgage5.4%Jan 1, 2025
Us Bank, N.A.Holds 5% or more of the mortgage5.4%Jan 1, 2025

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 67% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 72% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 64.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 23 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 83642, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.