Hearth Record

Precious Hospice

A hospice in Fayetteville, Georgia 30214

105 Habersham Drive, Suite D, Fayetteville, Georgia 30214. (404) 992-5088.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 39 hospices serving ZIP code 30214 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 4, 2024: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 4, 2024: complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(4)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 300 words

    “Based on record reviews, interviews, and review of policy titled “;Complaint Resolution,” it was determined the hospice failed to investigate and document a complaint for one patient (P) (P1). Findings include: Review of the undated policy titled “;Complaint Resolution,” Policy No. 227, reveals the following: Policy Statement: Precious Hospice has a complaint resolution process that is implemented whenever a complaint is received. Procedures: 4. All complaints are documented in a complaint log by the RN Clinical Supervisor no more than 5 business days from the date the complaint was first received. 5. A documented investigation is conducted by the appropriate personnel of all written or verbal complaints received by the hospice. Review of the clinical record revealed P1 was admitted to hospice on 8/7/2023. A revocation (end Medicare-covered hospice care) form was signed on 6/18/2024 with an effective date of 6/28/2024. Review of the form titled “;Revocation of the Hospice Benefit” reveals hospice benefit revoked (end Medicare-covered hospice care) because of “;safety concerns for my (family member), failure to provide supplies and equipment.” Review of the agencys complaint log for 2024 year to date reveals the complaint log failed to contain an entry related to this complaint. Family of P1 provided email dated 5/31/2024 revealing the familys complaints regarding supplies and care provided by the hospice and notes the request to revoke services effective 6/28/2024. On 9/3/2024 at approximately 1:10 pm, a telephone interview with a family member of P1 revealed multiple complaints and ongoing concerns regarding supplies and care provided by the agency. Family member further revealed she sent multiple texts regarding her complaints to the Administrator before revoking hospice. On 9/4/2024 at approximately 1:15 pm, an interview with the Administrator confirmed the complaint from P1 was not logged as a complaint and that all documentation had been provided.”

    Rule L0509. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 234 words

    “Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined the hospice failed to develop an individualized plan of care that includes all services necessary for the management and palliation of the terminal illness and related conditions for two patients (P) (P1, P2) of five sampled patients. Findings include: 1. Record review reveals P1 was admitted to hospice on 6/28/2023 and revoked (end Medicare-covered hospice care) 6/28/2024. The clinical record failed to reveal a medication profile for the patient. Review of document titled “;Palliative Drug Care Billing Report”, dated May 2024 reveals two medications were dispensed to the patient on 5/20/2024 as follows: • E kit (a small supply of medications that is kept in a patient’s home to treat symptoms that may occur) • Hyoscyamine (a drug that reduces the amount of sweat, saliva, and stomach acid your body makes, used in hospice to help control secretions). 2. P2 was admitted to hospice on 8/25/2023 and revoked on 6/7/2024. A review of the clinical record failed to reveal a medication profile for the patient. Review of documents titled “;Palliative Drug Care Billing Report,” dated April and May 2024 reveals medication Alprazolam (a medication used to treat anxiety) was dispensed by the pharmacy on 4/3, 4/18, and 5/22/2024. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/3/2024 at approximately 2:00 pm confirmed the clinical records for P1 and P2 failed to reveal medication profiles.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 172 words

    “Based on clinical record reviews and staff interview, it was determined the hospice failed to generate a hospice discharge summary for four patients (P) (P1, P2, P3, P6) of six discharged patients reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of clinical records reveals P1 was admitted to hospice on 6/28/2023 and revoked on 6/28/2024. A review of the clinical record failed to reveal a discharge summary. 2. Review of clinical records reveals P2 was admitted to hospice on 8/25/2023 and revoked on 6/7/2024. A review of the clinical record failed to reveal a discharge summary. 3. Review of clinical records reveals P3 was admitted to hospice on 3/25/2024 and revoked on 7/4/2024. A review of the clinical record failed to reveal a discharge summary. 4. Review of clinical records reveals P6 was admitted to hospice on 3/20/2024 and was discharged on 4/19/2024. A review of the clinical record failed to reveal a discharge summary. On 9/4/2024 at approximately 1:15 pm, an interview with the (Director of Nursing) DON confirmed the records lacked discharge summaries.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jul 3, 2024: recertification inspection by the state10 deficiencies
  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1)-(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 121 words

    “Based on review of policy titled, “;Precious Hospice Emergency Preparedness Plan,” record review, and staff interview, it was determined the hospice failed to develop an emergency preparedness plan based on a documented risk assessment utilizing an all-hazards approach. The emergency preparedness plan lacked a documented risk assessment. Findings include: Review of policy titled, “;Precious Hospice Emergency Preparedness Plan,” revised 2/21/2019, failed to reveal a provision for completing and documenting a facility-based and community-based all hazards risk assessment. Review of documents in binder labeled “;Emergency Plan” failed to reveal a risk assessment for the agency and surrounding community. On 7/3/2024 at approximately 10:00 am, an interview with the Administrator confirmed no risk assessment had been completed as part of the emergency plan.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Based on review of policy titled, “;Precious Hospice Emergency Preparedness Plan,” record review, and staff interview, it was determined the hospice failed to conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The hospice failed to conduct emergency drills to test the emergency plan. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, “;Precious Hospice Emergency Preparedness Plan,” revised 2/21/2019, failed to reveal a procedure for regular testing of the emergency plan. Review of documents in binder labeled “;Emergency Plan” failed to reveal emergency plan testing exercises. On 7/3/2024 at approximately 10:00 am, an interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed no exercises testing the emergency plan had been conducted.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1)(i)-(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Based on clinical record reviews and staff interview, it was determined the hospice failed to include a qualified Chaplain/spiritual counselor and a qualified Social Worker (SW) in the interdisciplinary group (IDG) meetings for ten patients (P) (P1, P2, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8, P9, P10, P12) of 16 sampled patients. Additionally, IDG meeting notes failed to reveal signatures from the Social Worker or chaplain. Findings include: Review of documents titled “;Plan of Care/ IDG Review” dated 6/20/2024, for P1, P2, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8, P9, P10, P12 failed to reveal signatures (indicating participation in the IDG meeting) of a Chaplain or SW. On 7/2/2024 at approximately 2:00 pm, an interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the hospices only Chaplain is out, and the only SW has been out. No other chaplain or SW was employed or available to cover ongoing needs of patients. The Administrator and DON confirmed the IDG meeting lacked the required SW and Chaplain.”

    Rule L0541. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(2))

    “Based on record reviews, and staff interview, it was determined the hospice failed to document what performance improvement projects (PIPs) are being conducted, the reasons for conducting these projects, and the measurable progress achieved on these projects. Findings include: Review of records failed to reveal PIPs conducted and the measurable progress achieved. On 7/2/2024 at 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Administrator in a conference room revealed that the Director of Nursing (DON) resigned, and PIPs were not done. The Administrator said he just hired a new DON.”

    Rule L0573. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 265 words

    “Based on review of the policy titled, “;Bereavement Services,” staff interview, and clinical record reviews, it was determined the hospice failed to develop a bereavement plan of care with bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of services for three patients (P (P13, P14, P16) of three sampled bereavement records. Findings include: Review of the undated policy titled “;Bereavement Services,” #39, reveals the following: Procedure: 4. A bereavement assessment and plan of care will be completed for each family at the time of admission. 5. Within two (2) weeks of the patients death. 1. P13 was admitted to hospice on 3/8/2024 with a date of death of 4/1/2024. A review of the Interdisciplinary Care Plan failed to reveal specific plans of care for the identified bereaved that included services to be offered and the frequency of delivery of those services. 2. P14 was admitted to hospice on 5/4/2024 with a date of death of 5/19/2024. A review of the Interdisciplinary Care Plan failed to reveal specific plans of care for the identified bereaved that included services to be offered and the frequency of delivery of those services. 3. P16 was admitted to hospice on 4/16/2024 with a date of death of 5/1/2024. A review of the Interdisciplinary Care Plan failed to reveal specific plans of care for the identified bereaved that included services to be offered and the frequency of delivery of those services. On 7/2/2024 at 3:15 p.m., an interview with the Administrator revealed that bereavement care plans and documentation were not done, but the services were provided to patients and patients families.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Based on record reviews, and staff interview, it was determined the hospice Registered Nurse (RN) failed to make an on-site 14 days supervisory visit to the patient’s home for one Patient (P) (P6) of 16 sampled patients. Findings include: P6 was admitted to hospice service on 5/15/2024. Review of “;Physician Order” revealed hospice aide will visit two times per week and two as needed. Registered Nurse (RN) AA failed to complete a supervisory visit during June 2024. On 7/2/2024 at 1:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN AA revealed that he has no reason he did not conduct 14 days supervisory visits during the month of June 2024.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 210 words

    “Based on review of policy titled “;Cost-Saving Documentation,” and staff interview, it was determined the hospice failed to document cost savings achieved through the use of volunteers. Findings include: A review of the facility’s undated policy titled “;Cost-Saving Documentation”, Policy 509, reveals the following: Procedure: The Precious Hospice will: 1. PH shall use volunteers under the supervision of the Volunteer Coordinator/Administrator. 2. Employees and volunteers will submit their productivity logs to the Administrator on a bi-weekly basis. 3. PH will maintain copies of all productivity logs at the office. 4. PH will receive a summary of the productivity reports from the volunteer coordinator which will provide the office with the total direct time put in by employees as well as the total number of hours put in by volunteers. 5. The Volunteer Coordinator will calculate the cost savings by adding up all the volunteer hours and dividing this number by the total number of direct hours provided by paid employees. On 7/1/2024 at 3:08 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Administrator at the conference room revealed the hospices Volunteer Coordinator position is currently filled by the Administrator. The Administrator revealed was unfamiliar with volunteer cost savings report requirements or calculations and was unable to provide any cost savings reports.”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 260 words

    “Based on review of policy titled “;Cost-Saving Documentation,” and staff interview, it was determined the hospice failed to provide records on the use of volunteer for day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that at a minimum equals 5% of the total patient care hours. Findings include: A review of the undated policy titled “;Cost-Saving Documentation”, Policy 509, reveals the following: Hospice Agency shall maintain a consistent volunteer program to provide direct patient care or administrative duties in the amount that is at least equal to 5% of the total patient care hours of all salaried hospice employees. The Hospice Agency will document the cost savings achieved through the usage of volunteers on a monthly basis and conclude at the end of the fiscal year. The Hospice Agency will document ongoing efforts to recruit and retain volunteers that will be kept in a cost savings book. Procedure: 8. Volunteer staff will be sufficient to provide administration support or direct patient care in an amount that equals 5% or more of the total patient care hours of all paid employees and contract staff. Hospice agency failed to provide volunteer day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that at a minimum equals 5% of the total patient care hours. On 7/1/2024 at 3:08 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Administrator at conference room revealed the hospices Volunteer Coordinator position is currently filled by the Administrator. The Administrator was unable to meet 5% due to difficulty in hiring someone to occupy volunteer coordinator and volunteer position.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 431 words

    “Based on record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined the hospice governing body failed to assume responsibility for the management of the hospice and the provision of all hospice services including the records on the use of volunteer for administrative or direct patient care services to meet 5%, develop a bereavement plan of care for three patients (P) (P13, P14, P16), no record of performance improvement projects (PIP), 14 day Registered Nurse supervisory visits for one patient (P6), and cost savings achieved through the use of volunteers. Findings include: 1. Hospice agency failed to provide volunteer day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that at a minimum equals five percent of the total patient care hours. Refer to L0647 as it relates to level of activity. 2. P13 was admitted to hospice on 3/8/2024 with a date of death of 4/1/2024. A review of the Interdisciplinary Care Plan failed to reveal specific plans of care for the identified bereaved that included services to be offered and the frequency of delivery of those services. P14 was admitted to hospice on 5/4/2024 with a date of death of 5/19/2024. A review of the Interdisciplinary Care Plan failed to reveal specific plans of care for the identified bereaved that included services to be offered and the frequency of delivery of those services. P16 was admitted to hospice on 4/16/2024 with a date of death of 5/1/2024. A review of the Interdisciplinary Care Plan failed to reveal specific plans of care for the identified bereaved that included services to be offered and the frequency of delivery of those services. Refer to L0596 as it relates to counseling services. 3. On 7/2/2024 at 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Administrator in a conference room revealed that the Director of Nursing (DON), resigned and PIPs was not done. The Administrator said he just hired a new DON. Refer to L0573 as it related to Performance Improvement Projects 4. Review of care plan “;Physician Order” revealed hospice aide will visit two times per week and two as needed ordered. Registered Nurse (RN) AA failed to do complete a supervisory visit during June 2024. Refer to L0629 as it relates to Supervision of Hospice Aides 5. On 7/1/2024 at 3:08 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Administrator at the conference room revealed the hospices Volunteer Coordinator position is currently filled by the Administrator and was unfamiliar with volunteer cost savings report requirements or calculations and was unable to provide any cost savings reports. Refer to L0646 as it relates to cost saving.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 147 words

    “Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the hospice failed to ensure the Medical Director or designee provided an initial written certification stating that the patients life expectancy is six months or less for three patients (P) (P4, P5, P6) of 16 sampled patients. Findings include: 1. P4 was admitted to hospice on 3/14/2024. The clinical record failed to reveal an initial certification by the physician. 2. P5 was admitted to hospice on 5/27/2024. The clinical record failed to reveal an initial certification by the physician. 3. P6 was admitted to hospice on 5/15/2024. The clinical record failed to reveal an initial certification by the physician. On 7/2/2024 at approximately 1:00 pm, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator confirmed that the written certifications were not in the clinical records. The DON revealed the physician was behind in doing certifications.”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 4, 2024Complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited
Jul 3, 2024Recertification inspection by the state10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 11, 2015.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 6.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 86.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 83% at home, 17% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day6.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.2%
Visits near death86.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Henry Mason (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Henry Mason (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Millard J Collier Jr (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 91.76% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 57.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 39 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 30214, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.