Hearth Record

Georgia Hospice Care

A hospice in Dublin, Georgia 31021

1700 Veterans Blvd,, Dublin, Georgia 31021. (800) 932-2738.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 13 hospices serving ZIP code 31021 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 20, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 20, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 954 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current: prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, supplements, herbal remedies, [and] other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The medication review process includes the identification of the following, the effectiveness of drug therapy, drug side effects, actual or potential drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, [and] drug therapy associated with laboratory monitoring. The assessment includes evidence that common side effects of medication in the hospice populations are anticipated, and, as appropriate, preventive measures are implemented to manage the side effects. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added, or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 19 (21%) clinical records reviewed and home visits observed, the agency did not ensure that the comprehensive assessment included a drug profile that contained the patient’s current medications. CLINICAL RECORD 7/HOME VISIT 1: The patient elected hospice care on 06/27/2024 with a primary diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). During the home visit with the Chaplain [Personnel Record 7] on 11/18/2025, the hospice medication profile printed on 11/17/2025 and the SNF medication profile were reviewed. The hospice medication profile documented acetaminophen 500 mg tablet, administer one (1) tablet every 6 hours as needed for mild pain or fever (dated 11/15/2024); allopurinol 300 mg tablet, give one (1) tablet by mouth daily as needed (dated 06/28/2024); anti-diarrheal (loperamide) 2 mg capsule, give two (2) caps/tabs by mouth after 1st loose stool, followed by one (1) cap/tab by mouth after each loose stool up to 6 tabs daily (dated 10/24/2024); duloxetine 40 mg capsule delayed release, one (1) capsule daily, dated 11/21/2024; polyethylene glycol 3350 17 gm/dose oral powder, mix 17 gm powder (one capful) with 6-8 oz fluids and drink daily as needed for constipation, dated 06/28/2024; and Senna Lax 8.6 mg tablet, take one (1) tablet by mouth daily, dated 09/10/2024. The SNF medication profile did not document acetaminophen, allopurinol, anti-diarrheal (loperamide), polyethylene glycol, or Senna. The SNF nurse verified that acetaminophen, allopurinol, anti-diarrheal (loperamide), polyethylene glycol, and Senna. CLINICAL RECORD 9/HOME VISIT 3: The patient elected hospice care on 05/02/2025 with a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). During the home visit with the Certified Nurse Aide (HA) [Personnel Record 8] on 11/19/2025, the patient’s home medications and hospice medication profile were reviewed. The patient’s home medications included pantoprazole sodium dr 20 mg, take one (1) tablet daily; benzonate 100 mg capsule, take one (1) capsule three times a day (dated 07/25/2023); potassium chloride ER 10 mEq tablet, take one (1) tablet daily (dated 11/04/2024); Centrum Woman’s Vitamin, take one (1) tablet daily; and acidophilus probiotic 100 million organisms, take two (2) capsules twice a day. All of the patient’s prescription bottles had older dates. The patient stated that the new medications were put in the smaller bottles to fit them all in the container where the medications are kept. The hospice medication profile printed on 11/17/2025 documented magnesium gluconate 12.5 mg magnesium (250 mg) tablet, take one (1) tablet by mouth at bedtime (dated 06/19/2025), and omeprazole 20 mg capsule, delayed-release, take one (1) capsule daily (dated 05/05/2025). The patient stated that the magnesium gluconate was taken a few times and then stopped due to not working, that pantoprazole has been taken for two (2) years instead of omeprazole, Centrum Women’s Vitamin has been taken for two months, and the acidophilus probiotics has been taken for several years. CLINICAL RECORD 10/HOME VISIT 4: The patient elected hospice care on 01/12/2023 with a diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The patient resided in an assisted living facility (ALF) since 04/2025. During the home visit with the Medical Social Worker [Personnel Record 6] on 11/19/2025, the patient’s home medications and the hospice medication profile printed on 11/17/2025 were compared. The hospice medication profile documented Midodrine 2.5 mg tablet, 5 mg orally as needed for severe hypotension (dated 01/16/2023). The ALF med tech reported that Midodrine was not documented on the ALF active or discontinued medications. CLINICAL RECORD 15: The patient elected hospice care on 08/21/2025 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The medication profile was reviewed on 11/19/2025. A clinical record review revealed a coordination note dated 11/05/2025 at 2:44 AM documenting, “Son called. Confirmed he is on contact list. Also confirmed date of birth (DOB). He reports this morning (patient) woke him around 230 (patient) is banging on the table in the kitchen. (Patient) is agitated. He placed the lorazepam cream about 30 minutes ago. So far it is not effective. He applied 4 clicks of the medication to the skin. He also has the lorazepam intensol 0.25 ml. When he gives (patient) is very drowsy. He did not administer this medication. He is requesting patient to receive a shot to help... sleep. Advised him will have a nurse come assess and assist with patient symptom needs...” The physician’s order dated 10/29/2025 ordered, “change lorazepam to scheduled TID (three times a day) and Q4HR PRN (every 4 hours as needed). Add lorazepam cream for emergency use when patient refuses oral medication.” The medication profile reviewed on 11/19/2025 did not include documentation of lorazepam cream or lorazepam intensol as active or discontinued medications to date. During a joint record review and interview on 11/20/2025, the Manager of Accreditation and Regulatory Compliance confirmed that there was no documented evidence that the medications were reconciled when new medication was added, or changes made to existing medications.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,742 words

    “It is required that the hospice designates a registered nurse member of the IDG to provide coordination of care, ensure continuous assessment of each patient’s and family’s needs, and ensure the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. Hospice care and services provided to patients and families follow the individualized plan of care established by the hospice IDG in collaboration with the attending physician (if any), the patient or patient representative, and the primary caregiver in accordance with the patient’s needs. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 19 (5%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the Registered Nurse member of the IDG coordinated care, continuously assessed the patient’s and family’s needs, and implemented the interdisciplinary plan of care established by the hospice IDG. CLINICAL RECORD 15: The patient elected hospice care on 08/21/2025. On 10/28/2025, the Registered Nurse (RN) and Medical Social Worker (MSW) visited the patient at the patient’s home together. The RN Coordination Note dated 10/28/2025 documented, “Upon arrival, (emergency medical services) EMS and law enforcement in the patient’s yard. Sheriff’s deputy in yard advised nurse that (son), PCG (primary caregiver) had called 911 d/t (due to) patient taking too many pills. EMS was in home evaluating patient. Patient sitting in recliner with eyes open upon nurse arrival. (Vital signs) VS were stable per EMS, and patient was at baseline of pleasantly confused. (Son) reported that the Synthroid bottle had 8-9 pills in it earlier, but now only had 2. Discussed using a pill planner and patient agreed. Nurse filled pill planner with available medications. Updated (son), POA [power of attorney] about visit. Per (POA), patient (pt) had 2 Synthroid when he had spoken to (the patient) the day before. (POA) does not believe patient took too many pills, patient requires assistance with all ADLs except feeding…” The MSW Coordinaton Note dated 10/28/2025 documented, “SW (social worker) met with pt and cg for routine visit. Pt alert and oriented to self. Pt hard of hearing. EMTS present upon SW arrival as pt had taken multiple thyroid pills by accident. RNCM (Registered Nurse Case Manager) also present. SW assessed pt for changes in mental health. Pt alert and able to communicate clearly. SW and RN provided education about medication management. RN filled pill planner. SW assessed for other needs.” The Triage After Hours Coordination Note dated 10/28/2025 at 9:57:00 PM, documented, “Son of (patient) calling because (patient) is yelling and anxious and very agitated. (Patient) has lorazepam but will not take it for (son). (Son) has called EMS to help get (patient) calm…. 10/28/2025 10:12:00 PM Called LPNOC (Licensed Practical Nurse on call). Gave report. (LPNOC) asked for us to call (the LPNOC) when the patient pings. Let (LPNOC) know I will email RNCM, (LPNOC), and the office to update… 10/28/2025 10:33:00 transferred (POA), another son, with POA. He says (the patient) has been combative and fighting. EMS is there, and they do not know what to do with (the patient). (The patient) is obsessed with getting (patient’s) thyroid pill.... (Patient’s) MAR and the medications in (the patient’s) home do not match in form, but (the patient) has lorazepam in the home…Also educated that there is (lorazepam (Ativan), diphenhydramine (Benadryl), haloperidol (Haldol) (“ABH”)) ABH cream that can take the edge off…, but the doctor would have to order it. He says they are trying to get through until January, when he can take (the patient) to a facility near his home.” The Triage After Hours Coordination Note dated 10/31/2025 at 5:57:00 PM, documented, “(son) CG states patient is supposed to be going to respite and he needs to find out when and where (patient) is going? 10/31/2025 6:08:00 OB call to (SW), who states (SW) will call on call SW for branch to see if (SW) can get some answers as to when/where patient is supposed to go and will f/u with son.” The Non-Clinical Phone Call Coordination Note entered on 10/31/2025 at 6:33:00, documented, “SWOC (social worker on call) needing to speak with region (number) SWOC regarding respite stay for pt… 10/31/2025 6:41:00 connected to SWOC…” The Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) Meeting dated 10/31/2025, documented, “Social Worker note: SW met with pt and cg for routine visit. Pt is agitated easily and cg fatigue combined with cg mental health concerns creates volatile environment for pt and cg. RN, SW, and DO (Director of Operations) discussed with cg and POA options such as medication and respite assist. Cg unwilling to utilize medication. POA agreed to take pt to his home for a few days to provide relief to cg after cg refused respite.” The Non-Clinical Phone Call (Customer Relations Team Leader) Coordination Note dated 11/02/2025 at 4:14:00 PM, documented, “Son calling. The patient is in the background agitated and yelling, and he is saying (the patient) may need to be placed somewhere because they are unable to take care of (patient) due to her behavior. Transferred to (nurse) in triage.” The Triage After Hours Coordination Note dated 11/02/2025 at 4:15:00 PM, documented, “Son came to pick pt up, and pt is screaming and combative. Pt is uncontrollable and family is unable to give any medications to calm patient down. CG deny the need for nurse visit as the patient was starting to settle towards end of call. Cg reports he will call office in the morning to come up with a plan for pt… Follow-up comment entered by (registered nurse) on 11/04/2025 Lengthy conversations with POA and nurses/MSW as well as CS (Clinical Supervisor) and AVP (Area Vice President) about care and needs.” There was a Triage After Hours Coordination Note entered on 11/03/2025 at 6:06:00 AM, that stated in part, “Family member (son) states he gave patient Ativan last evening and (the patient) slept until about 5 am and now (the patient) is awake, screaming. States they were not able to move the patient yesterday to another family member’s home, and he cannot take care of (the patient). States he has anxiety, and he cannot handle taking care of (the patient). Asked if he had tried to give patient more Ativan, and he states no because patient will not take the pills. States someone was supposed to be looking into finding somewhere for patient to go. Placed on hold and transferred to an on-call nurse.” The Triage After Hours Coordination Noted entered on 11/05/2025 at 2:44:00 AM, documented, “Son called….He reports this morning (the patient) woke him around 230 (The patient) is banging on the table in the kitchen. (The patient) is agitated. He placed the lorazepam cream about 30 minutes ago. So far, it is not effective. He applied 4 clicks of the medication to the skin. He also has the lorazepam intensol 0.25 ml. When he gives (the patient) is very drowsy. He did not administer this medication. He is requesting patient to receive a shot to help (patient) sleep. Advised him will have a nurse come assess and assist with patient symptom needs. He is also asking about respite as patient is becoming too difficult to care for….” The On Call RN Coordination Noted dated 11/05/2025 at 6:59:27, documented, “Received call from triage that pt son called reporting pt was screaming and beating on the table at 3 AM and he is not able to calm her down. Medications on med list do not match medications pt son is saying are in home. Request for nurse to come out and give pt a shot and take (the patient) to placement. Nurse called (POA) per report to inquire about situation. He is unaware, and states he went out to cut grass and clean up Monday and (son) was in home, pulled a gun on him so he is not going over there any more states (Son) and patient are “nuts” and they both need mental health help. Nurse called (son), and he stated he cannot calm pt down. He has not given the liquid Ativan since yesterday afternoon. Nurse told him he will have to give that to (the patient) to keep (patient) calm. Explained we cannot give patient a shot, and I cannot find placement for pt at 3 am…” The CS Annotation Coordination note dated 11/05/2025 at 11:49 AM, documented, “AVP and CS discussed care and safety issues with QA (quality assurance) Director about patient’s home environment this morning. Discussed the POA son and son that is physically at the home taking care of the patient not being the same person… (POA) states that he and (son) did argue on Monday and that he has pulled a gun on him in the recent past. It was suggested that we discharge patient from care for cause related to safety issues for staff. (CS) will plan to follow up with our MSW as well as (POA).” The CS Annotation Coordination Note dated 11/05/2025 at 11:59 AM, documented, “(CS) just got off the phone with (POA). …(POA) and (CS) discussed the need to discharge (the patient) for cause due to the risk of safety to our staff under the current living conditions. He said that he understands because he knows that his brother is unhinged and is not sure of his own safety when he goes to try to take care of the (patient).” The RN Hospice Discharge – No Visit Made note dated 11/05/2025, documented that the patient was discharged for cause. A clinical record review revealed no documented evidence that the RN made in-person visits after 10/28/2025 to continue assessing the patient and family needs. There was no documented evidence that the RN followed up with the patient or the sons after the triage calls requesting assistance with symptom management and placement. There was no documented evidence that the RN coordinated care with the full IDG, including collaboration with the Medical Director and/or Hospice Physician, and the patient or patient representative to meet the patient’s needs. During a joint record review and interview on 11/20/2025, the Manager of Accreditation and Regulatory Compliance confirmed that the clinical record lacked evidence of agency-initiated follow-up by the RN or other members of the IDG. The Manager of Accreditation and Regulatory Compliance agreed that the agency did not ensure that the RN coordinated care with the IDG, including the Medical Director or Hospice Physician, and continuously assessed the patient’s needs. Before the exit conference, the patient’s clinical record was updated with late entries regarding the incident and subsequent discharge.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 194 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 18 (6%) clinical records reviewed of patients receiving Hospice Aide (HA) services, the hospice did not ensure that the HA received written patient care instructions to meet the patient’s needs. CLINICAL RECORD 14: The patient elected hospice care on 02/08/2024 with a primary diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). The HA care plan dated 07/21/2025 assigned the HA the tasks, “Bathing (Bed) every visit, Bathing (shower) Monday, Wednesday, Friday.” The care plan did not provide the HA with clear instructions regarding the type of bath the patient was to receive. During a joint review of the record and an interview on 11/20/2025, the Manager of Accreditation and Regulatory Compliance agreed that the instructions on the HA care plan were not specific.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 380 words

    “It is required that hospice aides must report changes in the patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, and/or social needs to a registered nurse as the changes relate to the plan of care and any quality assessment and improvement activities. The hospice aide must also complete appropriate records of service, including the report of changes in the patient’s needs. Hospice aide documentation complies with hospice policies and procedures. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 18 (11%) clinical records reviewed for patients who received Hospice Aide (HA) services, the agency did not ensure that the HA notified the Registered Nurse of changes in the patient’s needs. CLINICAL RECORD 14: The patient elected hospice care on 02/08/2024 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The patient resided in an assisted living facility (ALF). The HA care plan dated 07/21/2025 assigned the HA the tasks of “Bathing (Bed) every visit and Bathing (shower) Monday, Wednesday, Friday.” The Hospice Aide visit notes dated 10/01/2025, 10/02/2025, 10/03/2025, 10/06/2025, 10/07/2025, 10/08/2025, 10/09/2025, 10/10/2025, 10/13/2025, 10/14/2025, 10/15/2025, 10/16/2025, 10/17/2025, 10/20/2025, 10/21/2025, 10/23/2025, 10/24/2025, 10/27/2025, 10/28/2025, 10/29/2025, 10/30/2025, and 10/31/2025 documented that the HA provided a bed bath and shower during each visit. There was no documented evidence that the registered nurse was contacted on which task to complete. CLINICAL RECORD 15: The patient elected hospice care on 08/21/2025 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The Hospice Aide care plan dated 08/28/2025 assigned the HA the relevant tasks: walker; assist to bedside commode; assist to toilet; bathing (shower); dressing; hair care; provide incontinence care; change linens; offer fluids; socialization; notify RN of any skin changes, bowel/bladder concerns, or safety issues; oxygen safety; report pain to nurse; review wound alert. The HA visit note dated 10/14/2025 documented “pt refused” for assist to toilet; assist to bedside commode; hair care; dressing; bathing (shower); provide incontinence care; offer fluids; change linens; socialization; and safety. There was no evidence that the HA notified the Registered Nurse (RN) of changes to the HA care plan. During a joint clinical record review and interview on 11/20/2025, the Manager of Accreditation and Regulatory Compliance confirmed that the HA documentation lacked notification to the Registered Nurse of the changes in the care plan.”

    Rule L0628. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 458 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are supervised by a registered nurse who makes an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and ensure that services ordered by the hospice Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) meet the patient’s need. The hospice aide does not need to be present. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 18 (11%) clinical records that had aide services reviewed revealed that the agency did not that the registered nurse did not make an on-site supervisory visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days and assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and ensure that services ordered by the hospice Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) meet the patient’s need. CLINICAL RECORD 1: The patient elected hospice care on 03/12/2025 with a diagnosis of alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver without ascites. The patient resided in an assisted living facility (ALF). The HA’s first visit was dated 03/14/2025. Registered Nurse visits were documented on 07/23/2025, 07/29/2025, 07/31/2025, 08/04/2025, 08/07/2025, 08/15/2025, 08/18/2025, 08/26/2025, 08/28/2025, 09/09/2025, 09/11/2025, 09/17/2025, 09/19/2025, and 09/24/2025. A clinical record review revealed no evidence that a Registered Nurse made an on-site supervisory visit from 07/21/2025 through 09/01/2025 and 09/09/2025 through 09/29/2025. CLINICAL RECORD 14: The patient elected hospice care on 02/08/2024 with a primary diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). The HA care plan dated 07/21/2025 assigned the HA the tasks, “Bathing (Bed) every visit, Bathing (shower) Monday, Wednesday, Friday.” The Hospice Aide visit notes dated 10/01/2025, 10/02/2025, 10/03/2025, 10/06/2025, 10/07/2025, 10/08/2025, 10/09/2025, 10/10/2025, 10/13/2025, 10/14/2025, 10/15/2025, 10/16/2025, 10/17/2025, 10/20/2025, 10/21/2025, 10/23/2025, 10/24/2025, 10/27/2025, 10/28/2025, 10/29/2025, 10/30/2025, and 10/31/2025 documented giving the patient both a bed bath and shower during each visit. There was no documented evidence that the Registered Nurse was contacted on which task to complete. The RN Hospice Subsequent Visit notes dated 10/06/2025, 10/13/2025, 10/22/2025, 11/05/2025, 11/13/2025, 11/20/2025 documented, “Supervisory functions: Does the aide follow the plan of care? Yes. Any changes to the plan of care? No.” There was no documented evidence that the RN assessed the quality of care and services provided by the HA to ensure that services ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) meet the patient’s needs. During a joint clinical record review and interview on 11/20/2025, the Manager of Accreditation and Regulatory Compliance confirmed that the RN did not make on-site supervisory visits every 14 days or assess the quality of care and services provided by the HA, and ensure that services ordered by the hospice Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) meet the patient’s needs.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. The record contains correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. The record may be maintained electronically or on paper. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum, physician orders. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 19 (5%) clinical records reviewed, the organization did not ensure the patient’s clinical record included physician’s orders to meet the patient’s care needs. CLINICAL RECORD 15: The physician’s order dated 10/29/2025 ordered, “Change lorazepam to scheduled TID [three times a day] and Q4HR PRN [every 4 hours as needed]. Add lorazepam cream for emergency use when the patient refuses oral medication.” The order did not document the strength, dose, or frequency of administration of the lorezapam cream. During a joint review of the record and an interview on 11/20/2025, the Manager of Accreditation and Regulatory Compliance agreed that the physician’s orders did not include the medication’s strength, the dose to be given, or the frequency.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 189 words

    “It is required that the designated IDG member provides the SNF/NF or ICF/IDF with the following information for each patient/resident: hospice election form. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, interview, and observation. Agency policy # 1-031 “Provision of Care to Residents of SNF/NF or ICF/IID” (not dated) stated in part, “7. The organization will provide the SNF/NF or ICF/IID the following information specific to each patient: B. Hospice election form and Advanced Directives.” In 1 of 1 (100%) home visits observed and clinical records reviewed of a patient residing in a skilled nursing facility (SNF), the organization did not ensure the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) provided the SNF with the hospice election form. HOME VISIT 1/CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient ELECTED HOSPICE CARE ON 06/27/2024. Upon reviewing the hospice documents at the SNF, there was no documented evidence that the agency provided a copy of the patient’s hospice election form. During a joint clinical record review, document review, and interview on 11/18/2025, the Manager of Accreditation and Regulatory Compliance confirmed that the agency did not provide the facility with the hospice election form.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 20, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 12, 2006.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 65% at home, 24% in assisted living, 1% in a nursing facility, 10% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.6%
Visits near death93.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Acg Acquisition LLC owns 100% directly since Jul 25, 2025.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Jordan Crumley (managing employee (on the payroll)); Troy Yarborough (corporate officer); Hayley Eby (managing employee (on the payroll)); Janelle I Plows (managing employee (on the payroll)); Marsha Hayes (managing employee (on the payroll)); Donald R Nelson (managing employee (under contract)); Pamela A Duncan Owens (corporate officer); Rhonda Hamilton (corporate officer); Dustin Williamson (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Acg Intermediate, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 25, 2025
Acg Parent Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 25, 2025
Arrow Management Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 25, 2025
Acg Mississippi, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 25, 2025
Acg Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 25, 2025
Acg Acquisition LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jul 25, 2025
Rep Coinvest III Agp Blocker, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies28.41%Jul 25, 2025
Rep Agp II Holdco, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies28.23%Jul 25, 2025
Cdpq Fonds 780, S.e.cOwns 5% or more through other companies20.53%Jul 25, 2025
Linden Capital Partners V-A LPOwns 5% or more through other companies16.31%Jul 25, 2025
Tvg Hcsc Blocker, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies15.61%Jul 25, 2025
Linden Investments III LPOwns 5% or more through other companies14.33%Jul 25, 2025
Linden Capital Partners V LPOwns 5% or more through other companies10.39%Jul 25, 2025
Rep Agp III Blocker, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies9.82%Jul 25, 2025

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 90% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.86% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 77.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 13 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 31021, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.