Hearth Record

Eternal Faith Hospice and Palliative Care

A hospice in Roswell, Georgia 30076

1080 Holcomb Bridge Road, Bldg. 200, Suite 100, Roswell, Georgia 30076. (770) 797-9300.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 50 hospices serving ZIP code 30076 had 3.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 20, 2024: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 10, 2024: initial inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 530 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 20 of 20 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. 

During record review for all records, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the care plans did not contain timeframes for achieving goals. For example in RRHV#1, the patient had a goal of patient/ family aware of available resources and support throughout the process. In RRHV#2, the patient had a goal of facility staff to be knowledgeable and involved in hospice care by ______ but the blank was not filled in. In RRNHV#1, the patient had a goal of pt/ cg demonstrates understanding of insulin administration with no goal timeframe. In RRNHV#2, the patient had a goal of patient/ cg will verbalize and demonstrate understanding of skin integrity with no timeframe noted and the goal had been entered 1 1/2 years prior to survey. In RRNHV#7, the patient had a goal of pt/CG:pt/ CG verbalizes understanding of OTC medication/ herbs that may interact with prescription meds no timeframe. Place in POC 1 1/2 years prior to discharge. no updates verbalize understanding of OTC medications/ herbs that may interact with prescription meds. The goal was places at SOC with no timeframe and the patient was discharged 1 1/2 years later. 

During record review for RRHV#2, RRHV#3, RRHV#4, RRNHV#5, RRNHV#4, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#9, RRNHV#10, and RRDC#1, the patients plan of care did not reflect all goals related to problems identified in updated comprehensive assessments. 

For example in RRHV#2, the patient did not have goals related to a recent fall and high fall risk or goals related to aspiration, which had recently been noted by the provider and the nurse. 

In RRHV#3, the patient had a recent issue with diarrhea which included new orders but it was not addressed on the plan of care. 

In RRHV#4, the nursing documentation stated 2 plus pitting edema to bilateral lower extremities but it was not addressed on the plan of care.

In RRNHV#5, the patient had several previous wounds that were not closed when the wounds closed and then the goals were not updated when the patient developed a new stage 2 pressure ulcer 6 months prior to survey. RRNHV#5 also had ongoing issues with constipation and it was not addressed on the plan of care. 

In RRNHV#1, the patient had two recent infections with medication orders and they were not addressed on the plan of care. 

In RRNHV#4, the patient had an upper respiratory infection with antibiotics ordered and it was not addressed on the plan of care. In RRNHV#8, the patient had multiple falls documented while on hospice but this was not addressed on his plan of care. 

In RRNHV#9, the patient had a diagnosis of Covid-19 over a year prior to survey and those goals were not updated on the plan of care. 

In RRNHV#10, the patient was end stage renal disease and had just stopped dialysis. The nursing notes identified agitation and delirium but these were not addressed on the plan of care. 

In RRDC#1, the patient was having issues with agitation and had multiple medication changes but it was not addressed on the plan of care. 


This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0545. Condition-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to implement policies and procedures that guided patient care, treatment, or services. During tracer activities for Leadership, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the organization failed to implement policies related to condition level findings at 418.54, 418.56, 418.100. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 20 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to assess and reassess its patients. 

During record review for RRNHV#5, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient had no documented bereavement assessment and this was confirmed with leadership. Also for the same patient, she had a Stage 2 pressure ulcer noted over the course of a month in the nurses narrative but there was no description of the wound or measurement of the wound at least weekly, as required by policy. 

During record review for RRHV#2, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient had a fall 2 weeks prior to survey with a nursing visit immediately following but a fall risk assessment was documented as NA and not performed per organizational policy. 

In RRNHV#10, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient had no documentation of a comprehensive psychosocial assessment completed. The patient was on service for 7 days and the MSW documented that she was out of town when the assessment should have taken place. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 20 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to update the interdisciplinary group with the most current patient information. During record review for RRNHV#8, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient had a stage II pressure ulcer to the buttocks with wound orders and orders to be turned every 2 hours. The nurse documented that the Assisted Living informed her that
 we cannot turn that patient every two hours but there was no documentation that the team was alerted or that the hospice physician was given this information. This was confirmed with the Hospice Leadership Team. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 188 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 20 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to maintain a complete and accurate patient record. During record review for RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#11, RRNHV#5, and RRDC#1, the Hospice nurse surveyor observed the patient records contained inaccuracies, errors or confusing documentation. For example in RRNHV#6, the nurse documented the patient is wearing oxygen at night yet the patient did not have oxygen ordered and no other staff documented the use of oxygen. In RRNHV#7, the nurse documented discharge for cause but all other documentation including that from the provider stated discharge for extended prognosis. In RRNHV#8, the nurse checked the oxygen box that patient was on oxygen and she did the assessment but there were no orders for oxygen. In RRNHV#11, the nurse documented that the patient was given 6 Blouses of MS. In RRDC#1, the documentation stated pain is controlled with ibuprofen and tramadol but neither medication was ordered. In RRNHV#5, the patient narrative on one nursing visit stated she increased the MA Robid for two days. Unclear what that meant. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 11 of 11 patient records reviewed, where recertification took place, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for RRHV#2, RRHV#3, RRHV#4, RRNHV#5, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3,RRNHV#4, 
RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#9, there was no documentation of progress towards goals. For example in RRNHV#2, there was room in the IDG template for SW to document progress towards goals but the documentation contained LMSW to continue to provide therapeutic presense and companionship to patient. There was no measurable progress. The nursing IDG notes did not include the same information and progress was not located elsewhere. In RRNHV#3, the LMSW documented progress towards goals will support patient family when needing respite care for summer. This is not measurable progress. And the nursing notes did not contain any information about patient progress towards goals. Upon talking with the leadership team, it was noted that the IDG template contains progress towards goals but that it had been eliminated when the nurse did her charting. In RRNHV#7, the patient was discharged for extended prognosis after 3 1/2 years on service and there was no documentation of progress towards goals. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 156 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 4 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization failed to implement the infection prevention and control activities it had planned. During home visits for RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRHV#3, and RRHV#4, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed staff did not follow the organization’s bag technique policy. During all visits both staff members left their bags opened. For RRHV#3 and RRHV#4, the aide left her bag open while driving between visits besides inside each visit. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team. Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization failed to implement the infection prevention and control activities, related to hand hygiene, it had planned. During the visit for RRHV#1, after the initial hand hygiene the nurse went into her bag several times with gloves on but did not complete hand hygiene as required by policy. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 187 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 9 of 11 patient records reviewed, of patients receiving aide services, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for RRHV#2, RRHV#3, RRHV#4, RRNHV#5, RRNHV#2,RRNHV#6, RRNHV#8, 
RRNHV#9, RRNHV#10, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the aide plan of care did not contain all needed precautions. For example RRHV#2, the aide care plan failed to include bleeding precautions as the patient was on aspirin. For RRHV#3 and RRHV#4, the aide care plan did not include precautions for bleeding or aspiration. And in both RRNHV#5 and RRNHV#2, , the aide care plan did not contain precautions for fall risk yet the patients scored high risk of falling. In RRNHV#6, the patient was taking a blood thinner but there were no precautions on the aide plan of care. In RRNHV#8, the patient had many falls while on service and was receiving aide care but the aide care plan did not address the high risk of falls. In RRNHV#10, the patient was on oxygen but it was not addressed on the aide care plan. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 20 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to maintain an accurate patient record. 

During record review for RRNHV#3, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the medication orders and record contained three antibiotics the patient was no longer taking. 

In RRNHV#7, the patient had an order for Macrobid for 7 days 1 1/2 years prior to discharge but the antibiotic was still listed on the discharge medication list. 

This was discussed and confirmed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization failed to provide the patient with education and training based on the needs of the patient and family. During home visit for RRHV#3, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed there was no individualized disaster plan in the home and upon conversation with the daughter she stated mom was on the previous hospice so I am not sure if she ever had one, noting that the current hospice had a new owner. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 20, 2024Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
May 10, 2024Initial inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 22, 2007.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 22% at home, 72% in assisted living, 1% in a nursing facility, 4% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.6%
Visits near death91.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Lifecare Home Health Intermediate Sub LLC owns 100% directly since Dec 3, 2025.
  • 3 owners or officers are people: James M Douthitt (corporate officer); William Dean Alverson (corporate officer); Monique Y Oden (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Lifecare Intermediate II LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 3, 2025
Lifecare Intermediate I LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 3, 2025
Lifecare Home Health Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 3, 2025
Lifecare Home Health Acquisition LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 3, 2025
Lifecare Home Health Intermediate Sub LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Dec 3, 2025
Lifecare Home Health Partners LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 3, 2025

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 29.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 50 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 30076, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3.5; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.