Hearth Record

Atrium Health Floyd Medical Center Heyman Hospice Care

A hospice in Rome, Georgia 30161

420 East Second Avenue, Suite 103, Rome, Georgia 30161. (706) 509-3200.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 30 hospices serving ZIP code 30161 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 30, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 3, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission14 deficiencies
  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(iii))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. In 1 of 3 volunteer records reviewed, the organization had not documented emergency management education and training during the last two calendar years. This finding was discussed with hospice leadership.”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 168 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to assess and reassess its patient’s. During record review for RRGIP#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient had an IV for IV pain medications at admission but the IV site was not assessed at admission or in further nursing visits. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, where a wound was present, the organization failed to assess and reassess. During record review for RRNHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient developed a wound 1 month prior to survey but it was not measured weekly as required by policy and documentation of the wound appearance and drainage was not assessed during each nursing visit. There was 14 days between the first two measurements and the wound had not been measured in 13 days as of the day of review. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. In 1 of 3 bereavement records reviewed, the organization had not documented a post death bereavement assessment. The organization’s bereavement policy, Bereavement Services - HO 804 states that the bereavement coordinator will complete an assessment after a patient’s death. This assessment is used to create a bereavement plan of care. This finding was discussed with hospice leadership.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 138 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 9 of 19 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRHV#3, RRHV#4, RRNHV#1, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3, RRMHV#4, and RRNHV#5, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the plan of care did not contain all needed elements. For example in RRHV#1, all goal timeframes were set for the last day of the certification period, which was not individualized. The patient had a goal of Pt/CG can identify potential complications actions to take and when to call hospice which was started at SOC and had a goal date of the end of the first certification, 90 days after SOC. In RRHV#2, all goals were expected to be achieved by the same date, the last day of the certification. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 resident records reviewed, the organization failed to provide care, treatment, or services. During record review for RRNHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient developed a wound 4 weeks prior to survey with wound care orders to be done every 5-7 days and PRN by either the Hospice RN or the facility. The wound care was only documented twice since its development with one being at onset. There was also no documentation that the facility had provided the wound care. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 6 of 9 patient records reviewed, where aide services were ordered, the organization failed to provide interdisciplinary, collaborative care, treatment, or services. During record review for RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRHV#3, RRNHV#3, RRNHV#5, and RRNHV#9, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the aide did not collaborate with the RN when the patient refused tasks on the plan of care. For example in RRHV#1 and RRHV#2 the patients had multiple visits with refusal of oral care ( ordered at every visit) but there was no documentation of collaboration with the RN. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program did not include all services provided. The QAPI program did not include the contracted DME service. This finding was discussed with hospice leadership.”

    Rule L0559. Standard-level.

  • Education (42 CFR 418.60(c))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 3 volunteer records reviewed, the organization had not documented any training and education regarding infection control and prevention. This finding was discussed with hospice leadership.”

    Rule L0582. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    “Observed in Individual Tracer. In 1 of 3 bereavement records reviewed, the organization had not completed an initial post death bereavement assessment. Therefore, the organization had not created a bereavement plan of care based on the assessed needs of the bereaved. This finding was discussed with hospice leadership.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Professional management responsibility (42 CFR 418.100(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 114 words

    “Observed in Document Review. The organization’s written agreement with the durable medical equipment providing contracted services did not include the following: 1. a stipulation that services will be provided only with the authorization of the hospice2. a stipulation that services will be delivered in accordance with the patient’s plan of care 3. the manner in which contracted services will be coordinated, supervised, and evaluated by the hospice4. the delineation of the role of the hospice and contractor in the admission process, patient/family assessment, and the interdisciplinary group conferences5. requirements for documenting that services are furnished in accordance with the agreement6. the qualifications of the individuals providing the servicesThis finding was discussed with hospice leadership.”

    Rule L0655. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. In 1 of 2 volunteer records reviewed, there was no evidence that a volunteer had received orientation and training relating to the hospice philosophy consistent with the organization s orientation and training policy. This finding was discussed with hospice leadership.”

    Rule L0661. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 131 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization failed to maintain a patient record that reflected the patient’s care, treatment, or services. During the home visit for RRHV#2, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the medication list in the EMR and in the home did not match the medications in the home. For example in RRHV2, the patient was taking Macrobid for a UTI. The medication was completed a month prior to survey but was not removed from the medication list. The patient also had Zofran and Ativan on her home and EMR list but was not currently taking either. There had been a change in caregivers and the nurse was unsure when the meds were stopped. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to maintain a complete and accurate patient record. During record review for RRHV#2, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed a DNR form signed and entered in the patient record was for another patient. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0685. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for RRNHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient had wound care ordered for a SNF patient but it did not indicate who would provide the wound care when. The plan of care stated the facility or the RN would provide wound care every 5-7 days. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 30, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Apr 3, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission14 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 21, 1990.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 60% at home, 19% in assisted living, 20% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10%
Visits near death97.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Ah Georgia Inc. owns 100% directly since Jul 14, 2021.
  • Atrium Health Inc. and Advocate Health Inc. run it.
  • 26 owners or officers are people: Dee B Russell (corporate director); Christopher E Sward (corporate director); Frank D Stegall (corporate director); Todd Bussey (corporate director); Kay Chumbler (corporate director); Kris Shepard (corporate director); Chantz Mcclinic (corporate director); William D Newby (corporate director); Mathew D Gorman (managing employee (on the payroll)); Stephen R Briggs (corporate director); Thomas Manning (corporate officer); Amar K Singh (managing employee (on the payroll)); Mark Manis (corporate director); Delvecchio S Finley (corporate director); Paul B Brock (corporate director); Rahul Garg (corporate director); John R Scott (corporate director); Rebecca Broome (managing employee (on the payroll)); Christopher P Piller (corporate officer); Christopher P Piller (corporate director); Kenna F Stock (corporate director); Gary Fricks (corporate director); Kurt Matthew Stuenkel (corporate director); Carl J. Herring (corporate officer); Carl J. Herring (corporate director); Muhammad R Ishaque (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ah Georgia Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jul 14, 2021
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 14, 2021
Atrium Health Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Jul 14, 2021
Advocate Health Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Dec 2, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 93% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.98% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 85% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 30 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 30161, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.